OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Fresno, California/City Council & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Historic Preservation Commission Regular Meeting - October 1, 2026

City Council & Commissions — Thursday, October 1, 2026
BodyFresno, California
SessionCity Council & Commissions
DateThursday, October 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 37:46

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:13

All right.

0:14

So we're gonna

Speaker 2

0:15

go ahead and call this meeting to order at 601 and start with roll call, please.

Speaker 3

0:28

Commissioner Eddings.

0:30

Commissioner Johnston.

0:33

Commissioner Laval.

0:35

Here.

0:35

Commissioner Federico.

Speaker 4

0:37

Here.

Speaker 3

0:38

Commissioner Halesian.

Speaker 2

0:39

Here.

Speaker 3

0:40

Vice Chair Hatwick.

0:43

Chair Sponsler.

Speaker 2

0:44

Here.

0:45

All right.

Unassigned speaker

0:46

So

Speaker 2

0:46

we do have a quorum, and we'll go ahead and move forward here.

0:50

Moving on to our procedures.

0:52

For each matter considered by the Commission, there will first be a staff presentation, followed by a presentation from the project applicant.

0:57

The commissioners will then have the opportunity to ask questions of staff and applicant before opening to the public.

1:02

Testimony from the supporters of the project will be taken, followed by testimony from those in opposition.

1:07

Staff may provide a summation if necessary.

Unassigned speaker

1:10

The

Speaker 2

1:10

applicant will have the right to a final rebuttal presentation prior to closing the public hearing, followed by consideration of the item and action, if any, by the commission.

Unassigned speaker

1:19

In

Speaker 2

1:20

accordance with section 13 of Article 2 of the Historic Preservation Commission bylaws governing length of public debate, all public testimony from those in support and in opposition to the project will be limited to three minutes per person.

1:32

All public testimony will must be presented to the commission at the podium, either in person or electronically.

1:38

Any testimony that preferences race, religion, ethnicity, economic status, national origin, or any other classification protected under state or federal law in a derogatory manner, shall be deemed irrelevant and will not be considered for the commission in making its determinations.

1:52

If you challenge these items in court, you may be limited to the raising only those issues you or someone else raised in oral or written testimony or before the close of the hearing.

Unassigned speaker

2:02

And

Speaker 2

2:02

I do want to note for the record that Commissioner Eddings is joining us at 6 03.

2:09

With that, I will go ahead and move on to item three, which is approval of the August 24th, 2026 meeting minutes.

2:16

Are there any changes to the minutes?

Speaker 3

2:19

There are no changes to the minutes.

Speaker 2

2:21

Okay.

2:22

I will entertain a motion.

2:24

So moved.

2:25

And a second.

Unassigned speaker

2:27

I

Speaker 2

2:28

second.

2:28

All right.

2:29

Motion by Commissioner Laval, second by Commissioner Federico.

2:31

All in favor, signify by saying aye.

2:33

Aye.

Speaker 4

2:34

Aye.

Speaker 2

2:34

Opposed.

2:36

Minutes pass.

2:37

We'll move on to item four approval of tonight's agenda.

2:40

Is there any changes to tonight's agenda?

Speaker 5

2:46

Good evening, Chair and Commissioners.

2:48

There are no changes proposed to the agenda.

Speaker 2

2:50

All right.

Unassigned speaker

2:53

So

Speaker 6

2:54

moved.

Speaker 2

2:54

And a second.

2:58

All right.

2:58

I have a motion by Commissioner Laval.

3:00

Second by Commissioner Eddings.

3:02

All in favor, signify by saying aye.

3:04

Aye.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████68%
Procedural██████████15%
Municipal Code███████10%
Code Enforcement█████7%
Summary of Proceedings

Historic Preservation Commission Regular Meeting - October 1, 2026

The Fresno Historic Preservation Commission met on October 1, 2026, at 6:01 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. The commission approved prior meeting minutes, held a public hearing on the Peacock Building's eligibility for local historic listing, and received updates on preservation projects, the Chinatown historic district survey, and staff activities.

Discussion Items

  • Peacock Building (937-945 F Street and 942 Fagan Alley) – Eligibility for Local Register: Assistant Director Phil Skei presented staff findings that three independent evaluations (2006 by Architectural Resources Group, 2024 by SWCA, and August 2026 by Stantec) all concluded the building was not individually eligible for listing due to lack of integrity and absence of qualifying significance. Staff recommended the commission determine it not eligible for the Local Register of Historic Resources.

