OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Duluth, Minnesota/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Duluth City Council Meeting – September 14, 2026

City Council — Monday, September 14, 2026
BodyDuluth, Minnesota
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, September 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:05:40

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
8:58

All right, we'll begin in one minute.

9:18

All right, good evening, counselors.

9:20

We will begin our finance committee meeting.

9:22

We're pleased to welcome General Manager Chris Belden for the twenty twenty-seven tool with Transit Authority budget presentation.

9:28

Mr.

9:29

Belden will have thirty minutes to present his budget to us.

9:32

We'll leave ten minutes for counselor QA.

9:34

So if you want to make your notes, we'll open that up and do that.

9:37

So please, Mr.

9:38

Belden, uh begin any time you're ready.

9:40

Thank you very much.

9:41

Uh Chris Belden, I'm the general manager of the Jewish Transit Authority.

9:44

And James Barg is our uh CFO, so he's been with us for uh a couple of years now, so second levy meeting, I believe.

10:00

First, I'll kick it off right away with what our levy request is for this year, and then give a bit of a background on what we've been up to, and then Jim will get through the budget a little bit, and then we'll we'll wrap it up.

10:09

So start off with the levy request.

10:12

A little bit of history.

10:14

So in 2024 and 2025, due to the pandemic and all the state transit agencies running into financial issues, they decided to lower the local match requirement, which is typically 20%.

10:28

They dropped it all the way to five.

10:30

For the size that we are, that saved a ton of money, which ended up being a reduced local levy, and then that expired last year, so that we had a big increase.

10:53

So it's it's quite a mix of different funding sources.

10:56

Um for 2026, that local match went from 5% to 15%, uh, still a little bit short of the usual 20%.

11:06

What we weren't expecting is this year it remained, or for 27, it'll remain at 15%.

11:12

But then after that in 28, it will go back to the normal uh statutory 20%.

11:19

So to give you a little bit of context of just how much that saves us for our 2027 budget is uh just under 1.2 million.

11:30

So the levy request itself, um, we're seeking a new growth only increase in our levy.

11:36

So this would uh keep our net tax capacity rate the same as it was last year.

11:42

Our actual levy percent is a slight decrease, but that would generate in the new growth um about 228,000.

11:50

Um and then to give some context on uh that home value number we've been using at 275,000, that would that would stay the same.

11:59

And then uh based on the new new growth within uh the boundaries of the city of Duluth, St.

12:06

Louis County figures our actual uh voter approved tax levy maximum is all the way up to 8.7 million now.

12:14

So we're asking less than half of what has been uh approved through referendum.

12:20

So a little bit on the the DTA.

12:22

So most of you are probably pretty familiar with who we are and what we do, but I'll give a quick overrun.

12:28

Um for those that want to come and visit us down in Lincoln Park.

12:33

Anybody's welcome, just give me a call and we'll give you the full-blown tour.

12:37

So we were created by the Minnesota legislature back in 1969.

12:42

Uh we we primarily serve Duluth and Superior.

12:46

We have a little bit on the the other cities, but primarily those two cities.

12:50

Um we've got 17 routes, which is an increase of service from what we had, what we presented last year.

12:56

I'll get into that uh soon.

12:59

We serve around 7,000 to 9,000 passengers a day on average.

13:05

Um and then we've got 200 employees, and then we have a board of directors with nine members on it.

13:15

Sorry, I missed that slide.

13:17

All right.

13:18

So a little bit on just our our uh legacy and history of excellence.

13:22

We've always been a really high performing transit agency, especially in the region.

13:27

Uh outside of the Twin Cities, we are the largest urban uh public transportation system, and we carry a third of greater Minnesota's um total passengers.

13:38

Um nationally, we always rank really high.

13:41

Uh there's a site called All Transit, which is kind of like a WAP score type of website, and they rank us fourth out of 131 other similar size agencies.

13:51

And out of all the those greater Minnesota Transit Agencies, we've recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic better than any of them.

14:02

So we've really found our our winning formula, and what that does is it gets us access to additional grants.

14:11

So the Federal Transit Administration has a pot of money that based on six different criteria.

14:17

If you score above average, you you're rewarded additional funding.

14:21

So there's only 14 other agencies in the nation that get more than we do.

14:26

Um we get five out of the six of those categories, which brings us in an additional 2.7 million.

14:34

So what we've really found out is that if we put more service in the right places, that gets us more ridership, which then brings us more state and federal funds, which helps keep the levy lower.

14:50

So a few of our recent highlights are our five-year ridership numbers.

