OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Davis, California/City Council & Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Davis Planning Commission Meeting - September 23, 2026

City Council & Planning Commission — Wednesday, September 23, 2026
BodyDavis, California
SessionCity Council & Planning Commission
DateWednesday, September 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 8:00:02

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

Uh we're going to uh approve the agenda, then we'll have brief announcements, and then we'll open it up to public comment.

0:09

Move to approve the agenda.

0:13

Second.

0:15

All right, all in favor.

0:17

Aye.

0:19

Okay.

0:20

Next we'll turn to staff for brief announcements and then commissioners.

0:26

We don't have any brief announcements tonight, madam.

0:30

Commissioners, any brief announcements?

0:37

Last meeting when we were talking about um College Park specifically, I mentioned a book that I had brought up once before, and I have it with me this evening so we can get that on the record and in our notes.

0:48

Um it is called a field guide to American Houses, and it's Virginia Savage and McAllister.

0:54

It's used by architects, uh docents, historic uh that do historic tours of uh historic homes.

1:01

Um it's a great reference, um, just so we have something uh to utilize uh when the conversation comes up in regards to our historic homes here in town.

1:11

Thank you.

1:15

I have one.

1:16

Uh it's not necessarily brief.

1:18

Um we've been receiving some documentation recently about uh ploughing that has occurred at the site that was proposed for the village farms development.

1:31

It seems to be fairly well documented through photographs and in-person observations that were done.

1:38

And what's concerning about this is that the plowing has included the 47 acres, evidently, of wetlands that were scheduled to be set aside in a habitat preserve if the village farms development had in fact been approved.

1:52

Um my concern about that is that this document, the biological resource assessment that was done for the village farms project, which comprised appendix D of the EIR, clearly identifies those wetlands as what's called waters of the United States.

2:09

In other words, they're recognized by the Army Corps of Engineers, which has jurisdiction over the Federal Clean Water Act.

2:16

Uh I did make an inquiry with staff about this as to whether or not any of the official government agencies had been informed.

2:23

I was informed by Sherry that in fact the state fishing game has been informed.

2:27

My concern is that doesn't go far enough because as I said, it's the federal Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Uh Fish and Wildlife Service that have jurisdiction over these wetlands and the vernal pool species.

2:39

Um there's really not much a city can do because this territory is in the county.

2:44

So I have not had time to do it yet, but I intend to pursue this with the county to see if they're going to investigate it.

2:51

Um all of my resources at uh Army Corps of Engineers and U.S.

2:55

uh fish and wildlife service are somewhat old.

2:57

I think all those people are retired and the res staff resources at those agencies are somewhat slim, but um I do find this very concerning that an area that's been identified just as recently as earlier this year in an EIR is now being plowed up.

3:13

Um we've all received emails about it.

3:17

And maybe at the next meeting, if I have some further answers, I'll bring those back to the commission.

3:22

Thanks.

3:25

Any other commissioners with announcements?

3:28

Uh September 30th at 2 p.m.

3:32

I'm gonna welcome Ariel Bauerbaum, who's a professor of planning from the East Coast, and she studies the impacts of school closures on land use.

3:41

So there'll be uh an event on campus at 2 p.m.

3:45

for folks who are interested in learning more about what school closures here in Davis might mean for community values, uh land use, property values.

3:54

Uh she is a national expert, so we're lucky to have her in town.

3:58

And then first week in October, the California American Planning Association conference is holding its its annual conference in LA, and there are sessions online for those who are interested.

4:10

And I hope this is a conference one day that we can all attend together, maybe with planning staff.

4:15

It's a really great conference.

4:17

It's coming to Sacramento next year, so it'll be right next door.

4:20

Lots of really interesting sessions, including one on uh how to deal with contentious politics as you're trying to make policy.

4:29

Um with that, let me turn it over to Madam Mayor.

4:33

Do you have any comments?

4:35

I I don't, thank you.

4:37

And I I apologize in advance that I have to step out in a bit and to go to another meeting and step back in.

4:42

So it's not because I'm not interested in what you're doing, just so you know.

4:46

All right, wonderful.

4:48

With that, we're gonna open it up for public comment, and you will receive three minutes on the clock, so please welcome you to planning commission.

