OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Deltona, Florida/City Commission & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City Commission Workshop on FY2025-2026 Budget: Debt Issuance and Special Assessments (June 23, 2025)

City Commission & Boards — Monday, June 23, 2025
BodyDeltona, Florida
SessionCity Commission & Boards
DateMonday, June 23, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 39:48

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

3:25

Okay.

3:26

Uh this time we're going to go ahead and enter into business.

Unassigned speaker

3:30

If

Speaker 1

3:30

I can uh fiscal year twenty twenty-five, twenty twenty-six budget discussions.

Unassigned speaker

3:39

Mr.

Speaker 1

3:39

McKinney, it's

Unassigned speaker

3:41

up.

Speaker 2

3:49

Um, at this time, I would like to call Jeremy with PFM up to go over the debt process overview.

Unassigned speaker

4:03

If

Speaker 1

4:03

you can please turn on your mic.

Speaker 3

4:06

How's that?

4:07

Good evening.

4:07

Uh, Jeremy Needfeld with PFM, Financial Basor to the city.

4:11

Uh, good to be here in front of you.

4:12

It's been uh it's been a couple of years, but uh John wanted me to go through a quick process of of the debt issuance uh approach and uh and talk a little bit and see if there were any questions on where where we're heading.

4:26

Uh just three parts to the agenda here.

4:29

We'll just do a quick debt overview, then we'll talk about the plan of finance, and I've got a quick uh market update just to present some some information on where the market rights

Unassigned speaker

4:37

are.

Speaker 3

4:39

So the uh the city's debt policies intend to establish some framework, essentially uh some ground rules for how uh how the city issues that uh takes affordability, uh

Unassigned speaker

4:49

you know,

Speaker 3

4:50

a comprehensive approach to to make sure the city doesn't become over leveraged.

4:54

Uh and takes into effect the financial planning and management objectives.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Um it creates the uh the community attitude and government philosophy uh and sets limits to preserve flexibility for the city going forward.

Speaker 3

5:10

There's several different types of debt.

5:12

There's self-supporting debt, uh, and that's debt that's that's essentially tied to uh an enterprise fund like a utility.

5:18

Uh, there's non-self supporting debt.

5:20

Uh that's essentially to cover general obligations for the city.

5:23

Uh the debt burden measures are uh are user rates that are set to cover operations and debt service.

Unassigned speaker

5:30

CID commission uh you know has committed through their policy to increase rates when necessary to ensure uh reasonable ability to address current operations with paygo and establish debt with regard to non-self supporting debt to ensure current and future flexibility.

Speaker 3

5:49

Here's a quick snapshot of your current debt profile.

Unassigned speaker

5:52

As

Speaker 3

5:52

you can see here, it's made up of uh stormwater assessment note, uh, some clean water of state revolving funds, uh capital improvement note, and a taxable utility system uh bond series.

6:07

Total outstanding principle is 150 million.

Unassigned speaker

6:12

Of

Speaker 3

6:13

that 150 million, approximately three quarters of it is utility debt, as you see in the the picture there with the brown in the blue area.

Unassigned speaker

6:20

Uh

Speaker 3

6:21

then you have capital improvement notes and then a small uh stormwater

Unassigned speaker

6:24

note.

Unassigned speaker

6:27

This

Speaker 3

6:27

is what the city budgets and pays for in debt service each year.

6:31

You can see each group of debt uh is categorized uh by color,

Unassigned speaker

6:38

and

Speaker 3

6:38

you have 25 years of debt outstanding uh on that utility system revenue bomb.

Unassigned speaker

6:45

So,

Speaker 3

6:46

quickly just to touch on plan of finance.

Unassigned speaker

6:48

I

Speaker 3

6:48

guess I'll pause if there's any questions on the the current debt.

6:52

None?

Unassigned speaker

6:53

Okay, sir.

Speaker 1

6:54

Any questions from anybody on the dice?

Unassigned speaker

6:56

No,

Speaker 1

6:57

please move on.

Unassigned speaker

6:58

Thank you.

