OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Fitchburg, Wisconsin/Common Council & City Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Fitchburg Municipal Court Arraignment Session – October 29, 2026

Common Council & City Boards — Thursday, October 29, 2026
BodyFitchburg, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council & City Boards
DateThursday, October 29, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 31:39

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Stay connected everywhere you go.

0:03

Pitchburg is on your phone and your tablet and your laptop and TV.

0:08

Download the app.

0:09

It's free.

0:11

Access Pittsburgh.

0:12

This is your city at your fingertips.

Unassigned speaker

0:29

Hi,

Speaker 2

0:30

I'm Jeremy Crosby.

0:31

And I'm Nick Bouchet.

0:32

We're your host for the program that's all about your city, Talking Pittsburgh.

Speaker 3

0:36

Every weekday, we pull together the

Speaker 4

0:37

news, events, and information you need to stay on top of what's happening in the city of Pittsburgh.

Speaker 2

0:42

Find Talking Fitzburg on Cable TV, Roku, Amazon Fire, Apple TV, and our live stream on the web.

0:48

Plus, you can find all our headlines and stories on Facebook.

Speaker 5

1:08

And good evening.

1:09

Before we start, I would like to explain to you the process that will be following tonight.

1:15

Tonight's session is an arrangement session, and you're going to be asked a very simple question, and that is what plea would you like to enter.

1:24

Now we have three alternatives.

1:25

And the first one is to enter a plea of not guilty, which means you believe you are innocent, or you believe that the city cannot prove its case against

Unassigned speaker

1:35

you.

Speaker 5

1:36

For the burden of proof is on the city to prove that you are guilty.

1:40

You do not have to prove that you're innocent.

1:42

Now the second alternative is the opposite.

1:44

That's to enter a plea guilty, which means you are accepting the facts and circumstances that are stated in the citation that you have already received.

1:54

The third alternative is called a plea of no contest, which means though in your heart you think you are innocent, you're also 100% sure

Unassigned speaker

2:02

that

Speaker 5

2:02

should your case goes to trial, you will end up being found guilty.

2:06

In essence, you believe that there are lots of evidence against

Unassigned speaker

2:10

you.

Unassigned speaker

2:10

If

Speaker 5

2:10

you enter a plea of no contest, you will be found guilty.

2:13

However, there is one advantage to a plea of no contest, and that's in cases involving potential civil liability claims in civil court.

2:52

So most of you are here for alleged traffic citations.

2:56

You should understand that if I find you guilty, in addition to the fine that I'm going to ask you to pay, I'll take from you something called demerit points.

3:06

In the state of Wisconsin, if you accumulate 12 demerit points, your driving privilege will be revoked.

3:13

If you are here for the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, also known drunk driving, you should know that you have the right to request a jury trial.

3:25

If you do so, the trial will be held at Dane County Circuit Court.

3:30

It will not be held in Fitchburg.

3:32

So briefly, I'm gonna talk to you a little

Unassigned speaker

3:34

bit

Speaker 5

3:35

about our philosophy in Pittsburgh.

3:37

It's our philosophy to see that justice is individualized.

3:41

And what I mean that by that is that I'm gonna listen carefully to whatever mitigating circumstances that you may wish to share with me.

3:49

You really don't have to tell me anything.

3:51

But if you want to talk and and seek um any kind of reduction in the fine or in the points and and have a good mitigating circumstances, you may at you may like to wish uh to say it to me.

4:06

Uh and in addition to that, I'm gonna listen and see whatever uh record you may have had in the past.

4:14

Just about everything that you may have committed in the past will be in front of me.

4:19

Based on those two variables, I'll come with a verdict.

4:22

It may be in that two people face to identical citation, may have different outcome.

4:28

And that's the case in all traffic citations with the exception of traffic citation that have any basis that relate to alcohol or drugs in these cases.

4:41

You pay the maximum penalty as stated in the statute.

4:45

The same thing could be said about city ordinances where there is a criminal code counterpart to the ordinance.

4:52

Pitchburgh have opted to adopt city ordinances that are parallel to the criminal code.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

So we have an ordinance for battery, disorderly conduct, carrying concealed weapons, issuance of worthless checks, prostitution, and even ours.

Speaker 5

5:06

Now, if a police officer writes a complaint against a citizen, claiming that that citizen have violated the criminal code, and the citizen is being prosecuted in municipal court, you got a major break.

5:22

For no matter what, municipal court cannot render a criminal conviction.

5:30

So if you have a battery, and the police officer saying this person committed a battery, but the prosecutor is saying, Hey Judge, I want to prosecute it in municipal court.

5:43

That prosecutor is saying I'm gonna give this person a break.

5:56

But ultimately, it is not a criminal conviction.

6:00

So you can write in your employment application.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Transportation Safety████████████████████████████████32%
Public Safety██████████████████████████████30%
Legal Affairs██████████████████████22%
Procedural████████████████16%
Summary of Proceedings

Fitchburg Municipal Court Arraignment Session – October 29, 2026

On October 29, 2026, the Fitchburg Municipal Court held an evening arraignment session. The presiding judge explained the plea process, the city’s individualized justice philosophy, possible penalties, and the consequences of conviction. Several traffic, ordinance, and OWI citations were resolved through guilty or no-contest pleas. No agenda or minutes were available for this session.

