OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Deltona, Florida/City Commission & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Deltona City Commission Workshop on Chapter 66 Parking Ordinances – June 8, 2026

City Commission & Boards — Monday, June 8, 2026
BodyDeltona, Florida
SessionCity Commission & Boards
DateMonday, June 8, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:11:53

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Parking demand and enforcement considerations.

0:02

At this time, I'd like to introduce Edward with the Cordino Group, and he will provide an overview and of the findings and recommendations and facilitate discussion with the commission regarding potential policy direction.

Speaker 2

0:17

It's the right all right, cool.

Speaker 3

0:19

Thank

Unassigned speaker

0:19

you.

Speaker 2

0:19

All right, good evening, uh Mayor Commissioners.

0:22

Uh, thank you for having us back again uh to discuss this very important topic.

0:26

Uh you recall last time um we were um the commissioner had asked that we look into certain things a little bit more, uh culture stacks, fire, uh, and uh so we uh you know step back, got together with staff, you see Danny and Sharon, uh we got with fire and we got with code enforcement and uh public works and so forth.

0:47

So we'll go with some of the T issues review today, looking at public safety, operational access, infrastructure, equity enforcement.

0:53

We do have some preliminary recommendations for you.

0:56

Um, but you know, ultimately we also uh uh hope to get out of this meeting from a staff perspective um a bit more direction on how you like that to proceed uh uh with those recommendations one way or the other.

1:09

Um do have an updated crash review.

1:13

Uh we update it from three to five years as requested, and uh looking at the time between January 1st, 2021 to December 31st, 2025.

1:23

Um we uh note that there's a total of just over 6,000 documented crashes and a small amount, only like 100, I believe.

1:34

I think it was Commissioner Cole, when you had it asked if we towards to look into more about actually how much we're on uh uh on site because we were like, well, that's really not that much.

1:43

Um and it is a small amount, uh 16%, uh 16 crashes occurred with on-demand delivery vehicles, and nine crashes occurred with emergency vehicles.

1:53

So it's not a very high number of the crashes uh overall in the city.

1:57

Um of those 99 crashes, which are all mapped, we were requested to map them as well.

2:03

You see that the citywide, no fatality and capaciting injuries, only three of them with minor injuries and four with possible injuries.

2:11

Um it does occur in both the new and the older residential areas.

2:16

We were asked to look at, you know, where or not there was a difference because our newer residential areas have uh smaller ride of ways, and we know that that to be kind of an issue.

2:26

Uh, but we found no discernible significant pattern when we expanded the data uh uh looking at from uh um from the DAT standpoint.

2:35

However, we do find that of the crashes that did occur, there are restricted site distance due to parked vehicles.

2:43

Um though, you know, it's not while it's not overly a big issue statistically, it is enough of an issue to have a hundred crashes in those years and that time frame.

2:53

And you know, vehicles backing out drive with limited visibility, that could be an issue for children.

2:58

Uh in particular, I know that's something that was brought up by the commissioner last time.

3:02

Like we look at like uh uh uh um crashes with the children.

3:06

Um there are no documented crashes involving children to drive visibility zone, though we're very thankful for that.

3:12

Uh we still think that from an engineering and planning standpoint that you just have a little bit of an elevated risk of uh of that.

3:20

Um uh, you know, there is one document crash within cul-de-sac.

3:24

Um the vice mayor asked us to look into the culture fact a little bit more.

3:28

Um that was at Hartley Court.

3:30

Uh we do find that there are roads to two or more entree park vehicles crashes.

3:35

Um we separate them out.

3:37

Um,

Unassigned speaker

3:38

you

Speaker 2

3:38

know, places like Fernanda Drive.

3:41

Not really surprising there because of the more narrow right-of-way.

Unassigned speaker

3:45

Uh

Speaker 2

3:45

the heat, kettering, roaddale, wanderer,

Unassigned speaker

3:48

you

Speaker 2

3:48

know, some of these sound familiar because they're part of our newer uh uh subdivision.

3:52

So there is, you know, enough to for us to say, hey, you might want to think about the width of your roadways, um, and and design standards.

4:03

We also went back and chatted with our um our fire department, and thank you, uh Sharon, for uh getting us uh a lot of the vital information we need to kind of look at this a little bit further.

4:14

We appreciate the fire department giving us the time and and and information.

4:18

We know that our fire apparatus uh requires a minimum of 20 feet of unstructured space for deploy equipment.

4:25

We know that you know, from an engineering design standpoint, we look at something called the Green Book, uh, which would be used.

