OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Fayetteville, North Carolina/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Fayetteville City Council Work Session Summary – November 2, 2026

City Council — Monday, November 2, 2026
BodyFayetteville, North Carolina
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, November 2, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 5:09:40

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:01

Welcome those who joined us in the audience, those who are joining us remotely.

0:06

We welcome you as well.

0:08

As with every meeting, we start with the invocation.

0:11

We're gonna ask that uh the Reverend Dr.

0:14

Stefan Ferguson.

0:15

Okay.

0:16

If you wouldn't not mind giving us to throw them, please, sir, and then after that, we could do the Pledge of Allegiance.

Speaker 2

0:25

Eternal Father, we thank you for this day.

0:27

We thank you, God for this opportunity that you have given us.

0:30

We ask that you be with us on today as we meet.

0:34

We ask you to open our eyes, our minds, our hearts so that we will make the right decisions, which is which is in the best interest of our residents.

0:43

In Jesus' name we pray.

0:44

Amen.

Speaker 1

1:03

Thank you.

1:04

Thank you, Councilmember Reverend Ferguson.

1:06

Um, Council, with that as we move forward, we will look to know who's filling in for the city manager for the city manager's report.

1:22

Obviously, they don't have anything to report, do they?

1:25

All right.

1:26

Mr.

1:26

Gibson just got to work.

1:28

Welcome.

1:29

Uh all right.

1:30

Uh moving to 5.0 is the approval of the agenda, council will work on our shore systems and we'll look to approve the agenda.

1:42

Uh so

Speaker 3

1:43

move to approve, sir.

Speaker 1

1:44

All right, hold on.

1:46

Okay.

1:46

All right.

1:46

All right.

1:47

As a motion by Councilman here, is there a second?

1:50

Second by Davis discussion on agenda approval.

Speaker 4

1:54

All right.

Unassigned speaker

1:59

All

Speaker 4

2:00

right.

2:00

Who we okay.

Unassigned speaker

2:01

Motion

Speaker 1

2:01

carries unanimous agendas approved item 6.01.

2:05

Uh receive and provide directional code enforcement collection framework and resolution authorizing accounting write-off and limited interest and penalty waivers.

2:14

So we'll turn this over.

2:15

Hi.

2:16

Good evening.

2:16

Good uh afternoon.

2:18

I'm sorry.

2:19

Hope it's not evening when we get out.

Unassigned speaker

2:48

Is

Speaker 5

2:48

that all?

Unassigned speaker

2:49

Okay.

Speaker 5

2:50

Good afternoon, Mayor and members of council.

2:53

Um, I'm Amanda Mott, the assistant CFO over financial reporting for the city.

2:59

Today we're bringing forward a recommended framework for how the city administers and collects code enforcement assessments.

3:07

This was previously presented to Councilmember McNair's

Speaker 6

3:10

committee.

Speaker 5

3:11

What began earlier this year as an effort to address long-standing receivables quickly became a much broader conversation about accountability, consistency, and how the city manages these obligations.

3:26

As finance began reviewing outstanding balances and communicating with property owners, we identified areas where clearer procedures were needed, not only to strengthen our collection efforts, but also to ensure that property owners are treated fairly and that public funds are appropriately accounted for.

3:46

This framework we're presenting today is intended to accomplish both.

4:03

At its core, this is about establishing a process that's fair, responsible, and consistent while ensuring the city is fulfilling its obligation to protect public resources.

4:16

We're here today because the city has spent public funds performing necessary work on private property, including lock cleanings, clearings, and demolitions.

4:27

It's important to understand that these assessments are not simply fines or penalties.

4:33

The principal balances represent actual taxpayer dollars the city has already spent to address address conditions on privately owned properties.

4:44

North Carolina general statutes authorize the city to intervene and perform this work when property owners fail to address certain

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural███████████████15%
Public Engagement██████████████14%
Code Enforcement█████████████13%
Municipal Service District█████████9%
Data Center Regulation████████8%
Legal Affairs███████7%
Noise Ordinance██████6%
Public Safety██████6%
Signage Regulations████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Fayetteville City Council Work Session Summary – November 2, 2026

The Fayetteville City Council held a work session on Monday, November 2, 2026, beginning at 2:00 p.m. The session covered a range of topics including code enforcement collections, noise ordinance amendments, removal of properties from the Downtown Municipal Service District (MSD), a resident engagement strategy, and updates to city council policies. Council members also introduced items on a catalyst site, a data center moratorium, and after-action reviews for city-funded events. The evening concluded with recognitions and a public forum.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Data Center Moratorium: Multiple speakers, including Constance Pratt, Rosemary Harris, Angela Tatum, Lorena Murray, Dale Dees, Joshua Schwab, and others, urged the council to adopt a moratorium on data center developments to allow time for comprehensive impact studies and community engagement. They cited concerns about infrastructure capacity, environmental effects, and transparency. A written comment from Eric Harris supported data centers, citing potential private investment and tax base expansion.
  • Downtown Safety: Stacey Graybill, a downtown business owner, described ongoing violence and excessive noise at a particular establishment, requesting nuisance abatement action.
  • Charitable Giving: Isaac Alfaro raised concerns about unregulated charitable giving downtown potentially enabling illegal activity and called for a joint city-county assessment.
  • Neighborhood Development: Deborah Nixon spoke against a proposed connection from a new apartment complex into the Tarlaton Plantation neighborhood, requesting alternative access be considered.
  • Other Concerns: Melissa Williams expressed frustration with the lack of response to her ongoing issue. Christopher Cruz asked the city to consider Family Heritage as a supplemental insurance vendor.

