No, if we want to get started there, Andrew, you got a need to vote for chair and vice chair to start the meeting.

I'll make some announcements here.

So all right.

Well, good evening.

Welcome to our uh planning commission meeting.

Today's date is Thursday, January 8th, 2026.

Happy New Year, everyone.

Welcome to the new year, and let's uh see what this uh one holds for us.

So we do have the agenda as posted with one uh correction.

We just want to add in we need to vote a new chair and vice chair in for the coming year for or the for this current year 2026.

So what which one do we do first?

Chair.

Let's do they do have to be separate.

They have to be separate according to the bylaws.

Yeah, correct, because there's no uh campaign signs that were uh joint.

There were no joint up.

That's right.

In in the in the on the refrigerator back there.

So got it.

Okay, well, all right.

Well, let's go ahead and take care of first.

Let's do chair.

This position right here.

Is there anyone that would like to make a motion for chairperson for 2026?

I'd like to make a motion.

I know I nominate Andrew Adams to be our chair for 2026.

Wow, thanks, Gary.

That's uh that's an honor.

Thank you.

Is there anyone that would second that?

I'll second.

Oh, thank you.

All right, so let's go ahead and put that to a vote.

Um, Andrew Adams for chair for 2026.

Let's start with you, Gary.

Yes, Lisa, yes, Susan, yes, and Kendra.

Yes.

And Christine.

Yes.

You get a vote as well.

No, it's okay.

It's uh there's no retribution if there's a no one.

All right, well, thank you for that.

Uh uh motion carries, and I gladly accept.

Thank you.

Appreciate the vote of confidence.

Now let's move on to vice chair for the year of 2026.

Does anyone have a motion there?

I would move the we up.

Move that.

Lisa, be vice.

Lisa Fowler.

Yes, vice chair.

Vice chair, suffer.

Okay, great.

That's a motion from Susan.

All right, and then let's put that uh to a second.

Who will second it?

Gary will second that.

All right.

So all right, let's vote on this one, guys.

Let's start with you, Susan.

Yes.

Gary.

Yes.

Christine?

Yes.

Lisa.

Do I vote for myself?

I mean, do I vote too?

Yeah, yeah, you get a vote.

Yeah.

So uh, and then Kendra.

Yes.

Perfect.

All right, unanimous.

Yeah, you have you get to vote for yourself.

That's awesome.

I don't because I don't get vote on anything.

All right.

Well, thank you for the votes of confidence.

And it really is a pleasure uh serving with you guys, and I appreciate your trust in this roll-up here.

And thank you especially to Lisa because how many times have you filled in for me?

So thank you so much, and I appreciate all the all the support.

All right, well, let's tackle it, guys.

Let's go ahead now here with our first agenda item tonight.

Again, the agenda will stand as posted, no changes.

Uh the first one we have tonight is a public hearing.

It's the England Salon Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit.

And this is on the request of Kayleen England, property owner and conditional use permit for a home occupation that provides personal care services on approximately 1.34 acres.

It's all located at 13058 South, 1300 East, and it's known as application 2025-0418.

Mary Ann Pickering's the staff contact, but I don't see Mary Ann.

Yes, she is unfortunately out sick today.

So we'll be covering for her.

Okay, great.

All right, so we'll turn it over to Todd Draper.

Go ahead, Todd.

So this is uh as you mentioned, the England Salon Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit.

Uh vicinity map there, located there approximately uh 130 58 south, uh 13th east.

It is down uh this private uh road this way.

Um there is aerial map of the home.

The salon is in the uh ADU will be in the back.

So I'm not sure that this really shows that.

Um probably an all aerial.

The land use map.

Uh this is low medium density.

And the zoning will hold there.

Uh RA2, uh resident residential agricultural.

And we'll go to I spun this around so it's at least uh north pointing up, so everything's upside down as far as the um the print is going, but uh this is that existing home.

This will be the ADU, and then the salon will be in the ADU.

This is the floor plan basically for that ADU.

We'll have uh what essential we will fit four cars in the garage.

There will be uh entrance back in here, uh, and then uh also additional uh entrance back through here.

So then that will be kind of up to the ADU, and then the salon has its own entrance.

And if it will hold there, uh just a couple of elevation uh renderings uh that they had produced as part of that uh eventual ADU that uh kind of show where that will be.

