OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Dunedin, Florida/City Commission & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Dunedin Local Planning Agency Meeting – August 12, 2026

City Commission & Boards — Wednesday, August 12, 2026
BodyDunedin, Florida
SessionCity Commission & Boards
DateWednesday, August 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 28:48

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

Good evening, everybody.

0:03

It is the August 12th, 2026 meeting of the local planning agency will now come to order.

0:09

The local planning agency is an advisory board of citizens appointed by the city commission.

0:14

This board is comprised of volunteers who represent the thoughts and concerns of the community.

0:19

The purpose of tonight's meeting is to make recommendations to the city commission regarding each item on the agenda.

0:25

Except for quasi-judicial items, which are identified on the agenda, tonight's format will be as followed.

0:31

I will introduce each item on the agenda, after which the city representative will present information about it.

0:37

Thereafter, members of the local planning agency will have the opportunity to ask questions of the city representative.

0:43

Finally, anyone from the public may come forward.

0:47

Those from the public wishing to provide comments will please approach the lectern, state your name and address for the record, and then utilize the microphone so that comments can be recorded.

0:57

Individual speakers are limited to three minutes of speaking time, and we kindly request that speakers be respectful of the clock countdown.

1:05

Citizens speaking on an agenda item or during citizens' comment shall not engage in loud, boisterous and or disruptive speech or conduct.

1:12

Any speech or speaker that has continued inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be requested to relinquish the podium.

1:20

Okay.

1:20

With that, I do want to do one reminder for the members up here to please be sure to turn on your microphone and turn off when you're done.

1:28

Good.

1:29

Okay.

1:30

All right.

1:31

The first item on our agenda tonight is to approve the July 8th, 2026 LPA minutes.

1:36

Are there any questions, questions, additions, deletions to those minutes?

1:42

No.

1:42

Hearing none, do I hear a motion to accept the minutes as submitted?

1:46

I do.

1:47

Sally makes a motion.

1:48

Do we have a second?

1:50

I second.

1:50

Dr.

1:51

Broom seconds.

1:52

It has been moved and seconded to accept the minutes.

1:54

All those in favor signify by saying aye.

1:57

Aye.

1:58

Any opposed?

1:59

Okay.

2:00

Minutes are passed.

2:02

Okay.

2:02

Item uh second item on the agenda is item one B, is a quasi-judicial item in nature.

2:08

And as such, the format will be as follows.

2:11

While the local planning agency is a non or is a not a quasi-judicial board and therefore has no final decision making power.

2:18

Our procedures for quasi-judicial items will be structured in a quasi-judicial manner.

2:24

The commission will be the ultimate quasi-judicial decision making authority.

2:28

The process will be as follows.

2:30

I will introduce each item, after which the city representative will present information about it.

2:35

Thereafter, members of the local planning agency will have the opportunity to question the city representative.

2:42

The applicant will present information about the item.

2:45

Thereafter, the members of the local planning agency will have an opportunity to ask the applicant questions.

2:51

If the applicant has any questions of staff or any we ask that those be addressed to the board.

2:58

Finally, anyone from the public may come forward.

3:02

Those please utilize the speaker's lectern, state your name and uh address for the record, and please limit your comments to three minutes.

3:09

Okay.

3:11

Upon uh conclusion of each public hearing, the local planning agency will consider the evidence before it and will vote on the agenda item.

3:18

That voice vote is the rendition of the order of the board, and there will be no written decision issued by the board.

3:24

Further, should the board vote to recommend denial of the matter, they will provide their basis for the denial.

3:30

Okay.

3:31

At this time, anyone in the audience who wishes to give testimony will be sworn in by the city clerk.

3:38

Do you swear to you swear the testimony you're about to give in this proceeding is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

3:48

Okay.

3:49

Before we get started, uh an item uh 1B, application LUP ZO-2026-0002, which is a request to rezone the 1.07 acre property located at 968 Douglas Avenue from downtown ordinance 2609, rezoning it from downtown industrial to downtown core.

4:12

Has anyone on this board had any ex parte communications regarding this item?

4:17

Nope.

4:18

Okay.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Personnel Matters███████████████████████████████31%
Economic Development██████████████████18%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████████18%
Procedural███████████11%
Public Engagement███████████11%
Community Engagement██████6%
Parks and Recreation█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Dunedin Local Planning Agency Meeting – August 12, 2026

The Dunedin Local Planning Agency (LPA) met at City Hall on August 12, 2026, beginning at 6:00 PM, as an advisory body to the City Commission. The board approved prior meeting minutes, conducted a quasi-judicial public hearing on a downtown rezoning request, and made membership recommendations for the LPA. All votes were unanimous unless otherwise noted.

Consent Calendar / Routine Approvals

  • Minutes from the July 8, 2026 LPA meeting were approved as submitted by unanimous voice vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • During the public hearing on the rezoning request, no members of the public came forward to offer testimony. The applicant’s representative made closing remarks expressing appreciation for the city’s collaboration and describing the project as a legacy project for the applicant.
  • No citizen input was offered for non-agenda items.

