OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Dormont, Pennsylvania/Borough Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Dormont Borough Zoning Hearing Board Meeting - April 29, 2026

Borough Council & Boards — Wednesday, April 29, 2026
BodyDormont, Pennsylvania
SessionBorough Council & Boards
DateWednesday, April 29, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 39:21

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

This evening, April April 28th.

0:05

My name is Liz Baldoni.

0:06

I'm the chair of the board, and I will have my fellow board members introduce themselves.

0:11

You can start.

Speaker 2

0:12

Alison Harmon.

0:14

Jeff Dobson.

0:16

Adrian Walker.

Speaker 1

0:17

Stephanie Wallace.

0:20

Thanks, everyone.

0:22

We have one application for this evening.

0:25

It is for the property including 3141 Raleigh.

0:31

There are several parcels at play, but we are just going to call that this evening, the Dormont Junction Light Rail Station.

0:40

They are seeking PRT is seeking a variance for Section 210406E regarding light fixtures and the maximum light level.

0:54

We are going to hear from the borough first and then the applicant and then any neighbors can ask questions.

1:00

Okay.

Speaker 3

1:03

Good evening.

1:04

We have received an application for a request for a variance for the maximum.

1:10

It's not the light fixtures per se, it's the maximum light transmission of those fixtures, which are proposed to exceed the 2.5 candle foot measurement that the current zoning code allows, as you stated under code 210 E1.

1:30

210406 E1.

1:33

There's two areas of concern that initially were brought up, but in looking further, and I wanted to clarify that while we're getting started,

Unassigned speaker

1:44

their

Speaker 3

1:44

measurements, I that's why I passed this piece of paper out.

1:46

You all have it.

1:47

Their measurements on the park boulevard side, which is the same thing that you got in your emails.

1:54

That measurement does not go all the way to their property line.

1:59

That measurement stops just off of the sidewalk, which is on the bus ramp.

2:04

There's still parcels of theirs that go further up towards Park Boulevard.

2:08

And their maximum measurement for light candle width is 3.0.

2:15

I would suspect that that would drain out to either 2.5 or less.

2:21

I can't confirm that because it's not on the measurement.

2:25

So

Unassigned speaker

2:27

I

Speaker 3

2:27

don't want to go based on assumptions either.

2:29

So I'll leave that to you guys.

2:30

But just wanted to click or clarify that.

2:32

And Rachel, if you could put the um

Unassigned speaker

2:35

we're

Speaker 3

2:36

gonna put it on the screen here so you can see what it looks like from

Unassigned speaker

2:40

the

Speaker 3

2:40

top view.

Speaker 1

2:41

While we're getting that picture up, I forgot to swear people

Unassigned speaker

2:43

in.

Speaker 1

2:44

Can you can we do that for us?

Unassigned speaker

2:50

And

Speaker 4

2:50

that would be right now.

Unassigned speaker

2:55

Yeah,

Speaker 4

2:55

if you did it, you might yeah, these are from Desago.

Speaker 3

3:06

Thank you.

3:07

Okay, so if you look can I see one?

3:09

If everyone could remember to use the microphone, that's the only way folks online can hear.

3:15

Okay.

3:15

Thanks so much.

3:17

So if you look on the computer screen, you can see the LRT station and going towards the top of the screen, you can see where the bus ramp loops around.

3:28

And I believe that says Raleigh Avenue.

3:32

So that is where this measurement is.

3:34

If you look on the piece of paper that I gave you that has Park Boulevard on the top, their parcels go that that group of parcels that's on the top that were Raleigh Avenue kind of splits them.

3:45

Their parcels go all the way up to the top to Raleigh Avenue.

3:49

So you can see that this measurement is down in the middle of say that that third parcel or second parcel from the top.

3:57

So I can't, I I don't know, and I can't tell what that light measurement is going to be when it actually hits their their property line.

4:04

And that's the that's the distance that's in question is where is what is the measurement at their property line.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure███████████████████████████████████35%
Zoning Regulations████████████████████████████28%
Transportation Safety████████████████████████24%
Public Safety████████8%
Procedural█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Dormont Borough Zoning Hearing Board Meeting - April 29, 2026

The Dormont Borough Zoning Hearing Board convened on April 29, 2026, with Chair Liz Baldoni presiding. Board members Alison Harmon, Jeff Dobson, Adrian Walker, and Stephanie Wallace were present. The sole agenda item was a variance application from the Port Authority of Allegheny County (PRT) for lighting at the Dormont Junction Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station. PRT sought relief from Section 210406 E1 of the zoning code, which limits light levels to 2.5 foot candles at the property line, as the proposed lighting would produce up to 5.1 foot candles at the property line in one area. The board heard testimony from the applicant, borough staff, and neighbors, and ultimately approved the variance with a condition.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Jim Barman (1400 Grandon Avenue, intersection of Grandon and Raleigh Avenue): Expressed concern about glare from the new light fixtures for drivers on Raleigh, Talma, Grandon, and Mervyn streets, particularly during rain. He asked whether drivers would be able to look directly at the light source.
  • Michael Drapick (2961 Madron Avenue): Inquired about the possibility of adding blocking mechanisms, such as canopies, to address any glare issues that might arise after installation.