14:56

So uh since 2021, we've seen an increase in ridership over 46%.

15:02

And then in our stride ridership, so that's our uh the smaller buses that provide transportation for those with disabilities, has been growing even faster.

15:11

It's been a 65% increase, and we we predict that to continue to grow based on our area demographics.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████17%
Affordable Housing█████████████████17%
Public Transportation██████████████14%
Public Engagement█████████████13%
Short Term Rentals███████████11%
International Relations█████5%
Public Safety████4%
Budget███3%
Transportation Safety███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Duluth City Council Meeting – September 14, 2026

The Duluth City Council met on Monday, September 14, 2026, at 6:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting covered a wide range of agenda items including a public hearing on a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) plan for the Legacy Housing project, adoption of a consent agenda with 24 resolutions, first and second readings of several ordinances, and discussion on a proposed code of conduct and traffic modifications on 4th Street. Several members of the public spoke on agenda and non-agenda items.

Consent Calendar

The following resolutions were approved unanimously (9-0) as part of the consent agenda:

  • Resolution 26-0807R authorizing an agreement with Arrowhead Radio Amateurs Club for radio communications equipment at the Highland Water Tower.
  • Resolution 26-0809R authorizing a three-year Microsoft enterprise agreement for an annual amount of $494,870.60 (total $1,484,611.80).
  • Resolution 26-0815R approving lawful gambling applications.
  • Resolution 26-0816R approving various liquor licenses.
  • Resolution 26-0774R approving amendments to the civil service classification of Deputy Fire Marshal.
  • Resolution 26-0814R vacating rights-of-way subject to a utility easement.
  • Resolution 26-0783R accepting a permanent easement from Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
  • Resolution 26-0789R granting municipal consent for CSAH 14 reconstruction.
  • Resolution 26-0790R approving a state project to rehabilitate Trunk Highway 2.
  • Resolution 26-0794R authorizing purchase of 2,000 tons of coal from Navajo Transitional Energy Company for $202,920.00.
  • Resolution 26-0795R authorizing engineering services for Canal Park Drive rehabilitation ($102,495.00).
  • Resolution 26-0796R increasing a purchase order for emergency work at Duluth Energy Systems by $75,000 (new total $220,000.00).
  • Resolution 26-0797R authorizing engineering services for Cross City Trail Phase 6 ($89,990.00).
  • Resolution 26-0798R amending a contract for Norton Road Bridge construction, increasing by $110,102.00 (new total $214,753.25).
  • Resolution 26-0799R authorizing a snow removal agreement with Independent School District No. 709.
  • Resolution 26-0808R awarding a contract for Upper Lakeside Water Zone Interconnect Phase 2 ($268,625.00).
  • Resolution 26-0811R authorizing a lease for a trommel screener ($21,300.00).
  • Resolution 26-0713R authorizing a Joint Powers Agreement for the Lake Superior Forensic Technology Task Force.
  • Resolution 26-0748R accepting a $29,836 DOJ grant and partner agreement with St. Louis County.
  • Resolution 26-0804R accepting a $37,008.00 firefighter training award.
  • Resolution 26-0805R accepting a $100,882.56 firefighter training award.
  • Resolution 26-0818R accepting $132,405.00 reimbursement for fire suppression in Superior National Forest.
  • Resolution 26-0730R authorizing an amendment to the Consolidated Maintenance Campus project contract with HCM Architects, increasing by $2,579,905.00 (new total $2,636,155.00).
  • Resolution 26-0803R authorizing application for a $500,000 Conservation Partners Legacy Grant for forest habitat restoration.

Public Comments & Testimony

Agenda Items (First Public Comment Period):

  • Hadrian DeMaioribus (Precinct 7) spoke in support of the 4th Street bike lane and no-parking resolutions, citing parking studies showing sufficient parking and the need for improved multimodal infrastructure, including winterized sidewalks for accessibility. He urged the council to pass the resolutions to advance design work.
  • Spencer Shields (55803) opposed Resolution 26-0794R to purchase 2,000 tons of coal, arguing the funds should be invested in renewable energy. He criticized the plan to sell old coal to a neighboring city, calling it environmentally harmful.
  • Jessica Boehland (55802, Park Point) spoke on the short-term rental (STR) ordinance, representing Park Point community groups. She noted 28 licensed vacation rentals on Park Point (roughly one-third of those in residential neighborhoods) and many unlicensed ones. She cited a survey showing concerns about loss of housing, increased property taxes, and diminished neighborhood vitality. She urged the council to pass the ordinance and enforce policies.
  • Seth Oliver (55802) opposed allowance of shared-room STRs in R1/R2 zoning, arguing it is unenforceable and leads to further loss of housing. He advocated for zero vacation rentals in residential zones except for accessory dwelling units under 400 sq ft.
  • Dawn Buck (55802, Park Point) thanked staff for addressing STR issues, highlighted safety concerns identified by the fire department, and stressed the need for enforcement and monitoring.
  • Pat Sterner (55802, Park Point) emphasized the loss of community fabric due to STRs, sharing personal experience of neighborhood gatherings during the pandemic.
  • Nicole Ottjes (Precinct 4) spoke in support of the 4th Street project, noting her daily bike commute and the need for safe infrastructure.

