OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City of Fort Smith Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustment Meeting - July 14, 2026

Meeting PortalTuesday, July 14, 2026
BodyFort Smith, Arkansas
SessionMeeting Portal
DateTuesday, July 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:30:50

Transcript — Verbatim
1:05

All right, uh good evening, everyone, and welcome to the City of Fort Smith Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustment July meeting.

1:14

I'd ask everybody to please stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

1:19

Primary allegiance of the United States of America and two Republic or one nation under God, indivisible liberty, and justice for all.

1:35

All right, I'd ask for a roll call of the commissioners present tonight.

1:40

Brett Taylor, Vicky Newton, Rod Coleman, Kelly Wilson here.

1:45

Griffin Hannah.

1:46

Here.

1:46

David Tyler.

1:48

Jackson Mendenhall.

1:49

Sean McCaffrey.

1:50

Here.

1:50

We have seven commissioners present.

1:53

All right.

1:53

Our next item is the approval of the June 9th, 2026 Planning Commission minutes.

1:58

If uh Commissioner have that opportunity to review it, I ask for a motion to approve or amend.

2:09

All right.

2:11

Aye.

2:11

Any opposed?

2:13

All right.

2:14

Um I'll ask the staff to present our staff comments and procedures for tonight's meeting.

2:20

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the July 14, 2026 Planning Commission meeting.

2:26

The Planning Commission is comprised of a group of volunteers appointed by the mayor who offer diverse expertise and perspectives guiding the development and growth of Fort Smith.

2:36

This evening, the Planning Commission will be reviewing the following items.

5:00

The existing parking lot complies with the UDO.

5:04

The site has two existing shared access driveways uh located on R.A.

5:08

Young uh drive and on Wells Lake Road.

5:11

Uh the nursery school will use the existing driveway and parking lot.

5:16

Uh there was a neighborhood meeting that was held uh on July the 8th uh uh 2026 on site at 911 RA Young Junior Drive.

5:25

Uh no neighboring property owners attended the meeting.

5:28

Uh the applicant did receive three calls prior to the meeting from people not able to attend.

5:32

All three calls had general uh questions to understand the intent of the meeting and the general questions regarding uh the business.

5:40

Uh no one expressed opposition.

5:42

Uh for staff comments, the applicant is uh requesting conditional use approval for a nursery school within the existing office building at uh 911 RA Young Junior Drive.

5:52

The applicant has stated that this location will be the startup location for the nursery business and plans to seek approval for a new location in the future if the organization expands.

6:03

Uh the program is intentionally structured to support uh different developmental stages while offering flexibility for families who may not uh need a full day of service.

6:15

Uh staff recommends approval contingent upon construction complying with a submitted development plan.

6:20

Uh changes or amendments to the submitted development plan are permitted, but eliminated those described in sections 27 through 307 of the UDO.

6:28

Any changes greater than those described in this section uh will require planning commission approval.

6:34

Any questions?

6:37

All right, I appreciate it.

6:38

Are there is there are those in here in the audience tonight in favor of the application?

6:43

If you'd raise your hand, anyone in favor?

6:46

Anyone opposed to this application this evening?

6:51

Okay.

6:51

Um in that case I'd ask for um motion to get this on the floor, please.

6:57

Make a motion to approve with staff comments.

7:00

Second.

7:01

All right.

7:02

Is there any other comments or questions from the commissioners?

7:07

Talked again and at the study session.

7:09

All right.

7:10

Is there a playground that's being associated with this?

7:14

Not at this time.

7:17

They don't have any outdoor space.

7:19

No.

7:24

All right.

7:24

Any other comments?

7:26

Oh, yes.

7:27

I'm sorry.

7:28

Nicole Swanson with the hub.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████51%
Procedural███████████████████████████31%
Community Engagement██████7%
Affordable Housing██████7%
Public Safety██2%
Water And Wastewater Management██2%
Summary of Proceedings

City of Fort Smith Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustment Meeting - July 14, 2026

The Fort Smith Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustment met on July 14, 2026, to consider several conditional use requests, a master land use plan amendment, rezoning, development plans, and a variance. The meeting began at 11:30 AM (local time) and included multiple public comments and commissioner discussions. All votes were unanimous except where noted.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of June 9, 2026 Planning Commission Minutes: Approved unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 2 (Conditional Use at 501 South 16th Street): Mario Guerlay (501 South 17th) asked about playground safety and security measures. The applicant, Perry Garrett, responded that the playground would be fenced later and security cameras would be installed.
  • Item 3 (Conditional Use at 8411 South 28th Street): Robert Allen (4909 Cliff Drive) spoke in opposition, citing longstanding drainage issues from the nursing home property and providing an engineer's study from 2000. He expressed concern that the addition would worsen existing flooding. The applicant, Mike Haythorn, noted the addition is only a 2% increase in impervious surface and offered to cooperate with a drainage study. David Garza, engineer, detailed potential drainage problems off-site and suggested further investigation.
  • Items 4 & 5 (Master Land Use Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Harbor House): Robin Fowler (623 North 20th) expressed support for the project but raised concerns about parking and neighborhood crowding. Another neighbor, Hiller (502 North 17th), questioned the effectiveness of the transitional living program and said the expansion would not help the neighborhood. The applicant, Chase and Garrett Architects, explained that parking needs would be met largely on-site and that most residents do not have cars.
  • Item 6 (Development Plan at Veterans Avenue): No public comments.
  • Item 7 (Variance and Development Plan at South Zero Street): No public comments.