Discussion Items

  • Applicant Presentation: Steve Ackerman (architect and project manager, Michael Baker International) presented on behalf of PRT. He explained that the lighting is needed for safety (riders boarding/alighting, ADA access, tripping hazards) and security (camera surveillance). The lighting follows PRT’s design guidelines, which require a minimum of 15 foot candles on boarding platforms. The variance is needed because the outbound platform is located close to the property line along Raleigh Avenue, resulting in a predicted maximum of 5.1 foot candles at that property line (2.6 foot candles over the code limit). He noted that the lighting fixtures are energy-efficient LED with cutoff lenses to reduce glare, and the canopy-mounted lights are angled away from residential properties. He also stated that the existing station lighting currently does not meet the zoning code either.
  • Borough Representative Jeff (Zoning Officer): Clarified that the variance request is strictly for lighting; no full project application has been submitted yet. He noted that on the Park Boulevard side, the measurement provided ends before the property line, so the actual level there might be closer to 2.5 foot candles. He emphasized that a comprehensive zoning review will occur once the complete application is filed.
  • Board Questions: Board members asked about the difference between 2.5 and 5.1 foot candles in practical terms, the 24/7 operation of the lights, the canopy material (steel frame with glass), and the direction of illumination (pointed towards tracks to minimize light spill). They also asked whether similar lighting at other renovated PRT stations also required variances; the applicant confirmed that other stations typically had more space from property lines.
  • Solicitor Pete Halsey: Questioned the hardship for the variance. Ackerman responded that reducing lighting below PRT’s standards would compromise safety and security for patrons, particularly those with disabilities, and that even the current lower-quality lighting on site does not meet the code.
  • Consultant Testimony: Sadine Saakyan (Evolve Environment Architecture, consultant team for PRT) added that platform furnishings such as seating, windscreens, and columns will further block light from the platforms, reducing potential glare.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion and Vote: A motion was made to approve the variance for Section 210406 E1 with the condition that the light level must not exceed 5.1 foot candles at the property line (the solicitor advised "must" rather than "should"). The motion was seconded and unanimously approved by the board.
  • Next Steps: PRT will proceed with bid packages and construction for the platform renovation, which includes boarding platforms, stairs, ramps, minimal sidewalk work, and several new ADA-accessible parking spaces. This project is separate from any future transit-oriented development. The borough will conduct a full zoning review once the formal application is submitted.

Note: The transcript of the meeting begins with the date "April 28th," but the meeting date was provided as April 29, 2026, which is used here as instructed.

Meeting Transcript

This evening, April April 28th. My name is Liz Baldoni. I'm the chair of the board, and I will have my fellow board members introduce themselves. You can start. Alison Harmon. Jeff Dobson. Adrian Walker. Stephanie Wallace. Thanks, everyone. We have one application for this evening. It is for the property including 3141 Raleigh. There are several parcels at play, but we are just going to call that this evening, the Dormont Junction Light Rail Station. They are seeking PRT is seeking a variance for Section 210406E regarding light fixtures and the maximum light level. We are going to hear from the borough first and then the applicant and then any neighbors can ask questions. Okay. Good evening. We have received an application for a request for a variance for the maximum. It's not the light fixtures per se, it's the maximum light transmission of those fixtures, which are proposed to exceed the 2.5 candle foot measurement that the current zoning code allows, as you stated under code 210 E1. 210406 E1. There's two areas of concern that initially were brought up, but in looking further, and I wanted to clarify that while we're getting started, their measurements, I that's why I passed this piece of paper out. You all have it. Their measurements on the park boulevard side, which is the same thing that you got in your emails. That measurement does not go all the way to their property line. That measurement stops just off of the sidewalk, which is on the bus ramp. There's still parcels of theirs that go further up towards Park Boulevard. And their maximum measurement for light candle width is 3.0. I would suspect that that would drain out to either 2.5 or less. I can't confirm that because it's not on the measurement. So I don't want to go based on assumptions either. So I'll leave that to you guys. But just wanted to click or clarify that. And Rachel, if you could put the um we're gonna put it on the screen here so you can see what it looks like from the top view. While we're getting that picture up, I forgot to swear people in. Can you can we do that for us? And that would be right now. Yeah, if you did it, you might yeah, these are from Desago. Thank you. Okay, so if you look can I see one? If everyone could remember to use the microphone, that's the only way folks online can hear.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com