OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Fredericksburg, Texas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Fredericksburg City Council Special Meeting and Joint P&Z: September 29, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, September 29, 2026
BodyFredericksburg, Texas
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, September 29, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:40:00

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:02

Good evening.

0:03

It is uh 5:30, September 29, 2026.

0:06

Uh welcome to a special meeting between city council and planning and zoning.

0:10

Uh, if you look at your agenda, you'll see uh we're gonna flip some of the numbering around a little bit just for efficiency.

0:17

Um, but at this time uh I want to jump to item 3A.

0:20

So I'm gonna ask Cliff Cross to uh take it away from here for that conversation and after that, and I do want to hear from the public, so I do have some speaker forms here and I've welcome comments as well, please.

0:33

Cliff yeah,

Speaker 2

0:35

uh good evening, thank you, Mayor.

0:37

Uh Barbara's here too, because I know this is an item that she worked on as well.

0:42

Um, as you're aware, we're here to talk about the uh negotiations associated with this uh potential development agreement, and I know Barbara's got the specifics, so I'll let her fill you in and help them.

Speaker 3

0:57

Thank

Speaker 4

0:58

you.

Speaker 3

1:01

I think I need to turn on the microphone.

1:04

Sorry.

Unassigned speaker

1:17

Okay.

Speaker 3

1:19

Thank you, Mayor.

1:20

Um at this time, we may want to go into an executive session to discuss the um resolution that's being presented today, and the terms of the um location of the roadway in case council or um you know, in case city council has any questions about it

Speaker 1

1:44

before we go into executive though, I do want to take public comments.

1:47

Cliff, do you have anything else you'd like

Unassigned speaker

1:48

to cover?

Speaker 2

1:49

Uh no, I think uh that's the uh purpose tonight is to talk about the potential resolution.

1:56

I I really don't want to go into too much more detail and why we're here in terms of the development plat.

2:02

The uh development plat was originally considered by PNZ, they took action on it with the condition pertaining to the uh alternate roadway.

2:10

So I think that's why we're here tonight to talk about the potential alternate roadway as part of that resolution.

Speaker 1

2:16

Okay,

Unassigned speaker

2:20

can

Speaker 1

2:21

I put up any information here?

Speaker 5

2:27

Okay,

Speaker 1

2:28

um, while they're working on that, uh so what I'll do is go into uh public hearing.

2:33

So I do have a series of folks that would like to speak.

2:36

So Charlie Keeney, please.

2:38

Former mayor.

Unassigned speaker

2:40

Thank you.

Unassigned speaker

2:46

Um

Speaker 6

2:47

we'll do three minutes.

Speaker 7

2:48

I know

Unassigned speaker

2:50

it

Speaker 5

2:50

was this one.

2:51

And it took you a minute to get it.

2:53

I know

Speaker 8

2:54

is this one in my clock.

2:56

I brought a packet in that somebody might have accidentally picked up.

Speaker 3

3:00

Mayor, can I ask a question?

3:02

I'm sorry.

3:04

Um

Speaker 9

3:05

mayor

Speaker 3

3:07

I would I thought that we would like to go into executive session so that we can help council decide on how we're going to proceed as well today before we do the public comments.

Speaker 1

3:20

I would like to have public comments so that that can help us with the deliberation when we're ready.

3:26

Is there a legal issue we can't do?

Speaker 3

3:27

No, there's no legal issue, Mayor.

3:30

Um we just wanted to discuss it first with council, but you can proceed however you want to proceed at this point.

3:37

If

Speaker 8

3:37

y'all were looking at what you picked up, see there's something stapled together.

Unassigned speaker

3:41

And

Speaker 8

3:42

if not, maybe as an old person, I might have displaced it.

3:44

So but I can go off without

Unassigned speaker

3:46

it.

Speaker 8

3:47

Okay.

3:48

Uh Mayor and City Council, thank you for having this meeting this evening and P and Z folks who might be here as well.

3:54

Uh, you know, let me share with you.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████45%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████████████22%
Economic Development█████████████13%
Cannabis Regulation███████████11%
Transportation Safety███3%
Historic Preservation██2%
Public Safety██2%
Public Engagement█1%
Tourism Promotion█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Fredericksburg City Council Special Meeting and Joint P&Z: September 29, 2026

