OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Folsom City Council Meeting: River District, Budget, Homelessness, and Fee Study (March 12, 2024)

City CouncilTuesday, March 12, 2024
BodyFolsom, California
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, March 12, 2024
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

We don't have to deal with that.

0:01

Okay, I'm gonna call to order the regular meeting of the Folsom City Council for March 12th, 2024.

0:09

Would you please call the role, Madam Clerk?

0:11

Council members Aquino here, Chalum Chairla, Rodriguez here, Ruhrbach here, and Kozlovski.

0:17

Here, and if everybody will please rise and join me for Pledge of Allegiance.

0:21

Hi, PlayStation.

0:22

Pledge allegiance public for which it stands indivisible with justice call.

0:39

All right, are there any agenda updates?

0:42

Good evening, Mr.

0:43

Mayor.

0:43

There is additional information transmitted for items one and five, as well as a revised staff report for item five months in that's agenda.

0:53

All of those items have been previously provided to you, and that they are also available on the table in the back.

0:59

Very good, thank you very much.

1:01

Okay, schedule presentations.

1:03

Okay, your first item this evening is your scheduled presentation item number one.

1:07

This is a river district master plan citizens advisory committee report out.

1:19

It just takes a second, you'll be fine.

1:21

Good evening, Mr.

1:22

Mayor, members of the City Council.

1:23

Uh Robert Goss representing the community development department tonight.

1:27

I am the project manager for the river district uh master plan.

1:30

I'll be doing a tag team presentation uh with uh chair of the Citizens Advisory Committee, John Lane.

1:36

So I will open and talk a little bit about the process of where we've uh where we started, where we've come from.

1:41

Uh John's gonna a little bit in the in the middle about some of the special things that we're working on, and then I'll close out with uh next steps.

1:50

So, as you recall, uh the 2018 general plan uh calls out the river district master plan as an important opportunity uh for the city to take a look at um several different things.

2:01

Uh increasing public access, increasing recreation opportunities, and increasing economic development in the river district.

2:07

And there are in the general plan some related objectives uh that apply to this project in terms of um city gateway enhancements, uh high quality design, enhancing Folsom's heritage, and then of course celebrating protecting our environmental uh cultural and historical resources.

2:23

So this is the river district.

2:25

Folsom Lake is over here on the right side, uh, the American River coming down into the historic district.

2:31

The Auto Mall is uh to our south or west on the left side of the screen.

2:36

Uh this is the Willow Creek um recreation area along the lake.

2:40

This is the Lake Forest Business Center or the Blue Ravine Road Business Center.

2:45

Um the corbyard is here, the historic district is here.

2:48

This is the Lake Natoma Crossing.

2:50

And for because it's a six-mile-long district, we have divided it into three areas north, south, and central.

2:56

So that we excuse me, so we could manage all of the uh information and ideas that are coming out of the uh process.

3:03

So the city council appointed a 24 member citizens advisory committee since August of last year.

3:10

We've been meeting seven times.

3:12

Uh we uh bridged a uh couple uh uh months in November, December because of the holidays, but we doubled up in January, so seven meetings today.

3:20

You can see where we started with introduction, even engaging with state parks, and then went through several meetings of opportunities and constraints, and that's the identifying where we see literally opportunities and and constraints can be any number of things from physical, environmental, cultural resource, um, I mean, lots of things can be constraints, but this likewise many things can be uh opportunities.

3:44

We have studied um general land use comp uh concepts related to the courtyard um as well as rodeo park, and you'll see a little bit of that work here uh shortly.

3:53

And then finally, we've had uh some substantial citizen engagement uh both uh through the um citizen citizens advisory committee, but also online through the uh social pinpoint um uh online engagement tool.

4:10

So um when we opened that up, the social pinpoint didn't by chance anybody on the council log into that and play around with it.

4:18

So you did not.

4:20

So it's uh it was based in um aerial photography and GIS, so that you could literally hone in physically or geographically on the river district, drop a pin, make a comment.

4:32

Others could actually like it or dislike it, or add to the comment, start a little dialogue there.

4:36

So um it was open for eight weeks.

4:39

We had uh 300 plus participants, we had over 526 uh individual uh comments, and then included on this uh social pinpoint um web page.

4:50

We had a supplemental questionnaire.

4:52

We'll talk about that in a moment, and then along the process on the city's uh River District uh web page, we uh invite the public to uh enroll or register for the constant contact group.

5:04

But we have over 150 um, I think Folsom residents and other um uh uh people of interest in the community, maybe from Orangevale, maybe you have interest in the American River itself and the lake that have uh registered, and uh we reach out to them with each uh time we notify the uh citizens advisory committee, we send a notification to uh the constant contact group as well.

