Tue, Dec 23, 2025·Denver, Colorado·City Council

Denver City Council Meeting Summary (2025-12-23)

Discussion Breakdown

Homelessness23%
Arts And Culture18%
Community Engagement8%
Youth Programs7%
Economic Development6%
Miscellaneous5%
Historic Preservation5%
Parks and Recreation4%
Animal Welfare4%
Procedural3%
Workforce Development3%
Environmental Protection3%
Affordable Housing3%
Disability Rights2%
Public Health Policy2%
Public Safety1%
Active Transportation1%
Public Engagement1%
Water And Wastewater Management1%

Summary

Denver City Council Meeting Summary (2025-12-23)

The council heard resident concerns about emergency alerts and evacuation planning near the Arsenal, then moved into an executive session to discuss ongoing litigation. After returning from executive session, the chair noted a few consent items would proceed and adjourned the meeting.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Resident/public commenter urged the city to avoid overusing alerts so people don’t “tune it out,” and asked why cell-phone emergency alerts aren’t used more frequently; indicated cell alerts feel “more real” than other notifications.
  • Council leadership (including remarks referencing Councilwoman Gilmore’s district) emphasized that while a serious incident may be unlikely (described as a “1% chance”), constituents—particularly in Lowry—remain concerned about open space risks (e.g., parties/firecrackers causing fires) and limited evacuation routes (e.g., Pena Boulevard), and expressed willingness to help share updated plans and information with the community.

Discussion Items

  • Emergency notification protocols (staff response)
    • Staff stated the city conducts a live test of cell phone wireless emergency alerts once a year (in September).
    • Staff described Denver 911’s current use of wireless emergency alerts for certain scenarios (e.g., lockdowns and barricaded suspects) and noted sirens are typically limited to weather-related events.
    • Staff explained sirens imply a “take shelter” action and are not ideal for scenarios requiring evacuation; sirens can’t convey written details, so they may be used in tandem with other tools depending on the incident.

Consent Calendar

  • Chair indicated some consent items were not pulled and would proceed after executive session (specific items not stated in the provided transcript excerpt).

Executive Session

  • Council entered executive session pursuant to DRMC 2-34A(3)(m)(7) to discuss ongoing litigation and privileged legal advice; a two-thirds vote requirement was noted.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion approved to enter executive session under the cited DRMC provision (no vote tally provided; entered “seeing no objection”).
  • Meeting adjourned after returning from executive session.

Meeting Transcript

That was part of that effort is to not do it so often that they tune it out. And why don't we do that with these alerts on the cell phone? Because to me that feels more real than just a ping on my phone. Sorry, then I'll be done. Thank you. Well, we do. So we do a live test of the cell phone alerts once a year. We do that in September. I mean, when there's an incident. It depends on what the incident is. So, for example, Denver 911 actually is using wireless emergency alerts now when they have scenarios such as lockdowns and barricaded suspects, they are starting to use that that we alert. And the other one is for only weather. For the sirens? Yeah. For that, we can use that for weather-related events, but we don't use it for things like lockdown or things like that. Part of the reason is that when people hear the sirens, your action should be? Go into the basement. Get in your house and take shelter. If you have a scenario where you want people to evacuate, you may not want to sound the sirens. So part of it is we can't communicate written information via the sirens. So often we'll use them in tandem. Thank you. Great. Thank you. Well, we have an executive session. So before we get into that, I want to just thank you so much. I will say I lived through September 11th in Washington, D.C., September 11, 2001. And I watched the 1% happen in real time and felt the fear. And, you know, in D.C., there's only a few exits, right, over bridges. And so the transportation piece, I know this is something Councilwoman Gilmore is very concerned about as well, because her district is right next to the arsenal and really Penny Boulevard is the only way out. And so if there's updated information or plans that we can share with our community, I know the Lowry community is very concerned about the open space right across the street from their homes. We've already seen parties happen there where firecrackers have started fires. You know, it's concerning to our residents. So even though it is a 1% chance of happening, which feels so small and unrealistic, I think as much as we can help you share out the information for what the plans are, how things are addressed, we're here to do that because it is something that our constituents are really concerned about. So thanks for your time. Thank you. Yeah, absolutely. So we have an executive session. I'm about to read the language, but before we do that, I want to just flag for everyone, after executive session, I will come back and adjourn the meeting. But there are a few items on consent that have not been called off that we'll just move forward. So with that, I have to put on my reading glasses, you guys. I know that's why I'm not sure. 100%. I will now entertain a motion to move us into executive session pursuant to DRMC 2-34A3M7 for the purpose of discussing ongoing litigation in which the city is a party and privileged advice related thereto. A two thirds vote of members present is required to enter to executive session. May I have a motion?