Note: The transcript indicates this meeting was originally held in January 2026, but the provided date for this summary is April 9, 2026. This summary uses the supplied date as instructed, but the discrepancy is noted.
The meeting covered approval of previous minutes, a detailed update on the ACME property master planning process (Part A), discussion of three concept alternatives, community engagement results, and other park department updates. Commissioners also discussed park inventory, funding strategies, and public comments.
Welcome everyone to the uh January Parks and Right Commission meeting. Jump with our December 24 25 minutes. Changes I'll then motion to approve those. So move. Motion. Second. All favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Okay. So those approved. Okay. Here we go. Update on the planning process. So we'll jump in on that one. That is all Scott and I that are here. There we go. Sorry. Oh, you guys are 100% on that. It's hard. Yeah. Okay, we're here. All right. Take it out. You want us to just jump right in, Sarah? Yep. Jump right in. Yeah. I think how many of them? Maybe a benchmark or at least a baseline. I think I've met most of you. I'm Scott Crawford with RDG, and Brian Trusty with Rose Consulting. And McClellan in uh consulting engineers was also very integral in everything that we've developed with the three entities. Yep, I can speak up, you bet. Um we presented to the board of directors last night, um, had a lot of uh good dialogue, uh informed questions from them that we were able to provide answers on most of the information. Some of it were questions about things that are yet to come later. And but it was good, it was a I think a really good update to the group. Um the meeting was quite well attended by the public. Um how many of you were a part of or at least participated in all or some of the meetings that we had in December. Okay, so a good portion of you have probably um seen some of the information that's here. Everything that's that we're gonna review today is available on the social pinpoint site online that the city has pushed out notifications on, and uh we presented some of the findings of that to the board last night, which we'll review today at least in some of the initial feedback that we've received. That site will remain open likely for the next couple of weeks uh to continue to get feedback from the community before we um export the data again and then incorporate that into the part A deliverables. But what we wanted to review review with you today is what we reviewed last night and have a dialogue with you all. Please ask questions as we go through it. Um the current master planning part A services that we're coming to the conclusion on, uh kind of recap the guiding principles that were established by the committees uh leading the project, review the preliminary concept alternatives. Brian will share a couple of uh the precedent case studies of similar uh public open spaces and parks and other communities that are reclaimed and repurposed quarry projects, and then we want to review kind of the dialogue that we received back on the community engagement and feedback to date. So as many of you know working with Sarah and the and the community and the committees on the project thus far. These are the three kind of uh committees or or the structure that was put together at the beginning of the project, the core team, the technical committee, and then the uh steering committee representing a broader cross-section of the community, and we had really good participation throughout the entire uh part A planning process uh with people attending meetings and uh actively participating in the discussion, so it was great to have such a good representation from the community in that process. The part A, or it's noted here that's as phase one of what we're coming to the conclusion on included that initial goal setting, establishing the guiding principles. There was some benchmarking uh that we did of other uh potential projects that had a wide range of program and recreational opportunities, the inventory analysis, and kind of in between tasks two and three, we spent a fair amount of time coordinating with half associates that's actually designing the stormwater basins on the project to help mitigate flooding in order to arrive at what we think is a really good recommendation to leverage the flood mitigations uh basins with active recreational opportunities on the property, meaning water activities and activities that can occur at or near the water's edge.