Edmonds City Council Special Meeting - April 22, 2026: Six-Month Extension of Tree Moratorium Ordinance 4389
Edmonds City Council Special Meeting - April 22, 2026
Note on date discrepancy: The agenda lists the meeting as April 21, 2026 at 2:40 PM, but the instruction for this summary specifies the meeting took place on April 22, 2026 at 20:00 UTC. The transcript references "today" and the meeting was adjourned at 2:49 PM, consistent with a late April date. This summary uses the provided date of April 22, 2026.
This special meeting was convened to conduct a second reading and vote on Interim Ordinance No. 4389, which extends by six months an existing interim regulation prohibiting the removal of certain landmark trees (greater than 30 inches in diameter) in Edmonds. The meeting lasted approximately nine minutes, from 2:40 PM to 2:49 PM, with a full quorum present. Unanimous approval was given after brief discussion.
Consent Calendar
- No consent calendar items were presented.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No public comments were received during this meeting. Staff noted that a public hearing was held the previous week (April 14, 2026) where a few comments supported extending the landmark tree ordinance.
Discussion Items
- Interim Ordinance No. 4389 – Six-Month Extension (Second Reading):
- Mike Cluxton (Planning and Development Department) presented the request. He explained that work on the permanent tree code update began slowly due to staffing and budget constraints but has accelerated since January 2026 when Deb Powers returned. Staff expects to complete the permanent code update by early October 2026, after review by the Planning Board and Tree Board, and then bring it to the City Council in summer 2026.
- Staff recommended extending the existing interim ordinance for six months to continue protections for landmark trees (≥30 inches diameter) during the code update.
- Councilmember Payne made a motion to approve the extension, noting the ordinance was originally adopted near Earth Day and that this action occurred a week before the deadline.
- Councilmember Holson supported the extension but requested that staff provide a thorough legal analysis of takings laws as they relate to landmark tree protections, either with the final code proposal or earlier.
- Councilmember Chen supported the extension as a necessary measure due to staff shortages, though he stated that moratoriums are generally not a good method of governance.
- Council President and other members echoed support, emphasizing the importance of getting the permanent code right and thanking the community and staff.
- Councilmember Nand initially had a question about notice to property owners but withdrew it after recalling previous answers.
Key Outcomes
- Vote on Interim Ordinance No. 4389 extension: Unanimously approved (all ayes, no nays). The ordinance extends the landmark tree moratorium for an additional six months, continuing the prohibition on removal of landmark trees larger than 30 inches in diameter.
- Directives: Councilmember Holson’s request for a takings law analysis was acknowledged by staff, who committed to working with the city attorney to provide that information before or with the final permanent code proposal.
- Next steps: Staff will continue work on the permanent tree code update, with completion targeted for early October 2026. The permanent code will go through Planning Board, Tree Board, and then City Council review.
Meeting Transcript
We're just waiting for the mayor to log in to start the meeting. Yeah, I had to get to his computer looking. There. I I think our clerk thought maybe I shouldn't participate. We are recording. Thank you. We do not need to do roll call, but I will acknowledge that we have a full quorum. And with that, we will go to council business. There is one item, which is the interim ordinance number 4389 regarding the six-month extension of uh the um of the moratorium. And I will turn it to Mike and or Brad. Thank you. Uh Mike Cluxton, uh Planning Development Department. Um and so this afternoon, thank you for taking a little bit of time to uh take a look at this uh extension. Um as you know, uh last week you had a public hearing on this. Um there were a few comments um to support the extension of the uh landmark tree uh ordinance that's currently in effect. And um staff would like to extend uh that for another six months. Um and there's a draft ordinance in your packet in attachment two that would do that. Um the uh tree code work obviously got off to a bit of a slow start due to just lack of of staff and and financial resources. So um we didn't really get started on this work until January of this year when um Deb Powers started back up with the city. Um since that time though, we've made uh very good progress on uh the code update. And so um the goal is within another six months, uh right around early October, we should be able to land this, um, take it all the way through planning board, have some touches with the tree board, um, and then bring it to council uh in the summertime for your review. Um and so extending the uh landmark tree um ordinance would continue those protections that you approved last year, right? For those uh landmark trees that are greater than 30 inches in diameter. So um there'd be no change. That would just continue for another six months. Staff would continue to work on uh the tree code update and the intent again would be to land all this um in early October. So uh if you have any questions, um we can definitely talk about that otherwise. Um yeah, we would ask your extension or your approval of the extension of the ordinance that's in uh attachment two. Can't hear you. Council member Payne, you're first. Thank you. Um I'd like to make a motion for an ordinance of the city of Edmonds, Washington extending by six months the interim regulation establishing by ordinance um number 4389 to prohibit the removal of certain landmark trees. Is there a second? Uh discussion maker of the motion. I'm just really pleased to see that we have this extension um happening before one a whole week before the deadline and also uh commemorating um that this is also a day before Earth Day when we um adopted it a year ago. It was um it was that same week. And so really appreciate everyone's support and everyone's um enthusiasm to see this um work plan get done. So I want to thank staff and then all my council um colleagues as well. Thank you. Councilmember Holson. Yeah, I'm in favor of the moratorium being extended. Um I did just want to remind staff that on the initial um uh project list for the permanent tree code that we were um looking for a full um delve into the takings laws and how that would um segue and be um affected by landmark tree protections and to make sure that that is um you know done thoroughly and um that information provided to council um when the permanent one is being proposed or or along the way um if that's maybe better to get that assess that information ahead of time. Thank you. And certainly we'll work with city attorney to uh make sure you do get that, whether it's with the the um you know code language that the planning board recommends or before that, um it'll be part of the packet at some point. Thank you. Are there other questions or comments on the motion? Uh Councilmember Chen. Thank you, Maya. So I support the extensions of the moratorium, but uh I want to comment the moratorium in general is not a good way to govern. Uh, but I realize that we have staff shortage and uh resources.
openpublica.com