OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Green, Ohio/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Green Charter Review Commission Meeting - February 9, 2026

City Council & Boards — Monday, February 9, 2026
BodyGreen, Ohio
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateMonday, February 9, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:19:34

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:08

Call to order City of Green Charter Review Commission February 9th.

0:14

It is 5 31 p.m.

0:17

Um we all rise for the pledge of allegiance of leadership of the United States over there.

0:46

Did we call the roll?

0:48

Sure.

0:49

Mr.

0:50

Dufferin.

0:50

Here.

0:51

Mr.

0:51

Knapp.

0:52

Here.

0:52

Ms.

0:52

Conan.

0:53

Here.

0:54

Miss Coral.

0:54

Here.

0:55

And Miss Yenko.

0:56

Here.

1:00

Um proval of minutes.

1:04

I had some comments on those.

1:06

Okay.

1:08

Um the part.

1:14

I'm sorry, I don't have my ducks in a row here.

1:17

I've got too much paper going on.

1:18

The part where it talks about here it is.

1:23

When we were discussing section C review of Article 3, the mayor.

1:32

Um you go down to about the second or third from the last sentence in that paragraph.

1:38

It says Bob Net Knapp and Betty Conan said they don't read it as the terms could go on forever after a second set of four-year terms.

1:47

I do read it that it can go on.

1:49

I don't know what you felt, but for my purposes, I I did feel that it could go on indefinitely as long as they sat out for four years.

2:00

So with the, you know, you mentioned before also further in here where it says I talk about the electors being able to correct that.

2:10

So I'm gonna make that change.

2:15

And the other part is in uh that same section, number two, where we talk about 3.2 qualification.

2:28

Um I think what I was saying is I remember reading in the um ethics code for the the Ohio Revised Code Ethics Code, there was a definition in there.

2:41

I I'm not saying that's the definition, I'm just saying that it there was a definition in there that I looked at.

2:46

So I don't know how you want to fix that.

2:49

And if I wasn't clear, that's entirely possible.

2:54

So I apologize for that.

2:56

How about if I add the word uh might have to do with an IO ethics code?

3:02

Ohio revised code.

3:05

Yeah.

3:06

Yeah.

3:08

Yeah.

3:09

Perfect.

3:09

Thank you.

3:11

So your comments.

3:13

That's it.

3:13

Thank you.

3:14

No comments.

3:16

Anybody make a motion to approve as amended.

3:20

I approve as or I make a motion to approve is amended.

3:24

Second.

3:27

Any other discussion?

3:31

Sure.

3:31

Ms.

3:32

Yenko.

3:33

Yes.

3:34

Ms.

3:34

Coral.

3:35

Yes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Charter Review███████████████████████████████████35%
Procedural████████████████████████████28%
Public Engagement█████████████████17%
Personnel Matters███████7%
Technology and Innovation█████5%
Franchises████4%
Healthcare Services██2%
Budget Equity Analysis█1%
Water And Wastewater Management█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Green Charter Review Commission Meeting - February 9, 2026

The Green Charter Review Commission met on February 9, 2026, at 5:31 PM in Council Chambers to review Article IV (Council) of the City Charter and continue discussion on unfinished business from previous meetings. The commission approved the January 28, 2026 minutes with amendments, discussed proposed modernizations to notification and publication procedures, and deferred several items for further research and law director input.

Consent Calendar

  • None. The approval of minutes required a motion and roll call vote after discussion, so it is not considered consent.

