Detroit City Council PED Meeting Summary - October 16, 2025
Detroit City Council PED Meeting Summary - October 16, 2025
The Planning and Economic Development Committee convened on October 16, 2025, to address a full agenda featuring multiple public hearings on zoning amendments, development exemptions, and property rehabilitation projects. The session was marked by significant public concern regarding the complexity and timing of proposed zoning text amendments, with many residents expressing distrust in the rushed process and demand for greater community engagement. The committee approved several projects, including a community farm redevelopment and a major office building conversion, while deferring the controversial "Housing and Parking" ordinance to allow for additional consultation and the scheduling of a dedicated public hearing.
Consent Calendar
- No routine consent calendar items were explicitly listed or acted upon distinct from formal hearing recommendations in this session.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Community Concerns on Zoning & Process: Multiple speakers, including Carolyn Hughes (Caller ID: Owner Papa) and William M. Davis, expressed strong opposition to the consolidation of multiple text amendments, calling the process "fraudulent," "rushed," and lacking transparency. They argued that the committee was prioritizing corporate interests over residents by removing public notice requirements and reducing parking standards.
- Opposition to Specific Amendments: Residents from historic districts (e.g., Lynette Roberson of the North End Association) and Indian Village (Ara) expressed fear that allowing "lofts" by-right in R1/R2 zones and expanding "microbreweries" would erode neighborhood character and safety. Caller "Don't Rush Massive Zoning Changes" reiterated the need to separate amendments rather than bundling them.
- Support for Specific Projects: Reverend Cheryl Clark and residents of the Broader Tower supported the proposed renovation and tax abatement for Broderick Tower. Martin White, President of the Indian Village Association, opposed the R1/R2 loft amendments in historic areas but admitted confusion as they may have been conflating items.
- Specific Project Concerns: Michelle Matthews supported the inclusion of miniature golf as a tool for community connection. Conversely, Tyson Gersh and others opposed the amendment granting credit for public parking up to a quarter-mile away in Traditional Main Street Overlay areas, citing concerns about neighborhood parking congestion.
- Calls for Fairness: Speakers demanded that residents be able to meaningfully study the 192-page ordinance texts and requested that the city stop "fast talk" and "fast track" approaches, specifically regarding retiree benefits and the city's financial health.
Discussion Items
-
10:15 AM Public Hearing (Rezoning for Detroit Farm and Cider & Jehovah Shalom Church): Leandra King and Woodrow Hankins presented a request to rezone seven parcels from R2/R5/R6 to SD1 (Special Development Small Scale Mixed Use) to allow for a youth equestrian farm, cider pressing, retail sales, and a church expansion including child care and event hosting. The City Planning Commission recommended approval.
- Public Questions: Concerns were raised regarding water runoff, fertilizer use, smells, and parking. The presenters confirmed the use of no-till methods to reduce runoff, the absence of animal smells due to pasture feeding, and the commitment to ADA-compliant parking and local hiring.
- Outcome: The committee voted to send the item to formal session with a recommendation to approve.
-
10:35 AM Public Hearing (Sixth General Text Amendment): Staff presented 17 substantive and non-substantive changes to the zoning code, including conditional allowances for lofts in R1/R2, by-right lofts in B2/B3/B4 districts, expanded allowances for tattoo parlors and brew pubs, removal of 500-foot spacing for miniature golf, and changes to the definition of "family" (increasing unrelated occupancy from 2 to 4).
- Deliberation: Member Letitia Johnson raised concerns about the complexity of the bill, the removal of public notice for planned developments, and the quarter-mile parking credit provision. She specifically requested the removal of the parking amendment pending further community discussion on walkability and transit. Member Vice Chair Fred Durha supported the changes as a necessary step toward a more walkable city and vibrant commercial corridors, noting the current lack of sufficient parking structures.
- Outcome: The committee voted to remove the quarter-mile parking credit provision as requested by Member Johnson. The amended text was then sent to formal session with a recommendation to approve.
-
10:55 AM Public Hearing (PA 146 Certificate for Wayne Tower LLC): Representatives from Black Acre Management requested an Obsolete Property Rehabilitation (OPR) certificate to redevelop the vacant 1200 Sixth Street office towers into 354 residential units (71 affordable), a 114-room hotel, and commercial space. The project promises a $71.9 million investment and 333 construction jobs.
- Deliberation: Public commenters inquired about environmental remediation (asbestos/lead), traffic congestion near the bus station, and community benefits. Developers confirmed full abatement of hazardous materials and minimal exterior site work due to the nature of the conversion. They clarified that the tax abatement does not replace existing tax revenue but freezes the current tax level during the 12-year term.
- Outcome: The committee voted to send the item to formal session with a recommendation to approve.
-
8.1, 8.4, and 8.7 (Screening and Buffering Amendment Updates): Director Marcel Todd clarified that most changes to the screening ordinance no longer require public hearings, with only one item requiring future review. The items were initially approved but required reconsideration to ensure the correct procedural action (Receive and File vs. Introduction).
- Outcome: The committee voted to reconsider and receive and file line item 8.1, as well as file the responses to 8.4 and 8.7.
-
8.2 (Broderick Tower PA 210 Commercial Rehabilitation District): Councilmember Johnson confirmed she had met with the developer and addressed constituent concerns. The item was moved for approval.
- Outcome: The committee voted to send the item to formal session with a recommendation to approve.
