Fort Smith Board of Directors Special Study Session: Mid-Year Budget Review and Strategic Planning Session - July 29, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Fort Smith Board of Directors Special Study Session: Mid-Year Budget Review and Strategic Planning Session - July 29, 2025
The Fort Smith Board of Directors held a special study session on July 29, 2025, at the Blue Lion to review the mid-year financial report and discuss the city's strategic goals. CFO Andy Richards presented the financial status of the General Fund, Street Maintenance Fund, Water & Sewer Operating Fund, and Solid Waste Operating Fund as of June 30, 2025. Acting City Administrator Jeff Dingman led a discussion on the six strategic goals adopted in December 2023 and the process for setting goals for FY2026. The board also approved a special meeting for audit committee interviews.
Discussion Items
Mid-Year Budget Review (CFO Andy Richards)
- General Fund: Total revenues of $23.7M and expenditures of $34.3M, resulting in a $10.5M deficit. CFO Richards noted that about $7M of expenditures were non-recurring (e.g., $4M building purchase, $2M roof repairs, $600K airport barrier system). Contingency reserve stood at 31.8% (actual), projected to decline to 20% by year-end per the amended budget. Sales tax revenues were down 1% year-over-year through June but showed a 1% increase in July collections. CFO Richards described the outlook as "stable" and "positive."
- Street Maintenance Fund: Contingency reserve at 70%, with $628K deficit. Director Settle questioned the high reserve and potential for funding street projects; CFO Richards noted that capital purchases and equipment maintenance account for some spending, and further discussion would occur during CIP planning.
- Water & Sewer Operating Fund: Debt service coverage ratio improved to 118% at mid-year (from 71% in 2024). Revenues increased 14% due to rate hikes, though water volume declined. CFO Richards cautioned that summer dry months could affect year-end results. Director Christina Catsavis inquired about reconnect fees, which rose to $196K from $43K; CFO Richards explained the increase may reflect both reconnections and new account fees.
- Solid Waste Operating Fund: Working capital at 45.7% (up from 43.1% in 2024). Expenditures increased due to equipment maintenance and cart/container purchases. A cost-of-service study is underway.
- Property Tax: Director Settle noted rising property valuations; CFO Richards confirmed increased revenue would be realized in FY2026.
- Convention Center Subsidy: Director Settle noted the subsidy has risen to approximately $1.25M, far above the original $777K target. CFO Richards attributed the increase to COVID-era impacts and management changes.
- Carryovers: Several directors expressed concern about large carryover balances (e.g., $1.9M for Parrot Island water slides, $1M for airport project). Director Kemp suggested returning to the old practice of allocating funds in the budget year and not carrying them forward, to reduce confusion.
Strategic Goals Discussion (Acting City Administrator Jeff Dingman)
- Dingman presented an update on the six goals from Resolution R-215-23: reducing neighborhood blight, supporting homelessness reduction (Next Step Homeless Services), strengthening consent decree relationships, mitigating inflation impacts, staffing reorganization, and increasing water supply/pressure.
- Highlights: Blight reduction efforts saw a 17% increase in property inspections and improved compliance. Next Step Homeless Services has submitted construction bids but needs additional fundraising. Consent decree modification is anticipated by August with an extended compliance period to 2037/2039. Inflation continues to pressure operating and capital budgets; the board cut $4.2M from the FY2025 budget in May. Water supply planning is ongoing, with $12M in federal funding for a transmission line.
- Board members expressed support for a facilitated strategic planning session to set FY2026 goals. Directors favored holding it as soon as possible, preferably in August or early September, to guide budget preparation.
Key Outcomes
- Consensus on Strategic Planning Session: The board agreed to schedule a facilitated full-day strategic planning session, likely on a Friday in August or early September, to establish FY2026 goals. Acting City Administrator Dingman will circulate potential dates.
- Special Meeting for Audit Committee Interviews: The board provided concurrence (four directors) to hold a special meeting on Thursday, August 7, 2025, at 2:30 PM at the Blue Lion, to conduct interviews for audit committee positions with DPI staffing. The meeting will include an executive session.
- Budget Guidance: The board reiterated the need for conservative spending, with CFO Richards noting that departments should aim to spend no more than 90% of their budgets. The FY2026 budget proposal is expected in early October, with review sessions in November and December.
- No Formal Votes Taken: The meeting was a study session; no binding votes were cast on budget or policy changes.