Discussion Items

  • Approval of Minutes (Jan 28, 2026): Commissioner Knapp noted that the draft minutes inaccurately reflected his position on term limits; he clarified that he reads the charter as allowing indefinite service after sitting out four years. A second correction clarified a reference to the Ohio Revised Code ethics code definition for qualifications. The minutes were approved as amended on a unanimous roll call.
  • Review of Article IV – Council: The commission systematically went through Sections 4.1 through 4.15.
    • 4.2 Wards: Discussion used Census data; the city’s population has grown modestly since 1992 (21,169) to 27,778 in 2020.
    • 4.3 Qualifications: Noted that the term “public office” appears and will need definition when an index is created.
    • 4.6 Vacancies: A commissioner raised a practical problem with the 90-day deadline for filling vacancies before municipal elections—candidate petitions must usually be submitted 90 days prior, leaving no time. The commission agreed to research board of elections practices.
    • 4.8 Regular and Special Meetings: The clause requiring written notice “by leaving a copy thereof at their usual place of residence” was discussed. Consensus to update to “personally or by email with read receipt” and strike the residence delivery language. The clerk will gather best practices from other communities.
    • 4.9 Legislative Procedures – Committee Reports: The charter requires committee recommendations in writing. Current practice relies on oral reports and video minutes. Commissioners debated whether to change the requirement to “recorded” or reinforce the written practice; no final decision, but noted as a point to revisit.
    • 4.11 Publication of Ordinances and Resolutions: The commission agreed to modernize by adding a 30-day posting on the city website and keeping a two-week newspaper publication. Physical posting will shift from “five public places” to the city hall lobby. An emergency exception was discussed but deemed unnecessary.
    • 4.13 Compensation and Bonds: Discussion touched on council salary ($8,000/year) and health insurance benefits. History of failed salary increase attempts was reviewed; no proposals made tonight.
    • 4.14 Franchises: Commissioners questioned whether the term “franchise” remains relevant given changes in cable and cell tower regulation. The franchise fees still provide revenue (approx. $70,000/year). The issue will be added to questions for the law director.
    • 4.15 Council Relationship to Administrative Officers: Discussion clarified that council must direct inquiries to the mayor, not directly to department heads, consistent with the charter’s executive chain.
  • Unfinished Business: Items from prior meetings (2.4 Form of Government, 3.1 Term of Office, 3.2 Qualifications, 3.3 Powers of the Mayor, 3.4 Vacancy in Office of Mayor) were carried forward without new votes. The commission will compile and prioritize all proposed changes at a later date.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to approve the January 28, 2026 minutes as amended passed unanimously (5-0).
  • Several draft revisions were discussed but no formal votes taken on Article IV text changes tonight; the commission will continue deliberation at future meetings.
  • Unfinished business items remain open and will be revisited.
  • Meeting adjourned at approximately 7:30 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Call to order City of Green Charter Review Commission February 9th. It is 5 31 p.m. Um we all rise for the pledge of allegiance of leadership of the United States over there. Did we call the roll? Sure. Mr. Dufferin. Here. Mr. Knapp. Here. Ms. Conan. Here. Miss Coral. Here. And Miss Yenko. Here. Um proval of minutes. I had some comments on those. Okay. Um the part. I'm sorry, I don't have my ducks in a row here. I've got too much paper going on. The part where it talks about here it is. When we were discussing section C review of Article 3, the mayor. Um you go down to about the second or third from the last sentence in that paragraph. It says Bob Net Knapp and Betty Conan said they don't read it as the terms could go on forever after a second set of four-year terms. I do read it that it can go on. I don't know what you felt, but for my purposes, I I did feel that it could go on indefinitely as long as they sat out for four years. So with the, you know, you mentioned before also further in here where it says I talk about the electors being able to correct that. So I'm gonna make that change. And the other part is in uh that same section, number two, where we talk about 3.2 qualification. Um I think what I was saying is I remember reading in the um ethics code for the the Ohio Revised Code Ethics Code, there was a definition in there. I I'm not saying that's the definition, I'm just saying that it there was a definition in there that I looked at. So I don't know how you want to fix that. And if I wasn't clear, that's entirely possible. So I apologize for that. How about if I add the word uh might have to do with an IO ethics code? Ohio revised code. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Perfect. Thank you. So your comments. That's it. Thank you. No comments. Anybody make a motion to approve as amended.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com