OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Framingham, Massachusetts/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Framingham City Council Meeting: September 15, 2026 - Surveillance Ordinance Debated

City Council — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyFramingham, Massachusetts
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:33:11

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

The City Council is the sole legislative body of the city of Framingham and is therefore responsible for passing city ordinances.

0:07

The city council is made up of 11 members who exercise the legislative powers of Framingham.

0:12

Two of these members are known as counselors at large, and nine members are known as district counselors.

0:16

The city council serves as a link between the citizens of Framingham and their municipal government.

0:21

Counselors help constituents by connecting them to resources, services, and city departments.

0:25

And also serve as advocates for all Framingham residents.

0:29

The following city council coverage is brought to you by the government channel, a service of the city of Framingham.

0:56

Good evening and welcome to the City Council meeting for the 15th of September 2026.

1:03

We're using version one of our agenda posted in the public meeting portal and published to I legislate on Thursday, the 10th of September.

1:10

Okay, so we have uh eight counselors in the room, and we have three counselors remote.

1:16

Uh councillors Bryant Long and Alexander, I believe, are remote.

1:19

Actually, I'm not sure if Councillor Bryan is remote.

1:23

I've heard from the other two.

1:25

Okay.

1:25

So the first item on the agenda would be the minutes from the 18th.

1:30

Motion to approval.

1:31

Second.

1:32

Okay.

1:34

I want to get my list out here, sorry.

1:38

I think I know, but no, I did not know.

1:40

Mr.

1:40

Ward.

1:42

Yes.

1:42

Miss Feeney.

1:43

Yes.

1:43

Mr.

1:44

Cannon?

1:44

Yes.

1:44

Mr.

1:45

Alexander, are you here yet?

1:47

He is joining us, I know.

1:48

Mr.

1:48

Aviani?

1:49

Yes.

1:49

Miss Malik.

1:50

Yes.

1:51

Yes.

1:51

Miss Bryan, are you here?

1:53

Yes.

1:54

Okay, myself and yes.

1:55

I got you.

1:56

Myself, yes, Miss Lambert.

1:58

Miss Long.

1:59

Yes.

2:00

In favor, none opposed.

2:02

We have no proclamations tonight.

2:04

Public participation.

2:06

Uh Mr.

2:07

Chick.

2:11

Uh Ron Chick.

2:13

I just want to thank the mayor's office.

2:17

The um you know this if you have three minutes.

2:20

Yes.

2:20

Okay.

2:21

Uh, the mayor's office, the uh CFO, director of planning, our Sarka Sarcassian, the conservation department for their diligent and perseverance on acquiring and securing 103 Guild Street.

2:35

Uh, it's an amazing property.

2:37

Some of you have been there.

2:39

Um, it's it's uh an existing footprint of wonderful trails through a woodland.

2:46

Uh the property also connects to about three, four hundred acres of deeded conservation land, and it's an amazing acquisition, and also thanking trustees of reservation for holding the deed restriction.

2:59

So a big thank you to all.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Immigration Policy█████████████████████████████████33%
Technology and Innovation███████████████████████████27%
Public Engagement██████████████14%
Public Safety████████8%
Procedural███████7%
Parks and Recreation████4%
Budget Equity Analysis███3%
Environmental Protection██2%
Historic Preservation█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Framingham City Council Meeting: September 15, 2026

The Framingham City Council held a regular meeting on September 15, 2026, with eight councilors present in the room and three participating remotely. The meeting covered approval of minutes, public comments, a public hearing on park staffing, approval of junk dealer licenses, and lengthy debate on a proposed ordinance banning automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and facial recognition technology, which was ultimately sent back to committee. Several referrals and council reports concluded the session.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes from August 18, 2026: Approved unanimously with all 11 councilors voting in favor.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Ron Chick, a resident, expressed gratitude to the mayor's office, CFO, planning director, conservation department, and Trustees of Reservations for acquiring and securing 103 Guild Street, describing it as an amazing property with trails connecting to hundreds of acres of conservation land.
  • Mr. Bloomfield addressed multiple topics, including school enrollment numbers for FY28, city-wide FY28 expenses vs. revenue, projected state/federal grants, EDC success guidance, cross-training school and city employees to lower costs, lack of lifeguards at city beaches, rezoning threats on Edmonds Road (citing historical Nipmuc land), and the bankruptcy department expansion. He called for an independent oversight review of the expansion.

Discussion Items

Public Hearing: Supplemental Budget for Mary Denison Park

  • The council held a public hearing (continued from September 3) on a Finance Subcommittee recommendation to transfer $183,000 from local revenue receipts for four additional workers at Mary Denison Park.
  • Councillor Bryant expressed concern that four positions might be insufficient, citing a BIPOX/REC analysis recommending ten staff. She asked about a monitoring timeline. Councillor Viani noted the subcommittee agreed to four as a starting point, with the possibility to request more later.
  • The council voted unanimously (11-0) to approve the transfer.

