OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Deltona, Florida/City Commission & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Deltona Special City Commission Meeting - September 22, 2025

City Commission & Boards — Monday, September 22, 2025
BodyDeltona, Florida
SessionCity Commission & Boards
DateMonday, September 22, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:13:27

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:11

2025.

0:12

If I can please have the city clerk call the roll.

Speaker 2

0:15

Commissioner Bilavasquez.

0:17

Commissioner Calwell.

Speaker 1

0:19

Here.

Speaker 2

0:19

Commissioner Howington?

0:21

Here.

0:21

Commissioner Novick?

0:22

Here.

0:23

Commissioner Santiago?

0:24

Here.

0:25

Vice Mayor Harriet?

0:26

Here.

0:26

Mayor Villa.

Speaker 1

0:28

Here.

Unassigned speaker

0:28

This time, if I can please have Commissioner Howington lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Speaker 1

0:57

Okay, we're gonna go ahead and move from the pledge to additions and deletions.

1:03

Commissioner Santiago?

Speaker 3

1:05

I would like to do an addition to the uh agenda.

Speaker 1

1:08

What is your addition?

Speaker 3

1:10

Um purchasing policies revert back to the March policies.

Speaker 1

1:18

Is there a second on

Unassigned speaker

1:19

that?

Speaker 1

1:24

Yeah.

1:25

Go ahead and then I'll give you the

Unassigned speaker

1:27

floor.

Speaker 4

1:33

I would like it if we could bring them back with a lot of those a lot, you know, the way that it was back in March, but there are a couple changes that I would like to see made to it if we could um specifically related to capital being allocated in its own cost center.

Unassigned speaker

1:50

Okay,

Speaker 1

1:50

Commissioner of Villa Vasquez.

Speaker 5

1:53

Um like to refresh my memory.

1:56

What was the purchasing policy back in March when it was ex uh over $25,000?

2:03

Is that what we're talking about?

Speaker 1

2:06

Finance director.

Unassigned speaker

2:08

Good

Speaker 6

2:08

evening, Mayor Commissioners.

2:10

Um what was passed in March 3rd of this year, resolution 2025-29 was for all goods and services budgeted and capital that's line itemed in the budget.

2:23

The city manager had authority to purchase his line item approval that was not budgeted was fifty thousand.

2:33

Anything over a hundred thousand dollars that was for a CIP, etc.

2:38

That was in any one of the capital improvement funds, was mandated to come back to commission for approval.

2:45

Um Commissioner I'm Harriet.

2:49

Um, all the capital is in its own cost center.

Speaker 5

2:54

So what would what what commissioner Santiago is asking that it goes back to what it was before?

Speaker 6

3:02

Yes, ma'am.

Speaker 5

3:03

Which was the amount again?

Speaker 6

3:05

Um city manager or his department has had five thousand dollar threshold authority, the city manager for items that wasn't detailed line item in the budget for goods and services or capital or exempt procurement, um, say um health insurance, etc.

3:28

Then he could purchase it in any dollar amount as long as it was line itemed in the budget.

3:34

Anything above that required it to come back to the city commission for approval, specifically anything related to our CIP programs, a park pavilion, um, a lift station improvement, a new city hall, all of the new fire station, all of that must come back to the commission for approval.

Speaker 5

3:55

Anything over 25,000?

Speaker 6

3:57

Anything over a hundred thousand that was not line itemed in the budget, had to come back for approval if it was a CIP, etc.

4:10

Anything else not explicitly authorized by the policy was fifty thousand dollars or more.

Speaker 5

4:16

So this was approved back in March, the way it is right now today.

4:20

It was approved back in March.

Speaker 6

4:22

No, ma'am.

4:23

The purchasing policy was approved by the commission March 3rd under resolution 2025-29 as I outlined just now on June 23rd.

4:35

There was a consensus vote done during a commission meeting that anything over 25,000, regardless of whether or not it was in the budget or not, had to come back for commission for explicit approval.

4:48

That's why since the July 21st Commission meeting on, we've had anywhere between 20 and 30 agenda items to purchase goods and services.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Again, my question, so anything over $25,000 has to come back to the commission for approval.

Speaker 6

5:04

Currently, yes, ma'am.