Discussion Items

  • 6.01 Code Enforcement Collections Framework: Assistant CFO Amanda Mott presented a framework to standardize the collection of code enforcement assessments, totaling approximately $3.9 million (including $2 million in interest/penalties). The framework includes accounting write-offs for aged receivables (without debt forgiveness), a formal administrative appeal process, and limited authority for the City Manager and CFO to waive interest and penalties. Council discussed fairness, notification, and repeat offenders. Motion passed 9-1, moving the framework and resolution to the November 9, 2026 consent agenda.
  • 6.02 Amend Noise Ordinance: Police Attorney Aaron Swinney recommended updates to Chapter 17, including a 150-foot quiet buffer around sensitive uses, enforcement based on a plainly audible standard, and new provisions for non-commercial free speech amplified sound. Council adopted specific provisions: a warning requirement before citation (Section 17-17) and a five-minute duration requirement (Section 17-10), both effective January 2027 after a December public forum. Minor editorial changes (Sections 17-7, 17-12, 17-14) and reorganization (Section 17-11) were adopted effective November 23, 2026. New definitions and major revisions were deferred to a future work session.
  • 6.03 Parkview MSD Removal: The council considered petitions to remove 49 residential units from the Downtown Municipal Service District. After debate about fairness, precedent, and district services, council voted 6-4 to direct staff to prepare an ordinance for removal, requiring two public hearings and final adoption by fiscal year-end. Opposed: Councilmembers McNair, Ferguson, Davis, and Hondros.
  • 6.04 Fay Connect Engagement Strategy: Staff outlined a plan to expand the existing Everbridge system for outward-facing resident notifications at an additional cost of $15,000 per year. The strategy includes voluntary subscriptions, geo-targeting, and ADA-compliant features. Council gave unanimous consensus to proceed with implementation.
  • 6.05 Council Policy Changes: Council adopted revisions to Policy 155.4 (naming of city properties) allowing revocation under certain conditions, and Policy 110.1 (filling committee vacancies) giving preference to alternates.
  • 6.06 Catalyst Site One: Councilmember Greene modified her request to refer the remaining portion of the catalyst site to staff for a flood zone survey and feasibility study, with a report due by February 2027. Consensus was granted.
  • 6.07 Data Center Moratorium: Councilmember McMillan presented a model work plan for a moratorium, including capacity studies and a community benefits framework. No vote was taken; staff was directed to use the feedback in drafting a moratorium ordinance statement of actions.
  • 6.08 After-Action Review Policy: Councilmember Ferguson requested a policy requiring after-action reports for city-funded community events within 30 days. Council gave consensus to direct staff to develop the policy.

Key Outcomes

  • Code Enforcement Framework: Approved for November 9, 2026 consent agenda (9-1).
  • Noise Ordinance: Partial adoption of specific amendments; warning and five-minute requirement to be effective January 2027 after a public forum; minor edits and reorganization effective November 23, 2026; other changes deferred.
  • Parkview MSD Removal: Council directed preparation of removal ordinance (6-4).
  • Fay Connect: Consensus to continue implementation.
  • Policy Changes: Policies 155.4 and 110.1 adopted.
  • Catalyst Site One: Referred to staff for survey, report due February 2027.
  • Data Center Moratorium: Staff to develop draft ordinance statement of actions.
  • After-Action Policy: Staff to develop policy.

Meeting Transcript

Welcome those who joined us in the audience, those who are joining us remotely. We welcome you as well. As with every meeting, we start with the invocation. We're gonna ask that uh the Reverend Dr. Stefan Ferguson. Okay. If you wouldn't not mind giving us to throw them, please, sir, and then after that, we could do the Pledge of Allegiance. Eternal Father, we thank you for this day. We thank you, God for this opportunity that you have given us. We ask that you be with us on today as we meet. We ask you to open our eyes, our minds, our hearts so that we will make the right decisions, which is which is in the best interest of our residents. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. Thank you. Thank you, Councilmember Reverend Ferguson. Um, Council, with that as we move forward, we will look to know who's filling in for the city manager for the city manager's report. Obviously, they don't have anything to report, do they? All right. Mr. Gibson just got to work. Welcome. Uh all right. Uh moving to 5.0 is the approval of the agenda, council will work on our shore systems and we'll look to approve the agenda. Uh so move to approve, sir. All right, hold on. Okay. All right. All right. As a motion by Councilman here, is there a second? Second by Davis discussion on agenda approval. All right. All right. Who we okay. Motion carries unanimous agendas approved item 6.01. Uh receive and provide directional code enforcement collection framework and resolution authorizing accounting write-off and limited interest and penalty waivers. So we'll turn this over. Hi. Good evening. Good uh afternoon. I'm sorry. Hope it's not evening when we get out. Is that all? Okay. Good afternoon, Mayor and members of council. Um, I'm Amanda Mott, the assistant CFO over financial reporting for the city. Today we're bringing forward a recommended framework for how the city administers and collects code enforcement assessments.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com