Mayor & Board of Aldermen Workshop - October 30, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Mayor & Board of Aldermen Workshop - October 30, 2024
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen held a workshop on October 30, 2024, discussing three major items: implementation plans for rental licensing funds, the annual report on small, minority, and women-owned business enterprise (SBR/MWBE) programs, and a rezoning request for Frederick County's proposed Prospect Center. No public comments were made.
Rental Licensing Fund Allocation and Implementation
- HHS Director Ruth provided an update on rental inspections: 90% complete; 34 units awaiting first inspection, 243 requiring a second inspection, and three condemnations (due to tenant hoarding, unsanitary conditions, and an illegal bedroom).
- FY24 rental registration income was $912,240; expenditures $384,299, leaving a surplus of $527,941. FY25 surplus is projected at approximately $5,269.
- Proposed changes to fund allocations: cap the Tenant Protection Fund at $50,000 (instead of 30% of surplus), allocate 40% to the Rental Assistance Fund (up from 20%), and the remainder to the Affordable Housing Conservation Fund.
- A debate arose over whether the Rental Assistance Fund should serve tenants displaced by ordinance enforcement or all low-income residents facing housing insecurity. Several aldermen favored broader use, while others noted the current language restricts it to those required to vacate.
- Ruth presented eligibility criteria for each fund, including a 90-day tenancy requirement. Aldermen Russell and Nash questioned this requirement, arguing it should not apply.
- The board expressed preference for partnering with existing community organizations to disburse funds rather than running an in-house program.
- For the Affordable Housing Conservation Fund, a home repair program with Habitat for Humanity was proposed. Board members called for a wider menu of options and suggested issuing an RFI to solicit proposals.
- Next steps: schedule another workshop with DPW staff to obtain detailed inspection data and revisit the ordinance language.
SBR/MWBE Annual Report and Proposed Revisions
- Gerard Bowens, Business Outreach Coordinator, presented the annual report on the MWBE and SBR programs.
- Since the last report: added over 200 vendors to the tracking sheet, launched the Frederick Buys campaign (adding ~90 new vendors), hosted a vendor resource fair (86 registered, 36 attended), created a mentor-protege program, and published a "Doing Business with the City" guide.
- MWBE program: on $39 million in projects, average goal 33%, actual participation 36%, total MWBE spend exceeding $11 million.
- SBR program: 103 exemptions out of 370 qualifying purchases in CY23; 118 out of 433 YTD in CY24. Many exemptions due to inability to obtain three SBE quotes.
- Proposed revisions:
- Exempt purchases over $50,000 from the SBR program, as only 1 of 81 purchases over that threshold successfully used the set-aside. This would allow focus on the $10,000 to $50,000 range.
- Add a 1% contract goal for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses.
- Integrate contract compliance software (~$30,000/year) to improve data tracking.
- Board reaction: Alderman Russell requested more time to study the $50k exemption proposal; the veteran-owned goal and software integration were generally well-received.
Rezoning Request for Frederick County's Prospect Center (585 Himes Avenue)
- The board continued discussion of a request to rezone 19.5 acres from Professional Business (PB) to Institutional (IST) for the Prospect Center, a multi-agency government services complex.
- County representatives (Will Savish, Jason Stitt, Peter Soprano, Todd Buckmanic, Carl Wilson, Anthony Rosato) addressed previous questions:
- Site selection: no formal study, but other sites were considered; the Prospect Center was chosen for affordable price, underserved community location, walkability, and transit access.
- Traffic: road diet on Himes Avenue (city project) will not impact site; a bus stop will be located on the property.
- Pedestrian path to Route 40 to be coordinated with future affordable housing on adjacent parcel.
- Emergency access: gated north entrance with SOS beacon.
- Screening: additional evergreens requested by board; monopole cannot be camouflaged cost-effectively.
- Microgrid to power critical operations and serve as a community resiliency hub.
- Fiber infrastructure: board requested assurance of city access to support economic development.
- Board members (Russell, Nash) proposed conditions for approval:
- Robust year-round screening with evergreens.
- Covered, protected bicycle parking.
- Monopole restricted to emergency communications; no third-party co-location.
- Binding intergovernmental agreement to preserve city access to fiber network.
- Continued access for city residents to training and emergency response facilities.
- Next steps: city attorney to draft conditions; applicant to accept; public hearing likely in November or December, depending on applicant's readiness.
Key Outcomes
- No votes were taken; the workshop was for deliberation and direction.
- The rental licensing ordinance will be revisited in a future workshop with DPW staff present to provide comprehensive inspection data.
- An RFI may be issued for uses of the Affordable Housing Conservation Fund.
- SBR program modifications (exemption over $50k, veteran-owned goal, compliance software) will be studied further before formal action.
- Conditions for the Prospect Center rezoning will be drafted and presented to the applicant, followed by a public hearing and final vote.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, and welcome to the October thirtieth, Mayor and Board of Ottoman Workshop. We will begin with a Pledge of Allegiance. He's coming back from a meeting in Annapolis, and Alderwoman Kazemchak indicated that she would not be able to join us today. I just need to share it. Okay. Okay, there you go. That's gonna show up there. Just two from that one. I should be good. Let me see. Okay, so I need to click this. Yes. Okay. Sorry about that. Um I just wanted to start out, and today is a continuation of the discussion that we had in August about um rental licensing. So I wanted to start out with just an update from DPW about kind of where we are with um with the act in terms of inspections. So with rental licensing inspections, they are 90% complete. There are 34 units that need a first inspection, 243 units that require a second inspection. And that's a little different than what we had in August, um, where I don't believe we had any second inspections required at at that time. But there are 243 units that we have to revisit and make sure that they've complied with this act. And lastly, condemnations. There were three condemnations. Um it sounds like all of them were because of the tenant, one was for hoarding, one for unsanitary conditions, and one because they had an illegal bedroom that they didn't get a permit for. Okay. So three condemnations were what were those again? They were uh the combat. Rentees or rental rentees or owner or lesser or renter, renter or rentee? It sounds as though it was uh the renters issues, hoarding, unsanitary conditions, and an illegal bedroom. Yeah. And a couple questions on those first data points. So you you noted there 90% complete. So that is what does that mean? 90% of what has been completed of our required inspections to get through in this year. That was what I thought. I'm really not prepared to explain exactly what all their numbers mean. I really just reached out and said, give me an update. So maybe it was inappropriate to to tell you at this time without you know, them here to actually answer those questions. So I apologize. Okay, and what does a first inspection needed mean? They haven't actually gotten to the unit yet to inspect it. So that number 34 would presumably be the outstanding ten percent? Correct. Okay. And of the well, that's that's worrisome. So if ten percent of the units selected for this year still need to be inspected. And that number is thirty-four. Right. Uh two hundred and eighty-seven looks like is the total total two ninety, twenty-nine percent would be twenty-nine. Right. So do you know how many units needed to be inspected this year for us to fulfill our our intention?
openpublica.com