OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Fresno City Committee Meeting Summary — September 2, 2026

City Council & CommissionsWednesday, September 2, 2026
BodyFresno, California
SessionCity Council & Commissions
DateWednesday, September 2, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:13:36

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Call us to order with a roll call.

0:08

Committee member Felix.

0:11

Here.

0:12

Present.

0:13

Can you committee member Lonso?

0:17

Committee member Clostellus?

0:19

Here.

0:23

Present.

0:26

Okay.

0:27

Next agenda item is agenda approval of the August 13th, 2026 meeting agenda.

0:34

Do I have a motion?

0:36

I have a motion to approve August 13, 2026 meeting agenda.

0:42

Okay.

0:44

Second.

0:45

Okay.

0:47

Motion passes.

0:50

Next on the agenda is a consent calendar.

0:52

The draft minutes for April 19th or April 9th, 2026.

0:57

Do I have a motion to approve?

1:00

I have a motion.

1:03

Draft minutes from April 9th, 2022, 2026 meeting.

1:10

Second.

1:11

Okay.

1:15

Okay, now on to uh the project review.

1:17

Uh new matters.

1:19

Uh item A is uh approval comments recommendations for development permit application number P2503462.

1:30

This was filed by Ken Bang of Vice Engineering and pertains to the approximate 2.89 acre lot on the west side of North Hayes Avenue, south of West Shaw Avenue.

1:41

The applicant proposes to construct a gated 60-unit multifamily residential development.

1:47

The project also consists of site improvements, such as a class one pedestrian trail, curved sidewalk and drive approach.

1:55

The parcel is zoned OS plus RM2, uh open space, multi-unit residential and urban neighborhood.

2:07

Yes, Ken Bang from Lane Consulting Leader.

2:10

Good evening, Chairman and members.

2:13

As indicated, we're proposing a 60-unit multifamily uh complex, a three-story.

2:19

We have a gated entry that tends to allow for higher events and some uh laybound recreational facilities on the property.

2:28

Um the property is zone RM2, um and that's what we're building uh meeting density requirements.

2:35

The western portion of the property is open space, but there's a trail under the uh uh need tower line so we have a trail on the uh open space trail connection trail bike one class one bike trail on the west side of the property in the future that trail will continue going to the to to the south and then eventually north uh into shawl and then across shawl to the canal.

2:59

So that's the bike path uh flat row.

3:06

Uh yes, I was curious.

3:07

Do you know the uh unit breakdown for the 60 units?

3:11

Yes, there are uh three bedrooms, um most of them, and then there's a two-bedroom, two bathroom.

3:17

So I think it was but each floor has uh three uh three bedrooms, then one two bedroom.

3:43

So there's one two three four five.

3:46

So that would be uh third, like a third okay, so 16 uh 40, so 43 bedrooms and then 22 bedrooms.

3:56

Okay, and is this all uh planned to be constructed in one phase or is it gonna be a multi-phase development?

4:02

Uh it's all one phase, and then I'll give you just market rents, no affordable housing, so you can all just monitor house.

4:08

You said uh affordable housing, no not affordable house.

4:11

Not affordable housing, okay.

4:13

Okay.

4:17

Okay.

4:18

And as far as uh leading up to this with approvals, do you have uh environment any environmental work done so far?

4:25

Uh phase ones or no, no phase one yet.

4:28

Uh the property was uh previously a uh uh rural residential, so it wasn't on phase one needed.

4:37

Uh we have done uh all the studies needed the traffic study was not needed, so we can do a traffic site because we're under the threshold, but all the studies needed are completely okay.

4:49

So this uh complies with the existing zoning, uh 60 minutes multifamily, predominantly three beds.

