Fort Lauderdale City Commission Conference Meeting - March 3, 2026
Fort Lauderdale City Commission Conference Meeting - March 3, 2026
The City Commission held a conference meeting on March 3, 2026, beginning in the afternoon and concluding with a closed attorney-client session before a scheduled evening meeting at 6:00 PM. The meeting covered communications from the Historic Preservation Board, commission and city manager reports, and discussions on the 2027 budget process and the Uptown Urban Village initiative.
Communications & Historic Preservation Board Recommendation
- The Historic Preservation Board sent a communication recommending review and strengthening of enforcement of city ordinances regarding the use of metal detectors on the beach park. Principal Urban Planner Trisha Logan explained the board was concerned about digging and metal detecting potentially disturbing archaeological sites.
- Deputy City Manager Chris Cooper clarified that existing park rules prohibit digging holes on the beach, but there is no specific ordinance against metal detecting. The rules define prohibited digging as 'robust' or extreme (e.g., holes deeper than typical beach activities like sandcastles or umbrella placement). No precise depth is codified; the 15-inch benchmark mentioned in a 2011 archaeological report is not a policy.
- City Attorney Sherry McCartney noted that the rules are park rules, not ordinances, and do not reference metal detectors. Commissioner Sorensen confirmed that metal detecting is currently allowed since it is not prohibited.
- Mayor and several commissioners expressed that this was a minor issue arising from a larger archaeological designation debate. Mayor stated, 'We're looking for a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.' The commission did not take action on the recommendation, effectively leaving current rules unchanged.
Commission & City Manager Reports
- Commissioner Glassman reported attending the Greater Fort Lauderdale Chamber of Commerce 116th annual meeting, the Central Beach Alliance monthly meeting, and a spring break press conference. He also noted the celebration of Mary Brickle's 190th birthday and requested a moment of silence for former County Commissioner Sue Gunsberger.
- Commissioner Sorensen highlighted participation in the Sistrunk Parade, mangrove planting (65–70 mangroves at New River Middle School), and the start of sea turtle nesting season.
- Mayor reported on the groundbreaking for a new community center at Bass Park, the Chamber of Commerce meeting, spring break preparations, the MPO Safe Streets Summit, and the Sistrunk Parade and Festival (noting state legislation that may affect support for such events, with State Representative Chip Lamarca voting against the bill).
- City Manager Raquel Williams announced several events she attended, including the Sistrunk Community Talks launch, a gun violence interruption basketball clinic, and the Stonewall Gala. She recognized the award-winning procurement services department (two awards from Florida Association of Public Procurement Officials). She also noted spring break is underway with weekly operational meetings to adapt.
- The city manager introduced Letter to Commission 26-053 regarding proposed budget hearing dates for FY2027: first public hearing on Thursday, September 3, 2026, and second on Monday, September 14, 2026, both at 5:01 PM. She also presented Letter to Commission 26-054 on federal appropriations requests for the Community Project Funding program: Los Olas Mobility Project ($8 million), Riverside Park Traffic Calming ($2.2 million), Northeast First Street Bridge ($7 million), and emergency management high water vehicles ($500,000).
Discussion Items: Budget Engagement & Financial Outlook
- Laura Reese, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Kevin Polito, Director of Strategic Communications, presented the public engagement plan for the FY2027 budget process. The nine-month timeline includes goal setting (January), budget advisory board meetings in May/June, manager's proposed budget on July 2, 2026, and two public hearings in September. The 'Balancing Act' tool will allow residents to simulate budget priorities.
- Kevin Polito highlighted a new video campaign to encourage resident participation, emphasizing property tax education. Commissioner Glassman requested clear messaging on what property taxes fund, and the city manager confirmed a focus on education, not advocacy.
- City Manager Williams discussed the potential impact of state property tax reform proposals. Assistant City Manager Yvette Matthews reported that nearly 30% of ad valorem revenue (about $72.8 million) comes from homesteaded properties. Eight proposals in the Florida House could reduce city revenue from $200,000 to $72 million, with most in the $20 million range. Some bills include provisions freezing public safety budgets, limiting ability to reduce police/fire spending.
- The city manager noted the city's FY2028 deficit projection is ~$20 million, and FY2029 ~$30 million (excluding tax reform). These figures incorporate the end of the SAFER grant for 28 firefighters. Adding a worst-case $72 million property tax cut could create a ~$100 million deficit by FY2028.
- Commissioner Glassman questioned whether the city should prepare for worst-case scenarios. City Manager Williams said departments are identifying cost savings, but dramatic changes in services and staffing may be necessary. She emphasized fiscal prudence, resourcefulness, and innovation.
- Vice Mayor raised the possibility of using a general obligation bond (voted debt service) for the new city hall to protect debt service from future property tax reforms. City Attorney McCartney agreed to research constitutional protections for voted debt service.
Discussion Items: Uptown Urban Village Update
- Anthony Fajardo, Development Services Director, and Jim Hutzel, Urban Design Planning Manager, presented the Uptown Urban Village Planning Initiative. The 361-acre area has seen significant redevelopment since the city adopted form-based regulations in 2016, following years of community engagement and a ULI technical assistance panel.
