OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Edmonds PSPHSP Committee Meeting on June 16, 2026

City Council & BoardsTuesday, June 16, 2026
BodyEdmonds, Washington
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateTuesday, June 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 52:12

Transcript — Verbatim
0:05

So this is Councilmember Jen and I would like to call to order the Edmund City Council Public Safety Planning Human Services and Personnel Committee on June 16th, 2026 at 4 30 p.m.

0:20

We have in attendance committee member Susan Payne and also our ex officio member, Council President Michelle Dash, and then exficyo Vivian Olson.

0:33

And we will be starting with item 2.1, which is the minor code amendments related to middle housing.

0:44

And I will let Brad Shipley take it away.

0:50

All right.

0:51

Well, well, thank you.

0:53

I know this is uh something that's been anticipated for a while.

0:56

It was almost a year ago when we first adopted low density residential uh to replace our traditionally single family zones.

1:03

Uh if you guys guys recall it was a uh kind of a scramble to comply with state regulations and part of that process envisioned uh multi phases to kind of come back and review code and and figure out where uh some of the references may not align or whether there's other code sections that do not align.

1:24

So this uh is a second phase of that project.

1:28

Um right now we're just looking at minor code amendments.

1:32

So uh minor code amendments is you know, that these were uh really non-substantive code issues.

1:39

Uh they're you know, maybe outdated references, formatting issues, internal consistencies, um, those types of things.

1:46

Uh those are all outlined in ECDC uh 20.80.015.

1:54

So this process was envisioned to allow us to you know refine the code uh over time and be a little bit more proactive uh in that process.

2:03

Um the minor code amendments, the these are not required to go to uh planning board for recommendation, they just go straight to council, um, often you know through a committee meeting and then uh could be brought to full council for um either consideration or on a consent agenda.

2:21

That's really up to council.

2:24

Um at the at that time, you know, council could look over the proposed amendments and they could pull some out to be included in a in a future change that's more substantive if that's what they choose, or they could you know adopt part or whole of uh the recommended changes.

2:40

So uh today, you know, we we're going over some of those recommended changes.

2:45

Um I did include that in the packet.

2:47

Um most of these are going to just be updated references to LDR where it used to be RS.

2:55

So they're pretty simple.

2:56

Uh a couple of them are um references that had changed with the new code, uh, but just weren't updated or missed uh as part of that code update process.

3:06

Um I guess you know, I think with that I I could kind of open it up to conversation here.

3:13

Um if there's any questions or uh discussion about any of these proposed changes.

3:20

Okay, um, are there any questions?

3:25

Please go ahead, Susan.

3:27

Yeah, thank you.

3:27

Um I thank you, Janet, and and thank you, Brad.

3:30

I just want to say I appreciate that these are really very simple um kind of alignment changes.

3:38

The only thing I had to look up was the one for domestic animal and um and that was um uh definitions, you know, part of the the coding.

3:50

So it wasn't anything that we needed to make bigger changes with or anything like that.

3:57

So I'm I'm pleased to see that these are coming through.

4:01

I you know, looking at the agenda memo, I I think that we can probably um take um option one, um, just proceed with the minor code amendments and um make sure that we build in consistency whenever we can through our codes.

4:18

I think that this is a nice nice start for a code update.

4:24

Are there any other comments?

4:26

Um yeah, I just wanted to note that this being uh kind of the the first touch on a long process, it's come back.

4:34

It is on the agenda planner for um next Tuesday for full council.

4:39

So just that way it's kind of the touch, and then after that, that can be more of a consistent update being done.

4:47

That'll be our recommendation.

4:53

Vivian, are there do you have any comments or questions?

4:58

Okay.

5:00

Um I'm looked over everything and I'm in complete agreement that these are minor code amendments.

5:06

And I don't think um that we have to go through any additional process.

5:10

So I'd like to follow the staff recommendation that we direct the staff to proceed with preparation of targeted minor code amendments related to middle house housing implementation, and that the amendment should be limited to code cleanup consistency, clarification, and administration of the adopted middle housing regulations.

5:31

Do we have consensus from the committee?

5:34

Just to quite be full counsel.

5:37

So I was going to come back next week for that.

5:40

I I'm comfortable if it's on consent.

5:43

I mean, these are really just the the most minor uh code changes.

5:50

If this through to consent, Michelle, do you anticipate that you would pull it off consent?

5:56

I wasn't anticipating.

5:57

I just thought with the process being so public and this being the first touch, that was just a clean way to bring it up and move it forward and then a sort of consistent way that it comes forward and everybody's understanding how it works, including the public.

6:09

This is this is the first touch.

6:11

Correct.

6:12

The next time would be the second touch, right?

6:14

Correct.

6:15

Yeah.

6:16

So if it were if it were likely to be pulled off of consent, I'd like the staff to have notice.

6:22

Um that they need to be there prepared to present it to full council.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Regulations███████████████████████████████████████39%
Affordable Housing██████████████████████22%
Transportation Safety█████████9%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████8%
Cannabis Regulation████████8%
Public Safety██████6%
Procedural█████5%
Community Engagement███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Edmonds City Council PSPHSP Committee Meeting - June 16, 2026

The Edmonds City Council Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee met on June 16, 2026, at 4:30 PM to discuss four items: minor code amendments for middle housing, a pre-approved DADU plan program, cigarette sales to minors, and parking impound fines. The committee reviewed each item and made recommendations for full council action.