5:00

uh previously a uh uh uh rural residential so there wasn't a phase one needed uh we have done uh uh all the studies needed here the traffic study was not needed so we think you would have to say because we're under the threshold that all the studies needed are completed so this uh complies with the existing zoning uh six minutes multifamily predominantly three beds uh okay I think uh those are all the questions that I have uh thank you for for coming this afternoon I I had a question uh just uh one first clarifying uh you said for that given zoning area you said this is on par with density requirements yes okay yeah the uh RM2 is a 16 to 30 which is the uh the medium high high density RM2 16 to 30 okay and we'll oppose at 21.9 so we're right in the middle thank you just out of curiosity I see uh no gas is being run to this site uh yeah is there solar intended in the site yes solar is not required in all multi panel um gas is kind of prohibited uh based on the building code and energy requirements basically one more gas in the future for all building types except for restaurants of course gotcha gotcha and do you know if uh I also believe uh EV parking will be yes we've got DV parking uh I think right now the current code is uh almost 50 percent yeah that's quite good yep okay and then to your knowledge and maybe one you can read as well what are the site any site improvement uh improvement requirements related to this um the the park is kind of optional for us the little playground kind of just give some menus to to the to the project and the side requirements are uh covered parcourse uh 50 percent of the stalls we'd be covered so we have that um the only thing is pg has the towers in the back they don't have any structures until we put all the parking the cover parking along with building to kind of meet the 50 percent and then we'll obviously loading out uh white now haze law proper five I'm trying to picture that corner and and see any like sidewalk tie tie ins I mean this is gonna be extent of your property footprint right there's nothing else beyond that definitely okay so there's one parcel that's still rural residential and then uh I think there's two parcels to the south that rural residential then there's another bigger subdivision to the south of that that's still in the works and then across the street that's where the the newer little shell gas station shopping centered out okay and just uh curious I know at 60 dwelling units predominantly larger unit size I anticipate there would be a decent amount of kids probably here as well has the local uh schools been contacted to see uh capacity wise if they're able to handle that influx of students you know the city generally routes uh uh comments to the school districts and that'll be one of the comments that we come back when the project moves for um I don't want you guys to route that to the city's to the school district yes yeah I think since uh projects are now accepted we we have started our routing so we should be receiving comments to the school district from the school district yeah I think um and generally as part of new developments um especially when comes with residential um they'll have to pay a school high fee right that'll go towards some contribution not all of it it's like a state maximum so they they'll pay that yeah depends on the school district as well on their fee and it looks like uh it's two parking spaces per unit is that uh consistent with the code or exceed it or yeah that's because this is a code for three bedrooms um uh two baths it's a one and a half stall and then you also have another half a stall for every two units for guest parking so that's a good time we get to do two stalls gotcha okay and then what's the nearest uh or one would be the nearest uh like bus station or or anything located to this I don't think there's not don't think there's anything on on the west shaw yet maybe on the on the west side of polk I don't think there's any bus stations I know there's some planned but um I think it it all be on the on the yeah eventually Shaw is a is a VRT route but then right now the actual bus routes right now I think they stop at Plot this time they don't come this far.

10:07

Yes.

10:07

Central spot.

10:19

Do you have any questions?

10:21

Okay.

10:24

Okay.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing█████████████████████████████████████████████66%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████11%
Transportation Safety██████9%
Public Engagement███4%
Procedural██3%
Environmental Protection2%
Economic Development2%
Community Engagement2%
Parks and Recreation1%
Summary of Proceedings

Fresno City Committee Meeting Summary — September 2, 2026

The City of Fresno committee met on September 2, 2026 (supplied timestamp 09:45:00+00:00) to review three residential development applications and a citywide zoning text amendment tied to the 2023–2031 sixth-cycle housing element. No agenda or minutes were available, so this summary is based on the raw transcript. Roll call was held; committee members Felix, Lonso, and Clostellus were present.

Consent Calendar

  • Agenda approval: A motion to approve the August 13, 2026 meeting agenda passed. The transcript does not state whether this was the current meeting agenda or a previous meeting agenda.
  • Draft minutes: The committee approved draft minutes by motion, but the transcript is internally inconsistent about the date, referring to April 19, 2026 and April 9, 2026, and including one garbled mention of April 9, 2022, 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public testimony appears in the transcript. After project presentations, the chair asked for public comments and none were offered.

