OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Folsom City Council Meeting: AB481 Policy, Crematorium Appeal, April 26, 2022

City CouncilTuesday, April 26, 2022
BodyFolsom, California
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, April 26, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

And we're having trouble with our WebEx connections.

0:06

So if there are people out there in the internet that are trying to get in, um, there's some sort of a technical glitch on our end, and we're trying to get our IT people to get that resolved.

0:18

So we apologize sincerely for anybody who was hoping to participate in the meeting remotely right this moment.

0:23

It doesn't look like that's happening or not yet, anyway.

0:27

And with that, there's too much paper up here tonight, kids.

0:31

Um, we will call to order the regular meeting of the Folsom City Council for Tuesday, April 26th, 2022.

0:40

And if the clerk would call the roll, please.

0:42

Council members Rodriguez.

0:43

Here keynote here.

0:45

Call and Sherlock here.

0:46

Kozlaski.

0:47

Here.

0:48

And how here.

0:50

And with that, if you will all join me on the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:56

To the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands.

1:02

One nation under God.

1:10

Do we have any agenda update?

1:17

I think we have some additional information on item eight that was provided to the council members, and I'm assuming that copy was left on the back table.

1:26

Just the one provided all council and copies at the back for the public.

1:30

Okay.

1:31

And we will start with business from the floor.

1:34

That is the opportunity to speak to the council on member on items that are not on the agenda.

1:39

And we only have one request to speak, and that's from Jack Henry.

2:02

I would like to talk to you about the Placerville and Sacramento Valley Railroad.

2:06

As you may already know, the PSVRR volunteers have been dedicated to this railroad for over 20 years with the express goal of saving the historic rail corridor and creating a top-notch excursion rail operation.

2:22

Prior to the removal of the railroad tracks by the Russell Ranch developers to install three at grade crossings, and then the COVID pandemic, the railroad had significant operating revenues with a yearly increase in revenues of approximately 20% each year.

2:51

Now today the PSVR has voluntarily shut down because of the controversy surrounding the three at grade crossings and ballast issues.

3:23

Your staff has said that it would cost the PSVRR 200,000 for ballast.

3:28

Not true.

3:38

And there's more to come.

3:41

The reason I bring this matter up to you is not to slam anyone, but to point out to you the importance of resolving these issues now, not next week or next month, and the importance of having a viable excursion railroad associated with the city of Folsom.

3:58

Let me give you a brief definition of a tourist destination.

4:02

Quote a tourist destination town is a town in which visitors can spend an overnight and in which a variety of activities and experiences are offered.

4:14

So what that means is the more variety that Folsom offers to tourists, the more tourists will come to Folsom.

4:22

Let me give you an example.

4:23

Fort Bragg is considered a tourist destination.

4:26

They have the beaches, Redwoods, nearby, and the skunk train.

4:31

The skunk train was started by a group of local citizen investors who saw the potential of an excursion train to bring more tourists to Fort Bragg.

4:41

I have given all of you a copy of a survey done by two independent groups covering the years 2016 and 2021.

4:50

The visit Mendocino County and the Mendocino Railway survey both agreed with each other on the economic impact that the skunk train has had on Fort Bragg's economy.

5:01

The one fact that should grab your attention is the 67.6 million dollars generated for the local economy during that time frame by the train.

5:16

Jack, I'm I'm gonna need you to wrap up.

5:18

And I'm gonna and I'm gonna make a further request.

5:20

We've got a we've got another big agenda item, and we typically only provide three minutes.

5:31

This is more an issue for the rail JPA.

5:34

Right.

5:34

And as you know, I'm chair of that.

5:36

And I'm happy to set up a meeting with you guys, myself, Mark, and anybody else that that needs to be in that discussion.

5:43

Okay, very good.

5:43

Thank you.

5:44

All right, thank you.

5:47

We have no more requests to speak from business from the floor.

5:50

Is there anybody else that would like to speak to us about any items that are not on tonight's agenda?

5:56

Okay, seeing knowing no one coming forward, we'll start with our um we'll move to our scheduled presentation.

6:03

The first one is a resolution of commendation honoring to be glass for receiving the 2021 Folsom Arts Achievement Award.

6:11

And I understand that's gonna be Mirabel Wyatt from the Arts and Cultural Commission, Tate Bezdeck, hopefully I pronounced that right.

6:20

Aaron Besdeck and Ash Koss, the owners of um Tu B Glass, if you'll meet me down front.

6:38

Shut down.

6:41

Welcome guys.