    • Commissioners raised concerns about whether the building might still contribute to a potential Fresno Chinatown Historic District and whether its removal would weaken the district's viability. Commissioner Eddings noted that previous SWCA analysis stated the building did not retain sufficient integrity to contribute meaningfully to a district. Stantec’s Melissa Ivie confirmed that the building’s period of significance currently falls outside the district’s, but ongoing analysis may consider expanding the period.
    • No public comment was presented.
  • Monthly Update Topics:

    • Jose Garcia Adobe: Assistant Director Ashley Atkinson reported that the city’s preservation consultant Rincon lacks technical expertise to fully assess the adobe’s structural feasibility; initial advice indicates in-place preservation is likely more feasible than relocation. The property owner has not responded to outreach; tarping and fencing remain in place ahead of a predicted severe winter. The property remains an open code enforcement case, with minimum maintenance being met, but the owner’s prior preservation entitlement has expired.
    • Chinatown Historic Preservation Survey: Melissa Ivie (Stantec) via Zoom reported that Stantec has begun a comprehensive cultural resources evaluation. The team expanded study boundaries beyond 2006, initially reviewed 136 parcels, and ultimately recorded 99 historic-age resources after field surveys in late August. Two previously recorded buildings were found missing; St. Genevieve's Catholic Church was identified as a potential contributor. Next steps include developing historic context, updating DPR 523 forms, and completing an archaeological assessment (ground-penetrating radar not yet planned). Draft findings are expected by late October to early November, with city review to follow.
    • Monthly Activity Report: Staff continued reviewing planning entitlements and building permits for historic preservation, working with Rincon as the qualified historic preservation specialist. Rincon is also concurring with Section 106 reviews by SWCA for housing projects. No new Mills Act applications were received (deadline was May); pending applications are moving forward with site visits scheduled for the following day, and contracts expected by the next meeting or by November. One Mitigation Program application was approved and work is underway.
    • Subcommittee Updates: Commissioner Halajian reported no items from the Architectural Review Subcommittee and brief progress from the Municipal Code Subcommittee (final draft review scheduled for next month).

Key Outcomes

  • Peacock Building (VII-A): Motion by Commissioner Halajian, seconded by Commissioner Eddings, to approve staff's recommendation that the property is ineligible for listing on the Local Register of Historic Resources. Passed 3-2: Chair Sponsler, Commissioner Halajian, Commissioner Eddings voted aye; Commissioner Federico and Commissioner Laval voted no. (Vice Chair Hatwig and Commissioner Johnston absent.)
  • Meeting Minutes (August 24, 2026): Approved on a motion by Commissioner Laval, seconded by Commissioner Federico. Carried 5-0.
  • Agenda: Approved on a motion by Commissioner Laval, seconded by Commissioner Eddings. Carried 5-0.
  • Next Meeting: Scheduled for October 26, 2026, in Room 2165 (diagonally across from Council Chambers).
  • Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 6:39 PM.

Chairperson's Report

  • Chair Sponsler encouraged attendance at the upcoming fair, which will provide expanded access to the Fresno County Historical Museum, highlighting its exhibits reflecting the community’s cultural diversity.

Unscheduled Items – Members of the Commission

  • Commissioner Laval reported that the Fresno City and County Historical Society is taking an active role in supporting the museum. There is hope Measure P funds will be allocated for disaster preparedness. The museum (open 11 years) currently operates only 24 days per year; efforts aim to improve that. A new medical exhibit (possibly featuring a historic dentist chair) is being installed for the fair. The committee is prioritizing inclusion of three unrepresented cultural groups—Chinese, Portuguese, and Vietnamese—before the next fair.

Meeting Transcript

All right. So we're gonna go ahead and call this meeting to order at 601 and start with roll call, please. Commissioner Eddings. Commissioner Johnston. Commissioner Laval. Here. Commissioner Federico. Here. Commissioner Halesian. Here. Vice Chair Hatwick. Chair Sponsler. Here. All right. So we do have a quorum, and we'll go ahead and move forward here. Moving on to our procedures. For each matter considered by the Commission, there will first be a staff presentation, followed by a presentation from the project applicant. The commissioners will then have the opportunity to ask questions of staff and applicant before opening to the public. Testimony from the supporters of the project will be taken, followed by testimony from those in opposition. Staff may provide a summation if necessary. The applicant will have the right to a final rebuttal presentation prior to closing the public hearing, followed by consideration of the item and action, if any, by the commission. In accordance with section 13 of Article 2 of the Historic Preservation Commission bylaws governing length of public debate, all public testimony from those in support and in opposition to the project will be limited to three minutes per person. All public testimony will must be presented to the commission at the podium, either in person or electronically. Any testimony that preferences race, religion, ethnicity, economic status, national origin, or any other classification protected under state or federal law in a derogatory manner, shall be deemed irrelevant and will not be considered for the commission in making its determinations. If you challenge these items in court, you may be limited to the raising only those issues you or someone else raised in oral or written testimony or before the close of the hearing. And I do want to note for the record that Commissioner Eddings is joining us at 6 03. With that, I will go ahead and move on to item three, which is approval of the August 24th, 2026 meeting minutes. Are there any changes to the minutes? There are no changes to the minutes. Okay. I will entertain a motion. So moved. And a second. I second. All right. Motion by Commissioner Laval, second by Commissioner Federico. All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed. Minutes pass. We'll move on to item four approval of tonight's agenda. Is there any changes to tonight's agenda? Good evening, Chair and Commissioners.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com