Discussion Items

  • Development Permit Application P2503462 — 60-unit multifamily development (Item A): Ken Bang, identified with both Vice Engineering and Lane Consulting, presented the application for a 2.89-acre site on the west side of North Hayes Avenue, south of West Shaw Avenue. The proposal is a gated, three-story, 60-unit multifamily complex with market-rate rents and no affordable housing, plus a Class I pedestrian/bike trail, curved sidewalk, and drive approach. The parcel is zoned OS + RM2; the applicant said the RM2 density range is 16 to 30 units per acre and the project would be about 21.9 units per acre. The unit mix was described as mostly three-bedroom units with some two-bedroom/two-bath units, but the exact count was not clearly transcribed. The project would be built in one phase. The applicant said a Phase I environmental assessment had not yet been done but was not needed due to the prior rural residential use; a traffic study was not required because the project is under the threshold. The applicant also said the project is all-electric, includes EV parking (set at almost 50 percent of current code requirement), provides covered parking for 50 percent of stalls, and keeps the PG&E tower area open. School comments would be routed to the school district, and state-maximum school impact fees would apply. Parking would be two spaces per unit, consistent with code for this unit type. Committee members asked about transit access and were told there is not yet a bus stop on West Shaw, though a FAX route is planned. All committee members recommended approval.

  • Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6552 / P260966 — 95-lot single-family subdivision (Item B): Derek Sylvester of Yamabe & Horn Engineering filed the application for DR Horton (Matt Trano); Sheryl Annanson of DR Horton presented. The 10.02-acre site is on the west side of North Hayes Avenue between West Dakota and West Dayton Avenues, and three properties would be subdivided into 95 single-family lots. The property is zoned RS5 ANX UGM. The Autumn Terrace project is within city limits at about 9.5 dwelling units per acre. It would offer three floor plans with three elevations each (nine configurations), homes from about 1,300 to 1,700 square feet, two stories, a two-car garage plus 20-foot driveway (four parking stalls per home), all-electric systems, solar, and EV-charger readiness. A centrally located 15,000-square-foot park would be dedicated to and maintained by the city. An HOA is proposed only because a temporary on-site storm drain basin must be maintained; the basin occupies six final-mapped lots on the southwest corner and would be infilled when city storm drain capacity becomes available, allowing six additional units. School impact fees would be paid to Central Unified. Committee members requested consideration of playground or activity amenities in the park, and all committee members recommended approval.

  • Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6551 / P260648 — 117-lot single-family subdivision (Item C): Also filed by Yamabe & Horn Engineering for DR Horton and presented by Sheryl Annanson. The approximately 19.54-acre site is on the west side of North Bryant Avenue between West Dakota and West Shields Avenues, and five properties would be subdivided into 117 lots. The property is currently county-zoned, but the city general plan designates it for medium-low density residential and open space/neighborhood park. The Valencia Park project would be annexed into the city and pre-zoned RS4, with a density of about six dwelling units per acre. It would include four floor plans with three elevations each (12 configurations), one- and two-story homes, three to five bedrooms, 2.5 baths, optional third-car garages, and all-electric systems with solar and EV readiness. A just-under-11,000-square-foot neighborhood park would be city-maintained. Three existing farmhouses would be demolished. No HOA is proposed because the project can connect to existing storm drain capacity on Bryan Avenue. Construction would be one phase at roughly six homes per month. The applicant will seek a planned development approval for a garage-to-primary-facade standard reduction on the smallest floor plan (about 1,200 square feet), limited to 20 percent of the subdivision. Full CEQA review and a traffic study are being completed as part of the annexation process. All committee members recommended approval.

