OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Delaware, Ohio/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting – June 24, 2026

Meeting Portal — Wednesday, June 24, 2026
BodyDelaware, Ohio
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, June 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 52:28

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
1:06

It is now 6 30 PM on June 24th.

1:11

And the Historic Preservation Commission meeting is in session.

1:14

Could we have the roll call, please?

1:17

Mr.

1:17

Fagan?

1:19

Here.

1:19

Mr.

1:20

Smiles.

1:20

Here.

1:21

Mr.

1:21

Crognow?

1:22

Here.

1:22

Mr.

1:23

Watts.

1:23

Here.

1:24

Councilman Ryder?

1:25

Here.

1:25

Ms.

1:26

Cole.

1:27

Here.

1:28

Chair of Vierra?

1:29

Here.

1:31

Before we move on to the approval of the motion summary, I just want to take a moment to introduce our new commission member, uh, Kristen Cole.

1:37

She's joining us after her appointment by City Council on Monday, uh, which is why it did not appear on the agenda uh to introduce her.

1:45

So Kristen, if you have anything you want to say, don't feel pressured to, but hi, I'm Kristen Cole, and I'm happy to be a part of this commission.

1:53

I decided to join.

1:55

I'm a historic homeowner.

1:56

I live in uh the Northwest neighborhood, and so I value the history of Delaware.

2:02

I'm also a fifth generation Delaware resident.

2:04

So I've been I haven't been here for a long time, but my family has been.

2:10

I grew up here, then moved away, and then my husband and I decided to retire here, so happy to be here.

2:17

Well, welcome.

2:19

Thank you.

2:20

We hope you enjoy it.

2:22

Okay.

2:23

Um has everybody read the minutes from our prior meeting?

2:28

And are there any corrections, additions?

2:34

I am curious though.

2:35

I I think I've probably overlooked this each time.

2:37

Uh in my curiosity, is the second line item at the approval of the motion summary.

2:42

Uh are we approving the minutes or the because the motion summary would be kind of a subset, I would think.

2:51

It's the same terminology.

2:52

Okay, all right.

2:53

Yep.

2:53

So that is what we mean.

2:54

Uh so perfect, thank you.

2:57

Sure.

2:57

So could we have a motion to approve and a second, please?

3:01

I'll motion.

3:03

Second.

3:04

The roll call, please.

3:08

Mr.

3:08

Fagan?

3:09

Abstain.

3:11

Mr.

3:12

Smiles?

3:13

Yes.

3:13

Mr.

3:13

Crognow?

3:14

Yes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████79%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████11%
Procedural██████10%
Summary of Proceedings

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting – June 24, 2026

The Historic Preservation Commission met on June 24, 2026 at 6:30 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. The commission approved two Certificates of Appropriateness and welcomed new member Kristen Cole, a fifth-generation Delaware resident and historic homeowner appointed by City Council on June 22.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Motion Summary (May 28, 2026): Approved with a roll call vote: Commissioners Fagan and Cole abstained; Smiles, Crognow, Watts, Ryder, and Chair Vierra voted yes.

Discussion Items

1. Certificate of Appropriateness 2026-1932 – 4 North Sandusky Street (Steve Hartman, applicant)

  • Request: Install eight new aluminum-clad wood double-hung windows on the south elevation to activate second and third floors. Proposed windows are from the Pella Reserve Traditional collection in "Blue Ash" (gray-blue), with sandstone lintels and sills sourced from historic material.
  • Staff Presentation: Staff (Anna) noted the building (mid-1800s, contributing to National Register Historic District) is undergoing facade improvements. New windows would replace boarded-up openings from the 1920s. Staff acknowledged the windows would partially obscure a faded historic ghost sign but recommended approval because the sign is not original to the building, the windows benefit upper-floor activation, and the design matches the front facade and is compatible with downtown architecture. Staff cited Secretary of the Interior Standard #9.
  • Applicant Presentation: Mr. Hartman described plans for open floor plans, egress, a balcony, and the need for light. He emphasized sourcing vintage materials and a 50-year preservation plan. He clarified that window placement may shift slightly to accommodate interior layout (kitchen, stairwell).
  • Commission Questions: Discussion included alignment with front windows, height of third-floor windows (9 ft vs. 8 ft max from Pella spec), safety concerns with low sills, and the precedent of removing ghost signs. Staff clarified that the ghost sign is not original and that the benefits outweigh the loss. The commission noted that the window layout is not perfectly symmetrical but is historically typical. The applicant indicated willingness to use 8 ft windows if required.
  • Outcome: The commission voted unanimously (7-0) to approve the certificate with the standard condition that any modifications require administrative review.

2. Certificate of Appropriateness 2026-1934 – 25 West Winter Street (Denise Dunlap, applicant, represented by contractor)

  • Request: Replace damaged wood siding on the front facade with fiber cement siding matching the existing 5.5-inch smooth finish siding installed on side elevations in 2012, and paint the entire front facade Arctic white (current color).
  • Staff Presentation: The building (c. 1842, former church, now Beanbag Books) is in the transitional subdistrict. Staff noted that fiber cement has been previously permitted as a durable alternative to wood, and the paint color meets non-garish requirements. Staff recommended approval with four conditions: standard revision condition, smooth finish fiber cement, siding to match existing dimensions, and a right-of-way permit for installation.
  • Commission Discussion: The application was seen as straightforward. Commissioner Cole shared a personal connection (her mother owned the building in the 1960s).
  • Outcome: The commission voted unanimously (7-0) to approve with all four conditions.

Staff Comments

  • Architectural Standards Update: Staff reported that a consultant-led survey is being distributed to commissioners and the public. The update aims to address more complex upper-floor renovations downtown.

Next Meeting

  • July 22, 2026 at 6:30 PM.

Adjournment

  • The meeting adjourned at approximately 7:21 PM.

Meeting Transcript

It is now 6 30 PM on June 24th. And the Historic Preservation Commission meeting is in session. Could we have the roll call, please? Mr. Fagan? Here. Mr. Smiles. Here. Mr. Crognow? Here. Mr. Watts. Here. Councilman Ryder? Here. Ms. Cole. Here. Chair of Vierra? Here. Before we move on to the approval of the motion summary, I just want to take a moment to introduce our new commission member, uh, Kristen Cole. She's joining us after her appointment by City Council on Monday, uh, which is why it did not appear on the agenda uh to introduce her. So Kristen, if you have anything you want to say, don't feel pressured to, but hi, I'm Kristen Cole, and I'm happy to be a part of this commission. I decided to join. I'm a historic homeowner. I live in uh the Northwest neighborhood, and so I value the history of Delaware. I'm also a fifth generation Delaware resident. So I've been I haven't been here for a long time, but my family has been. I grew up here, then moved away, and then my husband and I decided to retire here, so happy to be here. Well, welcome. Thank you. We hope you enjoy it. Okay. Um has everybody read the minutes from our prior meeting? And are there any corrections, additions? I am curious though. I I think I've probably overlooked this each time. Uh in my curiosity, is the second line item at the approval of the motion summary. Uh are we approving the minutes or the because the motion summary would be kind of a subset, I would think. It's the same terminology. Okay, all right. Yep. So that is what we mean. Uh so perfect, thank you. Sure. So could we have a motion to approve and a second, please? I'll motion. Second.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com