Discussion Items

  • Rezoning request – Ordinance 26-09: Staff presented the request by Mazus Development to rezone the 1.07-acre property at 968 Douglas Avenue from Downtown Industrial (DI) to Downtown Core (DC), Street Type C. The proposed Douglas Parking Center would include 318 structured parking spaces serving the Main Street Exchange project and downtown Dunedin, along with approximately 25,000 square feet of ground-floor retail along Douglas Avenue and a small portion oriented toward the Pinellas Trail. Staff explained the rezoning is needed because the current Downtown Industrial zoning does not permit retail uses. The underlying land use designation remains Activity Center, and staff stated the proposal is consistent with the CRA Master Plan, countywide rules, and the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Staff and the CRA director recommended approval and expressed strong support, describing the project as fulfilling a long-standing vision for Douglas Avenue.
  • Board questions and clarifications: A board member noted inconsistencies in printed materials regarding square footage, with figures of 25,000, 30,000, and 35,000, and parking counts of 309 and 318. The applicant clarified that 25,000 square feet is the current leasable footprint and 318 is the parking space count. Additional service or outdoor dining space could become leasable depending on the tenant, which would require a zoning administration review if the square footage changed. The board also discussed planned construction road closures on October 26–27, 2026, and their relationship to downtown Halloween events; staff indicated special events were taken into account. A board member suggested installing a time-lapse camera for the project, and the applicant indicated interest in that idea.
  • Quasi-judicial process: The chair confirmed that no board members had ex parte communications regarding the rezoning item. Public hearing testimony was given under oath, and the board’s vote was a recommendation to the City Commission, which has final decision-making authority.
  • LPA membership recommendations: The board discussed filling a regular vacancy by advancing Alternate #1 Tim Young to full-time membership, with Sylvia Seek moving to the Alternate #1 position. Candidate Caitlin Hembry, a real estate broker, spoke about her interest in serving the community and supporting balanced decision-making. She stated she has lived in the area for about one year, currently rents in Palm Harbor, and works in Clearwater. Board members and staff noted that the LPA requires members to be residents or business owners in Dunedin, making her application premature at this time. Staff offered to help her find other city board vacancies. The remaining candidates considered for Alternate #2 were Dan Masaro, Larry Gerson, John Schein, and Jeremy Reynolds.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the July 8, 2026 LPA meeting minutes.
  • Recommended approval of Ordinance 26-09, rezoning 968 Douglas Avenue from Downtown Industrial to Downtown Core, to the City Commission by unanimous voice vote, with no opposition.
  • Recommended Tim Young be advanced to a full LPA member and Sylvia Seek move to Alternate #1; motion approved unanimously.
  • Recommended Dan Masaro as Alternate #2; motion approved unanimously.
  • Caitlin Hembry was not recommended for appointment because she does not yet meet the LPA’s residency or business ownership requirement.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everybody. It is the August 12th, 2026 meeting of the local planning agency will now come to order. The local planning agency is an advisory board of citizens appointed by the city commission. This board is comprised of volunteers who represent the thoughts and concerns of the community. The purpose of tonight's meeting is to make recommendations to the city commission regarding each item on the agenda. Except for quasi-judicial items, which are identified on the agenda, tonight's format will be as followed. I will introduce each item on the agenda, after which the city representative will present information about it. Thereafter, members of the local planning agency will have the opportunity to ask questions of the city representative. Finally, anyone from the public may come forward. Those from the public wishing to provide comments will please approach the lectern, state your name and address for the record, and then utilize the microphone so that comments can be recorded. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes of speaking time, and we kindly request that speakers be respectful of the clock countdown. Citizens speaking on an agenda item or during citizens' comment shall not engage in loud, boisterous and or disruptive speech or conduct. Any speech or speaker that has continued inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be requested to relinquish the podium. Okay. With that, I do want to do one reminder for the members up here to please be sure to turn on your microphone and turn off when you're done. Good. Okay. All right. The first item on our agenda tonight is to approve the July 8th, 2026 LPA minutes. Are there any questions, questions, additions, deletions to those minutes? No. Hearing none, do I hear a motion to accept the minutes as submitted? I do. Sally makes a motion. Do we have a second? I second. Dr. Broom seconds. It has been moved and seconded to accept the minutes. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Minutes are passed. Okay. Item uh second item on the agenda is item one B, is a quasi-judicial item in nature. And as such, the format will be as follows. While the local planning agency is a non or is a not a quasi-judicial board and therefore has no final decision making power. Our procedures for quasi-judicial items will be structured in a quasi-judicial manner. The commission will be the ultimate quasi-judicial decision making authority. The process will be as follows. I will introduce each item, after which the city representative will present information about it. Thereafter, members of the local planning agency will have the opportunity to question the city representative. The applicant will present information about the item. Thereafter, the members of the local planning agency will have an opportunity to ask the applicant questions. If the applicant has any questions of staff or any we ask that those be addressed to the board. Finally, anyone from the public may come forward. Those please utilize the speaker's lectern, state your name and uh address for the record, and please limit your comments to three minutes. Okay. Upon uh conclusion of each public hearing, the local planning agency will consider the evidence before it and will vote on the agenda item.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com