6:43

So this is a resolution of commendation honoring to be glass receiving the 2021 Folsom Arts Achievement Award, whereas the Art Achievement Award is presented to recognize and honor 2B Glass, and whereas since 2018, Tuby Glass is partners with the Folsom Parks and Rec department to host the two-day Folsom Glass Pumpkin Patch held in October at the Folsom Art and Senior Center.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation██████████████████████████26%
Procedural█████████████████17%
Funeral Services███████████11%
Public Safety██████████10%
Public Works███████7%
Community Engagement███████7%
Public Health███████7%
Pending Litigation██████6%
Public Transportation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Folsom City Council Meeting Summary

The Folsom City Council held a regular meeting on April 26, 2022, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers. The meeting covered several key items, including a commendation for a local business, the introduction of a police military equipment use policy (AB481), and a public hearing on an appeal to overturn the denial of a conditional use permit for a crematorium. A technical glitch with WebEx interrupted the meeting and led to the continuance of the crematorium appeal to the next regular meeting on May 10, 2022.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 3: Approval of the April 12, 2022, meeting minutes.
  • Item 4: Resolution 10839 ratifying emergency replacement of fuel tanks at the Corporation Yard (CEQA exempt, fund appropriation).
  • Item 5: Resolution 10840 approving the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision improvement agreement, offers of dedication, and final map.
  • Item 6: Resolution 10841 authorizing purchase of a ladder truck from Golden State Fire Apparatus (Pierce) with an interfund loan and fund appropriation.
  • All items were approved by a unanimous roll-call vote (5-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Jack Henry: Addressed the council on the Placerville & Sacramento Valley Railroad (PSVRR), emphasizing the economic importance of the excursion railroad to Folsom tourism, citing a survey showing $67.6 million in local economic impact from the Skunk Train in Fort Bragg. Mayor Howell noted the issue belongs to the Rail JPA and offered to schedule a meeting.

Scheduled Presentations

  • Commendation for 2BGlass: Mayor Howell presented a resolution honoring 2BGlass for receiving the 2021 Folsom Arts Achievement Award. The event, operated since 2018, draws thousands and features over 5,000 glass art sculptures. (No opposition or discussion.)
  • Sacramento Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District Presentation: The presenter was unable to join due to a technical glitch; the item was postponed.

Discussion Item: Ordinance No. 1326 – Folsom Police Department Military Equipment Use Policy (AB481)

  • Staff Presentation: Lieutenant Brian Lockhart presented the ordinance for introduction and first reading, as required by Assembly Bill 481. The bill mandates council approval and annual reporting for defined 'military equipment.' The department currently possesses eight of fifteen categories, including a Bearcat, command vehicle, drones, patrol rifles, less-lethal launchers, and tear gas. All items are already in use or owned. The policy (FPD 707) was posted online and discussed at a community meeting on March 31.
  • Council Discussion: Councilmembers asked about training, regional sharing, and the nature of the equipment. Lieutenant Lockhart clarified that all officers receive training (minimum 80 hours) and that specific equipment requires specialized courses. He noted the department is not seeking approval for any new acquisitions. Mayor Howell and Councilmember Chalamcherla expressed that the disclosure is positive, highlighting the department's strength and preparedness.
  • No public comments were taken as this was a new business item, not a public hearing.
  • Outcome: The ordinance was introduced and given first reading. A second reading is scheduled for a future meeting.

Public Hearing: Appeal of Historic District Commission Denial – Lakeside Memorial Lawn Crematorium (PN 19-182)