4:32

Um you want certain width for travel purposes.

4:36

And they really should be based on design speed.

4:39

So you have lower speed, people aren't traveling along, you know, certain speed, you have a little bit more like a reaction time.

4:45

You can get away with slightly smaller widths, but still, you know, 20 to 25 mile per hour, you want 10 feet of travel lanes and 30, 35 mile per hour, you want 10 to 11 feet.

Unassigned speaker

4:56

Um you're running a bus or something on a roadway, you want 11 feet minimum.

Speaker 2

5:01

Um, it's pretty much engineering design standards.

5:03

And we try to take this from a standard standpoint, think about recommendation.

Unassigned speaker

5:07

You

Speaker 2

5:08

add all this together up, right?

5:09

You want to be able to have uh you have to run a fire truck through for them to turn to be have staging in case, you know, you know, having forbidden the fire, but you know, we have great, you know, staff here that you know will respond to it, but you gotta be able to get there.

5:23

And that means that when you have certain roadways, you should have a certain amount of width.

5:29

And so one of the recommendations that we want you to consider is um having no on-street parking road with a design speed over 35 miles per hour.

5:38

Um, and then based on the design speed of the road, think about restricting your parking so that you have enough maneuverability.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Transportation Safety████████████████████████████████████████40%
Zoning And Land Use███████████████████████████████████35%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████8%
Code Enforcement██████6%
Public Safety█████5%
Public Engagement█████5%
Procedural█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Deltona City Commission Workshop – Parking Ordinances Review

On Monday, June 8, 2026, the Deltona City Commission held a workshop from 5:30 PM to 6:41 PM to review and discuss potential revisions to Chapter 66 (Parking Ordinances). The workshop focused on public safety, emergency access, infrastructure impacts, equity, enforcement, and future policy direction. Edward Ng of Corradino Group presented an updated crash analysis and facilitated discussion. Commissioners debated parking restrictions on streets and swales, fire safety setbacks, commercial and recreational vehicle parking, and long-term programs. After deliberation, the commission provided direction via a series of consensus votes.

Consent Calendar

  • None.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • First speaker (name unidentified) urged compromise on parking rules, suggested allowing vehicles to park at least one foot into the right-of-way on narrow streets, emphasized education for workers parking on both sides, and asked that residents with recreational vehicles or large vehicles be given ample time to comply with any off-site parking requirements.
  • Tim Bloggett criticized the direction of the proposed ordinances, stating the city risks turning into “Bedford Stuyvesant.” He noted that fire trucks are about 9 feet 4 inches wide, but ladder trucks with stabilizers require nearly 30 feet of clearance – not the 20 feet mentioned earlier. He argued that septic tanks and soil compaction from swale parking are serious issues, and urged the commission to start by restoring previous code enforcement rather than adding new restrictions. He referenced a former official who said “don’t touch my swales.”

Discussion Items

  • Crash Data and On-Street Parking Safety – Edward Ng presented an updated crash review covering January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025. There were 6,000 documented crashes citywide, of which 99 involved on-street parked vehicles. Only 16 crashes involved on-demand delivery vehicles and 9 involved emergency vehicles. None resulted in fatalities; three crashes caused minor injuries and four caused possible injuries. No crashes involved children. The crashes occurred in both older and newer residential areas. Restricted sight distance due to parked vehicles was identified as a contributing factor.
  • Fire Safety and Vehicle Setbacks – The fire department requires a minimum of 20 feet of unobstructed space for equipment deployment. Ng recommended a 30-foot separation between structures and parked recreational/commercial vehicles, based on Volusia County fire manuals (not the Florida Fire Prevention Code). Commissioners expressed concern that many Deltona homes lack side or rear space to achieve a 30-foot setback, and that such a requirement would be unworkable. The vice mayor noted most front yards are too small. A floor discussion followed regarding Firewise principles versus enforceable code.
  • Roadway Width and Design Standards – Ng recommended restricting on-street parking on roads with a design speed over 35 mph and on the interior sides of curves. Commissioner Colwell questioned how to enforce parking restrictions on Deltona’s many curved roads. Ng suggested a general 100-foot restriction from intersections and a 5–10 foot buffer from driveways, with case-by-case review.
  • Service and Commercial Vehicle Parking – Commissioner Nabicht proposed regulations for service vehicles (e.g., utility trucks, landscaping), allowing parking during active calls only and requiring the operator to remain on site. Commissioners emphasized that Deltona is a working-class community and should not ban work vehicles with ladder racks or company logos. The majority supported creating clear rules for service vehicles during service calls.
  • Swale Parking and Drainage – Discussion centered on whether to allow or prohibit parking on swales. Commissioner Heriot and others argued that taxpayers should not bear the cost of maintaining swales (e.g., aeration, gravel) for private parking. Commissioner Colwell noted the city already offers a permit for driveway extensions (concrete) with no fee, and questioned why the city should spend money on swale maintenance. Commissioner Heriot suggested using Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTUs) on a block-by-block basis if residents want paved swales. Ultimately, the commission did not approve pursuing a privatized swale-to-parking conversion program.
  • Proposed Towing RFP and Enforcement – Commissioner Nabicht proposed issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a towing company that would handle: (1) towing city vehicles for maintenance, (2) code enforcement tows, and (3)