Unassigned speaker

6:59

So

Speaker 3

7:00

the plan of finance is really based on needs uh and based on addressing those capital needs in a meaningful way that fits your debt policy parameters uh by the wish of the commission.

7:10

So uh looking here at the five-year master plan, there's approximately 200 million dollars in priority projects that have been identified.

7:20

Significant needs of about 70 million in the next year, followed by almost 50 million in the two years following.

7:32

Currently, it's planned for about 35 million uh of debt funded, uh 75 million of cash and grant funded, uh, and approximately a hundred million of the capital needs have not yet been uh funded or identified on how they would be funded.

Unassigned speaker

7:51

And

Speaker 3

7:51

as you can see, a significant portion of next year is cash and grant funded.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Fiscal Sustainability█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Capital Improvement Plan████████████13%
Fire Safety█████████10%
Public Engagement███████8%
Public Safety██████6%
Public Works Recognition██████6%
Budget Equity Analysis████4%
Procedural████4%
Summary of Proceedings

City Commission Workshop on FY2025-2026 Budget: Debt Issuance and Special Assessments (June 23, 2025)

The City of Deltona City Commission held a workshop on June 23, 2025, to discuss elements of the upcoming FY2025-2026 budget. The primary focus was on debt issuance strategies tied to the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and a proposed change to how the city notifies property owners about special assessment increases. A representative from the city's financial advisory firm, Public Financial Management Group (PFM), presented the debt overview.

Discussion Items

  • Debt Process and Current Profile: Jeremy Niedfeldt of PFM presented the city's debt policies and current outstanding debt of $150 million, roughly three-quarters of which is utility debt. The city has not issued new debt since 2021.
  • Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Planned Financing: The Five-Year Master Plan identifies roughly $200 million in priority projects (agenda/minutes cite $205 million). Planned funding sources include $35 million in new debt, $75 million in cash and grants, leaving approximately $100 million unfunded. Key near-term projects include a $50 million water/wastewater project ($22 million debt financed) and a $20 million fire station project ($7 million debt financed). City Manager John McKinney noted these figures are from the May 3rd preliminary workshop and are subject to change, especially regarding fire station funding.
  • Unfunded Project Breakdown: Staff detailed specific unfunded needs, including $17.5 million for water/wastewater projects, $1 million for parks, and $14 million for stormwater projects.
  • Debt Financing Options: PFM outlined options including bond transactions for long-life assets (e.g., water treatment plants, large buildings) and bank loans for shorter-life assets (e.g., fire engines, smaller projects). Bank loans offer a cheaper and faster process (3-4 months) compared to bonds (4-6 months).
  • Credit Rating Discussion: Vice Mayor Heriot inquired about the city's credit rating. Mr. Niedfeldt confirmed a strong "AA" category credit rating, resulting in a trading spread of 30 to 40 basis points over the treasury curve.
  • Ad Valorem Tax Concerns and Backup Plans: Commissioner Howington raised significant concerns about the potential state-level elimination of property taxes and the city's backup plan for debt repayment. The City Manager acknowledged the risk, noting that ad valorem revenues account for a third of the general fund budget, and committed to presenting conservative projections at the next workshop. Commissioner Lulli pointed out that the bulk of the considered debt is for the utility enterprise fund, which relies solely on user fees and not ad valorem taxes.
  • Fire Station Studies and Transparency: Commissioner Avila-Vazquez expressed frustration about the lack of communication regarding proposed fire station locations in her district. Fire Chief Schneider confirmed that studies from Finch & Associates and data from Dark Horse analytics have been completed. He promised a full presentation to the entire commission, including specific station locations and training center plans, at the upcoming workshop.
  • Water Rate Study: Commissioner Howington asked if utility debt would necessitate raising water rates. Staff confirmed that the ongoing rate study by a consultant will incorporate this five-year outlook, and raising rates is a potential outcome.
  • Special Assessment Notifications: The Finance Director proposed changing the notification method for increases in special assessments (stormwater, solid waste) from standalone mailed letters to using the TRIM (Truth in Millage) notice. This change is permissible under Florida Statute 197 and would combine the notification with the parcel owners' existing TRIM mailings.
    • Savings Discrepancy: A discrepancy exists in the reported savings. The Finance Director stated in the transcript that the change would save the city $34,000 this fiscal year (compared to estimated $36,000 standalone cost). However, the meeting minutes record the savings as $43,000.
    • Vice Mayor Heriot clarified that property owners would still receive written notification annually via the integrated TRIM notice.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Courtney Crossbergs addressed the commission reflecting constituent concerns. She asked if impact fee increases were being considered in the budget, which staff confirmed. She also asked whether the budget discussions encompassed a fire training center in addition to new stations and if that center had been formally approved by the commission. The Mayor and City Manager reiterated that no formal approval for any debt issuance or specific projects has been granted by the commission and that the workshops involved preliminary discussions only.