5:30

The social pinpoint summary, um here's where you can see the various comments as we aggregate the kinds of comments that we have received.

5:38

Um what sticks out to me, and I think to the CAC, um that's short for Citizens Advisory Committee, is the trails and access.

5:46

It really is in the river district, it's it's so much about the trails and getting to the water, using the water, enjoying the water.

5:54

Uh, that just comes out loud, loud and clear.

5:57

The other comments are kind of all over the place.

6:00

Uh they range from concerns about the eagles nesting on the um county side of the lake and fulsom lights shining at the eagles.

6:08

Um the eagles, I think nested there after the lights were already there, but uh still concern about the eagles, concern about some maintenance issues along trails, and so on.

6:19

But then we have parks and recreation, economic opportunities and community gathering space.

6:23

That's your picnic pavilions and things like that.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget and Finance█████████████████████████████████████████41%
Community Engagement████████████████████20%
Parks and Recreation█████████9%
Public Safety████████8%
Homelessness███████7%
Revenue Generation████4%
Technology and Innovation██2%
Engineering And Infrastructure██2%
Procedural1%
Summary of Proceedings

Folsom City Council Meeting: River District, Budget, Homelessness, and Fee Study (March 12, 2024)

The Folsom City Council convened on March 12, 2024, to receive an update on the River District Master Plan, review the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Second Quarter Financial Report, conduct a workshop on Community Development Department fee updates, and hear extensive public testimony on homelessness, public safety, and the impact of proposed fee increases on community events.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the minutes of the February 27, 2024 special and regular meetings.
  • Adopted Resolution No. 11177 acknowledging receipt of completed annual state-mandated fire inspections.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Homelessness & Public Safety: Multiple speakers, including members of the Folsom Police Officers Association, expressed alarm over a 600% increase in the homeless population and stagnant police staffing at 81 sworn officers since 2016. POA President John Triplett argued the city has a spending problem, citing the zoo operating over $1 million in the red annually and declining attendance. POA member Mike Grunberg criticized Councilmember Rodriguez's campaign for Sacramento County Supervisor, stating her track record does not align with promises to fight crime and homelessness. Residents Gary Grice and business owner Naseem Ahmed demanded immediate action, describing the harassment of disabled individuals and the discovery of drug needles and vandalism on their properties. Officer Doug Skalze stated the dedicated homeless team has been disbanded and requested the council provide specific updates on its efforts since October.
  • Trail Safety: Students from Folsom High School presented a senior project proposing a QR-code wayfinding system on trails to provide exact coordinates to emergency dispatch for faster response times.
  • Community Events: Jeff Garcia of Friends of Folsom expressed frustration over the city's denial of a permit for a community day event at Rodeo Park, requesting guidance on how to successfully organize it.
  • Community History: Michael Harris provided updates on the upcoming 24th annual Juneteenth celebration and new collaborations with state parks.

Discussion Items

  • River District Master Plan CAC Report Out: Project Manager Robert Goss and Citizens Advisory Committee Chair John Lane presented the progress of the 24-member committee. Key findings from online engagement (300+ participants, 526 comments) strongly supported trails, water access, looped trail connections, and festivals. The committee is developing conceptual land-use ideas for the Corporation Yard and Rodeo Park in collaboration with State Parks. The draft master plan is expected for council review in late summer/early fall.
  • Fiscal Year 2023-24 Q2 Financial Report: CFO Stacey Tamani reported the general fund projects a negative $28,000 change to fund balance, decreasing the unassigned fund balance to 20.6% of expenditures. Sales tax revenue is projected to be $1.2 million under budget and flat year-over-year. The Risk Management Fund has been critically depleted from $9 million to $3.5 million over five years to cover unfunded liability insurance costs, a trend she called unsustainable. Councilmember Aquino raised concerns about budget transparency, noting $1.4 million in Community Development and $1.35 million in Parks & Recreation expenses exceeded the budget without direct approval, leading to a discussion on implementing quarterly budget amendment approvals.
  • Community Development Fee Study Workshop: Staff and ClearSource consultant Terry Madsen presented the first comprehensive fee update since 2006. Proposed changes included higher building/planning fees, a 5% technology fee, a $6,800 appeal fee, and a $500 base fee for special event permits.
    • Public Testimony: The Folsom Historic District Association stated the proposed fees would raise their annual permit costs for 17 events from $1,900 to over $17,000, threatening decades-old events. Former Councilmember Steve Miklos urged bifurcating event fees from the larger study. The North State Building Industry Association requested a phase-in of fee increases. Multiple merchants warned higher fees would decimate small businesses and community vibrancy.
    • Council Direction: The council separated special event fees for a tailored discussion. It directed staff to phase in building/engineering increases, significantly reduce the $6,800 appeal fee, amend Municipal Code Section 3.50 for fee discretion, and absorb the technology fee into overhead costs. Final building/engineering proposals are due April 23, 2024.

