The Folsom City Council met on June 13, 2023, beginning with a 3:00 p.m. special meeting that adjourned to closed session and reconvened with no final action. The regular meeting began at 6:30 p.m., included a joint workshop with the Traffic Safety Committee, and adjourned at 11:43 p.m. Key actions included renewing the Historic Folsom Property and Business Improvement District, forming the River District Master Plan Citizens Advisory Committee, discussing Folsom Lake Corridor traffic safety, and denying an appeal of the demolition of the cabin at 608 Bridge Street.
Special meeting. Are there any final actions? Good evening, Madam Mayor. No final action tonight. All right, we will now adjourn the city council special meeting and call to order the city council meeting and special joint city council traffic safety committee meeting this Tuesday, June 13th. Will the clerk please call the roll? Council members Rora here Aquino here. Kozlowski Rodriguez here. Let us all stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Are there any agenda updates? Yes, and now the mayor mayor is additional information for item six and also same for item 15 and a revised staff report for item 16, a copy of which, having provided it to you previously, they are also available to the public on the table in the ballot. And I understand the mayor will also rearrange the agenda sequence after consent, which is after number 12, where item 13 will be called following consent, followed by 16, 15, and then 14. Okay, thank you. Will the clerk please call the next item? Next item is scheduled presentations, proclamation of the mayor of the city of Folsom. Oh business from the floor. All right. Please keep in mind that the City Council is generally prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item that is not on the agenda. Public comments are limited to no more than three minutes. There is a speaker timer on the podium in front of you that will display the time you have remaining of your three minutes. The color will change to yellow when you have 30 seconds and turn to red and blink when your three minutes are completed. We ask that everyone respect the three minute limit to ensure that all speakers have an equal opportunity to address the city council. Please call the first person. The first speaker is Loretta Hedinger, followed by Ricky Jones and then Mike Gruenberg. Good evening, Loretta. Hello to all of you. So tonight I want to give you a bit of a history lesson. In the name of economic development, when Folsom was the second worst poverty pocket in Sacramento County, Jack Kip moved the central business district to East Bidwell Street and was ready to let Sutter Street fade into oblivion. But Davies and others wheedled little money out of him to build a median and shed roofs over the sidewalks and thereby saved Sutter Street. Further, the city established Sutter Street as the second historic district in the state and found the money even then to establish and support the historical committee as the historic district commission was called then. To Jack's credit, he learned from their success and in his later years became a vocal proponent of Folsom's history. In the name of economic development, you're where Jack Kip was, ready to let the historic district fade by devoting all resources elsewhere. Again, citizens are pleading for support of Folsom's incredible history. Will you listen like Jack did? Without the minor, though seeming major at the time, infusion of a little capital into the historic district in Jack Kipp's Day. Folsom would not today be reaping the sales tax and property tax benefits of a thriving historic district. The subsequent infusions of staff expertise and infrastructure updates have caused the high level of tax value the historic district now represents. Bud Davies and others were able to convince Jack to vote to devote a minor, though seeming major at the time, investment into the historic district. The citizens were right about the importance of Folsom's history and were able to convince Jack. What will it take to convince you to hire someone who knows what they're doing in regard to historic properties? As I've mentioned to you before, you devote 10 million dollars to parks and rec salaries, not counting the temps and can't find money for one staff person for the historic district. It's a drop in the bucket. How many more missteps, appeals, and lawsuits will it take to convince you that you're taking the work of previous councils for granted that the current prosperity of the historic district is yours to lose one mistake at a time. If you need an example of how costly a laissez-faire approach becomes, just examine the budget for the East Bidwell Central Business District planning effort. Undoubtedly to be followed by significant capital expenditure expend expenditures. The city focused its resources on new development and now has to play catch up. As we approach build out, we will need to shift gears to manage a developed city. Providing expertise for the historic district can provide a template for the time. Right out here, time is five seconds. One sentence when managing new development is no longer the main focus of Folsom's government.