OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Fraser, Michigan/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Fraser City Council Meeting – November 12, 2026: Park Master Plan, Road Projects, and Contract Awards

City Council — Thursday, November 12, 2026
BodyFraser, Michigan
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, November 12, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:40:39

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Unassigned speaker

0:00

How do we give us a h do we give us a hug

Speaker 1

12:15

We were asking people to pick one over the other, but to take a look at them as tools to look at different areas of the park.

12:21

Do you want a basketball court here?

12:23

Do you want a pavilion there, a splash pad of this size, a splash pad of that size?

12:28

And we have found strong support for a larger splash pad.

12:32

We showed a smaller one in one concept, a larger in the

Unassigned speaker

12:34

other,

Speaker 1

12:36

overwhelming support for revamping Fort Fraser in some manner, due to nostalgia, stake in it, just overall amenity for this park is huge, and we know that.

13:06

So maybe while we have these big event spaces, but also having garden or places to pause in a shaded space, and then of course spaces for events.

13:15

Some areas that we found might need more explanation or exploration would be like the amphitheater, and that's location and proximity to residences, fitness stations and those support, and location to parking and other amenities, parking and circulation, and create making sure that there's access to all portions of the park, whether that's parking or walking.

13:36

And then operation and maintenance concerns, as we add more amenities, was also something to consider.

13:45

Things that we found were more of a split response, didn't have a great direction one way or the other, are the skate park, disc golf, dog park, and roadway connections into the neighborhoods nearby.

13:56

So the skate park didn't have a strong support or really one direction where to put it necessarily.

14:10

Dog park, there was considerable amount of concern about safety or management of that type of amenity.

14:16

And then roadway connections, there were some concerns about traffic through traffic into the quieter neighborhoods.

14:23

All of these, you'll see a combination of the two of these concepts in the master plan

Unassigned speaker

14:29

here.

Unassigned speaker

14:30

So

Speaker 2

14:30

yeah, so this is the master plan for Stephens Park.

14:33

We will walk through them through the design phase by phase, but on a high level, this layout is similar to currently how Steppen Park is today.

14:42

It is a combination of both concept one and two, as Courtney mentioned.

14:46

You'll notice that we've put an emphasis on upgrading current amenities right now, such as the baseball fields that I know the city has already invested some money on, the parking lot near 14 mile road, the baseball fields, basketball area, and Fort Fraser upgrade and expansion.

15:03

We also included some new amenities as well, such as the splash pad, the nature walk, the one kilometer walking loop around the park.

15:12

These were all results of the what the survey resulted

Unassigned speaker

15:16

in.

Speaker 1

15:21

We also prepared a phasing and estimate plan.

15:24

It's important to understand that when you add all these numbers up to, it's about a $20 million price tag.

15:31

But that figure is extremely preliminary.

15:33

It's long-range planning estimate and it's not construction ready, or a commitment to spend 20 million dollars.

15:40

The estimate intentionally takes a conservative approach.

15:43

It accounts for anticipated inflation, future design and engineering services, additional planning and coordination for individual projects like Fort Fraser or a splash pad, and some capital improvements necessary to maintain and support existing infrastructure like pavilions.

15:58

The intent is to establish a high-level funding target that gives the city a realistic framework to build and plan and budget over time.

16:07

One of the primary considerations in developing this phasing plan was making the best use of infrastructure that already exists.

16:13

And we want to avoid investing in improvements today that need to be removed or relocated or reconstructed to accommodate a future project.

16:22

By looking at the park holistically, we can coordinate improvements, establish supporting infrastructure early on, and minimize unnecessary work and duplicated costs in the future.

16:34

Phases one through three.

16:36

So that's the blue, the pink, and the bright green on the on the sheet there.

16:41

Those contain the majority of proposed improvements and focus on putting foundational infrastructure up front.

16:48

It includes things like parking and circulation, stormwater management, and mass grading to prepare other areas of the park for future improvements.

16:56

These investments are intentional and address underlying infrastructure early

Unassigned speaker

17:01

on

Speaker 1

17:03

to work around existing limit.

17:07

I'm sorry, excuse me, so that we're not working around existing limitations in the future or revisiting improvements that were already constructed.

