This meeting of the Denver City Council’s Finance and Business Committee, chaired by Councilwoman Sedana Gonzalez Gutierrez, covered three major agenda items: a property tax exemption request for the Broadway Bark dog park, three private activity bond (PAB) actions, and the proposed acquisition of 1028 Acoma Street for a new park. Public testimony was taken only on the tax exemption. The committee voted on each item, forwarding recommendations to the full council.
Staff from the Denver County Assessor’s Office presented House Bill 25‑1289, which requires city council to determine whether property leased to a metropolitan district is used for a public purpose. The parcel (0.4 acres, actual value $4,110,100) is leased to Broadway Park Metro District No. 1 for $1/year. The tax exemption would total just over $160,000 (including $88,000 in Denver Mills and $71,840 in metro district mills). The lease term is year‑to‑year. Board members disclosed a conflict of interest as owners of the underlying property. Council members discussed the park’s hours (8 a.m. to 8 p.m., seven days a week) and its long‑term viability (development possible in 5–10 years). Council President Sandoval stated she would vote “no” because of the budget deficit and precedent of lost revenue. Chair Gonzalez Gutierrez expressed concerns about the metro district financing model and whether the park could exist without the exemption. The committee voted to send a recommendation of approval to the full council.
Finance analyst Dennis Wujenick presented three actions bundled together:
Parks and Recreation staff presented plans to purchase a 0.4‑acre parcel with an existing credit union building for $2,999,340 (appraised at ~$2.49 million, $500,000 over appraisal). The acquisition would be funded by the Parks Legacy Fund. The site would fill a 10‑minute walk gap in the downtown Civic Center neighborhood, serving an estimated 10,000 households (more than all previous park acquisitions combined since 2019 provided access to 9,600 households). The existing building could be used temporarily by forestry or operations. Council members questioned the above‑appraisal cost, equity across districts (District 7 has seen no legacy fund park investment), and future development funding. Chair Gonzalez Gutierrez expressed concerns about paying over appraisal and overall city finances but allowed the motion to proceed. The committee voted to forward both the purchase resolution and the companion appropriation ordinance to full council without a roll‑call vote.
Good morning, everyone. Uh welcome to the Finance and Business Committee. There might have been a little quick little switch up there, just so you know that's what if you are tuning in, that's what you're tuning in to right now is uh Finance and Business Committee today on Tuesday, July 14th. And my name is Sedana Gonzalez Gutierrez, I'm one of your council members at large and also chair of the committee. We are going to start off with council member introductions, and then we will get into what's on today's agenda. So with that, I will start over here to my left, and then I know we have virtual participation as well. Um actually let's start with virtual participation. Is Councilwoman Lewis online? Okay, we'll start to my left. Good morning, Diana Romero Campbell, Southeast Denver, District 4. Good morning, Paul Cashman, South Tendry, District 6. Good morning, Garrett Watson, fine district nine. Good morning, Amanda Sanibon, Northwest Denver District 1. All right. Um thank you, everyone. We do have a packed agenda that we are anticipating. We may need to go over to for today's committee, which uh notice was given. Uh the first action item that we have up today is regarding the decision on the North Sorry, Broadway Park North Metro District number one. And I want to just give a disclaimer so that everyone is on the same page here. So today's item differs from most committee action items because there is no resolution attached to this request, right? So we're not getting any recommendations from any city agencies. What we are being provided is simply information. But that is because the decision to grant or deny a property tax exemption, which is what we are here to discuss today, is solely the decision of city council, and no resolution can be drafted until this committee provides initial drafting guidance to the city attorney's office. As such, instead of asking for a motion to approve sending this to the full council, we will be asking that a motion with a recommendation of approval or denial of the property tax exemption be sent to the floor. That is the decision that we is before us today. It's not whether or not the space itself should exist, right? This decision does not bind council members who sit in this committee or council as a whole to this decision, but rather it acts as an initial guidance to the city attorney's office to draft a resolution to be filed. And again, that decision is whether or not to deny uh or to approve or deny. A member that disagrees with this committee's decision is encouraged to reach out to our legislative services and legislative council team to draft an amendment to the resolution that would result in a different recommendation than what this committee approves. If a legal guidance, if legal guidance is required for council members today, the committee will enter into an executive session to receive that privileged advice and then return to committee to continue our policy deliberations in public and vote. So just to be very clear where those lines are drawn. And again, we are not deciding on whether or not the space itself should exist. We are talking about the tax exemption solely. We will have public comment today, 15 minutes, and so that will follow the presentation, and then we will go into questions from council members and continue that business. So with that said, I will turn it over to our folks at the end of the table. You could please introduce yourselves and proceed with your presentation. Council members, I will take a cue from all of you, but then we will get to those after the public comment portion. Thank you. My name is Josh Bushner. I'm the commercial manager in the Denver County Assessors Office. And I'm Jonathan Norloff. I'm the Denver County Assessor. Thank you all for being here today. I'll uh go through my presentation rather quickly. Um we're here today to discuss a property tax exemption resolution request. Uh some quick background. This is based on House Bill 251289, which went into effect last year. Uh deals with metropolitan district leases and property tax exemptions, and uh lease property requested for property tax exemptions. Uh just a reminder the assessor's office locates appraises and records all of Denver's real and personal properties in accordance with the Colorado Constitution, state statutes, and Board of Equalization Procedures. Uh quick overview of House Bill 25 1289.