OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Elk Grove City Council Special Meeting – June 24, 2026

Other — Wednesday, June 24, 2026
BodyElkgrove, California
SessionOther
DateWednesday, June 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 0:47
Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

All right, we have reconvened from closed session.

0:03

I have the following two disclosure items.

0:05

By a five to zero vote, the city council authorized and directed the city attorney's office to defend the cases of CART versus the City of Elkgrove and all, and Vaden v.

0:17

Sacramento Sheriff Office and all as identified by the case number on the City Council meeting agenda.

0:24

Also by a five to zero vote, the city council authorized the city attorney's office to initiate litigation in one matter.

0:32

The name of the defendants and details are not subject to disclosure at this time.

0:36

Once litigation is filed, the information will be disclosed to any person upon inquiry.

0:43

So with that, I will adjourn the special meeting at 6.01 p.m.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Pending Litigation█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Summary of Proceedings

Elk Grove City Council Special Meeting – June 24, 2026

The Elk Grove City Council held a special meeting on June 24, 2026, beginning at 5:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting included a closed session followed by an open session where the mayor reported actions taken in closed session. The council unanimously voted on litigation matters and then adjourned.

Closed Session and Report

  • The council convened in closed session to discuss two existing litigation matters (Vanessa Vaden v. Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office, et al., Case No. 26CV014793; and Dennis Cartee v. City of Elk Grove, et al., Case No. 26CV013794) and one anticipated litigation matter.
  • After reconvening in open session at approximately 6:01 PM, Mayor Bobbie Singh-Allen reported two unanimous decisions:
    • By a 5–0 vote, the council authorized and directed the city attorney’s office to defend the City in the cases of Cartee v. City of Elk Grove and Vaden v. Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office (as identified by case numbers on the agenda).
    • By a 5–0 vote, the council authorized the city attorney’s office to initiate litigation in one matter; the defendants and details are not subject to disclosure at this time, but will be disclosed upon inquiry once litigation is filed.

Key Outcomes

  • The council took no other action and adjourned the special meeting at 6:01 PM.

Meeting Transcript

All right, we have reconvened from closed session. I have the following two disclosure items. By a five to zero vote, the city council authorized and directed the city attorney's office to defend the cases of CART versus the City of Elkgrove and all, and Vaden v. Sacramento Sheriff Office and all as identified by the case number on the City Council meeting agenda. Also by a five to zero vote, the city council authorized the city attorney's office to initiate litigation in one matter. The name of the defendants and details are not subject to disclosure at this time. Once litigation is filed, the information will be disclosed to any person upon inquiry. So with that, I will adjourn the special meeting at 6.01 p.m.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com