Court Procedures & Advisements

  • The judge explained three plea options: not guilty, guilty, and no contest. The city has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a trial.
  • For Wisconsin traffic convictions, demerit points may be assessed; accumulating 12 points can result in revocation of driving privileges.
  • OWI defendants were advised that they have the right to request a jury trial in Dane County Circuit Court rather than Fitchburg.
  • The judge stated that municipal court cannot enter a criminal conviction for city ordinances that parallel criminal offenses, but fines for those ordinances will not be reduced.
  • Unpaid fines may lead to an arrest warrant and jail time of up to 60 days, with a daily credit against the fine. The transcript is inconsistent about whether the credit is $50 or $100 per day.
  • The judge said each case would be considered individually, based on mitigating circumstances and the defendant’s prior record, except for alcohol- or drug-related offenses and parallel criminal-code ordinances.

Cases Heard

  • Andrew Adenopoe entered a no-contest plea to failure to yield the right of way while making a left turn. The court reduced the fine from $108 to $78 and the points from 4 to 3.
  • Mustafa Chatter entered a no-contest plea to violating a yellow traffic control signal. The court imposed a $78 fine and 2 demerit points, noting the points could be removed if he had no further convictions.
  • Christopher Brozek pleaded guilty to violating a red traffic control signal. He said he already had 10 points and risked losing his license. The court convicted him, ordered a driver improvement class, and gave him two months to complete it. The fine was stated as $108, though the transcript also includes a reference to $98.
  • Faith Waffler entered a no-contest plea to failure to yield the right of way. The court reduced the fine to $78 and gave her a choice of 3 points or 40 hours of community service; she chose 3 points.
  • One defendant entered a no-contest plea to disorderly conduct and said the incident involved self-defense. The court imposed the fine of $323 without reduction, but invited the defendant to return if the conviction affected employment or education.
  • Alexis Roll entered a no-contest plea to disorderly conduct and was fined $323.
  • Tori Dockery entered a no-contest plea to disorderly conduct and was fined $323.
  • Felicia Chrisco entered a no-contest plea to shoplifting and was fined $449. The court arranged a payment plan of $40 per month with extensions every two months.
  • Daniel Palayo entered a no-contest plea to failure to keep a vehicle under control. The court imposed a $146 fine and convicted him. Palayo said his job as an automotive technician was at risk because he might not remain insurable; the judge said he would speak with him after sentencing.
  • Sebastian Taylor appeared under a special appearance related to a motion to reopen, but said he was not trying to reopen anything. The judge reviewed the record and concluded there was no pending reason for him to be in court, allowing him to leave.
  • Maria Zampolteca pleaded guilty to deviation from a designated lane and to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration. Her test result was 0.19. The judge noted there were no minors in the vehicle and no accident. The OWI penalties included a $1,046 fine, 8-month license revocation, mandatory assessment, 6 demerit points, and installation of an ignition interlock device for at least one year. The lane deviation citation was reduced to a $78 fine and 3 points. An interpreter was used for the proceedings.

Key Outcomes

  • The court accepted multiple guilty and no-contest pleas, imposing fines, points, classes, and payment plans as described above.
  • No juvenile cases were called, and the court took a break after the adult calendar.

Meeting Transcript

Stay connected everywhere you go. Pitchburg is on your phone and your tablet and your laptop and TV. Download the app. It's free. Access Pittsburgh. This is your city at your fingertips. Hi, I'm Jeremy Crosby. And I'm Nick Bouchet. We're your host for the program that's all about your city, Talking Pittsburgh. Every weekday, we pull together the news, events, and information you need to stay on top of what's happening in the city of Pittsburgh. Find Talking Fitzburg on Cable TV, Roku, Amazon Fire, Apple TV, and our live stream on the web. Plus, you can find all our headlines and stories on Facebook. And good evening. Before we start, I would like to explain to you the process that will be following tonight. Tonight's session is an arrangement session, and you're going to be asked a very simple question, and that is what plea would you like to enter. Now we have three alternatives. And the first one is to enter a plea of not guilty, which means you believe you are innocent, or you believe that the city cannot prove its case against you. For the burden of proof is on the city to prove that you are guilty. You do not have to prove that you're innocent. Now the second alternative is the opposite. That's to enter a plea guilty, which means you are accepting the facts and circumstances that are stated in the citation that you have already received. The third alternative is called a plea of no contest, which means though in your heart you think you are innocent, you're also 100% sure that should your case goes to trial, you will end up being found guilty. In essence, you believe that there are lots of evidence against you. If you enter a plea of no contest, you will be found guilty. However, there is one advantage to a plea of no contest, and that's in cases involving potential civil liability claims in civil court. So most of you are here for alleged traffic citations. You should understand that if I find you guilty, in addition to the fine that I'm going to ask you to pay, I'll take from you something called demerit points. In the state of Wisconsin, if you accumulate 12 demerit points, your driving privilege will be revoked. If you are here for the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, also known drunk driving, you should know that you have the right to request a jury trial. If you do so, the trial will be held at Dane County Circuit Court. It will not be held in Fitchburg. So briefly, I'm gonna talk to you a little bit about our philosophy in Pittsburgh. It's our philosophy to see that justice is individualized. And what I mean that by that is that I'm gonna listen carefully to whatever mitigating circumstances that you may wish to share with me. You really don't have to tell me anything. But if you want to talk and and seek um any kind of reduction in the fine or in the points and and have a good mitigating circumstances, you may at you may like to wish uh to say it to me. Uh and in addition to that, I'm gonna listen and see whatever uh record you may have had in the past. Just about everything that you may have committed in the past will be in front of me. Based on those two variables, I'll come with a verdict. It may be in that two people face to identical citation, may have different outcome. And that's the case in all traffic citations with the exception of traffic citation that have any basis that relate to alcohol or drugs in these cases.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com