Speaker 5

5:06

And that was passed.

5:07

So why are we coming back to this again?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procurement Policy█████████████████████████████29%
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████████████████26%
Code Enforcement████████8%
Fiscal Sustainability██████6%
Public Engagement█████5%
Community Engagement█████5%
Parks and Recreation████4%
Zoning And Land Use████4%
Water And Wastewater Management███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Deltona Special City Commission Meeting - September 22, 2025

A special meeting of the Deltona City Commission was held on September 22, 2025, at 6:30 PM. The main agenda included adopting the final millage rate and budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, providing guidance on the Ordinance Review Committee, and discussing the city's purchasing policy. The meeting adjourned at 8:43 PM.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • David Markle (Hanley Street resident) voiced strong opposition to the proposed 6.70 millage rate, calling for a full rollback and criticizing spending inefficiencies.
  • Kathy Bryan (Deltona resident) argued that while taxes are necessary, the city should make compromises to achieve a full rollback, noting that non-ad valorem taxes are rising.
  • Brandy White urged commissioners to find courage and do better, criticizing the process as shameful and predicting the budget would pass regardless.
  • David Sosa opposed the millage rate, citing increased costs for residents and asserting that the budget increased by $7 million. He also requested a public records request regarding previous stormwater fee votes.
  • Carolyn Hickerson appealed for shared dignity and compromise, referencing recent tragedies and the withdrawal of a commission candidate due to personal attacks.
  • Gary Engel King (Deltona resident) stated the budget contains too much fluff and lacked sufficient detail, calling for relief for residents.
  • Taylor Nealer (Deltona resident) expressed that the budget is disturbing and warned against selling parcels to developers, risking affordability for families and seniors.
  • Christian O’Brien (District 6 resident) commented on specific budget items like the Fisher Water Plant ($44 million) and criticized divisiveness, asking commissioners to bring receipts and facts.
  • Kathy Bryan returned to speak about the purchasing policy, noting that the earlier second on the motion was questionable and recommending emergency-specific spending authority.
  • Matt Bergen noted the lack of an emergency fund in the budget and raised concerns about transfers between funds, advocating for line-item accountability.
  • Allison Route questioned the need to bring already-budgeted purchases over $25,000 back for approval, calling it redundant, and supported a $50,000 threshold for unbudgeted emergency items.

Discussion Items

  • 5A & 5B: Final Millage and Budget Adoption
    • Finance Director McKinney presented the final millage rate of 6.7000 mills per $1,000 valuation (a 2.30% increase over the rollback rate of 6.5494 mills), and a total citywide budget of $245,510,105 for new funding, plus $99,153,709 in rollover funds, totaling $344,663,814.
    • He highlighted major changes: $343,881 for AHAC, $500,000 for fraud/compliance audit, $1 million additional litigation, 6 additional firefighters ($534,187), Sheriff’s contract increase of $1.15 million, and reductions of 12 positions ($772,284 savings to General Fund). Capital projects include $1 million for land acquisition, $4.25 million for parks, and $1.04 million for road elevation.
    • Commissioner Howington proposed reallocating $1.25 million from Manny Rodriguez Park to fund a full rollback, stormwater improvements, lightning detection, and art/education programs. Vice Mayor Heriot opposed, arguing parks investment reduces youth crime. Commissioner Howington countered that the park is less than a mile from another with large play equipment. The proposal was not adopted.
    • Commissioner Avila-Vazquez explained her switch to support 6.7 mills, stating the rollback was never going to pass and she chose the lowest possible rate.
  • 5C: Guidance on Ordinance Review Committee (ORC)
    • Planning Director Smith requested direction on timing and scope. Commissioners discussed focusing on the Land Development Code (LDC) vs. general ordinances. Commissioner Nabicht advocated for immediate LDC review due to moratorium issues, while others noted that a Comprehensive Plan update (due late 2026) will trigger an LDC overhaul. The City Attorney suggested appointing the board, holding an initial meeting to get input, then returning for final direction. Commissioners agreed to proceed with appointments and later determine priorities. There was also discussion about qualifications: some preferred citizen members without professional ties; others were open to requesting professional background information.
  • 5D: Purchasing Policy (Added Item)
    • Commissioner Santiago moved to revert to the March 2025 policy, which allowed the city manager to approve budgeted purchases of any amount (except CIP) and unbudgeted purchases up to $50,000 (later reduced to $25,000 by consensus in June). A second by Vice Mayor Heriot resulted in a vote that appears conflicting between the agenda minutes and transcript. The minutes record a 4-3 vote in favor (Mayor, Heriot, Nabicht, Santiago in favor; Avila-Vazquez, Colwell, Howington against), while the transcript suggests a 3-3 tie. The motion failed to pass.
    • Commissioner Nabicht then moved to raise the manager’s spending limit for unbudgeted purchases to $75,000, while retaining the March policy for budgeted items (any amount) and CIP purchases requiring commission approval. The motion passed 4-2 (Mayor, Heriot, Nabicht, Santiago in favor; Avila-Vazquez, Colwell against).

