Edmonds City Council Study Session: Email Response & Priorities - Feb 12, 2026
Edmonds City Council Study Session: Email Response & Priorities - Feb 12, 2026
This study session covered two main items: implementing an automatic email reply to acknowledge public correspondence and finalizing the council's priority topics for 2026. Councilmembers discussed the wording of the auto-reply and debated which priorities to emphasize, including financial stability, economic development, and equity, with a plan to refine language through written feedback.
Discussion Items
- Email Auto-Reply Adoption: Council President Dutch introduced a proposal to set up an auto-reply for emails sent to the council office, acknowledging receipt without implying content has been read. Councilmember Payne suggested changing the closing from "warmest regards" to "sincerely," which was supported. Councilmember Burnett shared an example from former councilmember Neil Tibbet's auto-reply that included links to public comment, committee assignments, and the Fix It app. The group agreed to adopt the basic auto-reply now and consider adding links later.
- Council Priority Topics: Council reviewed a worksheet from the February retreat, which ranked priorities by urgency (red, yellow, green dots) and weighted scores. Five themes emerged: financial stability, strategic clarity and direction, prioritization/trade-offs/capacity, engagement/communication/transparency, and economic development. Discussion focused on narrowing to three core priorities. Councilmember Olson proposed changing language in financial stability from "move the city out of crisis" to "long-term financial stability," but others (Councilmembers Barnett, Chen) argued the fiscal crisis is ongoing due to structural deficits and borrowed funds. Councilmember Burnett suggested adding equity and inclusion language to the prioritization/trade-offs/capacity statement, which received broad support. Councilmember Jenna advocated for framing economic development around community-driven development and anti-displacement, especially on Highway 99. Councilmember Vivian proposed making engagement/communication/transparency a "lens" applied across all priorities rather than a standalone item. City Administrator Todd Tatum noted that once priorities are set, staff will map programs to them and develop measurable KPIs. Council President Dutch proposed sending a draft to members for track-change edits by mid-next week, with finalization at a future meeting.
Key Outcomes
- Email Auto-Reply: Consensus to implement automatic reply with the closing changed to "sincerely"; future amendment to add resource links.
- Priority Language Refinement: Council agreed to include equitable access and inclusion in the prioritization/trade-offs/capacity statement. Economic development remained a separate priority candidate, but many saw it as contributing to financial stability. No formal vote; the council president will circulate a draft for written feedback by February 19, with the goal of finalizing at an upcoming regular meeting or study session.
Meeting Transcript
Waiting on a couple more to log in here. Are they coming in or we should we get started? We have a quorum. Okay, started. Alrighty. So welcome everyone to the uh Edmund City Council study session here on uh February 11th, uh calling it to order at uh 3 p.m. At the moment we have council members Payne Chen, Eck and Olson with us uh and myself, uh Councilmember Dutch, Council President Dutch. And um are there any objections to approving the agenda as presented? No objection. Are we taking actions at this no? I somebody asked if the I mean I don't need to, but somebody had asked if the agenda could be changed, so I was just kind of put that out there. But if there's no objections, then we'll just adopt the agenda as we have it. Um we're gonna have staff joining us. Uh yes, there are supposed to be let's see who's all with us here. Yeah, we have um we have Todd Tatum here. Okay, so I thought thank you. Wonderful. Great. So we will start with our first item of business here, and that is the response to email sent to council office. And that came up um with uh discussing with the executive uh assistant about acknowledging when we receive uh emails from uh people that just to the council at um oftentimes um people can't respond right away, and uh it'd just be nice just to acknowledge that we received it, not saying that anybody read it, but just to say that um yes, it is received and and and that um they are sent to the council. And there was a recommended um uh text or uh email text for that that was in your packet. So I'll open it up to anybody that wants to comment on that. Hi, everyone. This one uh acknowledge that councilman Renan is with us and council member Barnett as well at 302. And we are at the first uh topic of our agenda. And so I just presented it and just asking for um feedback and uh uh from our council members here and we'll chat. Yeah, so uh I think it's a good idea to uh have that acknowledgement go out. My question is is this going to be able to uh respond to individual email to each individual council member or just uh the group member email? So if uh if um uh citizen or resident or anybody um send something to the council at, then that would be a reply back to that person, not uh if you want everybody to if you want it to be CC'd to all the council, I think that'd be a lot of emails, but it just would be reply uh back to the group. Yeah. And that actually that's uh easy one. Just said uh auto reply, and you'll automatically just acknowledge Lucy. So we don't have we don't need to spend any extra people. No, there wouldn't be on that. Yeah. Okay. I like that idea. Thank you. Uh I guess we'll use is first names are okay. I'll use first names. Uh Chris. Thank you. Um yeah, I agree. Having an auto reply makes so much sense. I like the idea of letting people know that their email was received. Um it doesn't cause extra work for uh Teresa except for setting up the auto reply. So I don't have any concerns. I think if we find something out along the way that comes up and is an issue, we can deal with that at the time, but I can't imagine there will be anything negative coming from it. Thank you. Uh Vivian.
openpublica.com