Meeting Transcript
I don't see a problem coming out. Good evening and welcome to the Fourth Miss City Board of Directors Studies Special Study Session where we will be discussing a mid-year budget review and strategic planning session this evening. Keep in mind these meetings are being televised live for our residents who cannot be with us in in person. This time we will go directly to the first item on the agenda. That's a review of the mid-year financial report. And you're recognized. How's that? Okay. Sorry. Um for those four funds as well as some detail. I thought uh just to start off uh this review process, I would uh kind of go over the four funds and just give you a couple of things that that I've noted uh to help kind of understand a little bit more behind the numbers there and then let you uh board members ask questions uh once I do that. But you want questions as we're going through it or wait till you're done. Uh really is up to you all. I mean good either way, but you know, I can just go through the highlights and then we can do that. But um just in just as an overall uh my you know kind of outlook on the results, you know, considering what what we've been doing here as far as you know trying to retool the budget, trying to make cuts, um, making you know large investments in the city, um, particularly out of the general fund, you know, dealing with rate increases, water and sewer, all those things that all these challenges and and opportunities that we're been dealing with. Um, I think just overall the numbers look fairly positive to me in light of all those things that we are that we've been working on. Um I think the the budget numbers show um reflect the cuts that the board committed to and passed, and I believe it shows that the department heads and the departments are being conservative and um going along with uh trying to be conservative and and spending. I think that's what it shows for the most part through all four of the funds. And so, you know, so in general I'm I kind of have a uh you know, the numbers turned out about what I expected, not worse. Uh maybe even a little better than what the what I expected to see when we got the June 30 numbers together. But um I'm gonna just comments and Josh, if you want to go to that budget for the general fund, I'll just start there. So, you know, I typically always start from the bottom and work my way up when I look at these financial statements, but you know, bottom line is uh at this point in time. So, you know, I typically always start from the bottom and work my way up when I look at these financial statements, but you know, bottom line is uh at this point in time, you know, we've got a 31 percent, 32 percent contingency percentage at June 30, 2024. With the budget cuts in place, we've we've projected a 20 percent uh percentage through the end of 25, which is um probably better than some of the numbers that we were looking at earlier in the year. Uh so the cuts are you know, that is the the board's goals to have at least a 20 percent uh fund balance uh there before any cuts are made. So you know we're at 31 percent now. Uh you can see the the budget, the available budget remaining is about sixty percent, fifty-six percent. So mid-year, you would if if everything went perfectly, you know, straight, no ups and downs, no seasonal type of things. I mean, you expect to have 50 percent of your budget remaining at this point in time. So uh 56 percent shows that we haven't spent half the budget at this point. So if you look at, you know, you know, it's hard to it's hard to look at mid-year and look at that annual budget, but you know, to kind of tell how we're doing, we always always look at the year before. So we've got June 30 2024 numbers there the prior year, which represents the six months uh compared to the actual date. Um, we're we're looking at uh a deficit of ten and a half million dollars of uh expenditures over revenues at this point in time for the six months in uh June 30, 25. Uh we were at 6.1 million dollar uh deficit um expenditures over revenues prior year. Uh one of the main things to point out, and this was kind of been you know the the budget that we have for 25 has a lot of non-reoccurring investments that the city made, and so in the actual numbers, I've identified about seven million dollars in these thirty-four million dollars of general fund expenditures that are non-reoccurring um you know capital outlay type investments uh that were made, you know. So that 34 million is not necessarily the amount of money we would necessarily have to spend just to operate these six months. There's you know, obviously the purchase of the building is in there. Um so we mean we bought land in the first half of 24 for about 2.3 million dollars. I think it was the crane Kia property that we bought. So you know, you kind of I kind of factor that in. So our capital outlays about 2.1 million dollars higher than that period last year. Because we spent $4 million on the building. Um we did some other things as well that that add up, but but we also you know, if you looked at the $28 million that we have in the expenditures in the general fund at 24, that includes 2.3 million dollars of that uh building purchase. So just try to for a comparative purposes. Uh we also have about two million dollars worth of roof repairs that we made um in this six months. That's you know, something that we typically won't do. You know, that was kind of an extraordinary expenditure, and then also six hundred thousand dollars towards the airport uh the the extension, the barrier system is also part of this thirty-four million in those expenditures. So you can see those, you know, that that comes up to about um like I said, seven million dollars of kind of you know, not you know, our normal operating things, these are more non-reoccurring activities that we that we done. Um, but if you're comparing it to 24, you know, we put 2.3 million dollars in the building, and I think also about 850,000 dollars in um the park, the projects. I think Creek Moore Park was the or the bathhouse project, we spent about 850,000 that time frame.
openpublica.com