Fort Smith City Council Annual Budget Hearing - November 17, 2025
Fort Smith City Council Annual Budget Hearing - November 17, 2025
The Fort Smith City Council convened for its annual budget hearing to address severe structural imbalances across the city's four primary operating funds, resulting in projected deficits totaling approximately $12.8 million for the 2026 fiscal year. Chief Financial Officer Andy Richards presented findings indicating that the General Fund, Water & Sewer, and Street Maintenance funds are projecting operating deficits driven by rising personnel costs (including a 30% increase in health insurance) and declining or flat revenue streams, while the Solid Waste fund remains in surplus. Acting Administrator Jeff Deem introduced a comprehensive slate of proposed expenditure reductions and revenue enhancements designed to balance the operating budgets and preserve the city's strategic reserve fund.
Consent Calendar
- No specific consent calendar items were recorded in the transcript; the meeting focused entirely on the discretionary budget hearing.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Angel (Manager, Miss Laura's House): Expressed strong opposition to cutting the museum's operating budget or closing the facility. She stated that deaccessioning would cost the city $520,000, and maintaining an empty building would cost an additional $253,000 annually. She stated the city would lose its National Register plaque if not maintained. She positioned the museum as the number two attraction in Fort Smith and stated that closing it would incur massive decommissioning costs to return artifacts to their original owners, whereas keeping it open allows for a path toward nonprofit stewardship.
- Director Christine Savage & Mayor: Expressed support for maintaining Miss Laura's House as a key tourism and community asset, emphasizing its historical significance to local women's history and the risk of losing its historical designation if the city stops paying for its maintenance.
- Director Rigo: Stated a position that the board must not simply blanket approve cuts but must also address revenue generation (taps fees, impact fees) to avoid "shooting ourselves in the foot" regarding service levels.
- Director Good: Stated that public safety needs are driven by citizen desire and that the city must find ways to fund them sustainably rather than just cutting positions.
Discussion Items
Financial Overview & Structural Deficits
- Andy Richards (CFO): Reported that the General Fund operating deficit for 2026 is $4.84 million. He stated that without structural changes, the city could run out of funds by 2028. He explained that personnel costs are up $2.8 million due to a 30% health insurance increase, workers' comp claims, and salary adjustments, despite no mass hiring in 2025.
- Andy Richards: Stated that the Water & Sewer fund faces a $2.9 million operating deficit, which would drop the debt service coverage ratio to 85% (below the 110-130% threshold required for bonding). He noted that revenue projections are lower than anticipated due to decreased water consumption volumes.
- Jeff Deem (Acting Administrator): Presented a proposed list of $6.4 million in potential operating expense reductions and revenue increases, including eliminating 57 vacant non-uniform positions, reducing police and fire vacancies, and increasing landfill gate rates.
Miss Laura's House (Museum)
- Management/Staff: Stated the operating cost was reduced to $228,000 for 2026, with $120,000 in personnel costs. They stated the goal is to transfer stewardship to a non-profit entity to access grants, but the city must fund the building maintenance ($57,000 remaining in the cut request) and prevent the $520,000 deaccessioning cost.
- Director Kemp: Stated a position that the city should not close the museum but should explore privatization to remove it from the city's books over time.
Public Safety Personnel Cuts
- Fire Chief Clark: Explained that the proposed cut of six vacant fire positions (including one entire engine company at Station 11) would be funded through overtime currently covering those spots. He stated that closing Station 11 would maintain service levels by rotating the new apparatus to the reserve fleet and that he has not yet been asked to do this before.
- Police Chief Baker: Stated that reducing 13 authorized positions (cutting 8 vacant ones) would require reallocating current officers from specialized units (Bicycle Unit, Crisis Intervention, Front Desk) or the airport. He stated that the Police Department has not received authorization to cut these positions and expressed concern that the cuts threaten the step raises he had previously promised to staff, which could severely damage morale.
- Mayor & Directors: Discussed the tension between protecting current staff pay scales and the necessity of reducing headcount. Director Rigo stated that the largest budget drivers are public safety and expressed a need to ensure revenue options are fully explored before relying solely on cuts.
Revenue Proposals
- Jeff Deem: Proposed increasing business license fees for non-brick-and-mortar businesses from $100 to $500, projecting an $137,900 increase.