17:15

Phases four through eight, those are generally smaller in scale, a little more flexible, and are it just offers the city more flexibility in how improvements are implemented and they can advance as complete projects or small projects as funding becomes available throughout time.

17:36

Another important consideration is that stormwater management will have to be addressed in phase one, no matter what is in phase one, just to make sure that that's taken care of up front.

17:49

Grant funding was also an important consideration in how this phasing was considered.

17:56

We want to make sure that the city is positioned for competitive grant applications.

18:01

So some things were kind of lumped together in a phase to know that, like, for example, a DNR grant and what their priorities are for those programs.

18:09

And it's also important to clarify that the estimate doesn't account for smaller capital improvements over time and day-to-day maintenance, like we're not accounting for replacing mulch beds and additional support staff that would come with new amenities.

18:28

So we'll take a look at this phase by phase and kind of break the park down a little bit

Unassigned speaker

18:33

more.

Speaker 1

18:34

To start, let's get a grasp on what Stephens Park looks like now with 14 mile at the top of the page or top of the screen there, Garfield on the left and city hall, and the VFW down in the south or the bottom of the page.

18:47

So we've got existing basketball courts that we're working with, two ball fields, existing pickleball and tennis courts off of 14 mile.

18:56

There's a gravel parking lot, and then Sweeney Drain also sweeps through the right side or the east side of the park.

19:02

And we've got Fort Fraser down in the bottom of the park or the south side.

19:07

Within phase one, we're looking at expanding and improving with a paved parking lot right off of 14 mile.

19:15

That includes, if you see the number eight there, a sweeping like drop off space for events, some inclusive parking spaces.

19:24

This also shows the two ball fields as if they've been improved.

19:27

We're taking into account the improvements that have already been made, and the money that has already gone towards those.

19:33

So we're also showing some improved amenities to support those ball fields.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████████████20%
Parks and Recreation██████████████████18%
Community Engagement████████████████16%
Personnel Matters█████████████13%
Procedural████████████12%
Miscellaneous████4%
Water And Wastewater Management████4%
Planning And Zoning████4%
Public Engagement███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Fraser City Council Meeting – November 12, 2026

The City of Fraser City Council met on Thursday, November 12, 2026, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers. The meeting lasted until 10:16 PM and included presentations on the Steffens Park Master Plan, capital improvement projects, several contract approvals, and public comments regarding a community garden controversy.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the October 8, 2026 City Council meeting minutes.
  • Received board/commission meeting minutes and the Historical Commission newsletter.
  • Approved transfer of delinquent payments to winter taxes.
  • Approved Holly Charest’s application for additional service credit purchase.
  • Approved a Letter of Understanding with TPOAM establishing the Senior Clerk – Public Safety classification.
  • Received check disbursements and revenue/expenditure reports.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Deanna Reiner (15569 Luxembourg) – Lifetime resident leaving Fraser. Asked that the city prioritize public safety, noting the loss of PSOs and a failed PA 33 tax increase. Expressed concern that a larger park would require more police/EMT resources. Suggested residents might use Roseville’s free splash pad instead. Questioned water usage costs for a splash pad given the city’s water contract with Great Lakes Water Authority.
  • Vanya Apps (31641 York Street, past president, Fraser First Booster Club) – Supported the park master plan, saying a walking path would bring people to the park. Urged the council to start with a phase, noting that McKinley Park started similarly with a $350,000 grant. Stated “Fraser needs to do something” to retain residents and attract families.
  • Annie St. Clair (Warren resident) – Criticized Mayor Lesich’s involvement with Urban Seed, alleging collusion and silencing of volunteers in the South Warren Community Garden. Called for the Mayor to step down from the Urban Seed board.
  • Stephanie Scott – Described volunteering with her daughter at East Point and South Warren gardens. Expressed disappointment with Mayor Lesich’s conduct and asked him to step down from the Urban Seed board.
  • Deanna Reiner (again) – Thanked public safety and DPW. Asked about previous $8,000 from farmers market for a dog park, a pet rainbow bridge, and the status of $50,000 from Sheets. Complained about being blocked from the Enough Facebook page and lack of transparency. Asked about conflict of interest with Mayor Lesich and Councilmember O’Dell on the Fraser First Booster Club board.
  • Katie Donnelly (East Point resident, volunteer at gardens) – Detailed allegations of a hostile takeover of Urban Seed’s board by Mayor Lesich and others. Claimed statistical evidence of collusion. Called for the Mayor to resign from the board.
  • Jeff Matthews (co-founder, chair, South Warren Community Garden) – Described a scheme to seize control of Urban Seed and alleged that Mayor Lesich and John Hoffman colluded to vote off volunteers. Stated the gardens are on strike. Asked the city to investigate.
  • Zachary Carrick (administered 2026 board election, analyzed voting data) – Presented data showing collusion. Accused Mayor Lesich of not volunteering at gardens and taking control of the nonprofit for reputational gain. Asked the Mayor to resign from Urban Seed.
  • Laura Lesich (15201 Fairview) – Defended volunteering and the city’s progress. Announced upcoming events including Christmas in Fraser and Beautification Club meetings. Supported the park plan.
  • Ken Immler (Hawk Industrial) – Thanked council for completing the industrial park road project, calling it “shockingly perfect.”