  • Staff Presentation: Associate Planner Josh Kincaid presented staff's recommendation to deny the appeal. The project proposes a crematory within an existing metal structure at the cemetery, with up to four cremations daily (max 500/year). Staff's initial study, including air quality and cultural resources analyses, found less-than-significant impacts under CEQA. However, the Historic District Commission denied the CUP (6-1) based on historical character concerns, citing letters from the Cemetery Advisory Commission and the Chinese Historical Society.
  • Council Questions: Councilmembers sought details on the cumulative risk, the county cemetery commission's opinion, and the zoning alternatives. Responding to questions, Mr. Kincaid noted that the 140+ public comments were counted individually, even if similar. A question about the National Register status of the Chonghua Cemetery surfaced conflicting information: staff said it was eligible but not listed, while a Letter of Decision from the Chinese Historical Society indicated it was listed. This discrepancy was noted.
  • Appellant, Igor Semenyuk: Representing Miller Funeral Home, argued the crematory is needed to serve the growing community's cremation needs, that traffic and air quality impacts are minimal, and that the denial was based on residents' concerns rather than data. He stressed that the facility would be modern and that the cemetery is already an operating business.
  • Public Testimony on Appeal: 20 speakers addressed the council.
    • In Support of the Appeal: Laura Alba, Anita Clainey, Wendy Schneider, Lauren Claney, Andre Semenyuk, and others emphasized the dignity of the service, the inability to meet demand, cultural needs, and the inconvenience of sending remains to Yuba City or Marysville.
    • In Opposition to the Appeal: Megan McClure, Terry Sorensen, Nancy Oldham, Sean Gates, Joy Hayes, Mary Johnson, Deborah Grassle, Peter Lucego, Helen Walsh, Steve Walsh, Victoria Foster, June Chan, and others expressed concerns about impacts on the historical character of the area, air quality and health risks, fire danger from propane tanks, property values, and the 'ick factor.' Several referenced the Chonghua Cemetery's importance to the Chinese community. Some noted that the initial study and noise analysis were inadequate.
  • Technical Glitch Continuance: Due to the WebEx, the council unanimously voted (5-0) to continue the public hearing to the May 10, 2022, meeting. The council will accept additional public comment at that time. Those who already spoke are encouraged not to repeat.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Unanimously approved (5-0).
  • Ordinance No. 1326: Introduced and read for the first time. A second reading is scheduled.
  • Crematorium Appeal: Continued to May 10, 2022; no decision made.
  • City Manager Reports: Community events announced: Drug Take Back Day (April 30), Folsom Monitoring Station Open House (April 27), and Community Service Day (September 17). A housing study is open for public input.
  • Councilmember Items: Councilmember Aquino requested expanding the scope of a consultant contract to assess the Superintendent's House for potential renovation; consensus was reached, and City Manager will review. Councilmember Kozlowski reported on SACOG's regional trail plan and funding. Councilmember Rodriguez updated on the STA executive search. Vice Mayor Rodriguez also urged the public to obey traffic laws.

Adjournment

The meeting was adjourned at 9:16 PM.

Meeting Transcript

And we're having trouble with our WebEx connections. So if there are people out there in the internet that are trying to get in, um, there's some sort of a technical glitch on our end, and we're trying to get our IT people to get that resolved. So we apologize sincerely for anybody who was hoping to participate in the meeting remotely right this moment. It doesn't look like that's happening or not yet, anyway. And with that, there's too much paper up here tonight, kids. Um, we will call to order the regular meeting of the Folsom City Council for Tuesday, April 26th, 2022. And if the clerk would call the roll, please. Council members Rodriguez. Here keynote here. Call and Sherlock here. Kozlaski. Here. And how here. And with that, if you will all join me on the Pledge of Allegiance. To the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God. Do we have any agenda update? I think we have some additional information on item eight that was provided to the council members, and I'm assuming that copy was left on the back table. Just the one provided all council and copies at the back for the public. Okay. And we will start with business from the floor. That is the opportunity to speak to the council on member on items that are not on the agenda. And we only have one request to speak, and that's from Jack Henry. I would like to talk to you about the Placerville and Sacramento Valley Railroad. As you may already know, the PSVRR volunteers have been dedicated to this railroad for over 20 years with the express goal of saving the historic rail corridor and creating a top-notch excursion rail operation. Prior to the removal of the railroad tracks by the Russell Ranch developers to install three at grade crossings, and then the COVID pandemic, the railroad had significant operating revenues with a yearly increase in revenues of approximately 20% each year. Now today the PSVR has voluntarily shut down because of the controversy surrounding the three at grade crossings and ballast issues. Your staff has said that it would cost the PSVRR 200,000 for ballast. Not true. And there's more to come. The reason I bring this matter up to you is not to slam anyone, but to point out to you the importance of resolving these issues now, not next week or next month, and the importance of having a viable excursion railroad associated with the city of Folsom. Let me give you a brief definition of a tourist destination. Quote a tourist destination town is a town in which visitors can spend an overnight and in which a variety of activities and experiences are offered. So what that means is the more variety that Folsom offers to tourists, the more tourists will come to Folsom. Let me give you an example. Fort Bragg is considered a tourist destination. They have the beaches, Redwoods, nearby, and the skunk train. The skunk train was started by a group of local citizen investors who saw the potential of an excursion train to bring more tourists to Fort Bragg. I have given all of you a copy of a survey done by two independent groups covering the years 2016 and 2021. The visit Mendocino County and the Mendocino Railway survey both agreed with each other on the economic impact that the skunk train has had on Fort Bragg's economy. The one fact that should grab your attention is the 67.6 million dollars generated for the local economy during that time frame by the train. Jack, I'm I'm gonna need you to wrap up. And I'm gonna and I'm gonna make a further request. We've got a we've got another big agenda item, and we typically only provide three minutes. This is more an issue for the rail JPA. Right. And as you know, I'm chair of that. And I'm happy to set up a meeting with you guys, myself, Mark, and anybody else that that needs to be in that discussion. Okay, very good. Thank you.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com