Non-Agenda Items (Second Public Comment Period):

  • Tone Lanizillo (55812) announced a climate briefing and town hall event, referencing record air quality alerts and a UN report on global warming.
  • Roy Hamlin (55811) apologized for previous comments at the August 10 meeting regarding a vape shop construction near his daughter's home, and thanked the council for the opportunity to address the issue.
  • Linda Heron (55812) spoke on climate grief and announced Climate Week activities, including a town hall on September 17 at St. Paul's Episcopal Church.
  • Eric Lindell (no zip stated) shared a personal story of suicide attempt and urged investment in mental health resources, de-escalation training for first responders, and lobbying for state/federal support.
  • Loren Martell (55805) criticized the ISD 709 “Red Plan” school construction, warning that new housing developments will exacerbate capacity issues and lead to further taxpayer costs for new schools and maintenance bonds.

Discussion Items

Public Hearing – Legacy Housing TIF (Resolution 26-0793R): A public hearing was held on the proposed Tax Increment Financing plan for the Legacy Housing District, a 148-unit development (mostly studios and one-bedrooms) adjacent to Lake Superior College, including 30 affordable units at 50% AMI. David Klein (Vice President at Lake Superior College) spoke in support, citing benefits for student and employee recruitment. No other speakers testified. After the hearing, the council suspended rules to welcome a delegation from Ohara-Isumi City, Japan (sister city) for introductions and a photo.

Legacy TIF Vote: Councilor Tomanek moved approval, seconded by President Nephew. Councilor Clanaugh moved to table, citing that supporting materials (pro forma, but-for test) were not made available to the public in a timely manner. After debate, the motion to table failed 2-7 (yes: Clanaugh, Durrwachter; no: Desotelle, Tomanek, Forsman, Johnson, Randorf, Kennedy, Nephew). The main motion then passed 8-1 (nay: Durrwachter). Several councilors noted that the level of documentation was consistent with past practice for HRA TIF districts.

Code of Conduct (Resolution 26-0810R): Vice President Kennedy and Councilor Johnson presented a revised resolution to amend standing rules to include a code of conduct. The text had been shortened per agenda session feedback. Some councilors expressed concern about receiving the final version only on the night of the meeting and requested more time for review. A motion to table was made by President Nephew, seconded by Councilor Durrwachter, and passed unanimously (9-0), tabling the resolution to the next meeting.

4th Street Traffic Modifications (Resolutions 26-0742R and 26-0743R): The administration had requested these items be sent back for further work. Councilor Desotelle made motions to return both resolutions to administration, seconded by Councilor Tomanek (for the bike lane) and Councilor Clanaugh (for the no-parking zone). Both motions passed unanimously (9-0). The items will be revisited after administrative review.

Short Term Rental Ordinance (Ordinance 26-038-O) – Second Reading: The ordinance to regulate STR licensing and permitting in Chapters 29 and 29A was moved by President Nephew, seconded by Councilor Clanaugh. Councilors discussed the need for a starting point despite acknowledged loopholes, particularly regarding owner-occupied shared rentals and enforcement. Deputy Chief Otis was commended for leading the effort. Councilor Forsman raised concerns about potential impacts on existing licensed STRs under stricter state health requirements but was reassured by staff. Councilor Durrwachter noted an estimated 400–800 illegal STRs in the city. The ordinance passed unanimously (9-0). Several councilors committed to ongoing amendments and a one-year review.

Other Ordinances – Second Readings:

  • Ordinance 26-029-O reclassifying Piedmont Trail System parcels from RR-1 to P-1: passed 9-0.
  • Ordinance 26-036-O amending the Home Rule Charter pertaining to vacancies of mayor and councilor: passed 9-0.