Item 4 & 5: Junk Dealer & Antique Secondhand Goods Licenses

  • National Rarities LLC for a three-day event (October 20-22): Approved unanimously.
  • Roadshow Concepts for two annual licenses (September 21-25, 2026, and December 14-18, 2025): Approved unanimously. Councillor Viani noted the location was formerly Sheraton Tara (now Renaissance) on Worcester Road.

Surveillance Technology Ordinance (Ban on ALPRs & Facial Recognition)

  • Councillor Stefanini (Chair of Rules Subcommittee) presented the ordinance, which bans ALPRs, facial recognition, and prohibits use of city resources by ICE. He stated the subcommittee spent six months working on the issue, splitting it into two parts: this immediate ban and a future broader review. He emphasized the need to maintain trust in local law enforcement and protect the immigrant community.
  • Councillor Bryant moved to send the ordinance back to the subcommittee for further editing, arguing it was not ready and that input from community experts was needed.
  • Debate focused on the preamble's political language referencing the Trump administration. Councilors Long, Cannon, Ward, Viani, and Malik criticized the language as inflammatory, unnecessary, and politically charged. Councilors Stefanini, Alexander, and Ms. Feeney defended the language as a necessary statement to support the immigrant community given real local impacts.
  • Public comments (six speakers): Speakers generally supported the ban but requested stronger, more specific language on data sharing, reporting, and ICE cooperation. One speaker (Kate) asked not to be quoted on behalf of the coalition, and noted lack of translation services. Another (Andrew) questioned the subcommittee report and cited EFF reporting on abuse of ALPR data. Bobby Isley argued surveillance violates rights regardless of administration. Ladybug proposed detailed prohibitions and data deletion timelines. Leela reported three recent ICE detentions in Framingham and asked for stronger protections.
  • Motion to refer back to the subcommittee was carried by a vote of 8-3 (Councillors Malik, Bryant, Chair, Lane Bruno, Long, Cannon, Alexander, Aviani in favor; Stefanini, Ward, Feeney opposed).

Key Outcomes

  • Approved: Supplemental budget of $183,000 for four park workers at Mary Denison Park (unanimous).
  • Approved: Junk dealer licenses for National Rarities LLC and Roadshow Concepts (unanimous).
  • Referred back to subcommittee: Proposed ordinance banning ALPRs and facial recognition technology (8-3 vote). It will be reconsidered by the Rules Subcommittee for further refinement.
  • Referred to Finance Subcommittee: Request from CFO for reauthorization of the opioid stabilization fund, with a requirement to present past and planned spending.
  • Referred to Rules Subcommittee: Request from Councillor Malik regarding establishment of council liaison positions.

Other Business & Reports

  • Council chair report: Noted an NSTAR application from the DEP Waterways Regulation Program in District 9; public comment deadline September 28.
  • Councillor reports: Upcoming events (farmers market, flower show, business expo, neighborhood meeting) and a moment of silence for Brianna Connolly.

Next Steps

  • The surveillance technology ordinance will be revised in the Rules Subcommittee and brought back for future consideration.
  • Finance Subcommittee to review opioid stabilization fund authorization.
  • City solicitor to finalize ordinance for revolving fund spending limits.
  • Public comment on NSTAR application remains open until September 28.

Meeting Transcript

The City Council is the sole legislative body of the city of Framingham and is therefore responsible for passing city ordinances. The city council is made up of 11 members who exercise the legislative powers of Framingham. Two of these members are known as counselors at large, and nine members are known as district counselors. The city council serves as a link between the citizens of Framingham and their municipal government. Counselors help constituents by connecting them to resources, services, and city departments. And also serve as advocates for all Framingham residents. The following city council coverage is brought to you by the government channel, a service of the city of Framingham. Good evening and welcome to the City Council meeting for the 15th of September 2026. We're using version one of our agenda posted in the public meeting portal and published to I legislate on Thursday, the 10th of September. Okay, so we have uh eight counselors in the room, and we have three counselors remote. Uh councillors Bryant Long and Alexander, I believe, are remote. Actually, I'm not sure if Councillor Bryan is remote. I've heard from the other two. Okay. So the first item on the agenda would be the minutes from the 18th. Motion to approval. Second. Okay. I want to get my list out here, sorry. I think I know, but no, I did not know. Mr. Ward. Yes. Miss Feeney. Yes. Mr. Cannon? Yes. Mr. Alexander, are you here yet? He is joining us, I know. Mr. Aviani? Yes. Miss Malik. Yes. Yes. Miss Bryan, are you here? Yes. Okay, myself and yes. I got you. Myself, yes, Miss Lambert. Miss Long. Yes. In favor, none opposed. We have no proclamations tonight. Public participation. Uh Mr. Chick. Uh Ron Chick.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com