Frederick Planning Commission Meeting - February 13, 2023: Multiple Site Plan Approvals and Training Session
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Frederick Planning Commission Meeting - February 13, 2023
The Frederick Planning Commission met on February 13, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. in City Hall. The commission approved several final site plans, modifications, and a forest conservation plan, and conducted a training session on quasi-judicial procedures. All votes were unanimous unless otherwise noted.
Consent Calendar
- Approved the January 9, 2023, Planning Commission meeting minutes.
- Approved the January 17, 2023, Planning Commission workshop minutes.
- Approved the February 10, 2023, pre-Planning Commission meeting minutes.
Discussion Items
A. Frederick County Animal Control Center Renovation & Expansion (PC22-926FSI)
The applicant requested approval of a final site plan for a 7,958-square-foot addition (total 20,619 sq ft) and renovation of the existing animal control facility at 1832 Rosemont Avenue. The project will add eight parking spaces (total 52), including two EV charging stations, and improve pedestrian access. Staff recommended approval, finding compliance with LMC Articles 4–8 and the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner MacShane recused himself due to missing the presentation; Commissioner Lee (alternate) voted in his place. The commission approved the plan unanimously (4-0) with two conditions: adding case 22-742 HPC to the project history and noting the approval date.
B. SECU Remote ATM at Monocacy (PC22-919FSI)
The applicant sought final site plan approval for a standalone ATM in the Shops at Monocacy parking lot (1700 Kingfisher Drive), along with a modification to Section 808(d) of the LMC (buffer requirements). Staff found the modification met criteria for not being contrary to code intent, consistency with the comprehensive plan, and compensating design features (proposed shrubs). The commission unanimously approved the modification and the site plan, with a condition to add the modification approval date.
C. Prospect Hall Final Site Plan (PC21-334FSI)
The applicant proposed renovating the historic mansion at 889 Butterfly Lane for use as a reception facility and recreation/social service center. Three modifications to parking standards were requested: (1) reduce access drive width from 24 to 20 feet; (2) reduce parking setback from 30 to 23 feet (north) and 19 feet (northeast) from property lines; (3) allow light spillover near the Butterfly Lane entrance for safety. Staff supported each modification, citing consistency with the comprehensive plan and compensating features (landscaping, lighting design). The commission approved all three modifications and the final site plan unanimously, with conditions including recording the right-of-way dedication and adding approval dates.
D. Prospect Hall Combined Forest Stand Delineation and Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan (PC21-550FSCB)
The applicant requested approval of a forest conservation plan and a modification to remove five specimen trees (over 25 inches DBH) to accommodate required parking. Staff found the modification warranted due to the historic property’s constraints and that the applicant would pay a fee-in-lieu of $4,312.44 for 0.33 acres of mitigation. The commission unanimously approved the modification and the forest conservation plan, with conditions to correct note numbers and add approval dates.
E. Renn Quarter Phase 3 Combined Preliminary Plat/Final Site Plan (PC22-1096PSU/FSI)
The applicant sought a revision to the previously approved Phase 3 plan to enlarge 12 townhome units from 20- to 24-foot lot widths, introducing a front-loaded one-car garage unit. The overall plan includes 75 units on 9.889 acres. Staff found the plan compliant with applicable LMC articles and the comprehensive plan. The commission unanimously approved the combined plat and site plan with conditions to add street profiles, verify acres, and update plan history.
F. Visitation Adaptive Reuse Final Site Plan (PC22-925FSI)
The applicant proposed a four-story, 33,100-square-foot building with seven multifamily units as part of the Visitation Adaptive Reuse project at 200 E. 2nd Street. The building height is 54 feet. Staff recommended approval, finding compliance with LMC Articles 4–8 and 12. The commission unanimously approved the site plan with conditions including execution of a cross-access easement and adding standard water/sewer notes.
Planning Commission Training Session
Commissioner MacShane recused himself from item A due to missing the presentation, leading to a discussion on abstaining versus recusing. Assistant City Attorney Scott Waxter conducted a training session covering:
- The quasi-judicial role of the commission and the three-tiered court review (error of law, sufficient evidence, reasonable mind).