Discussion Items

  • Steffens Park Master Plan Presentation (Item 7a) – AEW consultants presented an eight-phase, $20 million preliminary plan (not construction-ready) based on community survey feedback. Phases include parking, walking loop, splash pad, Fort Fraser renovation, amphitheater, and bridges. Council discussion centered on costs, phasing, maintaining the carnival/fireworks, Fort Fraser replacement, and stormwater management. The plan was received and filed; no motion was taken.
  • 2025 Capital Improvement Program Update (Item 7b) – Ashley presented water main and storm sewer replacement for Elity, Schoolcraft, Redetta, Cyril, and Linden streets. A new water main on Hanover Street (serving ~5 homes) was added at an estimated $500,000 (water main only $330,000). Total project cost about $7 million, with $5 million from the general fund. Council also discussed standardizing street widths and removing unpermitted pavement in rights-of-way. Motion passed 5-0 to approve the project including Hanover and full storm sewer replacement.
  • Residential Cross Connection Contract Extension (Item 7c) – Approved a three-year extension with Hydro Corp for $129,730 (first year $44,415, with 4% annual increases). Motion passed 5-0.
  • City Hall Boiler Repairs (Item 7d) – Approved Ingersoll Mechanical quote of $10,352 to complete repairs. Motion passed 5-0.
  • State-Required Elevator Upgrades (Item 7e) – Approved City Elevator of Michigan proposal of $37,500 for elevator safety upgrades at City Hall and Senior Housing. Motion passed 5-0.
  • Planning Commission Recommendation on Building Services (Item 7f) – After discussion, council voted 5-0 to direct administration to negotiate a one-year contract with the City of Roseville Building Department for $185,728, effective January 1, 2027, subject to contract details.
  • Planning Commission Recommendation on Planning Services (Item 7g) – Council heard from three firms: McKenna (incumbent), Wade Trim, and Giffels Webster. After presentations and public comment, council voted 5-0 to award a one-year planning services contract to Wade Trim.

Key Outcomes

  • Steffens Park Master Plan: Received and filed; no immediate funding or action. Council emphasized it is a “vision” and not a commitment.
  • Capital Improvement Program: Approved (5-0) the full project including Hanover water main and storm sewer replacement on multiple streets. Construction targeted for summer 2027.
  • Residential Cross-Connection Contract: Approved (5-0) Hydro Corp extension at $129,730 over three years.
  • City Hall Boiler Repairs: Approved (5-0) $10,352 to Ingersoll.
  • Elevator Upgrades: Approved (5-0) $37,500 to City Elevator of Michigan.
  • Building Services: Approved (5-0) directing administration to negotiate with Roseville for $185,728/year, one-year contract beginning January 1, 2027.
  • Planning Services: Approved (5-0) awarding a one-year contract to Wade Trim.
  • Closed Session: Council voted to enter closed session to consult with the city attorney on a written legal opinion. After closed session, council voted to direct the attorney as discussed. Meeting adjourned at 10:16 PM.

Election Update

City Clerk reported a 60.36% voter turnout in Fraser for the recent election. Early voting and absentee ballots accounted for about one-third of votes. Precinct 5 had 70% turnout. The clerk thanked staff and DPW for support.

