The Charter Review Commission met on Monday, May 4, 2026, at approximately 5:54 PM (the agenda listed 5:30 PM but the actual start time was 5:54 PM as noted in the transcript). The meeting was held in the City of Green Council Chambers. Commissioners reviewed and voted on a series of proposed charter amendments, including changes to the form of government, public notice procedures, and parks board language. Major discussions centered on the mayor's temporary absence, parks budget allocation, and income tax revenue distribution. Several items were advanced as charter amendments, others were tabled or placed on a non-substantive recommendations list.
Note: The meeting agenda listed a start time of 5:30 PM, but the transcript indicates the actual start at 5:54 PM. Most votes were recorded with roll call; Commissioner Dufferin voted "no" on Article 2 and abstained on Item 15.
Call to order the City of Green Charter Review Commission May 4th, 5 54 p.m. Um, with that, ask everyone to rise for the Pledge of Allegiance Pledge of Allegiance. Under a indivisible liberty and justice crawl. With that, would you call the roll, please? Sure. Mr. Dufferin. Here. Mr. Knapp. Here. Miss Conan? Here. Miss Coral. Here. Miss Yenko. Here. Okay. Under procedural review, procedure review. I just wanted to talk briefly of what hopefully we're going to get accomplished tonight. We're going to go through each of the recommendations that we've brought forward since our we commenced on the review. My ask is that we will go through those that I I view will probably be the easiest to go through. And if there's any discussion, and then we will call a vote if we want to advance them for a charter amendment or not. And then I'll keep the three uh larger ones, which would be the parks budget, uh law director and the competit bidding, we'll keep those to the tail end, and we will try to work through those. Um if we get long, um, some of these maybe we'll just pause and see to maybe take a vote to see where we are with it. But the hopes would be that we end tonight with those things. We're gonna recommend as charter amendments. We take the remainder of the week on to brush those up, and then we would pass those over to Lisa, and then our next meeting. Um the hopes would be those things that we decided no this evening. We would then decide of those what would go on the non-substantive list, would go on to this new recommendations for mayor and council, or no action needed. And there's several I think that kind of fall in that category after a lot of research and debate. I don't know if there's any a way to move them forward. And the only thing I would ask is that on these there's modernization, which I think are several of them, and anything where there's a uh a defined need that's been brought forward either by this uh commission, by the administration, council, um, those are important. If there's we have some of these that there just is not been any issue, nothing over the last seven years. We don't have a better way to define it, then I would ask that we uh let that go because I think we really want to end up one protecting, which I think at this point is the largest one we have is the parks budget that's got a um uh a really defined need, and then some of the other ones will go through them. Uh Rob, I appreciate um all that you sent forward. Um reminds me of my old days in corporate or had to read lots of documents, but I appreciate all that you did for us. So with that, um let's uh we've got the approval of minutes. Um I know Betty, you have some. No, we're good. I think uh we corrected them. I can move to uh approve them. Second, second okay, Miss Conan? Yes, Miss Coral, yes, Mr. Dufferin. Yes, Mr. Knapp? Yes, Miss Yanko, yes, okay, motion case um correspondence. I know we got something from you, Lisa, um, in terms of of term limits and or um talking about I think uh competitive bidding, which will come up this evening, and when we get to those sections, um we didn't have any other correspondence, correct? Okay, so if you we'll start through these, and when I said there's a few of them I'll just kit, we'll put to the back, but let's go through and again if there's not a lot of debate or somebody, and I think there was one in there.