And then uh just some of the impacts mitigations uh with this kind of uh home-based business.

Obviously, impacts would be customers and the potential for vehicular parking and traffic, and then the mitigations here's appointments will be scheduled one at a time.

Uh business hours from nine to five, Monday through Friday, and they do have one off-street parking stall that's located on the driveway leading up to the ADU.

Now you can see uh some pictures that they uh provided that help uh show as well that there would be some parking on the driveway that would not impede the actual uh use of the garage and then the path here that leads back to where the salon is, and then they have one more picture of inside.

There we go.

Um other than that, uh the the applicant is here, I believe, and can tell you a little bit more about uh what uh the business uh entails.

Uh but yeah, that's the presentation I have.

Any questions I can help answer there?

No, that's it.

Maybe while we're just paused here, if you'll just go back, Todd, and just put it back on the uh floor plan of the yeah, so we can see the salon floor plan right there, right?

Right behind the cars.

Yep.

Thank you.

All right, is the applicant here?

If you want to come on down, it's not scary at all.

You just state your name and then you can add anything else you'd like to that presentation, and we'll see if we have any questions for you.

I don't think that's on.

Hold on one second.

That's not your your responsibility.

Hold on, one second.

See, we record these things, so we want to make sure we hear what you said.

There we go.

Okay.

Hello, I'm Kayleen England.

Perfect.

Is that on the other hand?

Anything else it's working.

Yeah.

Anything else you want to add to that?

So it looks like I had a uh I was just curious.

What's the approximate square footage of that salon?

Is it and is it just one room or were there two?

There are two rooms.

So when you enter off that sidewalk that it showed you, you go directly into the first room, which is the hair salon, and then you walk through there, and then that's the aesthetics.

Got it.

Yeah.

So that's the same thing.

And that so that door would be on that exterior side there, kind of under the stairwell of going upstairs.

They're both in that okay.

Same entrance, and they're both in there.

Cool.

That's a cool design, right?

You get the dual functionality, get a big garage and ADU, and then a little bit of a channel.

Yeah, it's awesome.

And the kids' apartments up there, so perfect.

Yeah.

Oh, sorry, I didn't turn this on.

The parking is not in front of those cars.

No, no, it's off to the side.

The parking's like right in front of that walkway.

It's where that little red block is.

Right there.

It's right there.

Oh, see where the tennis court is.

The ADU is right next to that, where it's just looks like uh it's it's just between the the main structure and the tennis course.

And the tennis court, and then the parking.

I don't know if you go back to that.

We have troubles with this sort of thing.

We're so sorry, we have a trick mouse here that's I know.

I no worries.

I think Riverton City brought it in as a joke.

And they just plugged it in.

They're punking us.

There's a messing with you.

It's hard to tell, but there's a little jeto in the driveway that it kind of jets out where it's just the parkings right there for that.

So it doesn't impede the driveway or anybody's garage or anything.

Thank you.

Yeah, yeah.

Is there a car there right now?

A pretty good layout.

Any other questions?

Okay.

Well, perfect.

It's a public hearing, so we'll open it up to public comment.

And if we need to invite you back up, we will give you your time to shine.

So that's it.

Easy enough.

Great.

Thank you.

Thanks.

All right.

So this is a public hearing.

We're gonna have a couple of these tonight.

Uh when we open it up for public comment, uh, we have a red uh three-minute timer started over there, and anyone that wants to address these agenda items gets up to three minutes.

You don't have to take the whole time.

We just ask that you don't go over.

So, with that being said, is there anyone that would like to address this agenda item tonight?

All right, look at that.

We don't have any pitchforks, no no neighbors.

Everything's good.

So we'll go ahead and close the public hearing portion of that agenda item.

All right, commissioners, what are your thoughts?

It's pretty straightforward.

Yeah, I'm I'm comfortable with this.

I think it makes sense, and it's nice that they have an extra um building on their property to do it in.

Does anybody on the commission want to make any other comments?

No?

Okay, then I'll make a motion.

I move that we approve the home occupation conditional use permit as requested by Kayleen England, property owner application 2025-0418-USE based on the following findings for approval and subject to the conditions listed in the staff report dated December 30, 2025.

I I believe the pro proposal complies with the standards for approval found in the Draper code, and the negative impacts are mitigated through the um impositions listed in the staff report.

Thank you, Lisa.