Meeting Transcript

Parking demand and enforcement considerations. At this time, I'd like to introduce Edward with the Cordino Group, and he will provide an overview and of the findings and recommendations and facilitate discussion with the commission regarding potential policy direction. It's the right all right, cool. Thank you. All right, good evening, uh Mayor Commissioners. Uh, thank you for having us back again uh to discuss this very important topic. Uh you recall last time um we were um the commissioner had asked that we look into certain things a little bit more, uh culture stacks, fire, uh, and uh so we uh you know step back, got together with staff, you see Danny and Sharon, uh we got with fire and we got with code enforcement and uh public works and so forth. So we'll go with some of the T issues review today, looking at public safety, operational access, infrastructure, equity enforcement. We do have some preliminary recommendations for you. Um, but you know, ultimately we also uh uh hope to get out of this meeting from a staff perspective um a bit more direction on how you like that to proceed uh uh with those recommendations one way or the other. Um do have an updated crash review. Uh we update it from three to five years as requested, and uh looking at the time between January 1st, 2021 to December 31st, 2025. Um we uh note that there's a total of just over 6,000 documented crashes and a small amount, only like 100, I believe. I think it was Commissioner Cole, when you had it asked if we towards to look into more about actually how much we're on uh uh on site because we were like, well, that's really not that much. Um and it is a small amount, uh 16%, uh 16 crashes occurred with on-demand delivery vehicles, and nine crashes occurred with emergency vehicles. So it's not a very high number of the crashes uh overall in the city. Um of those 99 crashes, which are all mapped, we were requested to map them as well. You see that the citywide, no fatality and capaciting injuries, only three of them with minor injuries and four with possible injuries. Um it does occur in both the new and the older residential areas. We were asked to look at, you know, where or not there was a difference because our newer residential areas have uh smaller ride of ways, and we know that that to be kind of an issue. Uh, but we found no discernible significant pattern when we expanded the data uh uh looking at from uh um from the DAT standpoint. However, we do find that of the crashes that did occur, there are restricted site distance due to parked vehicles. Um though, you know, it's not while it's not overly a big issue statistically, it is enough of an issue to have a hundred crashes in those years and that time frame. And you know, vehicles backing out drive with limited visibility, that could be an issue for children. Uh in particular, I know that's something that was brought up by the commissioner last time. Like we look at like uh uh uh um crashes with the children. Um there are no documented crashes involving children to drive visibility zone, though we're very thankful for that. Uh we still think that from an engineering and planning standpoint that you just have a little bit of an elevated risk of uh of that. Um uh, you know, there is one document crash within cul-de-sac. Um the vice mayor asked us to look into the culture fact a little bit more. Um that was at Hartley Court. Uh we do find that there are roads to two or more entree park vehicles crashes. Um we separate them out. Um, you know, places like Fernanda Drive. Not really surprising there because of the more narrow right-of-way. Uh the heat, kettering, roaddale, wanderer, you know, some of these sound familiar because they're part of our newer uh uh subdivision. So there is, you know, enough to for us to say, hey, you might want to think about the width of your roadways, um, and and design standards. We also went back and chatted with our um our fire department, and thank you, uh Sharon, for uh getting us uh a lot of the vital information we need to kind of look at this a little bit further. We appreciate the fire department giving us the time and and and information. We know that our fire apparatus uh requires a minimum of 20 feet of unstructured space for deploy equipment. We know that you know, from an engineering design standpoint, we look at something called the Green Book, uh, which would be used. Um you want certain width for travel purposes. And they really should be based on design speed. So you have lower speed, people aren't traveling along, you know, certain speed, you have a little bit more like a reaction time.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com