The Fort Worth Housing Finance Corporation met on February 24, 2026, to approve prior meeting minutes, review unaudited financial statements, and receive a briefing on audit results for the Housing Finance Corporation's expense review. Key findings included control weaknesses that have been or are being addressed.
No other business was conducted, and the meeting was adjourned.
All right, I'd like to call our Fort Worth Housing Finance Corporation uh meeting. Um let's see, our first order of business would be our approval of our minutes for our last meeting held on January 27, 2026. All right, we have a motion and a second. All in favor, say aye. Any opposed? All right. Moving on to our written reports, we have our unaudited financial statement as of January 31st, 2026. We have uh Matthew Mondero here. If there are any questions from council, there are any questions? No. And are there any questions regarding our housing finance corporation expense review audit report? All right, so if there's no questions, we'll move on to our briefing. Um our housing finance corporation expense review audit results and recommendations. Patrice Randall will be presenting to us today. Good afternoon, Patrice Randall, city auditor. Last month, our office released an audit report related to expenses paid by the uh housing finance corp. And so I'm here to provide a brief summary of those audit results. So our audit period covered October 1, expenses paid from October 1, 2023 through March 31 of 2025, and the purpose for the audit was just to make sure expenses were properly approved, reviewed, and supported. And so, based on our audit results, overall the expenses were reviewed, approved as required, they were reasonable, they were allowable. We did, however, identify some control weaknesses related to segregated duties, blank check stock, maintenance of supporting documentation, and formal written procedures or policies. So, in reference to segregated duties, uh, some examples of what we saw was there were some bank transactions that were approved using a generic user ID. So since it was a generic user ID and wasn't specific to a certain employee, we were unable to determine whether those duties were properly segregated. In reference to blank check stock, based on our observations, uh, when we looked at the blank check stock as well as the key that allows access to the blank check stock, we concluded there was a security risk for maintenance of supporting documentation. There were some expenses where we considered the documentation not adequate. Some examples include for like permanent supportive housing. There were um bus passes for clients. However, the documentation did not show which clients received the bus passes or how many bus passes they received. And also when uh looking at some of the expenses, uh, they were there was an allocation. However, the method for determining that cost allocation was not documented, and then uh some lack of written formal written procedures and policies. So we made recommendations in each of these areas and management concurred with the recommendations. They provided us with a target implementation date, and from an audit perspective, once we receive a target implementation date, we follow up to see if those recommendations have been implemented. And as you can see from the screen, each of the recommendations that had a January 31st implementation date, we determined were fully implemented. We looked at documentation between the finance corp and the Chase Bank, the generic user IDs have been deactivated, we observed the check stock, everything had been fully implemented. So we commend staff on that. And then there were three recommendations that have a target implementation date of February 28th. Of course, that time has not come, but when we went to verify the January 31 dates, we did determine that these three recommendations had already been partially implemented as of that date. Now they may have been fully implemented as of now, because that's been a couple of weeks or last week. And then in addition to our audit findings, we made some suggestions regarding the mowing contract. We recommended that the contracts going forward include the specific address. We didn't consider the finding because we were able to trace the addresses and the dollar amounts, but we uh recommended or suggested that it include the um the unit numbers in the contracts for those properties, and then we suggested that for the uh mowing service contract to competitively bid that uh the corp has been using the same vendor since like June of 2016, so we recommended competitively bidding that and that concludes our report summary. Are there any questions? For me, Garkeisha. There are any questions for Ms. Randall? Um could you quantify? I'm just kind of curious about the uh bus passes. I mean, uh what numbers are we talking about? There were maybe less than three because eight over 80 percent of the expenses were for fine. Okay, so it was very the exceptions or minimal. Gotcha.