Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Des Moines City Council held its regular meeting on Thursday, August 27, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers, 21630 11th Avenue S, Suite C. Mayor Yoshiko Grace Matsui presided, and all seven councilmembers were present: Deputy Mayor Gene Achziger and Councilmembers Pierre Blosse, Robyn Desimone, JC Harris, Jeremy Nutting, and Harry Steinmetz. There was no additional correspondence and no regional committee report. The meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m.
Capital Improvements Plan (2027-2032): Finance Director Jeff Friend presented the proposed CIP, which contains 76 projects totaling $220,393,000. Funding consists of $166,222,000 in secured funding, $49,072,000 in unsecured grants, and $5,097,000 in unidentified funding. There are 58 fully funded projects, 14 partially funded projects, and 4 unfunded projects. Planned expenditures are approximately $36.5 million in 2026, $15.5 million in 2027, and $23.4 million in 2028. Staff said future CIPs will be organized by high, medium, or low priority based on need, legal obligation, and consistency with adopted plans. Councilmember Nutting supported the priority approach; Councilmember Desimone asked for a time-frame component; Councilmember Blosse asked for better visibility into grant applications; Councilmember Harris criticized the consolidated priority list, saying stormwater and transportation are funded differently and should remain separate. City Manager Caffrey said the prioritization would not replace approved TIP/plans and is meant as a snapshot. The Council adopted Resolution 26-098 by a 7-0 vote.
Development Agreement Ordinance (Draft Ordinance 26-030): Community Development Director Rebecca Deming presented the first reading of an ordinance establishing development agreements under RCW 36.70B. The ordinance would require development agreements to specify uses, densities, building sizes, design standards, parking, affordable housing provisions, parks/open space, impact fees, phasing, and site/concept plans. Departures from standards would need an offsetting benefit of equal or greater value determined by the city. The maximum term would be 20 years, with no administrative minor modifications allowed for landscaping reductions, setback reductions, height increases, access changes, or increased adverse impacts; building, environmental, and surface water codes could not be modified through a development agreement. Deming said the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7 and reviewed other jurisdictions before recommending the 20-year cap. Councilmember Steinmetz asked for second-reading additions to include explicit city authority to revoke agreements for noncompliance after notice/cure and to require approval before an agreement transfers to another entity. Councilmember Harris moved to remand the ordinance to a study session; the motion received no second. Councilmember Desimone said the item felt premature. The mayor confirmed that at least three councilmembers wanted the two amendments prepared for second reading. The motion to pass Draft Ordinance 26-030 to second reading passed 6-1, with Councilmember Harris opposed.
New Agenda Items: Mayor Matsui requested that a discussion of the 223rd Street Project be placed on the September 24, 2026 agenda. She indicated option B would be considered, while option C would no longer be available in the same way and the associated water quality grant would expire.
At this time I would like to call the August 27th, 2026 Des Moines City Council meeting to order. I'm going to be leading us in the pledge. Please stand if you are able. Thank you. Please let the record show that we have all council members' attendance and are present. Is there any correspondence that has not been previously shared with the council? No, ma'am. All right. Now it is time for public comments. We ask that you keep your comments respectful. When I call your name, you'll come up to the podium. Uh you'll have three minutes to speak. Uh please state your name in your city of residence. Since first I have um Susan Aigner. Okay, thank you. Christy. Hello, thank you for allowing us to do this. Um, my name is Christy, and I'm a long-term um Des Moines resident. I'm here to please urge you to end the contracts and hood all flock cameras in Des Moines. We're seeing reports all over the country of the backlash that flocks is facing flock is facing, and citizens are screaming from the rooftops that they do not want mass surveillance. Not only are people upset about this abuse of power, but we're also scared. We've had a considerable uptick in kidnappings in Des Moines and the surrounding areas lately. School is starting soon, and I am a teacher, 20th year in Highline, and I've already had families come to me because last spring there was someone kidnapped in our parking lot. How how do I help them? How do I make them feel better, right? Um people are scared. And the and the cameras don't help this. Yeah, it took me a while to get to it too. The portal is easy to find under the police department tab on the city website. Go check it out to see what information is available there. There's no question that flock cameras take away each of our Fourth Amendment privacy rights. We don't even have the option to opt out. I don't think there are many criminals being caught when there were 40 searches in the last 30 days. There were also 951 hot list items as compared to 428 hot list items when I checked in July. But there were 233,215 vehicles recorded in those same 30 days. Is this worth giving up our privacy rights for? How would crimes be solved without flock cameras? The UDAB has shown that border patrol has been able to access flock camera data. This info is being used to track and kidnap immigrants right now. I say kidnap because the immigrants are not given due process, which is a right for any person on U.S. soil. You may be not you may not be worried about it now if you're not an immigrant. But the big question is who will be who will the flock data be used to track next? Immigrants today, and who tomorrow? Peter Peter Boss.