The Folsom City Council held a regular meeting on April 26, 2022, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers. The meeting covered several key items, including a commendation for a local business, the introduction of a police military equipment use policy (AB481), and a public hearing on an appeal to overturn the denial of a conditional use permit for a crematorium. A technical glitch with WebEx interrupted the meeting and led to the continuance of the crematorium appeal to the next regular meeting on May 10, 2022.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:16 PM.
And we're having trouble with our WebEx connections. So if there are people out there in the internet that are trying to get in, um, there's some sort of a technical glitch on our end, and we're trying to get our IT people to get that resolved. So we apologize sincerely for anybody who was hoping to participate in the meeting remotely right this moment. It doesn't look like that's happening or not yet, anyway. And with that, there's too much paper up here tonight, kids. Um, we will call to order the regular meeting of the Folsom City Council for Tuesday, April 26th, 2022. And if the clerk would call the roll, please. Council members Rodriguez. Here keynote here. Call and Sherlock here. Kozlaski. Here. And how here. And with that, if you will all join me on the Pledge of Allegiance. To the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God. Do we have any agenda update? I think we have some additional information on item eight that was provided to the council members, and I'm assuming that copy was left on the back table. Just the one provided all council and copies at the back for the public. Okay. And we will start with business from the floor. That is the opportunity to speak to the council on member on items that are not on the agenda. And we only have one request to speak, and that's from Jack Henry. I would like to talk to you about the Placerville and Sacramento Valley Railroad. As you may already know, the PSVRR volunteers have been dedicated to this railroad for over 20 years with the express goal of saving the historic rail corridor and creating a top-notch excursion rail operation. Prior to the removal of the railroad tracks by the Russell Ranch developers to install three at grade crossings, and then the COVID pandemic, the railroad had significant operating revenues with a yearly increase in revenues of approximately 20% each year. Now today the PSVR has voluntarily shut down because of the controversy surrounding the three at grade crossings and ballast issues. Your staff has said that it would cost the PSVRR 200,000 for ballast. Not true. And there's more to come. The reason I bring this matter up to you is not to slam anyone, but to point out to you the importance of resolving these issues now, not next week or next month, and the importance of having a viable excursion railroad associated with the city of Folsom. Let me give you a brief definition of a tourist destination. Quote a tourist destination town is a town in which visitors can spend an overnight and in which a variety of activities and experiences are offered. So what that means is the more variety that Folsom offers to tourists, the more tourists will come to Folsom. Let me give you an example. Fort Bragg is considered a tourist destination. They have the beaches, Redwoods, nearby, and the skunk train. The skunk train was started by a group of local citizen investors who saw the potential of an excursion train to bring more tourists to Fort Bragg. I have given all of you a copy of a survey done by two independent groups covering the years 2016 and 2021. The visit Mendocino County and the Mendocino Railway survey both agreed with each other on the economic impact that the skunk train has had on Fort Bragg's economy. The one fact that should grab your attention is the 67.6 million dollars generated for the local economy during that time frame by the train. Jack, I'm I'm gonna need you to wrap up. And I'm gonna and I'm gonna make a further request. We've got a we've got another big agenda item, and we typically only provide three minutes. This is more an issue for the rail JPA. Right. And as you know, I'm chair of that. And I'm happy to set up a meeting with you guys, myself, Mark, and anybody else that that needs to be in that discussion. Okay, very good. Thank you.