Discussion Items

  • Item 1 (Conditional Use – Nursery School at 911 RA Young Jr Drive): Staff presented the request for a nursery school in an existing office building. A neighborhood meeting had no attendees, but three calls with no opposition. Commissioners discussed a proposed portable playground fence; staff clarified that a permanent fence would require a site plan amendment. The applicant stated the fence was voluntary and DHS had no objection. The motion to approve with staff comments passed 6-1 (Commissioner Coleman abstained).
  • Item 2 (Conditional Use – Primary/Secondary School at 501 South 16th Street): Applicant Perry Garrett described a school for 30-35 students aged kindergarten to fifth grade, operating two days per week. The school would use two drop-off points (front and alley) to minimize congestion. The property has six classrooms and six staff. The playground will be added later. Motion to approve with staff comments passed unanimously.
  • Item 3 (Conditional Use – Nursing Home Addition at 8411 South 28th Street): Extensive discussion on drainage. Staff added a contingency requiring a formal drainage analysis for the city engineering department prior to building permit issuance. The applicant's engineer reported that the existing detention pond may need evaluation due to multiple past additions. Commissioners debated whether the drainage study would solve off-site problems. The motion to approve with staff comments (including the drainage analysis condition) passed unanimously.
  • Items 4 & 5 (Master Land Use Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Harbor House Transitional Living): Staff recommended approval to allow a transitional dwelling for substance abuse recovery at 604 North 18th Street and to give all four Harbor House properties consistent zoning. The plan includes 100% high-quality materials, signage restrictions, and a rear access driveway. The master land use plan amendment and rezoning were both approved unanimously.
  • Item 6 (Development Plan – Contractor’s Office and Storage Yard at Veterans Avenue): The applicant changed the original plan from a mini-storage warehouse to a contractor’s office and storage yard. Staff recommended approval with conditions including landscaping, lighting, and outdoor storage screening. Motion to approve passed 6-1 (Commissioner Mendenhall abstained).
  • Items 7 & 8 (Board of Zoning Adjustment – Variance Withdrawal on Greenwood Road and Planning Commission Withdrawal): The applicant requested withdrawal of a variance application. Both the Board and Planning Commission approved the withdrawal unanimously.
  • Items 9 & 10 (Board of Zoning Adjustment – Variance for Vent Stack Screening at South Zero Street and Development Plan): The variance requested relief from mechanical equipment screening for a paint booth vent stack on an existing metal building. Staff recommended approval with the condition that the vent stack be painted to match the building. The Board approved the variance unanimously, and the Planning Commission approved the companion development plan unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • Conditional Use – Nursery School (911 RA Young Jr Drive): Approved 6-1 (Coleman abstained).
  • Conditional Use – School (501 South 16th Street): Approved 7-0.
  • Conditional Use – Nursing Home Addition (8411 South 28th Street): Approved 7-0 with an additional condition requiring a drainage analysis before building permit issuance.
  • Master Land Use Plan Amendment (Harbor House properties): Approved 7-0.
  • Rezoning (Harbor House properties): Approved 7-0.
  • Development Plan – Contractor’s Office (Veterans Avenue): Approved 6-1 (Mendenhall abstained).
  • Variance Withdrawal (Greenwood Road): Approved 7-0 by Board of Zoning Adjustment and Planning Commission.
  • Variance – Vent Stack Screening (South Zero Street): Approved 7-0 by Board of Zoning Adjustment.
  • Development Plan – Paint Booth Addition (South Zero Street): Approved 7-0 by Planning Commission.

Meeting Transcript

All right, uh good evening, everyone, and welcome to the City of Fort Smith Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustment July meeting. I'd ask everybody to please stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Primary allegiance of the United States of America and two Republic or one nation under God, indivisible liberty, and justice for all. All right, I'd ask for a roll call of the commissioners present tonight. Brett Taylor, Vicky Newton, Rod Coleman, Kelly Wilson here. Griffin Hannah. Here. David Tyler. Jackson Mendenhall. Sean McCaffrey. Here. We have seven commissioners present. All right. Our next item is the approval of the June 9th, 2026 Planning Commission minutes. If uh Commissioner have that opportunity to review it, I ask for a motion to approve or amend. All right. Aye. Any opposed? All right. Um I'll ask the staff to present our staff comments and procedures for tonight's meeting. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the July 14, 2026 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission is comprised of a group of volunteers appointed by the mayor who offer diverse expertise and perspectives guiding the development and growth of Fort Smith. This evening, the Planning Commission will be reviewing the following items. The existing parking lot complies with the UDO. The site has two existing shared access driveways uh located on R.A. Young uh drive and on Wells Lake Road. Uh the nursery school will use the existing driveway and parking lot. Uh there was a neighborhood meeting that was held uh on July the 8th uh uh 2026 on site at 911 RA Young Junior Drive. Uh no neighboring property owners attended the meeting. Uh the applicant did receive three calls prior to the meeting from people not able to attend. All three calls had general uh questions to understand the intent of the meeting and the general questions regarding uh the business. Uh no one expressed opposition. Uh for staff comments, the applicant is uh requesting conditional use approval for a nursery school within the existing office building at uh 911 RA Young Junior Drive. The applicant has stated that this location will be the startup location for the nursery business and plans to seek approval for a new location in the future if the organization expands. Uh the program is intentionally structured to support uh different developmental stages while offering flexibility for families who may not uh need a full day of service. Uh staff recommends approval contingent upon construction complying with a submitted development plan. Uh changes or amendments to the submitted development plan are permitted, but eliminated those described in sections 27 through 307 of the UDO. Any changes greater than those described in this section uh will require planning commission approval. Any questions? All right, I appreciate it. Are there is there are those in here in the audience tonight in favor of the application? If you'd raise your hand, anyone in favor? Anyone opposed to this application this evening? Okay. Um in that case I'd ask for um motion to get this on the floor, please. Make a motion to approve with staff comments. Second. All right. Is there any other comments or questions from the commissioners? Talked again and at the study session.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com