OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Edmonds, Washington/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Edmonds PSPHSP Committee Meeting Summary – September 15, 2026

City Council & Boards — Wednesday, September 16, 2026
BodyEdmonds, Washington
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateWednesday, September 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 26:36

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:13

Hello.

0:15

Well, let me get this meeting started.

0:18

We had a quick um change of events.

0:22

Um council member Nan um is not feeling well, and so she asked me to chair the meeting today.

0:29

So I will get our um the public safety planning, human services and personnel committee um meeting underway.

0:38

Um this is for September 15th, it's 4 30 p.m.

0:42

And present today we have council members Vivian Olsen, Michelle Dotch and Chris Eck here along with myself.

0:52

And I don't have the packet up quite yet, but I will get there.

0:57

Um but first up we have and is to have the proposed interlocal agreement regarding the Linwood Neighborhood Center um from the municipal court.

1:06

And with that, we have Omar Gamez here to speak to it.

1:10

Mr.

1:11

Gomez, Gamez, sorry, Gamas, I know who you are.

1:16

Good afternoon, everybody.

1:19

This is my first um presentation to the council in the meeting like this.

1:23

So uh bear with me if I don't have the proper uh uh words or ways of doing things, but uh we're just gonna go with it.

1:32

Um we're fairly involved here.

1:35

So you um it's it's typically first names, so or whatever you're most comfortable with at that point.

1:41

But please thank you.

1:43

Um and you need my join us too in case there's questions that I might not be able to answer that are um more on her uh line of questioning.

1:50

Um she might be joining us here in a second.

1:53

Um so uh basically uh the the little history behind it, um we've had community court at different locations.

2:00

Um we've had it at the Swedish hospital at one point um that was free to us and it was within the city of Edmonds.

2:07

We then moved it to um the health clinics on 99, um, and then our neighborhood center um when we had it for a couple months there as well.

2:17

So um since that closure, we've been uh really actively looking for another location that would um uh meet all of our needs that we were looking for.

2:25

And it took us uh a while to find the right um space.

2:29

Um and I think we're finally almost there.

2:32

Um, and then that's the Linwood uh neighborhood center.

2:35

Uh we twered it, a couple of us went and met with them.

2:39

Um it has everything that we were looking for, uh, not just location, but also what it provides to the community and to a lot of our folks that um are needing to access resources, and that's already a place where a lot of those rose resources already exist.

2:54

Um, and that's what it's for.

2:56

You know, it's meant for a place of gathering and for them to connect um with the child care there, they have um health services, all of those different things that they may be able to also tap into while they're there, right?

3:08

Um the location is beautiful, it meets uh, you know, like I said, all of our needs and and mostly location-wise, right?

3:15

Um it's a lot easier to get to for a lot of our folks, um clients and attorneys and everybody involved uh right off of 99 on that main corridor with a lot of buses, you know, um and transportation and stuff like that.

3:28

So um that was our our main um, you know, uh key point.

3:33

Um so for that, you know, we did a little bit of research and um you know, other cities and counties around the state already have something um set up like this where um you know they offer these uh court events at um either city libraries or things like that, but uh sometimes they're not in their actual city, right?

3:51

In their jurisdiction.

3:53

Um so with this, we did a little bit of research, like I said, and um, you know, it does require some kind of agreement between the cities because we are now telling our folks to, hey, next quarter day you're gonna go into this location, which is just right side uh outside of our of our city, but it does uh kind of um step foot on that um jurisdiction uh of Linwood.

4:14

Um so with that we just want to make sure that uh both cities are in agreement that it's okay for that to happen just so we don't have any legal issues down the road uh with any defendants and stuff that might try to use that, you know, like well uh I don't have to go there because it's not admitting that kind of thing.

4:29

Um we're not um asking, you know, any um anything from Linwood, that there's no um payments going through from city to city or anything.

4:38

It's already um, you know, their own nonprofit agency that runs it.

4:42

So um, you know, there's no uh money being you know um involved there within the cities or anything like that.

4:49

So it's just basically more of a formal agreement between the cities that it's okay for us to operate uh within their um you know city umbrella kind of thing, but not anything to do with them.

5:00

We don't need them for anything.

5:01

Um just just to give us the blessing of having it there.

5:08

Okay.

5:09

Does anybody have any questions for Mr.

5:11

Gamus?

5:15

Okay.

5:15

Um my only question is oh go ahead, Vivian.

5:19

Okay, this was before I could go second.

5:21

Um I just wanted to um ask because um there was sort of an illusion that maybe there was another agreement with the Linwood um neighborhood center that um is this um gonna be an expense that um council's expecting to come back, or um is this just another way that the neighborhood center is serving in the community?

5:42

Or if you don't want to.

5:45

I was just gonna say this is this has to do with some of the legal issues that might be drawn up on a case if jurisdictionally were hearing cases in another city versus ours.

5:54

So this is truly just to help with issues that may occur down the line if somebody says, I don't need to abide by that order because the judge didn't have an agreement that they could be a judge within that city.

6:05

So this really doesn't have to do with any of like using it as a vendor space or any other conditions that the city might have with the neighborhood center.

6:12

This is just to deal with criminal cases going before a judge in another city.

6:17

That's truly what it is.

6:19

I I do appreciate that.

6:20

There was um something in the agenda memo or um document, I don't remember which, but it sounded like there might still be another separate agreement with the Linwood Center.