Ordinances – First Readings:

  • Ordinance 26-024-O revising Chapter 13 of the city code (personnel) was read for the first time.
  • Ordinance 26-040-O amending Chapter 50 regarding lodging (zoning and parking standards) was read for the first time.

Key Outcomes

  • Legacy Housing TIF (Resolution 26-0793R): Approved 8-1 after a failed motion to table (2-7).
  • Code of Conduct (Resolution 26-0810R): Tabled unanimously (9-0) to the next meeting.
  • 4th Street Bike Lane (Resolution 26-0742R) and No-Parking Zone (Resolution 26-0743R): Returned to administration unanimously (9-0) for further work.
  • Short Term Rental Ordinance (Ordinance 26-038-O): Approved unanimously (9-0) as a second reading, with plans for future amendments.
  • Piedmont Trail Rezoning (Ordinance 26-029-O): Adopted 9-0.
  • Vacancies of Mayor/Councilor (Ordinance 26-036-O): Adopted 9-0.
  • Consent Agenda (24 resolutions): Approved unanimously (9-0) as a block.
  • Finance Items (Resolutions 26-0800R, 26-0801R, 26-0802R, 26-0803R – tax levies): All tabled to the September 28 meeting, following presentations from DTA and HRA (which occurred prior to the council meeting).
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement with Law Enforcement Labor Services (Resolution 26-0806R): Approved unanimously (9-0).

The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 PM (based on transcript length).

Meeting Transcript

All right, we'll begin in one minute. All right, good evening, counselors. We will begin our finance committee meeting. We're pleased to welcome General Manager Chris Belden for the twenty twenty-seven tool with Transit Authority budget presentation. Mr. Belden will have thirty minutes to present his budget to us. We'll leave ten minutes for counselor QA. So if you want to make your notes, we'll open that up and do that. So please, Mr. Belden, uh begin any time you're ready. Thank you very much. Uh Chris Belden, I'm the general manager of the Jewish Transit Authority. And James Barg is our uh CFO, so he's been with us for uh a couple of years now, so second levy meeting, I believe. First, I'll kick it off right away with what our levy request is for this year, and then give a bit of a background on what we've been up to, and then Jim will get through the budget a little bit, and then we'll we'll wrap it up. So start off with the levy request. A little bit of history. So in 2024 and 2025, due to the pandemic and all the state transit agencies running into financial issues, they decided to lower the local match requirement, which is typically 20%. They dropped it all the way to five. For the size that we are, that saved a ton of money, which ended up being a reduced local levy, and then that expired last year, so that we had a big increase. So it's it's quite a mix of different funding sources. Um for 2026, that local match went from 5% to 15%, uh, still a little bit short of the usual 20%. What we weren't expecting is this year it remained, or for 27, it'll remain at 15%. But then after that in 28, it will go back to the normal uh statutory 20%. So to give you a little bit of context of just how much that saves us for our 2027 budget is uh just under 1.2 million. So the levy request itself, um, we're seeking a new growth only increase in our levy. So this would uh keep our net tax capacity rate the same as it was last year. Our actual levy percent is a slight decrease, but that would generate in the new growth um about 228,000. Um and then to give some context on uh that home value number we've been using at 275,000, that would that would stay the same. And then uh based on the new new growth within uh the boundaries of the city of Duluth, St. Louis County figures our actual uh voter approved tax levy maximum is all the way up to 8.7 million now. So we're asking less than half of what has been uh approved through referendum. So a little bit on the the DTA. So most of you are probably pretty familiar with who we are and what we do, but I'll give a quick overrun. Um for those that want to come and visit us down in Lincoln Park. Anybody's welcome, just give me a call and we'll give you the full-blown tour. So we were created by the Minnesota legislature back in 1969. Uh we we primarily serve Duluth and Superior. We have a little bit on the the other cities, but primarily those two cities. Um we've got 17 routes, which is an increase of service from what we had, what we presented last year. I'll get into that uh soon. We serve around 7,000 to 9,000 passengers a day on average. Um and then we've got 200 employees, and then we have a board of directors with nine members on it. Sorry, I missed that slide. All right. So a little bit on just our our uh legacy and history of excellence. We've always been a really high performing transit agency, especially in the region. Uh outside of the Twin Cities, we are the largest urban uh public transportation system, and we carry a third of greater Minnesota's um total passengers. Um nationally, we always rank really high. Uh there's a site called All Transit, which is kind of like a WAP score type of website, and they rank us fourth out of 131 other similar size agencies. And out of all the those greater Minnesota Transit Agencies, we've recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic better than any of them.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com