All right, who will second that motion?

I'll second that.

All right, thanks, Kendra.

So let's put it to the vote starting with Lisa.

Yes.

Kendra?

Yes.

Christine?

Yes.

Gary?

Yes.

And Susan.

Yes.

All right.

Congrats on that.

So good luck with your business that passes and uh well done.

That's it.

We'll use that as a as a uh template, right?

On how it can be done when you've got some extra land there.

So thank you.

All right.

So let's go ahead and move on to our next public hearing.

It's the Western State's flooring conditional use permit request.

And this one's on the behalf of Marshall Peterson representing Western State's flooring a conditional use permit request to operate a limited wholesale and warehousing business on approximately 6.8 acres.

It's located at 12453 South 265 West Suite A.

It's known as application 2025-0184-USE, and the uh contact on this one is Nick Whitaker.

So go ahead, Nick.

Thank you.

So yes, this is the Western State's flooring conditional use permit.

Seems like both of them ICE are kind of difficult tonight.

Okay.

Here's a vicinity.

Wow, I didn't even touch it.

Um here's a vicinity map of the uh property.

Um it's located at uh 12453 south, 265 west.

In fact, this is the third um uh conditional use permit for this facility that we've had in the last year.

Um here's an aerial map of the property, um, they will be in unit A, which is this uh section right here.

Uh the land use is industrial and manufacturing and the zoning is C BP zone.

So here's an overview and definitions.

So the proposed land use is uh limited wholesale and uh warehousing of carpet within a CBP zone, and that does require a conditional use permit in the CBP zone, and uh the definition of wholesale and warehousing limited, um, which is the definition which they would their business would fall under, is uh an establishment that is engaged in the small scale storage and sale of goods to other businesses for resale, excluding self-storage warehouses, uh major distribution centers, motor freight terminals, moving and storage firms, and similar high volume high turnover facilities, and no outside storage is permitted.

Um the proposed use.

Um the uh installers come to the property and pick up the carpet in the uh rear of the property here.

There's a bay in which they can uh back their trucks in, load up their trucks and get on their way.

Here's a floor plan of the uh entire property.

There's of course two sides.

They're on this the uh south uh build located within the south building rather, in unit A, which is right here.

And here is a floor plan that they provided.

Um course the main entrance would be here.

This is the north end, the parking lot, of course, right out here as well as on the uh east of the property or the east of the building as well, and then the area back here where trucks can come and go and load up.

So impact analysis and mitigation.

Um identified potential impacts would be the potential uh potential parking lock congestion due to large trucks delivering and collecting shipments.

Um potential for unauthorized storage outside of the building and suite.

Um potential for trucks or trailers to be parked on the property for lengthy periods of time.

The proposed mitigation is that uh in no manufacturing shall take place at the property.

Shipping and receiving shall only be conducted at unit A's designated shipping bay.

Shipping and receiving may not block or interfere with vehicular parking stalls, drive aisles, or the dock bays of other businesses on the property that all storage related to the wholesale and warehousing business operation be located inside of the subject suite, and no trucks or trailers parked on the property for over 12 hours.

And no trucks or trailers parked on the property for over 12 hours.

And here's an exterior photo of both of the properties or the property in both of the buildings, rather.

This is the building in which the applicant's business is located.

Oh any questions or comments.

Does anybody else in either of these facilities have a conditional use permit as well?

Uh in the last year we've had three.

Well, this would be the third conditional use permit request for one of these suites.

Can you show us the suites, please?

So we did one earlier in the last year for I believe it was this one and then another one with this, or next to it, it was this.

Do you know what they're doing or what we've approved them to do?

Actually, so the last one that we did for this property was for the exact same use.

The uh um cabinet.

Yeah, it was it was the uh oh well button cabinets, and it was for um limited wholesale and warehousing, the exact same of cabinet tree, you said okay.

Yeah, I just don't remember.

It was just there was no manufacturing allowed or no assembly.

It was just for storage and pretty much like distribution of ship out, yeah.

So do you recall the other which is what this is?

Yeah, same thing, no manufacturing.

Do you recall the other one that's across the the that was neutral strips?

Um yeah, that was I remember that what was that?

I remember it.

Put them in your mouth and they they're quality was it the air quality and the smell the fabrication or whatever.

Yeah, yeah, okay.