6:31

And I didn't, I was just curious um whether there was going to be a cost impact to the city that we'd be seeing in the budget.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Regulations███████████████████████████████████████████43%
Procedural█████████████████████████25%
Technology and Innovation███████████████████19%
Human Services████████8%
Judicial System█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Edmonds City Council PSPHSP Committee Meeting Summary – September 15, 2026

The Edmonds City Council Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee met on September 15, 2026, at 4:30 PM. Councilmember [Name] chaired in place of Councilmember Nan, who was unwell. Also present were Councilmembers Vivian Olsen, Michelle Dotch, and Chris Eck. The committee addressed three items: a proposed interlocal agreement regarding a municipal court in the Lynnwood Neighborhood Center, a short plat vacation interim ordinance, and an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system update.

Consent Calendar

  • Proposed Interlocal Agreement regarding Lynnwood Neighborhood Center: The committee discussed the first reading of this agreement, which allows Edmonds to hold court proceedings at the Lynnwood Neighborhood Center, outside city jurisdiction. The committee gestured toward moving it to the consent agenda after the city attorney confirmed no extra council action was needed; the only change would be allowing the judge to sign the agreement.

Discussion Items

  • Short Plat Vacation Interim Ordinance: The committee reviewed the first reading of a one-year interim ordinance to establish a process for short plat vacations, which the city currently lacks. The planning director noted this was a simple two-lot process with no dedications required, and the ordinance would allow time to address state mandates, including code updates for unit lot subdivisions and lot splits due by June 2027. The committee agreed to move it to full council on October 13, 2026 for discussion and potential adoption.
  • ERP Update: The committee received the third quarter 2026 ERP implementation update. As of September 10, project tasks were about 42-43% complete, with roughly 40 days under budget overall (25 days under for finance, 15 days under for HR). About 55% of the 2026 budget was consumed ($130,000 to $133,000 of $238,000). Some components, such as centralized purchasing, were deferred due to IT staffing constraints. No action was requested.

Key Outcomes

  • Interlocal Agreement: Expected to move to the consent agenda for final approval.
  • Short Plat Vacation Interim Ordinance: Approved by the committee to proceed to full council on October 13, 2026.
  • ERP Update: No formal action was requested or taken; the committee acknowledged the report and expressed appreciation for the IT team's work.

Meeting Transcript

Hello. Well, let me get this meeting started. We had a quick um change of events. Um council member Nan um is not feeling well, and so she asked me to chair the meeting today. So I will get our um the public safety planning, human services and personnel committee um meeting underway. Um this is for September 15th, it's 4 30 p.m. And present today we have council members Vivian Olsen, Michelle Dotch and Chris Eck here along with myself. And I don't have the packet up quite yet, but I will get there. Um but first up we have and is to have the proposed interlocal agreement regarding the Linwood Neighborhood Center um from the municipal court. And with that, we have Omar Gamez here to speak to it. Mr. Gomez, Gamez, sorry, Gamas, I know who you are. Good afternoon, everybody. This is my first um presentation to the council in the meeting like this. So uh bear with me if I don't have the proper uh uh words or ways of doing things, but uh we're just gonna go with it. Um we're fairly involved here. So you um it's it's typically first names, so or whatever you're most comfortable with at that point. But please thank you. Um and you need my join us too in case there's questions that I might not be able to answer that are um more on her uh line of questioning. Um she might be joining us here in a second. Um so uh basically uh the the little history behind it, um we've had community court at different locations. Um we've had it at the Swedish hospital at one point um that was free to us and it was within the city of Edmonds. We then moved it to um the health clinics on 99, um, and then our neighborhood center um when we had it for a couple months there as well. So um since that closure, we've been uh really actively looking for another location that would um uh meet all of our needs that we were looking for. And it took us uh a while to find the right um space. Um and I think we're finally almost there. Um, and then that's the Linwood uh neighborhood center. Uh we twered it, a couple of us went and met with them. Um it has everything that we were looking for, uh, not just location, but also what it provides to the community and to a lot of our folks that um are needing to access resources, and that's already a place where a lot of those rose resources already exist. Um, and that's what it's for. You know, it's meant for a place of gathering and for them to connect um with the child care there, they have um health services, all of those different things that they may be able to also tap into while they're there, right? Um the location is beautiful, it meets uh, you know, like I said, all of our needs and and mostly location-wise, right? Um it's a lot easier to get to for a lot of our folks, um clients and attorneys and everybody involved uh right off of 99 on that main corridor with a lot of buses, you know, um and transportation and stuff like that. So um that was our our main um, you know, uh key point. Um so for that, you know, we did a little bit of research and um you know, other cities and counties around the state already have something um set up like this where um you know they offer these uh court events at um either city libraries or things like that, but uh sometimes they're not in their actual city, right? In their jurisdiction. Um so with this, we did a little bit of research, like I said, and um, you know, it does require some kind of agreement between the cities because we are now telling our folks to, hey, next quarter day you're gonna go into this location, which is just right side uh outside of our of our city, but it does uh kind of um step foot on that um jurisdiction uh of Linwood. Um so with that we just want to make sure that uh both cities are in agreement that it's okay for that to happen just so we don't have any legal issues down the road uh with any defendants and stuff that might try to use that, you know, like well uh I don't have to go there because it's not admitting that kind of thing. Um we're not um asking, you know, any um anything from Linwood, that there's no um payments going through from city to city or anything. It's already um, you know, their own nonprofit agency that runs it. So um, you know, there's no uh money being you know um involved there within the cities or anything like that. So it's just basically more of a formal agreement between the cities that it's okay for us to operate uh within their um you know city umbrella kind of thing, but not anything to do with them. We don't need them for anything. Um just just to give us the blessing of having it there. Okay. Does anybody have any questions for Mr. Gamus? Okay. Um my only question is oh go ahead, Vivian. Okay, this was before I could go second.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com