OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Dormont, Pennsylvania/Borough Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Zoning Hearing Board Meeting Summary - June 25, 2026

Borough Council & Boards — Thursday, June 25, 2026
BodyDormont, Pennsylvania
SessionBorough Council & Boards
DateThursday, June 25, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 6:28

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Thank you, everyone.

0:02

I'm going to call to order the zoning hearing board meeting for tonight, June 24th, 2026.

0:09

Our applicant is no net NGO NHAT.

0:17

They own the property at 1666 McFarland Road, parcel ID 63-N-001 in the residential street loaded zoning district.

0:29

They are seeking a variance for the code section 210-210C regarding surface parking.

0:36

They want to install a parking pad in the front yard.

0:40

The applicant has not arrived yet.

0:42

So I will say again if that my name is Liz Baldoni.

0:48

I don't think that I said that.

0:49

The chair of the board.

0:50

And I will ask my other board members to introduce themselves.

Speaker 2

0:55

Adrian Walker, board member.

Speaker 1

1:03

Okay.

1:05

And I guess Jeff, can you help us out?

Speaker 3

1:12

Uh sure.

1:12

Uh this is uh an application that as you stated, the homeowner, property owner would like to install a parking pad in their front yard.

1:22

Um, as far as hardships or anything else, that would be for them to um tell you.

1:28

And I can tell you that they're aware of the hearing because they dropped off the zoning or the survey that you guys should all have a copy of late last week.

1:38

So um where they are, I don't know, but I am not um

Unassigned speaker

1:44

the

Speaker 3

1:44

borough is not here to speak on behalf of their hardship, just to represent the borough.

Speaker 1

1:52

Okay.

1:53

Well, um, but I guess I will read for the purpose of the record that well, I guess I will state for the purpose of the record that we have received um their application, along with as Jeff mentioned, a copy of the survey indicating red ink that they would like to install a 10 foot by 14 foot um parking pad in the front of their property facing Farland Road.

2:23

And since they're not here, um

Unassigned speaker

2:31

I

Speaker 1

2:32

don't think that we can make a decision in their absence.

2:36

Is our solicitor in agreement?

Unassigned speaker

2:38

Yep.

Speaker 4

2:39

Without the ability to develop a record uh with respect to the five factors, particularly the hardship um that the applicant is experiencing, the board isn't capable or in the position of rendering a decision relative to their application at this

Unassigned speaker

2:51

time.

Unassigned speaker

2:54

So

Speaker 1

2:54

does that mean then that the decision stands that the borough's decision stands?

Speaker 4

3:00

Absolutely the ability for them to contest it.

3:03

Yes, the borough's decision would relatively

Unassigned speaker

3:05

stand.

Unassigned speaker

3:07

All

Speaker 1

3:07

right, board, is everybody okay with

Unassigned speaker

3:09

that?

Speaker 5

3:12

Yeah.

3:14

Doesn't seem like there's an alternative option.

3:18

So I guess.

Unassigned speaker

3:20

I

Speaker 3

3:20

just would also, if I could just state for the record that uh everything was mailed according to the zoning code and the property was uh posted um physically on their property, the legal notice.

3:34

So um I can't imagine what the circumstances would be for not showing up, but uh they were full, they they were fully ordered.

Speaker 1

3:45

Jeff, in the interest of kindness to our neighbor, I will ask if it's the new who's been in touch with them most.

3:52

Would you just pop into your quick and do a little refresh and see if they got in touch?

Unassigned speaker

4:01

I'm

Speaker 3

4:01

sorry, could you repeat that?

4:02

I'm I'm in a park.

Speaker 1

4:05

Um can we check attempted to get in touch in the last few minutes about if there was some sort of emergency?

Speaker 3

4:14

Uh I've I've received no correspondence from them.

4:16

I did reach out to them and let them know that um it would be helpful that we had the survey with the property marked and and where they would like to place the parking pad.

4:29

More so that that's really needed specifically for the building permit, but it I thought it would be helpful more so just as a reference so that you all could see where they were proposing to place the parking pad.

4:41

Um, and like I said, I left I I spoke to him about that, and then he dropped that off late last week.

