Frederick Planning Commission Meeting - June 9, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Frederick Planning Commission Meeting - June 9, 2025
On June 9, 2025, the Frederick Planning Commission held a public hearing at City Hall, beginning at 6:00 PM. The commission approved several site plans and modifications, postponed the Frederick Health master plan due to a lack of quorum, and held initial hearings on the Frederick Gateway annexation amendment and zoning map amendment for a proposed cricket stadium. Public comments were heard on multiple items.
Minutes Approval
- The commission approved the May 12, 2025 Planning Commission meeting minutes unanimously. Minutes from May 19, May 21, and June 6 meetings were held over due to insufficient commissioner attendance at those meetings.
Discussion Items
- PC21-910FSI – Frederick Shoppers World Extension: The applicant requested a one-year extension of the final site plan for a 3,423 sq. ft. pad site at 1275 W. Patrick Street. The extension was granted to July 10, 2026, to allow additional time to identify tenants and complete administrative processes.
- PC24-662MU – Frederick Health Master Plan: This item was postponed because Commissioner Lee recused herself due to professional ties, leaving only two commissioners. Without a quorum, the item was deferred to the July 14, 2025 meeting.
- PC24-760FSI – 1435 West Patrick Street: Approval of a final site plan for a 12,145 sq. ft. shopping center with a laundromat and three other tenants. Two modifications were approved: a reduction in access separation distance (to 140 ft) and a reduction in interior parking lot landscaping (to 8.5%). The site plan was approved with conditions including updated notes and a fence detail.
- PC24-761FSCB – Forest Conservation for 1435 West Patrick Street: A modification to remove two specimen trees was approved, finding the floodplain created an unwarranted hardship. The combined forest stand delineation and preliminary forest conservation plan was approved with a fee-in-lieu of $2,548.26 and conditions to correct title block and calculations.
- PC24-834PSU/FSI – Brickworks Lot 5 Townhouses: Approval for 231 townhomes. Two modifications were granted: reducing street tree requirements on specific streets (exceeding overall requirement by 8 trees) and allowing lots to front on open space instead of public streets. The combined preliminary plat and final site plan was approved with 11 conditions, including installation of an 8-foot fence along Molding Press Alley for screening from adjacent industrial uses.
- PC24-835PFCP – Forest Conservation for Brickworks Lot 5: The preliminary forest conservation plan was approved, providing 2.30 acres of on-site conservation via afforestation, landscape credits, and street tree credits, with a fee-in-lieu for the remainder. Conditions included correcting case number and providing protective fencing.
- PC24-983ANX – Frederick Gateway Annexation Amendment: First of two required hearings. The applicant proposed amending the 2009 annexation resolution to replace a 16-acre parkland dedication requirement with flexibility to design public recreational amenities (path, boat launch) on site. The commission took no action and will continue at a future hearing.
- PC24-984ZMA – Frederick Gateway Zoning Map Amendment: First hearing for rezoning 24.33 acres from General Commercial to Institutional to allow a cricket stadium (classified as a special event center). The applicant presented a traffic management plan using off-site parking and shuttle buses. Public comment raised concerns about traffic impacts, floodplain, parking adequacy, and compatibility. The commission will take public comment and continue to the July 14 hearing.
Public Comments & Testimony
- On the Brickworks Lot 5 site plan, a resident (Bob Roby) questioned the environmental remediation status and the layout of townhouses facing pocket parks, suggesting the modification benefited only a few lots. Heather Goddard (East Frederick Rising) echoed concerns about density, lack of screening from industrial neighbors, and the need for more usable open space. The applicant noted the open spaces are designed as community amenities.
- On the Frederick Gateway annexation, Christopher Allen raised concerns about floodplain impacts from grading. Alan Schaefer urged denial of the annexation amendment until a full review is done, noting the original 2009 terms are outdated and the monetary proffer of $500,000 is insufficient. Roberta Huber pointed out inconsistencies in the original annexation (tax exemption, sewer pumping station requirements). Deborah Jakewith asked how parkland parking would be preserved for public use during events.
- On the zoning amendment for the cricket stadium, Roberta Huber calculated bus logistics, warning of significant traffic and neighborhood parking spillover. Deborah Jakewith cited Maryland SHA comments requiring a traffic impact study and highlighted existing congestion at I-70 ramps. Christopher Allen noted that off-site parking locations exceed the LMC maximum distance of 1,320 feet. Jeff Bainbridge emphasized the lack of on-site parking and the unreliability of third-party parking agreements. Alan Schaefer questioned if the proposal truly qualifies as institutional rather than mixed-use and criticized the reliance on off-site parking without legal commitments.