Key Outcomes

  • No Formal Actions Taken: The workshop was informational. No votes were taken on debt issuance, the CIP, or the specific budget figures. The City Manager explicitly stated that none of the plans discussed have been approved by the commission.
  • Direction to Staff: Staff was directed to create a dedicated tab within the budget documents for all FY2025-2026 presentations and related materials.
  • Special Assessment Notification Change: The commission appeared to support staff's recommendation to utilize the TRIM notice for special assessment notifications, shifting away from standalone mailings to achieve cost savings.
  • Upcoming Workshops Scheduled: Key budget and fire station discussions will continue in the following workshops:
    • July 14, 2025: Detailed discussion on the operating budget, fund balance allocation for capital projects, and conservative financial projections regarding potential state revenue changes.
    • July 21, 2025: Presentation of the proposed fire station locations and assessments, and setting maximum assessment rates.

Meeting Transcript

Okay. Uh this time we're going to go ahead and enter into business. If I can uh fiscal year twenty twenty-five, twenty twenty-six budget discussions. Mr. McKinney, it's up. Um, at this time, I would like to call Jeremy with PFM up to go over the debt process overview. If you can please turn on your mic. How's that? Good evening. Uh, Jeremy Needfeld with PFM, Financial Basor to the city. Uh, good to be here in front of you. It's been uh it's been a couple of years, but uh John wanted me to go through a quick process of of the debt issuance uh approach and uh and talk a little bit and see if there were any questions on where where we're heading. Uh just three parts to the agenda here. We'll just do a quick debt overview, then we'll talk about the plan of finance, and I've got a quick uh market update just to present some some information on where the market rights are. So the uh the city's debt policies intend to establish some framework, essentially uh some ground rules for how uh how the city issues that uh takes affordability, uh you know, a comprehensive approach to to make sure the city doesn't become over leveraged. Uh and takes into effect the financial planning and management objectives. Um it creates the uh the community attitude and government philosophy uh and sets limits to preserve flexibility for the city going forward. There's several different types of debt. There's self-supporting debt, uh, and that's debt that's that's essentially tied to uh an enterprise fund like a utility. Uh, there's non-self supporting debt. Uh that's essentially to cover general obligations for the city. Uh the debt burden measures are uh are user rates that are set to cover operations and debt service. CID commission uh you know has committed through their policy to increase rates when necessary to ensure uh reasonable ability to address current operations with paygo and establish debt with regard to non-self supporting debt to ensure current and future flexibility. Here's a quick snapshot of your current debt profile. As you can see here, it's made up of uh stormwater assessment note, uh, some clean water of state revolving funds, uh capital improvement note, and a taxable utility system uh bond series. Total outstanding principle is 150 million. Of that 150 million, approximately three quarters of it is utility debt, as you see in the the picture there with the brown in the blue area. Uh then you have capital improvement notes and then a small uh stormwater note. This is what the city budgets and pays for in debt service each year. You can see each group of debt uh is categorized uh by color, and you have 25 years of debt outstanding uh on that utility system revenue bomb. So, quickly just to touch on plan of finance. I guess I'll pause if there's any questions on the the current debt. None? Okay, sir. Any questions from anybody on the dice?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com