Key Outcomes

  • Resolution 2025-133 (Final Millage) approved 5-2 (Avila-Vazquez, Heriot, Nabicht, Santiago, Avila in favor; Colwell, Howington against). The rate is 6.7000 mills.
  • Resolution 2025-134 (Final Budget) approved 5-2 (same vote). Total budget $245,510,105 plus $99,153,709 rollover.
  • Ordinance Review Committee: Commission directed staff to proceed with appointing members (approximately 8-10 applications already received), hold an initial meeting to gather committee input on focus areas, and return to the Commission for final scope determination. Staff will collaborate with a consultant funded by $75,000 in the budget.
  • Purchasing Policy: The Commission rejected a motion to revert entirely to the March 2025 policy (discrepancy noted between minutes and transcript). Instead, they approved raising the city manager’s threshold for unbudgeted purchases to $75,000, keeping the March policy for budgeted purchases (no limit) and CIP items (require commission approval).
  • Note: The vote on the first purchasing policy motion (revert to March) is recorded differently in the minutes (4-3 pass) versus the transcript (apparent 3-3 tie). According to minutes, the motion carried 4-3; according to transcript the motion failed. The second motion (raise to $75,000) passed 4-2 consistently.

Meeting Transcript

2025. If I can please have the city clerk call the roll. Commissioner Bilavasquez. Commissioner Calwell. Here. Commissioner Howington? Here. Commissioner Novick? Here. Commissioner Santiago? Here. Vice Mayor Harriet? Here. Mayor Villa. Here. This time, if I can please have Commissioner Howington lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance. Okay, we're gonna go ahead and move from the pledge to additions and deletions. Commissioner Santiago? I would like to do an addition to the uh agenda. What is your addition? Um purchasing policies revert back to the March policies. Is there a second on that? Yeah. Go ahead and then I'll give you the floor. I would like it if we could bring them back with a lot of those a lot, you know, the way that it was back in March, but there are a couple changes that I would like to see made to it if we could um specifically related to capital being allocated in its own cost center. Okay, Commissioner of Villa Vasquez. Um like to refresh my memory. What was the purchasing policy back in March when it was ex uh over $25,000? Is that what we're talking about? Finance director. Good evening, Mayor Commissioners. Um what was passed in March 3rd of this year, resolution 2025-29 was for all goods and services budgeted and capital that's line itemed in the budget. The city manager had authority to purchase his line item approval that was not budgeted was fifty thousand. Anything over a hundred thousand dollars that was for a CIP, etc. That was in any one of the capital improvement funds, was mandated to come back to commission for approval. Um Commissioner I'm Harriet. Um, all the capital is in its own cost center. So what would what what commissioner Santiago is asking that it goes back to what it was before? Yes, ma'am. Which was the amount again? Um city manager or his department has had five thousand dollar threshold authority, the city manager for items that wasn't detailed line item in the budget for goods and services or capital or exempt procurement, um, say um health insurance, etc. Then he could purchase it in any dollar amount as long as it was line itemed in the budget. Anything above that required it to come back to the city commission for approval, specifically anything related to our CIP programs, a park pavilion, um, a lift station improvement, a new city hall, all of the new fire station, all of that must come back to the commission for approval. Anything over 25,000? Anything over a hundred thousand that was not line itemed in the budget, had to come back for approval if it was a CIP, etc. Anything else not explicitly authorized by the policy was fifty thousand dollars or more.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com