- Jeff Deem: Proposed increasing the landfill gate rate from $36 to $50 per ton, projected to generate $3.7 million, with $1 million transferred to the General Fund to offset Animal Control costs.
- Director Rigo: Stated that water rates for out-of-city customers should be reviewed, noting that 42% of water production is sold outside city limits.
Key Outcomes
- Deficit Identification: The council identified a structural deficit in the General Fund ($4.8M), Water & Sewer ($2.9M), and Street Maintenance (>$400k), with the General Fund operating at a projected $1,400 daily burn rate.
- Proposed Action Items: The administration proposed a set of cuts totaling $6.4 million, including:
- Eliminating 57 vacant non-uniform positions ($545k General Fund savings).
- Eliminating 8 vacant police officer positions and 6 vacant fire positions ($1.2M savings).
- Reducing unspecified operating expenses by 5% across various departments.
- Increasing landfill gate rates to $50/ton.
- Increasing business license fees for non-local brick-and-mortar businesses.
- Board Directives: The council directed administration to provide:
- A detailed breakdown of the cost increase between 2024 actuals and 2026 budget (personnel, overtime, and benefit drivers).
- A detailed history and projection of the LOFTY pension fund contributions.
- A more specific list of $2.5-$3 million in potential cuts for the Water & Sewer fund beyond the generic 5% reduction.
- An explanation of how potential personnel cuts would impact overtime costs.
- Timeline: The council scheduled the budget adoption for the regular meeting on December 2, 2025, with a deadline to resolve all budget matters by February 1, 2025.
- Future Action: The board scheduled an executive session after the December 2nd meeting to review applications for a new City Administrator.
Meeting Transcript
Well, good morning. Good morning to all of you. And welcome to our annual budget hearing. This is where the rubber meets the road. And we're glad that you're here. All the staff, thank you for the hard work you've put into generating your budgets. Appreciate your professionalism and hard work you put in day in and day out to make sure Fort Smith continues to be one of the premier cities in the state of Arkansas. Again, this is budget hearing on November 17th of the year 2025 at the Blue Lion here in Fort Smith, Arkansas. This meeting is officially called to order. At this time, I'm going to turn it over to the uh acting administrator, Mr. Jeff Deem. Thank you, Mayor. And I echo the mayor's sentiments and seeing all the staff here. I know everyone has a vested interest. And this has been a uh a rough process for the last few months as we've gone through this. And uh mostly predicated by the fact that you know, we're we we are we are overall in financially healthy shape. However, if we want to maintain that, the overriding theme for today will be um making our operating budgets balance. And that is not something that we accomplished for the 2025 budget uh when we adopted an operating budget uh with a deficit of 5.7 million dollars. Uh and that is a that is a hole that we need to start climbing out of. And so um some targeted steps for getting out of that hole for the 2026 budget um have been discussed with during our uh departmental meetings that started in the early September and then through for the last couple of months as we've gotten to this point. So um I appreciate everyone's hard work so far. Uh we still have some work to do, so that's what today is about, and I'm welcome the board members. We've um spoken with most or all of you about uh different concepts regarding the budget and things we're looking at, and we appreciate the feedback that you've given us so far. And at this point, uh, with that very brief introduction, I'll uh turn it to uh Andy Richards to go through the city's uh current financial condition. Good morning. So my plan uh to just start out with is kind of walk through uh what the financial conditions look like um in the proposed budget and you know some of the try to drill down to some of what what is the actual issues that that I see and that I've been trying to communicate with uh departments and administration here and so um so basically you know we're you know I'm gonna be focusing on the four main operating funds. Um that is what is considered by city policy the legally adopted budget of the city is the four main operating funds being general fund street maintenance water and service solved waste. Um so for general fund, and these numbers are on the sheet that I've the board has, and it's basically a re you know reformatting of the summaries, it's the same results. It's not moving, is it? Oh, sorry. All right. Thank you. So it's the same results that's in the budget book, the proposed budget that's online from the summaries, but we've reclassified some of the expenditures. The the total results are the same, but um we started looking at it differently than what has been presented in the budget in the past, and the key is to separate what is considered to be an operating expenditure, something that's a recurring day-to-day expenditure and revenues, things that we routinely count on and expect, and what is the level of those expenditures versus you know, we have we have a lot of one time projects, capital items, things that happen. reclassified some of the expenditures the the the total results are the same but um we started looking at it differently than what has been presented in the budget in the past and the key is to separate what is considered to be an operating expenditure something that's a