Public Safety

City Manager reported that a police vehicle involved in a pursuit-related accident was totaled; a replacement will be pursued.

Meeting Transcript

How do we give us a h do we give us a hug We were asking people to pick one over the other, but to take a look at them as tools to look at different areas of the park. Do you want a basketball court here? Do you want a pavilion there, a splash pad of this size, a splash pad of that size? And we have found strong support for a larger splash pad. We showed a smaller one in one concept, a larger in the other, overwhelming support for revamping Fort Fraser in some manner, due to nostalgia, stake in it, just overall amenity for this park is huge, and we know that. So maybe while we have these big event spaces, but also having garden or places to pause in a shaded space, and then of course spaces for events. Some areas that we found might need more explanation or exploration would be like the amphitheater, and that's location and proximity to residences, fitness stations and those support, and location to parking and other amenities, parking and circulation, and create making sure that there's access to all portions of the park, whether that's parking or walking. And then operation and maintenance concerns, as we add more amenities, was also something to consider. Things that we found were more of a split response, didn't have a great direction one way or the other, are the skate park, disc golf, dog park, and roadway connections into the neighborhoods nearby. So the skate park didn't have a strong support or really one direction where to put it necessarily. Dog park, there was considerable amount of concern about safety or management of that type of amenity. And then roadway connections, there were some concerns about traffic through traffic into the quieter neighborhoods. All of these, you'll see a combination of the two of these concepts in the master plan here. So yeah, so this is the master plan for Stephens Park. We will walk through them through the design phase by phase, but on a high level, this layout is similar to currently how Steppen Park is today. It is a combination of both concept one and two, as Courtney mentioned. You'll notice that we've put an emphasis on upgrading current amenities right now, such as the baseball fields that I know the city has already invested some money on, the parking lot near 14 mile road, the baseball fields, basketball area, and Fort Fraser upgrade and expansion. We also included some new amenities as well, such as the splash pad, the nature walk, the one kilometer walking loop around the park. These were all results of the what the survey resulted in. We also prepared a phasing and estimate plan. It's important to understand that when you add all these numbers up to, it's about a $20 million price tag. But that figure is extremely preliminary. It's long-range planning estimate and it's not construction ready, or a commitment to spend 20 million dollars. The estimate intentionally takes a conservative approach. It accounts for anticipated inflation, future design and engineering services, additional planning and coordination for individual projects like Fort Fraser or a splash pad, and some capital improvements necessary to maintain and support existing infrastructure like pavilions. The intent is to establish a high-level funding target that gives the city a realistic framework to build and plan and budget over time. One of the primary considerations in developing this phasing plan was making the best use of infrastructure that already exists. And we want to avoid investing in improvements today that need to be removed or relocated or reconstructed to accommodate a future project. By looking at the park holistically, we can coordinate improvements, establish supporting infrastructure early on, and minimize unnecessary work and duplicated costs in the future. Phases one through three. So that's the blue, the pink, and the bright green on the on the sheet there. Those contain the majority of proposed improvements and focus on putting foundational infrastructure up front. It includes things like parking and circulation, stormwater management, and mass grading to prepare other areas of the park for future improvements. These investments are intentional and address underlying infrastructure early on to work around existing limit. I'm sorry, excuse me, so that we're not working around existing limitations in the future or revisiting improvements that were already constructed. Phases four through eight, those are generally smaller in scale, a little more flexible, and are it just offers the city more flexibility in how improvements are implemented and they can advance as complete projects or small projects as funding becomes available throughout time. Another important consideration is that stormwater management will have to be addressed in phase one, no matter what is in phase one, just to make sure that that's taken care of up front. Grant funding was also an important consideration in how this phasing was considered. We want to make sure that the city is positioned for competitive grant applications. So some things were kind of lumped together in a phase to know that, like, for example, a DNR grant and what their priorities are for those programs. And it's also important to clarify that the estimate doesn't account for smaller capital improvements over time and day-to-day maintenance, like we're not accounting for replacing mulch beds and additional support staff that would come with new amenities. So we'll take a look at this phase by phase and kind of break the park down a little bit

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com