Key Outcomes
- Frederick Shoppers World Extension: Approved unanimously.
- 1435 West Patrick Street – Site Plan & Forest Conservation: Approved unanimously with conditions.
- Brickworks Lot 5 – Site Plan & Forest Conservation: Approved unanimously with conditions (including fence screening).
- Frederick Health Master Plan: Postponed to July 14, 2025, due to lack of quorum.
- Frederick Gateway Annexation & Zoning: First hearings held; no action taken. Written public comments accepted until June 30 for inclusion in the July 7 packet. The second hearing is scheduled for July 14, 2025.
Meeting Transcript
More um assigned by the charter um charter of the city of Frederick described in section 202 of the land management code. All of tonight's cases have been appropriately advertised pursuant to section 301 of the land management code and we will be presented to the planning commission in the following format. Um first we will have an introduction of the case, then we will have the presentation of the case and initial recommendation by staff. We will have commission questioning of the staff. We will then have the applicant or authorized agent remarks on the case, followed by commission questioning of the applicant, and we'll have public comment, um applicant response to public comment, um, then we'll come back up to here for discussion questions and finally commission action. Um so at this point I need to remind everybody that um everybody who wants to present um something before the commission tonight needs to be sworn in, and that includes um city staff, applicants, and any of the members of the public who want to make public comments. So if everybody would raise your right hand and do you solemnly swear or affirm that the response is given and the statements made in this hearing before the planning commission will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth. If so, answer I do. Thank you very much. All right. Um at this point I will turn it over to Gabrielle for any announcements. Thank you. Just a couple of announcements about upcoming meetings. Um we have our planning commission workshop for next Monday, the 16th at 2 p.m. And that is held in this room. Uh, and that is for items that will be coming up um before the commission for a vote at subsequent uh hearings. That same evening we are holding a special planning commission hearing, uh, much like this meeting at 6 p.m. And that is um due to the need to extend our agenda uh for the month of June into two meetings, and that is moving our citywide planning uh department community outreach meeting to June 23rd. That's also held at 6 p.m. And that's in this room. Uh that is an informational meeting uh that we have just to share with the community all of the new development projects that have been submitted that will ultimately maybe be coming forward to the planning commission. Uh so that is just an informational session, but uh one that provides some interesting information on new projects. And that's all I had. About what we about a policy or a procedure for something. Does it is it is it relevant to tonight's case? It is okay. Hurry up. No, I just have a quick question about when I know we have to do an open meetings act, we always have to speak in public, but I just wanted to know when is the right time to discuss how a policy or procedure for, and I'm only speaking for myself, for us to receive our materials in a timely manner. Um if we're going to receive items over the weekends, how do we get notified about that? Obviously, this time it wasn't a huge issue, but any other times moving forward. I just would like to know when can we put something like that in place to make sure we don't miss anything. I would just hate to get something at the last minute, not be able to read it and then not be able to truly make in an informed decision for a case. That's all with regards to this meeting this evening. Um, we did have our pre-planning commission meeting on Friday and and such um requests were made for just some additional backup information that were transmitted to the planning commission after um after the meeting on Friday, so that would have been later in the day and into into the weekend. Um in addition, we tried to forward public comment that we receive over the weekend, sometimes leading up to the meeting to the planning commission. Obviously, when the meeting starts, we're no longer able to forward that public comment. Um, but we do try to make sure that every piece of information we receive uh gets to the planning commission uh ahead of time in terms of a broader policy discussion about um you know we just amended our rules or procedures, um, but that doesn't mean we can't do it again. Uh if the council or the commission wants to discuss um methods of that communication, we can reopen those rules or procedures and and have a have a discussion on that at a workshop, probably would be the best venue. Perfect. Thank you so much, Gabrielle. All right, so the next item on the agenda is the approval of minutes. Um, but out of the meetings, the minutes that we have for approval, we have found out that for um most of the meetings except for the May 12th meeting, we do not have a quorum based on in order to be eligible to vote on the minutes. And between the three of us, we haven't done that for all of the meetings that we've missed. So the only meeting that we're going to be able to vote a vote on tonight is the May 12th 2025 Planning Commission meeting minutes. I move for the approval of the May 12, 2025 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Second. And that is a motion by Commissioner Minellis, a second by Commissioner Lee. All in favor? Aye. Aye.
openpublica.com