OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Fresno, California/City Council & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Building Standards Appeals Board Regular Meeting - August 25, 2026

City Council & Commissions — Tuesday, August 25, 2026
BodyFresno, California
SessionCity Council & Commissions
DateTuesday, August 25, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 39:20

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
3:21

All right, this one.

3:24

Okay.

3:24

Good afternoon, everybody.

3:26

We will call this meeting to order.

3:31

And uh staff, uh, please uh call the role.

3:39

Board member Field.

3:40

Here.

3:41

Board member Ransom.

3:44

Board Member Mears.

3:46

Vice Chair Vincent.

3:48

Present.

3:49

Chair Golek.

3:50

Present.

3:53

Okay, I'm going to explain to you the procedures and um and how we go about with this meeting.

4:02

So for each matter considered by the board, there will be first a staff presentation.

4:11

Followed by the presentation of the project applicant.

4:16

Then discussions by the board.

4:18

Both staff and applicants will have the right for rebuttal presentation prior to closing the public hearing.

5:00

And the speaker should be completing the testimony by the time the red light comes on.

5:03

With a final bell indicating the time has expired.

5:07

Any testimonies uh that references race, religion, ethnicity, economic status, national origin, or any other classification protected under the state or federal law.

5:22

Is it a in a derogatory manner shall be deemed irrelevant and will not be considered by the board in making its determination?

5:33

In accordance with the section 11, Article 2, the appellant and the department will have each 10 minutes to present their position.

5:42

The department shall present first, then the appellant will present.

5:46

Each party will then have three minutes for rebuttal.

5:51

The department will present its rebuttal, and then the appellant may present its rebuttal.

5:56

After the rebuttal, board members may ask questions of either party.

6:01

The board will then close the hearing and discuss the appeal and deliberate on the appropriate action.

6:09

Now uh we will proceed with the approval of the agenda.

6:15

Are there any changes to the agenda?

6:19

No.

6:20

Board members, are there any proposed changes to the agenda?

6:25

Move to approve the agenda is published.

6:28

Move to approve the agenda.

6:30

Uh do we have a second?

6:31

Second.

6:33

All in favor?

6:34

Aye.

6:35

Aye.

6:35

Okay, the motion has passed.

6:38

Uh okay, now we'll move on to the consent calendar.

6:42

On the consent calendar, we have um approval of the August 4th building standards.

6:52

Is there a motion to approve the consent can calendar?

6:56

Motion.

6:58

Yeah, motion to approve.

7:00

Second.

7:02

Second.

7:04

All in favor, say aye.

7:06

Aye.

7:06

Opposed.

7:07

Okay.

7:08

The consent calendar is approved.

7:10

And we you will we will now move on to under reports by the board members.

7:15

Um board members, do you wish to make any reports?

7:21

No reports.

7:22

No.

7:23

No.

7:23

Okay, then we will move on to the public consent.

7:28

Public consent.

7:29

We're going to take public comments on all matters.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████76%
Code Enforcement███████████19%
Public Engagement███5%
Summary of Proceedings

Building Standards Appeals Board Regular Meeting - August 25, 2026

The Building Standards Appeals Board held a regular meeting on August 25, 2026, at Fresno City Hall. The board addressed two progress hearings on code enforcement cases and received a workshop on Robert's Rules of Order. All votes were unanimous. Note: The minutes provided for this meeting are dated August 18, 2026, creating a date discrepancy; the meeting date used here follows the provided instruction.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the minutes of the August 4, 2026 regular meeting (ID 26-1095) unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were made.

Discussion Items

VIII-A: Progress Hearing – 3436 N Virginia Lane (Case E25-13830)

  • Deputy City Attorney Calvin Massey reported that an inspection scheduled for August 12, 2026, did not occur. He recommended a 60-day continuance to allow the appellant to work with Planning & Development and obtain the required inspection. Appellant Catarino Pardo expressed frustration over the missed inspection (the third such occurrence) but stated readiness to complete the work with a contractor, awaiting city specifications. The board expressed concern about the missed inspections and encouraged the building official to investigate the system. A motion for a 60-day continuance passed unanimously.

VIII-B: Progress Hearing – 1347 E. Shields Ave. (Case E25-16660)

  • Deputy City Attorney Christina Pina reviewed the case. The appellant, Ms. Porter (a traveling nurse working in the Bay Area), was unable to attend but had made progress by completing a consultation with Planning on July 2, 2026. The inspection revealed multiple unpermitted alterations (conversion of a permitted bedroom into a second unit, addition of kitchen/restroom, conversion of unpermitted patio). Ms. Porter is awaiting determination from Building & Safety on which building code year (2005 or 2026) applies. The board clarified that Planning does not make that determination; Building & Safety does. Pina agreed to follow up. The board approved a 60-day continuance unanimously.

VIII-C: Workshop – Robert’s Rules of Order

  • Senior Deputy City Attorney Daniel Casas presented a workshop on Robert's Rules of Order to ensure orderly, fair, and transparent meetings. Topics included meeting structure, chairperson role, speaker recognition, motion procedures, and voting methods. Board members asked about quorum requirements (3 out of 5 constitutes a quorum) and whether roll-call votes should be used for complex or contentious matters. The workshop concluded with no formal action taken.

Reports by Board Members

  • None.

Report by Secretary

  • Interim Building Official Bill Hayes introduced himself, noting he is serving at the pleasure of the City and offered assistance.

Adjournment

  • The meeting adjourned at 1:36 p.m. after a motion and unanimous vote.

Note: The official minutes list the meeting date as August 18, 2026, while the summary instruction specified August 25, 2026. This discrepancy is recorded here for clarity.

Meeting Transcript

All right, this one. Okay. Good afternoon, everybody. We will call this meeting to order. And uh staff, uh, please uh call the role. Board member Field. Here. Board member Ransom. Board Member Mears. Vice Chair Vincent. Present. Chair Golek. Present. Okay, I'm going to explain to you the procedures and um and how we go about with this meeting. So for each matter considered by the board, there will be first a staff presentation. Followed by the presentation of the project applicant. Then discussions by the board. Both staff and applicants will have the right for rebuttal presentation prior to closing the public hearing. And the speaker should be completing the testimony by the time the red light comes on. With a final bell indicating the time has expired. Any testimonies uh that references race, religion, ethnicity, economic status, national origin, or any other classification protected under the state or federal law. Is it a in a derogatory manner shall be deemed irrelevant and will not be considered by the board in making its determination? In accordance with the section 11, Article 2, the appellant and the department will have each 10 minutes to present their position. The department shall present first, then the appellant will present. Each party will then have three minutes for rebuttal. The department will present its rebuttal, and then the appellant may present its rebuttal. After the rebuttal, board members may ask questions of either party. The board will then close the hearing and discuss the appeal and deliberate on the appropriate action. Now uh we will proceed with the approval of the agenda. Are there any changes to the agenda? No. Board members, are there any proposed changes to the agenda? Move to approve the agenda is published. Move to approve the agenda. Uh do we have a second? Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Okay, the motion has passed. Uh okay, now we'll move on to the consent calendar. On the consent calendar, we have um approval of the August 4th building standards. Is there a motion to approve the consent can calendar? Motion. Yeah, motion to approve. Second. Second. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Opposed.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com