El Paso Mass Transit Department Board Meeting - October 14, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
El Paso Mass Transit Department Board Meeting - October 14, 2025
The El Paso Mass Transit Department Board met on October 14, 2025 at 11:44 AM to discuss and vote on several agenda items including contract modifications, new awards for transit services, and janitorial services. All votes were unanimous.
Consent Calendar
- Approved the minutes of the previous meeting by a motion from Board Member Fiero, seconded by Board Member Limon. The item passed unanimously.
Discussion Items
- Item 3 – Termination of Janitorial Contract (Eagle Janitorial Service Co.): The board discussed and approved a resolution to terminate contract #2023-0673 for janitorial services at Sun Metro due to an overestimation of service hours in the original scope. The termination is effective November 3, 2025. Anthony DeCogger, Director of Sun Metro, explained that the original contract was based on projected ridership recovery from COVID-19, which did not materialize as expected. Additionally, a 2023 FTA audit required fair and open competition, prompting a new bidding process. The new contract reduces estimated hours from 2,100 to 1,875, resulting in lower capacity requirements, which allowed 11 bidders (including local companies) compared to only 4 in the prior bid. A local company won the new contract and pays employees $1 more per hour. Board Member Chavez requested clarification on why a contract would be canceled and replaced at a higher cost; DeCogger explained the regulatory and market-driven reasons. The motion to approve was made by Board Member Limon, seconded by Board Member Chavez, and passed unanimously.
- Item 4 – Award of Fixed Route Service Contract to Project Amistad: The board approved a three-year contract (with two one-year options) to Project Amistad (doing business as LULAC Project Amistad) for an estimated $16,083,540 initially, $11,375,760 for the two-year option, and a total over five years of $27,459,300. The contract provides reliable and consistent transportation options for residents. Board Member Canales expressed strong support for Project Amistad, noting their excellent service and community contributions. Motion by Board Member Limon, seconded by Board Member Canales, passed unanimously.
- Item 5 – Award of Bus Shelter Cleaning Contract to ACE Government Cleaning LLC: The board approved a three-year contract (with two one-year options) for bus shelter and stop cleaning services for an estimated $2,981,655 initially, $1,987,770 for the option period, totaling $4,969,425 over five years. Motion by Board Member Fiero, seconded by Board Member Limon, passed unanimously.
- Item 6 – Award of Janitorial Services Contract to ACE Government Services LLC: The board approved a three-year contract (with two one-year options) for daily janitorial services at Sun Metro Transit Centers, Park and Ride lots, Anthony Parking Lot, and Transit Terminals for an estimated $4,017,948 initially, $2,678,632 for the option period, totaling $6,696,580 over five years. Motion by Board Member Limon, seconded by Board Member Boyar Trejo, passed unanimously.
Key Outcomes
- All four agenda items (Items 3, 4, 5, 6) were approved unanimously by the board.
- The board expressed appreciation to Anthony DeCogger for his detailed explanations and engagement with council offices.
- The meeting adjourned after the final vote.
Meeting Transcript
is in recess at 11 44 a.m. in order to conduct the mass transit department board meeting good morning good morning this is a meeting of the el Paso Mass Transit Department Board for Tuesday October 14 2025 it is 1144 a.m present in presiding as board chair johnson and also present in council chambers are board members Chavez Acevedo Rocha Boyar Trejo Niño Fiero Limon and Canales Mr. Mayor we only have the minutes on the consent agenda and we do not have anybody signed up for public comment. Okay is there a motion to approve second all right there's a motion and a second to approve the mass transit consent agenda give me one second all matters listed under the consent agenda including those do a trick yes will be considered by mass transit department board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless separate discussion is requested by board members prior to the vote members of the audience may ask questions regarding items on the consent agenda when the vote has been taken if an item has not been called out for separate discussion the item has been approved the mass transit department board meeting board may however reconsider any item at any time during the meeting and again this is for item one the the minutes and who made the motion board member fiero seconded by board member limon okay let's call for the vote voting session is open mr mr mayor thank you sir and the item has been approved unanimously all right let's take item number three item number three is discussion and action on the resolution that the director of purchasing and strategic sourcing is authorized to modify to notify Francisco Corral doing business as eagle janitorial service company that the city is terminating contract number 2023-0673 janitorial services mass transit rebid and this is for convenience due to an overestimation of service hours in the original contract scope of work and that the termination shall be effective as of November 3rd 2025 okay okay there's a motion and a second that represent chavez thank you mayor um and I know that we're going to be canceling this contract and awarding another one and I wanted um the presentation or Anthony to come speak to to the reason for that and I don't know if you want to do it on this item or the approval of the next contract if you could just go over the the reasoning behind canceling this contract and approving the next one please thank you so Anthony DeCogger