- The relationship between the LMC and the Comprehensive Plan: the LMC incorporates the plan, and decisions based on the LMC are presumed consistent.
- Proper motion practice: making a motion to approve with separate supporting findings rather than embedding findings in the motion.
- Conflicts of interest and required recusals (financial, familial, etc.) versus discretionary recusals (lack of eligibility, inability to fairly judge).
- Abstentions: discouraged unless truly unable to decide; recusal allows alternate to vote.
- Open Meetings Act compliance: avoid serial email discussions; public deliberation only in noticed meetings.
- Ex parte communications: avoid discussing pending cases outside the hearing room.
- The commission also discussed the ability to recommend text amendments by forwarding a letter to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen.
Key Outcomes
- All development applications (A through F) were approved unanimously.
- Commissioner MacShane recused from item A; Commissioner Lee voted as alternate.
- The training session provided guidance on legal and ethical standards for decision-making.
- No public comments were received on any agenda item.
Meeting Transcript
Well, good evening, and welcome to the February twenty twenty-three meeting of the City of Frederick's Planning Commission. Before we begin tonight's proceedings, I like to give a little bit of background on the Planning Commission and the procedures that we will be following this evening. Members of the Planning Commission are all residents of the city and are volunteers appointed by the mayor and board of Alderman. The commission is made up of five regular members and one alternate. All of tonight's cases have been appropriately advertised pursuant to section three zero one of the land management code. And the cases will be presented tonight and in the format as follows. First, there'll be an introduction of the case, then a present then a presentation of the case and initial recommendation by staff. This will be followed by questions and comments from the planning commission, then we'll call the applicant up and they will give their presentation. If there is public comment, we also give the applicant an opportunity for rebuttal to the public comment. Then we bring it up here for uh commission discussion and any further questions of staff, and we finally take a vote. So anyone wishing to speak publicly tonight regarding any application must be sworn in prior to giving their testimony. All speakers must begin by providing their name and address for the record. Anyone speaking that was not previously sworn. Now I'm not going to read this because if anyone was here and you weren't sworn in, um if anyone comes later, they would not have heard this section. But we're basically anyone who comes in after this group swearing in, we will have to swear them in before they give their comment. So without further ado, um staff, applicants, and anyone from the public that is planning on testifying tonight in front of the planning commission if you would stand and raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the responses given in statements made in this hearing before the planning commission will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth? If so, answer I do. Okay. Thank you. So with that, we'll turn it over to Gabrielle for announcements. Good evening, everyone. Uh just two announcements this evening, um, both related to events on the 21st. Uh, the 20th is a holiday next Monday, so our planning commission workshop is at 2 p.m. And that is held in this room, and the backup information for the cases on the workshop will be published tomorrow afternoon. So it is uh Tuesday afternoon, 2 p.m. And then that same evening we are also hosting our community uh meeting where we provide information about new pending applications. That'll be at 6 p.m. and also in this room. So thank you. Thank you, Gabrielle. So now we'll go to the minutes. Um looking for a motion for the January 9th, 2023 Planning Commission meeting minutes. I move for the approval of January 9, 2023 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Second. Okay, that is a motion by Commissioner Menales, second by Commissioner Beattie. All those in favor? That is unanimous. Looking now for a motion for the January 17th, 2023 Planning Commission workshop minutes. I move for approval of the January 17th, 2023 Planning Commission workshop minutes. Second. Okay, that is a motion by Commissioner Strawson and a second by Commissioner Beattie. All those in favor? Okay. That is unanimous. And finally, looking for a motion for the February 10th, 2023, Planning Commission, pre-planning commission meeting minutes. I move for the approval of the February 10th, 2023 Planning Commission pre-planning commission meeting minutes. Second. Okay, that is a motion by Commissioner Beattie, second by Commissioner Manales. All those in favor.
openpublica.com