5:06

Good evening, Planning Commission Commission members.

5:10

I'm Kathy Howard Crow, I'm a third generation resident of College Park.

5:17

I'm also a member of the steering committee for the College Park Neighborhood Association, and I'm speaking on behalf of the College Park Neighborhood Association at the request of the History Committee.

5:31

And we have some members here.

5:34

So the College Park Neighborhood Association is a city organized city sanctioned association that represents the entire uh college park neighborhood of 48 homes.

5:53

Thank you for your service to the community.

5:59

And to the planning commission, we understand that you are volunteers and appreciate the commitment to the community.

6:08

We are also working as volunteers for the community, and with me tonight again are members of the College Park Neighborhood Association History Committee.

6:19

This is a small representation of the community members involved, as we have several committees and dozens of members.

6:58

That letter, along with the relevant city ordinance, along with the unadept uh unadopted design guidelines was sent to you last week.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Arts And Culture█████████████████████████████████████████████69%
General Plan Update████████13%
Procedural███4%
Flood Management███4%
Public Comment██3%
Public Engagement██3%
Village Farms█1%
Historic Preservation█1%
Transportation Safety█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Davis Planning Commission Meeting - September 23, 2026

The Davis Planning Commission held a regular meeting on September 23, 2026, which included public comments, consent calendar items, and a detailed discussion on the General Plan Update. Commissioners also heard announcements, received public testimony on various topics, and made decisions on a driveway request and a General Plan recommendation.

Consent Calendar

  • Second Driveway at 3103 Shelter Cove Place: The commission approved a revised final plan development to allow a second driveway to serve an ADU and detached garage. The approval includes a recommendation that the applicant consider using permeable surfaces to reduce hardscape and support tree health.
  • General Plan Update (Informational): Staff provided an update on the General Plan process, including upcoming public workshops (October 14, 2026) and the review of a draft land use plan. Discussion touched on LAFCO sphere of influence criteria, floodplain mapping, and the need for a glossary of terms.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Kathy Howard Crow (College Park Neighborhood Association) advocated for the adoption of the College Park Historic District Design Guidelines, noting the process has been pending for 46 years.
  • Eileen Semitz (former planning commissioner, Citizens for Responsible Planning) expressed concern over recent disking of vernal pools at the Village Farms site, calling it a "horrendous act" and urging protection through conservation easements.
  • Les Bertelo (Rotary Club member) urged the commission to take action on the Boy Scout Cabin, warning that it may be destroyed by El Niño.
  • Carl Hiller (College Park resident) asked for flexibility in historic guidelines, noting some provisions are obsolete (e.g., ADU driveway width).
  • Brad Sutton spoke about the permanence of conservation easements and the need for clear floodplain policies.
  • Rena Nyer expressed concern that the General Plan process is being fast-tracked, urged preservation of citizens-based plan, protection of historic neighborhoods, improved transit, and removal of Village Farms from the land use map.
  • Ziv Lang argued against fast-tracking, opposed high density without transit improvements, and called on UC Davis to build more on-campus housing.
  • Elizabeth Ray (safety manager) warned against building on floodplains, citing costly flood damage at a Tulare facility.
  • Ningwan (former HRM commissioner, realtor) discussed easement ownership and raised questions about property conditions.
  • Mileen Samets (former planning commissioner) reiterated concerns about the General Plan, urging a reduced footprint for Village Farms and no building on floodplains or conservation easements.
  • Mark Housing (Chair, Transportation Commission) presented the commission's recommendations: physically protected mobility infrastructure, grade-separated crossings, neighborhood destinations, proximity of greenfield sites to trip generators, caution on south expansion, and benchmarking success by user abilities.