the director of Sun Metro so the question is I think the question is why are we doing this particular canceling this one and adding the next contract so for this it the question um kind of reminds me of when Claudie was asking you were asking Claudia the question when she was presenting the contract um presentation a few weeks ago about um why contracts are amended sometimes and Claudia was saying that hey you have to in the contracts but the department generally knows the reason why so there's often two perspectives of why that and so they wrote in here the overestimate service hours and so for this particular contract is unique like all contracts are why they have to be um amended um so so for this one if you go back to um 2022 when we looked at this contract the janitorial contract is specifically tied to um ridership and so it was during covet but we had to project it out so we had to project it out so we had to look at we think ridership is coming back so we looked at 2017 when when ridership was higher because we had to say this contract has to cover that time right the time projected out three year contract plus um two years of options right and so we had to project it so would cover all that but it didn't cover that because it it would have if it would have gone back in fact the whole industry thought the time would have the ridership would have came back meaning we had janitory contracts that covered what need to be cleaned up with the ridership going back um and so the whole industry thought that ridership would come back but when it didn't we had to give it another year to to check right and so when it didn't then we had to amend so there you go it wouldn't a particular answer why why we amend so this is an example of why we would amend because we we needed to based upon the conditions so sometimes we have to amend when the conditions call for that In fact, the whole industry thought the time would have the ridership would have came back, meaning we had janitory contracts that covered what needed to be cleaned up with the ridership going back. Um so the whole industry thought that ridership would come back. But when it didn't, we had to give it another year to check, right? And so when it didn't, then we had to amend. So there you go, it wouldn't a particular answer why why we amend. So this is an example of why we would amend because we we needed to based upon the conditions. So sometimes we have to amend when the conditions call for that. Um so we did, but we also have other regulations like FTA. And FTA says that we have to have uh where is it at fair and fair and open competition. So we have to have fair and open competition. So we had a um uh audit in 2020 2023. So we had an audit in 2023, and the FTA said, hey, you have to do fair and open competition. So after we amended one time and it said and FTA, we know FTA says you have to do that after we admit it twice, actually, and we know the ridership's not going up as fast as we thought. Now we have other rules that we have to abide by FTA, fair and open competition. The first time we had a bid, we had four bidders, right? And since the numbers were so high, we only had bidders come in from out of town, right? Because they could only that's who could handle the capacity. But once we knew the ridership wasn't going up as fast as we thought, and we amended it twice, right? Uh to the conditions, right, instead of doing the whole new contract. This time we want to do a new contract because we know it's the right thing to do, and FTA is saying do fair and open competition. So now we're doing doing that based upon the conditions and the requirement by FTA says we must do that, and we know that because the audit in 2023. So now we have another audit coming up in 2026. So we know we have to do this, right? So then the question comes, I believe that you are inquiring, ma'am. Does this contract make it so we have to pay more? Well, in fact, we do have to pay more because the new contract says facilities by hours 21 when the old the older contract was 1875, right? So there is is some increase to this, but it doesn't really matter because we have to do this by the FTA regulation. So we're gonna have to end this contract and start another one, right? And so, but there is good news to this because I know that we want to bring dollars back to the community, right? So there's a when we have four bids before, but now we have 11 that supports the fair and open competition, but it also allowed because the number of hours went down, it also allowed local companies to be able to bid because now they can handle the capacity. So we we made a good news story in two ways. The first one was we're following the FTA regulations because we have to open the contract. The second way is we made it so that local local businesses could compete in this, one because we had to, and two, because the conditions change. So we're amending because the conditions change one to open it fair in competition, too. It helped the the local vendors be able to bid and actually wanted the local bid um what one local business is actually won the competition, and the other good news is they actually pay a dollar more than the other company did. So now we're bringing in more dollars to local community and the local people are getting paid more. So did that answer your question right now. Thank you, Anthony. That's great. And thank you, Tikal. Yeah, I think I really think the work you're doing is great. I I had originally just wanted to know why you were canceling a contract, bidding it out and going to pay more money for it, but that explains it perfectly, and I appreciate the work that all of you are doing. Thank you so much. Thank you, Anthony. All right, so there's a motion in the second on item number three. And I do have a motion made by board member Limon, and who's seconded?
openpublica.com