recurring day to day expenditure and revenues things that we routinely count on and expect and what is the level of those expenditures versus you know we have we have a lot of one time projects capital items things that happen um you know covet occurred you know back in 20 and then we eventually we ended up we were able to you know collect and record six million dollars into the general fund just you know those type of non-recurring things that happen you know every year it's something new um but we try to you know we try to flatten out the numbers so we can say trend as far as what is our normal trend and what can we expect and so the the deficit that pertains to our operations which is our day to day um in the 26 proposed budget is the four million four million eight hundred and forty six thousand if you looked in the budget the total deficit would have been about eight million so about three point two million of that was capital request generally at this stage we don't have these type of capital requests in the original budget those things typically considered later but this time around we wanted to put everything on the table all what all the needs were so we can prioritize what the needs are whether it's capital or operating uh type expenditures but this um and so the deficit that's 4.8 million dollars so that is a day to day overspending of what we do in the general fund so all the different departments that that make up the general fund are a part of this um police fire uh parks transit administration um management services development services planning development every you know everything that's part of the general fund that's all considered in what I'm talking about and so and if you look back at uh 24 an actual uh that there was actually a surplus in operations it was uh the the schedule that I'm showing you there has it shows 2.2 million dollars surplus um there is some the we did building roof repairs in 24 so it was a little bit of skewed there but we did have an operating surplus in 24 um and so but what if you equate this 4.8 million dollars that we've proposed that's basically what you're doing is you're just you you're burning up your fund balance your bleeding money to the tune of about 1400 a day out of the general fund and that's what we're and that's what this does um you know this is something that has over time with this situation is created you know we've had um you know you know we've we've got we've got sizable fund balance right now the projection at the end of 26 would be 11.8 million which is right at our 20 percent reserve policy um then that's with considering a you know total deficit of eight million dollars but um but it you know it's it's not just uh it's this we don't want to you know fundamentally we don't want to spend day-to-day operations we don't want to fund it with fund balance it needs to be it needs to be you know with current year revenues by and large you can have you know you can have uh cycles where one year you might be over or under but this situation is indicating that we have a structurally imbalanced general fund budget I do want to make mention of that if if you if you go back and look at our audits from 15 to 24 we're a positive fund balance every single year the 15 we were negative but 1617 1819 25 there were some big years nine million dollars one year in the general fund it was just 24 and 25 that we went negative so we don't have this long history of of dipping into the fund balance we we it's it's time for a correction for the last couple years but traditionally historically we've been extremely positive in the general fund so we just got to go back to that so I just at least want to acknowledge that in terms of you know where we've been spending and and how we've spent historically at least in the last 10 years so yeah so cyclically we've had increases and decreases in fund balance over time um but you know and you know I'm saying we had a we had a cert you know we had an operation surplus in 24 we still had an overall deficit of six and a half million dollars So I just at least want to acknowledge that in terms of you know where we've been spending and and how we've spent historically, at least in the last 10 years. So yeah, so psychically, we've had increases and decreases in fund balance over time. Um but you know, and you know, I'm saying we had a we had a certain, you know, we had an operation surplus in 24. We still had an overall deficit of six and a half million dollars. Uh we did a lot of capital things. Uh and we had the fund balance built up over those years to be able to fund that. Yeah, at the beginning of 24, we had 41, almost 42 million dollars of fund balance in the general fund. Um, which is about a you know, that's a sizable, it's over a 60 percent reserve. But now two years later, we're projecting for uh 12 million dollar fund balance basically. So um, but you know, a lot of that's capital investments, and that's what when you have when you have a reserve that large, that's what you should be doing. That's that's the time to make one-time capital non-reincurring investments, but fundamentally for long-term fiscal sustainability, we have to look at the operations. What does it cost to run the general fund of the city day to day and make sure that our daily recurring revenues can cover these daily uh incurring expenditures, and that's not what we're seeing in 25. We're projecting a 3.7 million dollar operational deficit in 25. And so that is that is the task at hand is to balance, you know. You know, we say we want to balance the budget, that's great.
openpublica.com