-
8.5 (Housing and Parking Ordinance - COO Proposal): This item, proposed to increase housing capacity by modifying zoning in R2-R6 districts, became the primary discussion point. Director Schneider and COO team acknowledged community confusion, particularly regarding historic districts and the North End. They proposed adding explicit exemptions for historic districts and committing to further engagement in the Lower North End (R3 zones).
- Deliberation: Significant discussion ensued regarding the timeline before the election and the inability to secure a public hearing slot on the current agenda due to scheduling conflicts. Member Johnson requested the item be brought back in one week to allow for more comprehensive community engagement and clarification of the amendments. Member Vice Chair argued that postponing by one week would still allow for a hearing in November, whereas immediate introduction was urgent to meet statutory timelines.
- Outcome: The committee voted to bring back line item 8.5 in one week to facilitate additional engagement and finalization of the text, specifically regarding historic district exemptions and North End concerns.
-
9.16 (Miscellaneous Council President Pro Tem): Request for LPD assignment clarification was brought back in one week pending resolution.
-
Other Dispositions:
- Line items 9.2 through 9.10 (Termination of Brownfield plans): Approved to be sent to formal session with recommendation to approve.
- Line item 9.11 (Payment in Lieu of Taxes): Removed from the agenda and referred to the President's office/BFA.
- Line items 9.12, 9.13, 9.15: Received and Filed or brought back in one week.
Key Outcomes
-
Approved for Formal Session (with amendments):
- Line Item 5 (Rezoning for Detroit Farm & Cider): Recommendation to approve.
- Line Item 6 (Sixth General Text Amendment): Recommendation to approve with the specific removal of the quarter-mile public parking credit provision.
- Line Item 7 (PA 146 Certificate for 1200 Sixth Street): Recommendation to approve.
- Line Item 8.2 (Broderick Tower PA 210): Recommendation to approve.
- Line Items 8.4 & 8.7 (Screening amendments responses): Received and Filed.
- Line Items 9.2–9.10 (Brownfield terminations): Recommendation to approve.
-
Deferral/Postponement:
- Line Item 8.5 (Housing and Parking Ordinance): The item was not moved to formal session. The committee voted to bring back the item in one week to allow for further community engagement, finalization of historic district exemptions, and negotiation of a dedicated public hearing slot.
- Line Items 8.8, 8.11, 8.12: Brought back in two weeks/one week respectively pending responses from law departments and auditors.
- Line Item 8.1: Reconsidered and received and filed after clarification.
-
Removal/Referral:
- Line Item 9.11 was removed from the agenda and referred to the Budget and Finance Committee (BFA).
-
Procedural Clarifications:
- Director Marcel Todd and Attorney Anderson clarified that items not acted upon before the end of the legislative term (2025) will fall to the floor. However, if the 120-day viability period remains active, items can be resubmitted to the next council without restarting the planning commission public hearing process, provided they were not voted down.
-
Public Engagement Commitment:
- The Housing and Revitalization Department and COO office committed to holding additional meetings (16 already held, 8+ scheduled) and specifically targeting the Lower North End and historic districts to clarify the impacts of the proposed housing and parking ordinances before the next hearing.
Meeting Transcript
On any general item, please raise your hand now. Uh if you are uh calling in or here for a particular um public hearing, you will have an opportunity during that portion of the meeting to give your comments, but so I'm just asking you to please reserve your your time for that moment. But if you're calling about anything in general uh that's on the agenda or just in general, period, please raise your hand now. I think I saw two hands in the committee of the whole. All right. Uh going once, going twice, going three times. Collection of public comments have now concluded. Uh Ms. Caprice, good morning to you. Good morning, sir. We have 14 callers online, two in person. Okay. So it takes us to uh 16 callers. As I mentioned, we have uh quite a number of public hearings today. So we want to move briskly. I'm gonna give everyone uh a minute for general public comment. And we're gonna allow our two individuals to come to the microphones who are in the committee of the whole currently. And just as a word of advice, if uh when you get to the microphone, you want to push that button at the bottom and let the all let the red turn uh green. Oh, we have one. Okay, sorry about that. We have one person who wants to speak. And we're gonna have to give everyone the same amount of time, so please be mindful of the clock. And your time begins now. Good morning. Good morning. How is everybody doing? Doing blessed. I'm Reverend Cheryl Clark, and yes, we all are blessed because we woke up this morning. Um, my property is 13845 guided. Um, which is sits in R2 area, and so I'm here to get recognition for that community to be a part of this uh advancement in development with the condos. Right now they are two sitting on Lumpkin, and I don't know if they I don't know what, but anywhere it's two sitting, two condos sitting on Lumpkin. So that's how I became aware of the fact of what's happening over there. So that's all I have to say. The citizens that well, that's not all I have to say. The citizens that live in that area have been there for 50 and 60 years, and they should not be left out of this development. Again, I'm Reverend Cheryl Clark. My address is 13845 guided 48212. Thank you. Thank you so much. All right, we shall now go to our folks who are calling online. Who's our first caller? Our first caller is Owner Papa. All right, caller, the floor is yours. You have a minute, general public comment. Good morning, and through the chair, may I be heard? Yes, ma'am. Yes, one minute is really not enough to give the public for general comments. Um this this whole this whole committee has been a fraud. What you have planned is to take the money from citizens, property taxes, and fill holes for the things that you have been planning and doing. I think it's a moral you must be morally bankrupt to come to the people in the city after you've bankrupt their city and then turn around and take their surplus property tax dollars and use them to feel the shortfall for corporate America.
openpublica.com