4:48

So he dropped it off after I posted the property with the legal notice.

Speaker 1

4:54

Okay.

Speaker 3

4:55

That's what that's what that's what leads me to believe.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

I don't want to make assumptions, but that's what leads me to believe that he should fully be aware that this was happening today at six o'clock.

Speaker 2

5:04

Understood.

5:08

Just uh again, out of kindness for uh neighbor, do we want to give them until like six fifteen before

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Regulations███████████████████████████████████████39%
Procedural████████████████████████████████████36%
Parking Management█████████████████████████25%
Summary of Proceedings

Zoning Hearing Board Meeting Summary - June 25, 2026

The Dormont Zoning Hearing Board convened on June 25, 2026, at 6:00 PM to consider a variance application for a surface parking pad at 1666 McFarland Road. The applicant, No Net NGO NHAT, did not appear, and after a brief recess, the board adjourned without rendering a decision. The board noted that the applicant may reapply.

Discussion Items

  • Board Chair Liz Baldoni opened the meeting and introduced the application for a variance under Section 210-210C of the zoning code to install a 10-foot by 14-foot parking pad in the front yard of a property in the Residential Street Loaded zoning district.
  • Borough representative Jeff stated that the applicant had been notified and had dropped off a survey indicating the proposed location, but no further communication was received.
  • The board and solicitor agreed that without the applicant present to establish a record regarding the required hardship factors, they could not make a decision.
  • The board waited until 6:15 PM but the applicant did not arrive.

Key Outcomes

  • The board did not approve or deny the variance application due to the applicant's absence.
  • The board determined that the applicant retains the right to reapply for the necessary permits and variances.
  • The borough's prior decision (presumably a denial or condition) remains in effect as the board did not overturn it.
  • The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:15 PM.

Note: The transcript indicates the meeting occurred on June 24, 2026, but the summary uses the date provided in the instructions.

Meeting Transcript

Thank you, everyone. I'm going to call to order the zoning hearing board meeting for tonight, June 24th, 2026. Our applicant is no net NGO NHAT. They own the property at 1666 McFarland Road, parcel ID 63-N-001 in the residential street loaded zoning district. They are seeking a variance for the code section 210-210C regarding surface parking. They want to install a parking pad in the front yard. The applicant has not arrived yet. So I will say again if that my name is Liz Baldoni. I don't think that I said that. The chair of the board. And I will ask my other board members to introduce themselves. Adrian Walker, board member. Okay. And I guess Jeff, can you help us out? Uh sure. Uh this is uh an application that as you stated, the homeowner, property owner would like to install a parking pad in their front yard. Um, as far as hardships or anything else, that would be for them to um tell you. And I can tell you that they're aware of the hearing because they dropped off the zoning or the survey that you guys should all have a copy of late last week. So um where they are, I don't know, but I am not um the borough is not here to speak on behalf of their hardship, just to represent the borough. Okay. Well, um, but I guess I will read for the purpose of the record that well, I guess I will state for the purpose of the record that we have received um their application, along with as Jeff mentioned, a copy of the survey indicating red ink that they would like to install a 10 foot by 14 foot um parking pad in the front of their property facing Farland Road. And since they're not here, um I don't think that we can make a decision in their absence. Is our solicitor in agreement? Yep. Without the ability to develop a record uh with respect to the five factors, particularly the hardship um that the applicant is experiencing, the board isn't capable or in the position of rendering a decision relative to their application at this time. So does that mean then that the decision stands that the borough's decision stands? Absolutely the ability for them to contest it. Yes, the borough's decision would relatively stand. All right, board, is everybody okay with that? Yeah. Doesn't seem like there's an alternative option. So I guess. I just would also, if I could just state for the record that uh everything was mailed according to the zoning code and the property was uh posted um physically on their property, the legal notice. So um I can't imagine what the circumstances would be for not showing up, but uh they were full, they they were fully ordered. Jeff, in the interest of kindness to our neighbor, I will ask if it's the new who's been in touch with them most. Would you just pop into your quick and do a little refresh and see if they got in touch? I'm sorry, could you repeat that? I'm I'm in a park. Um can we check attempted to get in touch in the last few minutes about if there was some sort of emergency?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com