The Fredericksburg City Council convened a special meeting on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, at 5:30 PM, in a joint session with the Planning and Zoning Commission. The agenda included a resolution to authorize a revised conceptual alignment for a future roadway (part of a potential Waldorf Astoria development), executive sessions, and a joint discussion on amending the Zoning Ordinance regarding Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) in the Central Business District (CBD).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Charlie Keeney (former mayor): Asked whether Resolution 2026-05 is binding, if the developer is obligated to make improvements, whether the road will be open to the public, and how drainage will be affected. He expressed hope the development would be good for the community.
  • Dr. Mike Braden (property owner east of proposed development): Stated the new alignment may be the best approach but expressed concerns about the road being built in the floodplain, extra costs for building a bridge and curves, and the impact on other property owners. He urged that the road be built to state standards and paid for before development.
  • Greg Davis (co-owner of Coliseusellers Winery, 414 Goehmann): Expressed excitement about the potential Waldorf Astoria resort, stating it would help his business with seven-day-week traffic and allow him to employ more full-time staff.
  • Tony Smith (owner of Avast Winery, Stonewall): Voiced strong support for the Waldorf Astoria project, saying the resort would bring the “right kind of tourism” and provide vital midweek business for local wineries and restaurants. He noted the project is not walled off and will include public spaces.
  • Randy Box (owner of Fredericksburg Inn and Suites): Supported the project, calling it a unique amenity that elevates the town’s perception for tourists.
  • John Crenwelge: Stated he does not oppose the Waldorf but objects to the proposed roadway alignment near his property on safety grounds. He urged keeping the previous alignment, which he believes would be safer and less prone to accidents.
  • Mike Davis (nearby ranch owner): Expressed empathy for neighbors but indicated general support for the Waldorf project, hoping it contributes positively to the town.
  • Julie Herbert (COO of Heat Family Brands, 30-year resident): Voiced strong support, stating the Waldorf will attract the needed customer base, bring new residents, and help the community grow. She said “growth does not scare me” and that not growing is “dying.”

Discussion Items

  • Resolution 2026-05 – Revised Conceptual Roadway Alignment at 405 Goehmann Lane: The Council heard from engineers and staff regarding the proposed roadway, which is part of a potential development agreement with Waldorf Astoria. Questions from Council focused on floodplain issues, FEMA approval, cut and fill requirements, safety of curves, and the eventual dedication of the road to the city. The developer’s attorney confirmed the road will be built to arterial standards as a two-lane private road initially, with the city having the right to take ownership and expand to four lanes in the future. The floodplain engineer explained that the areas to be filled are off-channel ineffective flow areas, and FEMA has already approved a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR).
  • Joint P&Z/City Council Discussion on Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance – Conditional Use Permits (CUPs): Council and P&Z members discussed requiring CUPs for certain businesses in the Central Business District, particularly alcohol-related uses (wine tasting rooms, bars, etc.). Development Services Director Cliff Cross presented on the purpose and process of CUPs. City Attorney Barbara Quirk provided examples from San Marcos, including caps on the number of bars (14) and restaurants with alcohol (25) in their downtown, as well as time-limited CUPs and distance requirements. Councilmembers expressed differing views on whether there is a current problem or a perception problem, and on the need to preserve retail diversity. A consensus emerged to avoid regulating all CBD businesses and to focus on specific uses, with an agreement to form a subcommittee (possibly with stakeholders) to study the issue further before drafting amendments.

Key Outcomes

  • Resolution 2026-05 (approving the revised conceptual roadway alignment) passed 4-1.
  • Council and P&Z agreed to direct staff (led by Cliff Cross) to form a subcommittee to evaluate potential Zoning Ordinance amendments regarding Conditional Use Permits in the Central Business District. The subcommittee will consider regulating uses such as alcohol-related businesses, explore tools like distance separations, caps, and time-limited permits, and examine market data to ensure retail diversity. The goal is to bring forward specific recommendations for a future public hearing.
  • The meeting noted that the order of the agenda was adjusted for efficiency, with public comments heard before the executive session on the roadway resolution.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. It is uh 5:30, September 29, 2026. Uh welcome to a special meeting between city council and planning and zoning. Uh, if you look at your agenda, you'll see uh we're gonna flip some of the numbering around a little bit just for efficiency. Um, but at this time uh I want to jump to item 3A. So I'm gonna ask Cliff Cross to uh take it away from here for that conversation and after that, and I do want to hear from the public, so I do have some speaker forms here and I've welcome comments as well, please. Cliff yeah, uh good evening, thank you, Mayor. Uh Barbara's here too, because I know this is an item that she worked on as well. Um, as you're aware, we're here to talk about the uh negotiations associated with this uh potential development agreement, and I know Barbara's got the specifics, so I'll let her fill you in and help them. Thank you. I think I need to turn on the microphone. Sorry. Okay. Thank you, Mayor. Um at this time, we may want to go into an executive session to discuss the um resolution that's being presented today, and the terms of the um location of the roadway in case council or um you know, in case city council has any questions about it before we go into executive though, I do want to take public comments. Cliff, do you have anything else you'd like to cover? Uh no, I think uh that's the uh purpose tonight is to talk about the potential resolution. I I really don't want to go into too much more detail and why we're here in terms of the development plat. The uh development plat was originally considered by PNZ, they took action on it with the condition pertaining to the uh alternate roadway. So I think that's why we're here tonight to talk about the potential alternate roadway as part of that resolution. Okay, can I put up any information here? Okay, um, while they're working on that, uh so what I'll do is go into uh public hearing. So I do have a series of folks that would like to speak. So Charlie Keeney, please. Former mayor. Thank you. Um we'll do three minutes. I know it was this one. And it took you a minute to get it. I know is this one in my clock. I brought a packet in that somebody might have accidentally picked up. Mayor, can I ask a question? I'm sorry. Um mayor I would I thought that we would like to go into executive session so that we can help council decide on how we're going to proceed as well today before we do the public comments. I would like to have public comments so that that can help us with the deliberation when we're ready. Is there a legal issue we can't do? No, there's no legal issue, Mayor.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com