Discussion Items

  • Minor Code Amendments Related to Middle Housing (2.1): Brad Shipley from Planning presented minor, non-substantive code amendments to align references with the newly adopted Low Density Residential (LDR) zone, replacing RS references. The committee discussed whether to forward the amendments to full council as consent or regular business. Councilmember Susan Payne supported option one (proceed with minor amendments) and suggested consent, but after discussion with ex officio members about public visibility and staff preparation, the committee reached consensus to forward the item to full council as regular business for the next meeting.

  • Resolution on Contract Authority for Pre-Approved DADU Plan Program (2.2): Ted Corey, Building Official, presented a program to allow design professionals to submit pre-approved structural plans for detached accessory dwelling units (DADUs). The resolution would move authority to enter into agreements with design professionals from the city council to the mayor to expedite the process. Committee members expressed support and discussed oversight, including regular updates to council, design quality, and potential for a design review committee. The committee reached consensus to recommend the resolution for consideration and approval at the July 14, 2026 city council meeting as regular business.

  • Cigarette Sales to Minors (2.3): Shane Holly from Police Services presented an ordinance amending ECC 5.15 and 5.46 to align city code with RCW 70.155 regarding cigarette sales to minors. The update primarily affects retailers. Committee members had no questions and agreed to forward the item to a future consent agenda.

  • Parking Code Update (Impound Fines) (2.4): Shane Holly presented an amendment to reduce the fine for 72-hour overtime parking from $250 to $40, consistent with other parking fines, noting that vehicles are already subject to towing fees. Councilmember Susan Payne requested regular business for visibility, and the committee agreed. The committee recommended forwarding the ordinance to full council as regular business.

Key Outcomes

  • The committee forwarded the minor middle housing code amendments to full council as regular business.
  • The committee recommended approval of the DADU program resolution at the July 14, 2026 council meeting as regular business.
  • The committee approved forwarding the cigarette sales to minors ordinance to a future consent agenda.
  • The committee recommended the parking code update (impound fine reduction) to full council as regular business.

The meeting adjourned at 5:22 PM.

Meeting Transcript

So this is Councilmember Jen and I would like to call to order the Edmund City Council Public Safety Planning Human Services and Personnel Committee on June 16th, 2026 at 4 30 p.m. We have in attendance committee member Susan Payne and also our ex officio member, Council President Michelle Dash, and then exficyo Vivian Olson. And we will be starting with item 2.1, which is the minor code amendments related to middle housing. And I will let Brad Shipley take it away. All right. Well, well, thank you. I know this is uh something that's been anticipated for a while. It was almost a year ago when we first adopted low density residential uh to replace our traditionally single family zones. Uh if you guys guys recall it was a uh kind of a scramble to comply with state regulations and part of that process envisioned uh multi phases to kind of come back and review code and and figure out where uh some of the references may not align or whether there's other code sections that do not align. So this uh is a second phase of that project. Um right now we're just looking at minor code amendments. So uh minor code amendments is you know, that these were uh really non-substantive code issues. Uh they're you know, maybe outdated references, formatting issues, internal consistencies, um, those types of things. Uh those are all outlined in ECDC uh 20.80.015. So this process was envisioned to allow us to you know refine the code uh over time and be a little bit more proactive uh in that process. Um the minor code amendments, the these are not required to go to uh planning board for recommendation, they just go straight to council, um, often you know through a committee meeting and then uh could be brought to full council for um either consideration or on a consent agenda. That's really up to council. Um at the at that time, you know, council could look over the proposed amendments and they could pull some out to be included in a in a future change that's more substantive if that's what they choose, or they could you know adopt part or whole of uh the recommended changes. So uh today, you know, we we're going over some of those recommended changes. Um I did include that in the packet. Um most of these are going to just be updated references to LDR where it used to be RS. So they're pretty simple. Uh a couple of them are um references that had changed with the new code, uh, but just weren't updated or missed uh as part of that code update process. Um I guess you know, I think with that I I could kind of open it up to conversation here. Um if there's any questions or uh discussion about any of these proposed changes. Okay, um, are there any questions? Please go ahead, Susan. Yeah, thank you. Um I thank you, Janet, and and thank you, Brad. I just want to say I appreciate that these are really very simple um kind of alignment changes. The only thing I had to look up was the one for domestic animal and um and that was um uh definitions, you know, part of the the coding. So it wasn't anything that we needed to make bigger changes with or anything like that. So I'm I'm pleased to see that these are coming through. I you know, looking at the agenda memo, I I think that we can probably um take um option one, um, just proceed with the minor code amendments and um make sure that we build in consistency whenever we can through our codes. I think that this is a nice nice start for a code update. Are there any other comments? Um yeah, I just wanted to note that this being uh kind of the the first touch on a long process, it's come back. It is on the agenda planner for um next Tuesday for full council. So just that way it's kind of the touch, and then after that, that can be more of a consistent update being done. That'll be our recommendation. Vivian, are there do you have any comments or questions? Okay. Um I'm looked over everything and I'm in complete agreement that these are minor code amendments. And I don't think um that we have to go through any additional process. So I'd like to follow the staff recommendation that we direct the staff to proceed with preparation of targeted minor code amendments related to middle house housing implementation, and that the amendment should be limited to code cleanup consistency, clarification, and administration of the adopted middle housing regulations. Do we have consensus from the committee? Just to quite be full counsel. So I was going to come back next week for that. I I'm comfortable if it's on consent. I mean, these are really just the the most minor uh code changes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com