Yeah, so again with this, yeah.

This is just uh people really low impact.

Just quiet quiet housing.

Is it is this just because this location it's just not an allowance, it's just not permitted.

I mean it's conditional, but it's just yeah, it's just that way that's coming up here, and we're not seeing that in other warehousing districts like the the new one that's down the way.

It's it's part of the zone, so anything in the D G zone that's uh I mean I I believe that the the rationale behind it is to just make sure that they can mitigate the impacts of running that type of uh business.

Yeah, um, it's a pretty at least from what my own observations it's a it's a pretty common uh land use in this type of zoning.

Um so yeah, it's yeah, just a requirement to to have that type of use in this zone.

Perfect.

Well, good.

Any other questions for staff then?

All right, thanks, Nick.

Is the applicant here?

Hi, you want to come on up, one of you is come up and do the same thing.

You can add it in both, yep.

It's your time to shine.

So if you state both your names and then we'll listen to you.

I'm Marshall Peterson.

Hi.

I'm Jamie Kempton.

Hi.

Anything else you'd like to add to that?

Um, no, not really.

Um, just uh yeah, go ahead.

The only thing that I had is um to the mic if you would think that I had is the part of about selling goods.

There are no selling of goods there.

It's it is just a warehouse for storage.

Just for storage, so good.

That's all perfectly.

Yeah, not open to the public, no retail sales, anything like that.

It's carpet and pad only being stored, no adhesives, no chemicals, nothing like that.

So perfect.

Yeah.

So just uh yeah, we put words in your mouth, didn't we?

We're like, oh yeah, these guys are selling carpet out of it.

How does who do you who comes to get the carpet?

Is it your installers?

Your installers, our installers do.

Uh yeah, so we house it there until the scheduled date.

Um, then the installers come, pick up the carpet in the pad, and then take it out to the customer's house and install it.

Perfect.

Yeah.

Not a showroom at all.

No.

Okay.

Nope.

Perfect.

Yeah, that's good clarification.

Any other questions for them?

Okay.

You guys are off the hook too.

Same as last time.

We'll open it up to the highly contested public comment, right?

And then if we need you to come back up and add anything, we'll do it.

Okay.

All right, thank you.

All right, thanks, guys.

Okay, again, this is a public hearing.

We'll open it up to public comment.

Who would like to take to up to three minutes to discuss or comment on this agenda item?

All right, see, we don't see anyone, so we'll go ahead and close it.

So the public hearing is now closed.

All right, commissioners.

Uh, you've got a good clear explanation and definition of what they're gonna be doing here.

What are your thoughts?

I think this one's straightforward, and if nobody has any other comments, I can make a motion.

Yeah, go ahead, Kendra.

I move that we approve the conditional use permit as requested by Marshall Peterson representing Western States Flooring 2025-0184-USC based on the following findings for approval and subject to the conditions listed in the staff report dated December 23rd, 2025.

And those findings are that it complies with the standards for approval found in the Draper Code, Section 9-5-080E, and potential potential negative impacts are mitigated through the imposition of reasonable conditions as laid out in the staff report.

Great.

Thank you, Kendra.

Who will second her motion?

I'll second it.

All right, thanks, Susan.

Okay, so let's go ahead and uh this for approval.

Kendra, how do you vote?

Yes.

Susan?

Yes.

Lisa?

Yes.

Gary?

Yes.

And Christine.

Yes.

All right.

Congrats on that.

So appreciate you coming in and good luck with your business.

Thanks for choosing Draper.

All right, let's go ahead and move on now to our uh, I think there's our final public hearing tonight.

So this is the Bell Peterson and Gustin land use and zoning map amendment request.

It's on the request of Dave Johnson representing all three property owners to one amend the land use designation for a portion of 693 east and 138 south from residential low medium density to residential medium density.

Second, it's to amend the land use designation for 1377 south, Shadow Mountain Lane from residential medium density to residential low medium density.

And thirdly, amend the zoning designation from RA1, residential agricultural to RA2, which is residential agricultural, and R3, single family residential for 693 East, 1380 South, and fourth, amend the zoning designation from RA1 to RA2, residential agriculture for the entire property at 703 East, 138 South.

So our staff contact Mary Ann Pickering is dodging a bullet on this one.

So who would like to clarify all of that for us?

Yep.

I get this one as well.

All right, Todd Draper, take it away.