  • Text Amendment P2602359 — Housing Element code compliance (Item D): Sophia Pagalatis of the Planning and Development Department presented the proposed citywide development code amendment to implement the 2023–2031 sixth-cycle housing element. She explained the housing element contains 37 action programs and that the city is required to complete this code update in 2026. Proposed changes include converting subjective residential, mixed-use, and facade design standards into objective standards (for example, minimum five-foot sidewalks and tree spacing), increasing density bonuses to up to 80 percent with four concessions for 100 percent affordable projects, removing parking requirements for accessory dwelling units and for supportive housing within half a mile of transit, aligning emergency shelter parking and hours with state law, permitting low-barrier navigation centers ministerially in certain commercial and mixed-use zones, permitting residential care facilities in all residential zones without a conditional use permit, defining single-room occupancy units, permitting supportive housing in all multi-unit and mixed-use zones, and allowing missing middle housing types (duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, bungalow courts, courtyard apartments, and live-work units) in single-unit zones near transit with tiers of up to 12 units within a quarter mile and up to six units within a half mile. Pagalatis said the city is in good standing with HCD and no funding is being withheld. Committee discussion focused on transit coverage and spatial equity; one committee member recommended trying to maximize the geographic application of the missing-middle provisions, while another recommended approval without conditions. The committee recommended the text amendment move forward.

Key Outcomes

  • Agenda and draft consent minutes were approved by motion.
  • P2503462: recommended for approval by all committee members.
  • Tract Map 6552 / P260966: recommended for approval by all committee members, with an advisory request for playground or activity amenities.
  • Tract Map 6551 / P260648: recommended for approval by all committee members.
  • Text Amendment P2602359: recommended to move forward, with a committee comment about spatial equity of missing-middle housing near transit.
  • No administrative matters or unscheduled communications were presented; the meeting adjourned by motion.

Meeting Transcript

Call us to order with a roll call. Committee member Felix. Here. Present. Can you committee member Lonso? Committee member Clostellus? Here. Present. Okay. Next agenda item is agenda approval of the August 13th, 2026 meeting agenda. Do I have a motion? I have a motion to approve August 13, 2026 meeting agenda. Okay. Second. Okay. Motion passes. Next on the agenda is a consent calendar. The draft minutes for April 19th or April 9th, 2026. Do I have a motion to approve? I have a motion. Draft minutes from April 9th, 2022, 2026 meeting. Second. Okay. Okay, now on to uh the project review. Uh new matters. Uh item A is uh approval comments recommendations for development permit application number P2503462. This was filed by Ken Bang of Vice Engineering and pertains to the approximate 2.89 acre lot on the west side of North Hayes Avenue, south of West Shaw Avenue. The applicant proposes to construct a gated 60-unit multifamily residential development. The project also consists of site improvements, such as a class one pedestrian trail, curved sidewalk and drive approach. The parcel is zoned OS plus RM2, uh open space, multi-unit residential and urban neighborhood. Yes, Ken Bang from Lane Consulting Leader. Good evening, Chairman and members. As indicated, we're proposing a 60-unit multifamily uh complex, a three-story. We have a gated entry that tends to allow for higher events and some uh laybound recreational facilities on the property. Um the property is zone RM2, um and that's what we're building uh meeting density requirements. The western portion of the property is open space, but there's a trail under the uh uh need tower line so we have a trail on the uh open space trail connection trail bike one class one bike trail on the west side of the property in the future that trail will continue going to the to to the south and then eventually north uh into shawl and then across shawl to the canal. So that's the bike path uh flat row. Uh yes, I was curious. Do you know the uh unit breakdown for the 60 units? Yes, there are uh three bedrooms, um most of them, and then there's a two-bedroom, two bathroom. So I think it was but each floor has uh three uh three bedrooms, then one two bedroom. So there's one two three four five. So that would be uh third, like a third okay, so 16 uh 40, so 43 bedrooms and then 22 bedrooms. Okay, and is this all uh planned to be constructed in one phase or is it gonna be a multi-phase development? Uh it's all one phase, and then I'll give you just market rents, no affordable housing, so you can all just monitor house. You said uh affordable housing, no not affordable house. Not affordable housing, okay. Okay. Okay. And as far as uh leading up to this with approvals, do you have uh environment any environmental work done so far?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com