Detroit City Council Meeting Summary: November 19, 2025
Detroit City Council Meeting Summary: November 19, 2025
This virtual public comment session, held due to a lack of quorum preventing the approval of minutes or the start of formal agenda items, featured testimony from eight residents regarding financial transparency, retirement grievances, election integrity, and zoning issues. Council members and staff were notified that Chairman Young was en route, but the meeting was ultimately recessed at the call of the Chair pending a future quorum.
Consent Calendar
- No items were processed due to the absence of a quorum, preventing any motions to approve minutes or consent calendar items.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Carolyn Hughes: Expressed confusion and concern regarding agenda item 7.3, stating that a $0.50 fee to the city seems unprofitable for a transaction threshold over $4,000, and questioned the financial logic of the city entering the agreement. She questioned the $135 million contract on item 7.4, noting it is a purchase lease agreement for an amendment. She also raised concerns about discrepancies in large event expenditures, specifically a $12,000 charge for the Detroit Fire Department with no charge for the Police Department, and questioned where half a million dollars in related funds is going.
- Unnamed Caller (Detroit Retiree): Expressed that residents are "grossly overtaxed" and confirmed that moving out of the city reduced insurance rates by half. The speaker stated a clear preference for having their own money back rather than relying on a "fast track" for general Detroit retirees. They warned that current council members face a future risk of having 20% of their pensions and annuities taken and described their strategy of self-reliance.
- Betty A. Verner (President, South Elsie Black Association): Expressed support for seniors who persist in contacting services, specifically advising them to document call attempts. She stated she has been successful in receiving services from the DDEAA program and described the program choice waiver as a "wonderful program" that allows higher income individuals to qualify for Medicaid ($2,900/month) and receive home assessments.
- Mr. Cunningham: Shout-ed out Councilmember Gabriella Sanjay Gromero for celebrating the life of Marguerite Maddox. He announced the existence of a DDO meeting offering two $70 31-day bus passes via raffle. He emphatically reiterated his need for bus tickets, listing them repeatedly.
- William M. Davis: Questioned agenda item 7.3, asking why the city appears to be short-changed and inquiring about the necessity of a five-year lease. He asked if detainees at the detention center are provided with phones for contacting loved ones and expressed concern about high rates. He stated a need for a greater effort to track retirees and questioned the recent raises for the Mayor, Clerk, and Council, asserting the Clerk provides "horrible service."
- Jadante Smith: Expressed agreement with retirees regarding the need to help the city track them and stated that "nobody deserves a raise." He praised "Mothers Keeping Boots on the Ground" and praised Mr. Cunningham. He argued that providing bus tickets is insufficient without adequate housing, stating that people will "ride the bus all day and all night" if they have no homes. He requested that members submit documents regarding a "Chrono's country facility" located at 3405 Gay War, which he alleges is spewing toxic dust over 800 sidelots and 1 million square feet of property. He expressed strong opposition to solar farms taking generational wealth and urged City Council to show loyalty to long-term residents.
- Caller ending in 039: Made accusations against public officials, stating that "Dennis Worthy cheated all y'all in" and that the Mayor is a "cheating in public official" worth five million dollars who settled for 2.5 million in divorce proceedings. The speaker alleged that the school board, police commissioners, and board of police commissioners were all involved in cheating and made threats regarding the "first lady of the city" and turning the city upside down.
- Cindy Dara: Expressed frustration regarding the Department of Elections, stating that the provision of write-in lists for a community advisory commission was done incompetently, as the law requires distribution at the department rather than polling places. She stated that the department did not include her name on initial lists and claimed that despite campaigning, no names were recorded in the poll book as required by law according to a retired clerk source. She requested a meeting with the election commission.
- Caller ending in 482: Identifying as a "stop violating charter section six-205" caller, she stated in no uncertain terms that Councilmember Young, as an at-large member, must follow the Detroit City Charter Section 6-205 which mandates due process. She argued that the planning department and council are shorting residents by allowing developers to speak while preventing impacted residents from sharing their stories. She stated that democracy takes time and urged the Council to stop limiting opportunities for residents to speak about changes affecting their quality of life.
- Unnamed Caller (Virtual, ending in 482 mentioned in transcript body but logic suggests a separate entry or repeat): Reiterated that they meant every word they said.
Discussion Items
- No formal discussion or deliberation by the Board/Council occurred as a quorum was not present. The Chair noted that a motion to approve minutes could not be made and that the meeting could not proceed to the substantive agenda without a quorum.
Key Outcomes
- Meeting Recessed: The meeting was recessed at the call of the Chair because a quorum was not present, preventing the processing of the consent calendar, public hearing, or any official votes. The Chairman was noted as being en route.
- Agenda Items Noted: Items 7.3 (transaction fee questions), 7.4 ($135M purchase lease agreement), and large event expenditures ($12,000 fire department charge) were cited by a public caller as requiring explanation but were not voted on or discussed formally.,
Meeting Transcript
Mr. Chair, you do not have a quorum president. Okay, excellent. Thank you, madam clerk. Uh both uh chairman, I believe the chairman is on his way. Um and um Santiago uh member Santiago Romero has been excused. Well, the clerk will note that. Excellent. Um we don't can't make a motion to approve the minutes and negative chairmarks. We will now go into public comments. Uh Mr. Payne, how many people? There's no one here uh physically. So how many people do we have virtually that are here for public comment? Good afternoon, Mr. Chair. We have eight raised hands. Eight raised hands. Okay. Public comment is now closed. Public comment is now closed. Public comment. Is now closed. All right. Who do we have first in the queue? Mr. Payne. Mr. Chair, our first online caller's owner Papa. All right, you have two minutes. Floor is yours. Two minutes. Are you there? Good afternoon, Carolyn Hughes. May I be heard? Yes, ma'am. Thank you. On your agenda today. It's a little strange that um 7.3 seems a little strange. It's like uh 50 cents for the city of Detroit, who are the least sores in this relationship, but you have to have an excess of $4,000 or $4,000. The the transaction has to be greater than 4,000. I'm not sure how that's working, but 50 cents to the people who are in the precincts that you the who I'm I'm assuming Detroit still owns the precincts. Never can't tell though. But um how is that even profitable for us to to enter into this? Uh 7.4 is um a very large contract of it appears 135 million dollars for some type of amendment. I'm not sure what's an amending, and then it's a purchase lease agreement. Um also on the large events um schedule. There's a huge 12,000 dollar charge for Detroit fire department and no charge for the um police department. I'm not sure how this events and they and it says to little location little Caesars Arena. Uh please explain the um it appears to be discrepancies on the on the large events um expenditures or I guess what they're saying we're making.
openpublica.com