Key Outcomes

  • Budget Oversight: Directed staff to explore a formal process for quarterly council approval of budget amendments related to overspends in departments with highly variable fee-based revenues.
  • Fee Study Directions: Special event fees separated for later discussion. Building/engineering fees to be phased in. Proposed $6,800 appeal fee to be significantly reduced. 5% technology fee to be absorbed into overhead. Municipal code to be amended to allow council discretion on cost recovery percentages. Final recommendations for building/engineering fees to be presented on April 23, 2024.
  • River District Plan: Council received the CAC report out. Council workshop anticipated in late summer/early fall 2024.
  • Future Agenda Items: Council expressed interest in a future workshop on the debt service implications for Folsom Ranch in the event of a school district split.
  • Council Comments: Councilmember Rodriguez defended her commitment to public safety and homelessness. Councilmember Rohrbough thanked the police for their service. Councilmember Chalamcherla reported on Folsom Boulevard progress and cable commission initiatives.

Meeting Transcript

We don't have to deal with that. Okay, I'm gonna call to order the regular meeting of the Folsom City Council for March 12th, 2024. Would you please call the role, Madam Clerk? Council members Aquino here, Chalum Chairla, Rodriguez here, Ruhrbach here, and Kozlovski. Here, and if everybody will please rise and join me for Pledge of Allegiance. Hi, PlayStation. Pledge allegiance public for which it stands indivisible with justice call. All right, are there any agenda updates? Good evening, Mr. Mayor. There is additional information transmitted for items one and five, as well as a revised staff report for item five months in that's agenda. All of those items have been previously provided to you, and that they are also available on the table in the back. Very good, thank you very much. Okay, schedule presentations. Okay, your first item this evening is your scheduled presentation item number one. This is a river district master plan citizens advisory committee report out. It just takes a second, you'll be fine. Good evening, Mr. Mayor, members of the City Council. Uh Robert Goss representing the community development department tonight. I am the project manager for the river district uh master plan. I'll be doing a tag team presentation uh with uh chair of the Citizens Advisory Committee, John Lane. So I will open and talk a little bit about the process of where we've uh where we started, where we've come from. Uh John's gonna a little bit in the in the middle about some of the special things that we're working on, and then I'll close out with uh next steps. So, as you recall, uh the 2018 general plan uh calls out the river district master plan as an important opportunity uh for the city to take a look at um several different things. Uh increasing public access, increasing recreation opportunities, and increasing economic development in the river district. And there are in the general plan some related objectives uh that apply to this project in terms of um city gateway enhancements, uh high quality design, enhancing Folsom's heritage, and then of course celebrating protecting our environmental uh cultural and historical resources. So this is the river district. Folsom Lake is over here on the right side, uh, the American River coming down into the historic district. The Auto Mall is uh to our south or west on the left side of the screen. Uh this is the Willow Creek um recreation area along the lake. This is the Lake Forest Business Center or the Blue Ravine Road Business Center. Um the corbyard is here, the historic district is here. This is the Lake Natoma Crossing. And for because it's a six-mile-long district, we have divided it into three areas north, south, and central. So that we excuse me, so we could manage all of the uh information and ideas that are coming out of the uh process. So the city council appointed a 24 member citizens advisory committee since August of last year. We've been meeting seven times. Uh we uh bridged a uh couple uh uh months in November, December because of the holidays, but we doubled up in January, so seven meetings today. You can see where we started with introduction, even engaging with state parks, and then went through several meetings of opportunities and constraints, and that's the identifying where we see literally opportunities and and constraints can be any number of things from physical, environmental, cultural resource, um, I mean, lots of things can be constraints, but this likewise many things can be uh opportunities. We have studied um general land use comp uh concepts related to the courtyard um as well as rodeo park, and you'll see a little bit of that work here uh shortly. And then finally, we've had uh some substantial citizen engagement uh both uh through the um citizen citizens advisory committee, but also online through the uh social pinpoint um uh online engagement tool. So um when we opened that up, the social pinpoint didn't by chance anybody on the council log into that and play around with it. So you did not. So it's uh it was based in um aerial photography and GIS, so that you could literally hone in physically or geographically on the river district, drop a pin, make a comment. Others could actually like it or dislike it, or add to the comment, start a little dialogue there. So um it was open for eight weeks. We had uh 300 plus participants, we had over 526 uh individual uh comments, and then included on this uh social pinpoint um web page. We had a supplemental questionnaire. We'll talk about that in a moment, and then along the process on the city's uh River District uh web page, we uh invite the public to uh enroll or register for the constant contact group.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com