So I'll try and explain what all of that was.

Um it is a little bit more of a complex one, but uh I think when you see it, it it becomes a little more straightforward here.

Again, this is just the vicinity map.

Uh there are three properties involved.

You'll see there, uh 693 and 703 east on 138th, and then one uh three seven seven seven south shadow mountain lane.

Uh they all kind of uh back up to each other or adjacent to each other.

As you can see there, this is the aerial the property on Shadow Mountain and the property at 693 both have existing homes on them.

Uh the home, I think that was on 703 was removed a few years ago.

The current land use uh for the two properties that uh are on 138 south is the uh low uh medium density with the property uh on Shadow Mountain being the residential medium density, and then the current zoning for the two uh that are on 13800 south are is the RA1 with uh the property on Shadow Mountain being RA2.

And the whole point of this is to change that all up.

So this is the proposal from the applicant.

Um what they would be proposing to do is on the property on Shadow Mountain, they would like to change the land use map from that medium density to the low medium density, and on the property at 693, they would actually like to split this and put that residential medium density on the front portion, leaving uh the rear portion in the existing residential low slash medium density uh land use designation, and then this property is also already in that existing low uh medium density designation.

So the real change uh with the land use map would be for this property and this half of this property, and that is so that they could uh request the zoning that they are, which would be to take this portion of the the rear portion of this property and this property to the uh east at 703 and uh ask for the RE2 zone, moving from the RA1 to the RA2.

And though it's not colored the same, uh take the front portion here and move it to the R3 zone, which is also the zoning of the adjacent uh property to the west.

Uh and this is so that they can facilitate um hopefully a uh boundary line agreement they would like to do between all three neighbors.

Um I'm not sure that this really quite shows it.

There was a little portion of this property that would become Peterson.

Uh the majority of this would be Guston, and then the Bell property would be reduced down to that smaller uh lot size or or parcel size that they would like the R3 to be able to go down to.

It'll be less than the half acre.

Um again, here's the site photos uh from uh Street View, uh looking north at the 703 property.

I need to stop using the mouse, and then looking north at the 693 east, and then uh this is just uh more of an aerial oblique aerial uh view of the property on Shadow Mountain, and you can kind of see maybe if the mouse wants to work, uh you can see back in here where the current property line would be approximately, and then the portion they would like to to pick up and the future, and I tried to put that on this uh uh aerial so that kind of makes sense.

Um there would be uh likely a little portion here.

I just don't know where that is off the top of my head.

It's uh it's a different application.

So it was either a little piece here or a little piece there they wanted uh that would go with this property, but this is the short shorter version of uh what they would be looking to do and and amending the lot lines.

So this property would be RA2, this property be also RA2, and then this would be the R3.

And with that, that's what I have as a presentation.

If you have any questions, I can help answer.

I have a question, Todd.

Can you go back to that's that slide?

This one, yes, I can turn it back to the back.

It'll stay.

Okay.

Um if we make these changes, and this plan doesn't happen.

What's what's what could happen?

What's I don't know if I want to say the worst, but what I mean, what could happen.

Um that back lot could be developed, and then how would you get to that back lot?

So I have not looked into that as much.

Um I could maybe see if I can find that in the staff report again.

What the size would be?

I don't think that it makes this one large enough to technically divide into two.

Okay.

I think it's like in the back of my head, I want to say it's like 0.86.

Don't quote me on that.

It's probably in the staff report there somewhere.

Uh, and then uh same kind of thing here.

It's not big enough to subdivide then even in those zones or that use.

I don't I don't believe so.

Well, you know what?

It it might be uh just barely, but it would be something of uh flag lot, and we would not allow flag lots on a uh major arterial street like 138th.

So there's some other things kind of preventing that.

Okay, thanks.

Yeah, it would be about.

Which one?

The developed one?

Or the red one or the orange one?

Or this one, it'd be about 0.8 acres with what they're they're gonna be picking up in the back.

So that wouldn't be big enough to put two half acre lots on.

This property here is currently um.68 acres here from our understanding, they're just picking up you know, a little bit of bit of property here.

So again, not big enough to put two lots on.

Okay, thanks.

So that helps to have you explain that.

All right, anything else on that, Todd?

Nope.

All right, thanks for the clarification.

Okay, so is the applicant here?

Hi.

You want to come on down?