Discussion Items

  • Expansion Northeast and Northwest: Commissioners debated whether to recommend expanding the city's urban limit line to the northeast (contingent on comprehensive flood control) and northwest. Staff noted that floodplain areas can be engineered with detention basins and master planning, but no funding exists for such studies. Commissioners expressed hesitancy due to flood risks and FEMA maps (last updated 2010). No motion was made on northeast expansion.
  • Commissioner Rowe's Memo: Commissioner Rowe presented an 11-page critique of the current General Plan, arguing it is outmoded and overly restrictive. He recommended a new plan focusing on economic development, housing, and eliminating Planned Development districts.
  • Land Swap with Solano County: A motion passed unanimously to explore the feasibility of a land swap with Solano County to obtain developable land outside the floodplain.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved: Second driveway at 3103 Shelter Cove Place (with recommendation for permeable surfaces).
  • Motion passed: Explore land swaps with Solano County as part of the General Plan update.
  • No action: General Plan recommendations for northeast expansion tabled; commissioners will review written Transportation Commission recommendations at the next meeting.
  • Next meeting: October 28, 2026, will include further General Plan discussion, SB9 ordinance amendments, and Chapter 40 mobile vending amendments. No meetings in November.

Meeting date confirmed as September 23, 2026, based on provided timestamp.

Meeting Transcript

Uh we're going to uh approve the agenda, then we'll have brief announcements, and then we'll open it up to public comment. Move to approve the agenda. Second. All right, all in favor. Aye. Okay. Next we'll turn to staff for brief announcements and then commissioners. We don't have any brief announcements tonight, madam. Commissioners, any brief announcements? Last meeting when we were talking about um College Park specifically, I mentioned a book that I had brought up once before, and I have it with me this evening so we can get that on the record and in our notes. Um it is called a field guide to American Houses, and it's Virginia Savage and McAllister. It's used by architects, uh docents, historic uh that do historic tours of uh historic homes. Um it's a great reference, um, just so we have something uh to utilize uh when the conversation comes up in regards to our historic homes here in town. Thank you. I have one. Uh it's not necessarily brief. Um we've been receiving some documentation recently about uh ploughing that has occurred at the site that was proposed for the village farms development. It seems to be fairly well documented through photographs and in-person observations that were done. And what's concerning about this is that the plowing has included the 47 acres, evidently, of wetlands that were scheduled to be set aside in a habitat preserve if the village farms development had in fact been approved. Um my concern about that is that this document, the biological resource assessment that was done for the village farms project, which comprised appendix D of the EIR, clearly identifies those wetlands as what's called waters of the United States. In other words, they're recognized by the Army Corps of Engineers, which has jurisdiction over the Federal Clean Water Act. Uh I did make an inquiry with staff about this as to whether or not any of the official government agencies had been informed. I was informed by Sherry that in fact the state fishing game has been informed. My concern is that doesn't go far enough because as I said, it's the federal Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Uh Fish and Wildlife Service that have jurisdiction over these wetlands and the vernal pool species. Um there's really not much a city can do because this territory is in the county. So I have not had time to do it yet, but I intend to pursue this with the county to see if they're going to investigate it. Um all of my resources at uh Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. uh fish and wildlife service are somewhat old. I think all those people are retired and the res staff resources at those agencies are somewhat slim, but um I do find this very concerning that an area that's been identified just as recently as earlier this year in an EIR is now being plowed up. Um we've all received emails about it. And maybe at the next meeting, if I have some further answers, I'll bring those back to the commission. Thanks. Any other commissioners with announcements? Uh September 30th at 2 p.m. I'm gonna welcome Ariel Bauerbaum, who's a professor of planning from the East Coast, and she studies the impacts of school closures on land use. So there'll be uh an event on campus at 2 p.m. for folks who are interested in learning more about what school closures here in Davis might mean for community values, uh land use, property values. Uh she is a national expert, so we're lucky to have her in town. And then first week in October, the California American Planning Association conference is holding its its annual conference in LA, and there are sessions online for those who are interested. And I hope this is a conference one day that we can all attend together, maybe with planning staff. It's a really great conference. It's coming to Sacramento next year, so it'll be right next door. Lots of really interesting sessions, including one on uh how to deal with contentious politics as you're trying to make policy. Um with that, let me turn it over to Madam Mayor. Do you have any comments? I I don't, thank you. And I I apologize in advance that I have to step out in a bit and to go to another meeting and step back in. So it's not because I'm not interested in what you're doing, just so you know. All right, wonderful. With that, we're gonna open it up for public comment, and you will receive three minutes on the clock, so please welcome you to planning commission.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com