- As of March 2026, seven development projects have been through the process: one completed (Trio, 295 units, 8 affordable), three approved (Mela Mylla – 312 units; Avery – 200 units, 24 affordable; Spire – 345 units; Cypress multifamily – 973 units, 145 affordable), two under review (Target – 90,000 sq ft at Cypress Creek Station; Pinnacle – 196 senior affordable housing), and one under construction. Three additional projects are expected with no applications yet.
- Next steps include multimodal improvements (sidewalks, bike paths) as committed to FDOT during the land use amendment, and branding/placemaking for the area.
- Commissioner Glassman (who represents the district) praised the projects for creating affordable housing and transit-oriented development near the Cypress Creek Tri-Rail station, calling it a model for the city.
Other Business & Reports
- Trent Simpson, a member of the public, spoke urging the commission to consider acquiring an existing building for city hall rather than constructing a new one, emphasizing the need for full evaluation of options.
- The city manager noted a lease agreement with the proposed developer for city hall due diligence will be executed under her authority, allowing surveys and geotechnical work. Commissioner Glassman expressed concern about delaying the guaranteed maximum price (GMP) to 90% design instead of the typical 30%, potentially adding 3–6 months. Assistant City Manager Ben Rogers said staff is evaluating Jacobs' recommendation for a more secured GMP at 90% and will bring the interim agreement forward.
- Regarding the YMCA's request for $3 million in federal appropriations for the Holiday Park facility, the city manager said staff is determining if the YMCA can apply independently or if the city must be lead applicant. Mayor noted the YMCA has already secured $53 million and questioned the need for additional funds. The city will clarify before making a recommendation.
Key Outcomes
- No action taken on the Historic Preservation Board's metal detector enforcement recommendation; current rules remain unchanged.
- Budget hearing dates proposed: Thursday, September 3, 2026, and Monday, September 14, 2026, both at 5:01 PM (to be confirmed with commission offices).
- Federal appropriations requests submitted by March 6, 2026, include four city projects totaling ~$17.7 million. YMCA request under review.
- City Manager will execute a lease for due diligence on the city hall site and notify the commission via letter.
- The commission proceeded into a closed attorney-client session regarding three pending cases against the Florida Department of Transportation, estimated to last 45 minutes, before reconvening for the evening meeting at 6:00 PM.
Meeting Transcript
Anyway. Good afternoon, everybody, and welcome to the City Commission conference meeting this uh March 3rd, 2026. Um I see we have a full audience here today. Uh anyway, um so we made a few changes uh since the last time we met, and um we're going to be um right after this the uh communications to the city commission, we'll jump to the city commission reports. Our first communication, I believe, is from the uh historic preservation board, correct? And yep. So there was a communication on sent to us to recommend uh that we need to review and strengthen enforcement of city ordinances regarding the use of metal detection on the beach park. Uh hi. What do you have to tell us today? Hi, good afternoon, Mayor and Commissioners, Trisha Logan, uh Principal Urban Planner. This is related to um an archaeological site designation for the beach park area, and the board um had a discussion with the applicant about uh people that are digging and metal detecting on the beach, and the board wanted to convey to the commission that it would be um good to make sure that we're enforcing any regulations that are existing. And what is that regulation now? Um I believe that we already have a regulation that says you cannot dig or metal detect on the beach. Is that true? So is it just enforcement then? Well, wait a minute, let's see. I want to hear what the law is. That's the law. Good afternoon, Chris Cooper, deputy city manager. So we do have a prohibition on digging in the bee on the beach, so particularly digging deeply. I mean, people can put in umbrellas, build sand castles and things like that, but we do not allow for you know really robust digging on the beach and in the sand. So somebody could metal detect, which often leads to digging on the beach. So if we wanted to go a little bit further and prohibit an activity, we could, but right now it really we really just regulate the actual digging. So how deep is deep. There's no there's no there's no precise measurement. I mean, uh you know, things that are typical beach activities, like I said, putting an umbrella in the sand, making a sand castle, digging around a little bit, you know, we just don't want to see really extreme digging because sometimes it can also become a dangerous situation when people dig in the beach sand too deeply. So all those spring breakers who bury themselves in the sand, that's gonna be forbidden. I mean, this is getting ridiculous. Yeah. Only if they hit a musket ball when they're gonna be able to do that. Yeah, I mean it's it's look. The reality is that yeah, there may be old things, you know, that find their way, you know, in the sand or anywhere in the city. And you know, these the the beach is a recreation area, okay. So uh it's either we either make it a recreation area or we we we rope off the entire place saying it's either for turtles or for historic preservation. This tiptoeing around this issue is not making any sense to me. So if if if people want to make uh sand castles, you're gonna be digging into the sand far deeper than an inch or two. Uh if you're going to put an umbrella in the sand, it's gonna be very deep. Uh what happens if you hit something? What is if you hit you go down two feet and you hit something, uh they they violate the law? I mean, it's this is getting absurd. Yes. So from staff's perspective, you know, we're comfortable with our current rules regarding the beach and what can be done there related to these types of activities. So, you know, I think if and I and I believe we've actually added some signage that kind of outlays some of those beach rules, so we're communicating it to the public, but from our perspective, a change probably isn't necessary. So let's hear from the commission. What are some thoughts on the commission? Let's see, district two is um part of the beach and district one is part of the beach. So what are your thoughts? Vice Mayor. So just one quick thought. Um and it's not necessarily with respect to to the historic preservation aspect.
openpublica.com