You've seen the drill, so you're welcome to come on down, state your name and add anything you'd like.

Hi, I'm I'm Dave Johnson.

I'm the excuse me, I'm the surveyor.

Put all this together.

Um, it's just uh it's a case of an older family that wants to step back a little bit and not have so much land to take care of, and two families that are getting bigger and the kids are getting older and they need um practice facilities for soccer and pickleball and whatever they need to put on there.

So we're just trying to make facilitate that.

Perfect.

Great.

Any questions?

Okay, well, thanks for being here.

So again, we'll put it up for public comment, and if there's any disputes or clarification, we'll get you.

Okay, thanks.

A public hearing we'll open this up for public comment.

Who is here to that would like to address this one?

I'm looking around, no one.

All right.

Off to a slow start this year, guys.

So we'll go ahead and close the public hearing.

All right, commissioners.

Now it's it was it's more straightforward now than it was before, correct?

So uh what are your thoughts?

Any deliberation?

Or should we just put a motion together?

We've got two items on here.

We've got the I think the uh land use and the zoning map.

It seems like a lot seems like a lot of work just to make a few boundary line adjustments, but it makes sense and it makes things clean and concise.

So it almost puts that one RA1 lot is the odd man out now, right?

So it's almost the everything's become RA2, and you've got just one last hold out there uh on that private road.

Yeah, because if you just read the description, you're like, now what?

Sounded complicated, but it really isn't when you when Todd explains it the way he did.

So yes, we're just trying to give but the land where it's needed or wanted.

Yes, right, perfect.

All right, well, that's a uh oh, so I'll have I'm happy to make a motion unless someone has comments or concerns.

Yeah, go ahead, Susan.

Let's I move we forward a positive recommendation to the city council for the land use map amendment as requested by Dave Johnson representing the property owners, application 2024-0408-MA based on the findings of approval.

And there are six findings for approval.

Great, thank you, Susan.

Who will second her motion?

I'll second that.

All right, thanks, Kendra.

Let's put this one to a vote.

Then this is to move a positive recommendation forward on the land use map amendment.

Susan, how do you vote?

Yes, Kendra?

Yes, Christine?

Yes, Gary?

Yes, and Lisa.

Yes.

All right.

So next we have the zoning map amendment.

Same thing.

Who would like to motion on that with a positive or negative recommendation?

I can make that.

Okay, go ahead, Kendra.

Um, let's I move that we forward a positive recommendation to the city council for the zoning map amendment as requested by Dave Johnson representing the property owner's application 2025-0135-ma based on the findings for approval listed in the staff report this dated December 30th, 2025.

And there are five findings for approval listed there.

Thanks, Kendra.

Who will second that?

I will.

All right, thank you, Lisa.

Let's go ahead and put this one to a vote for positive recommendation on the zone map amendment.

Uh let's start with you, Kendra.

Yes.

Lisa.

Yes.

Susan?

Yes.

Christine?

Yes.

And Gary.

Yes.

All right.

Thank you again for coming in and clarifying.

So we appreciate that.

And now that'll go off to the uh city council for final final vote on that.

All right, let's go ahead and discuss.

Is there anything else that needs to come up on the agenda that's not on the book?

Yeah, I've got a couple things for item two, other business.

Um, Lori emailed out the annual interest uh conflict to interest disclosure forms.

Please get those filled out and return to her.

Um, and then I've got a plot for you to sign before you leave, Andrew.

Perfect.

Do you guys have hard copies of those that we I could do right now?

Uh sorry.

Are they we can we can go print one out if you give us a few minutes?

I'll just do it.

We will we can bring them bring some hard copies at the next meeting.

I'd love that.

Thanks.

Okay, we'll do that.

Perfect.

Great.

Also, thank you for everyone getting your training done.

We're good for last year.

Perfect.

So good.

Did you notice it was December 31st?

But we got it done.

I got it done.

Perfect.

So that means there's no trading until October of 2026, correct?

That's when we'll really start cramming it in.

Probably the next meeting.

Oh, perfect, good.

We already get ahead of it.

Hey, it's you're the boss, you're it's your schedule.

We'll we'll play along.

All right, anything else, commissioners?

I don't see any other business on our agenda, so make a motion to adjourn.

All right, meeting adjourned.

Thank you.

Any cards on other words?

Winning the election.