OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Green, Ohio/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Green Charter Review Commission Meeting - May 13, 2026

City Council & Boards — Wednesday, May 13, 2026
BodyGreen, Ohio
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateWednesday, May 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:03:04

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
5:59

Call to order the City of Green try to review commission meeting.

6:04

It is 5 36 PM.

6:07

All rise for the Pledge of Allegiance.

6:12

Pledge of allegiance.

6:13

Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

6:22

Underground.

6:50

Sure, Mr.

6:51

Duffren.

6:52

Here.

6:52

Mr.

6:53

Knapp.

6:53

Here.

6:54

Miss Conan.

6:55

Here.

6:55

Miss Coral.

6:56

Here, Miss Yanko.

6:57

Here.

7:00

Okay.

7:01

Um this evening I thought what we would do is let's start up where we left off, which is finalizing the parks budget, and then we can go through the competitive bidding and then finish with the law director.

7:14

And I know we have some people here that may want to speak on the competitive bidding.

7:19

So with that, um we've got um I think we have the correct version of this.

7:27

The only question I had was in the last line in or out.

7:32

Um what Sharon has, right, Sharon?

7:36

That was what we believe was the final final.

7:39

Right, with that last line left in questions of on that version that we have up.

7:57

Okay.

7:58

With that, does anybody want to make a motion to approve?

8:06

I'll make the motion to approve.

8:08

Is it item sixteen?

8:10

Yes.

8:11

Item sixteen, item sixteen.

8:15

Second.

8:23

Sure.

8:24

Ms.

8:24

Yanko.

8:25

Yes, Miss Coral.

8:27

Yes, Mr.

8:27

Dufferin.

8:32

I have a question.

8:34

Okay.

8:34

I I apologize.

8:36

It says no more than forty percent of the annual allocation may be used for the operation.

8:43

And we're talking about only taken out it's we're we're talking about income tax revenue.

8:54

So is there if if the city is then contributing or subsidizing the parks.

9:13

So what we're doing is we're allowing some of the expense that comes out of the general fund to get paid for out of that seven percent, up to forty percent, which then opens up some of the dollars, correct?

9:26

Shelley, that can be used because that's been the issue that that's there's been a constraint because the operating expense has grown so dramatically that it's starving off some of the other funding for other departments.

9:38

And so this allows some of that then to be some of the expense dollars to be funded out of the seven percent.

9:46

It's okay, but we have we're gonna have two budgets though.

9:50

We're gonna have an income tax budget and then a budget that includes the city's revenue that is subsidizing that parks, right?

9:57

You have two I'll let Shelley talk.

10:00

You have two I'll let Shelley talk you're taking money today out of two lines for the parks.

10:03

Correct.

10:04

So currently, as it stands, we have the income the parks capital income tax fund, and then we have the general fund.

10:12

So this seven percent it's in the charter goes into the parks capital fund, and we're saying up to 40 percent of that can be used for parks operating.

10:25

That is saying no more than 40 percent of the seven percent can be used for parks operating.

10:32

So it's preserving 60 percent of that for capital purposes, which is the first portion.

10:41

Oh and then you're shifting those.

10:44

So it says no more than 40 percent of the annual allocation, which is referenced in number one, which is um I'm sorry, and referenced in B, which is the seven percent.

10:56

Okay, but it says annual income tax revenue allocated or assigned, then it says no more than the annual allocation.

11:03

It doesn't necessarily refer directly to the income tax allocation because you're gonna have more allocation for the parks as a result of subsidizing from the city's general fund.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Charter Review█████████████████████████████29%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████████████████████23%
Personnel Matters██████████████14%
Procedural██████████10%
Procurement Practices█████████9%
Parks and Recreation███████7%
Budget Equity Analysis████4%
Public Safety██2%
Pending Litigation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Green Charter Review Commission Meeting - May 13, 2026

The Green Charter Review Commission met on May 13, 2026 at 5:30 PM in Council Chambers. The commission reviewed and approved a modification to the allocation of income tax revenues for parks, debated proposed changes to competitive bidding and procurement procedures, and discussed a comprehensive rewrite of the law director provisions. Both the procurement and law director proposals were not adopted but placed on a recommendation list for future council consideration.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of the May 4, 2026 Charter Review Commission Meeting Minutes was moved and approved unanimously.

Discussion Items

  • Item Sixteen – Allocation of Income Tax Revenues (Parks Funding): The commission discussed a proposed amendment to Section 8.2 to clarify that the 7% income tax allocation for parks can be used up to 40% for operations, with at least 60% reserved for capital. Commissioner Duffrin suggested inserting "income tax" between "annual" and "allocation" in subsections B.1 and B.2 for specificity. The amendment was accepted and the item approved unanimously.
  • Item Four – Competitive Bidding and Procurement: Commissioner Duffrin presented draft charter language to establish a comprehensive procurement system allowing various methods (competitive bidding, design-build, direct negotiation, etc.) and to waive state bidding requirements. Administration staff (Finance Director Shelley, Engineering Director Paul, and others) expressed opposition, stating the current system works well, competitive bidding protects against favoritism, and no problems exist. Commissioner Duffrin argued the proposal would modernize procurement and prevent litigation. The commission decided not to advance the proposal but to include it on a recommendation list for City Council.
  • Item Four – Law Director Removal Authority: The agenda included a proposal to remove "or appointed" regarding the Mayor's authority to remove the Law Director. This was not discussed in detail due to time.
  • Item Twelve – Director of Law Provisions: Commissioner Duffrin proposed a full rewrite of Section 6.4, including qualifications, term, duties, replacement, removal, and compensation. Commissioners expressed concerns that the topic was too large for the remaining meetings, needed further study, and that the current system was not broken. The proposal was not adopted but placed on a recommendation list for future council or charter review commission consideration.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved: Item Sixteen (parks income tax allocation) with the language amendment to specify "income tax allocation." Motion carried unanimously (5-0).
  • Not Adopted: Item Four (competitive bidding) and Item Twelve (law director rewrite) were not adopted as charter amendments. Both will be included in a recommendation list to City Council for future consideration.
  • Next Meeting: The next meeting will review the final draft of charter changes and the cover letter to Council. The commission will finalize non-substantive edits and sign the letter.

Meeting Transcript

Call to order the City of Green try to review commission meeting. It is 5 36 PM. All rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge of allegiance. Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. Underground. Sure, Mr. Duffren. Here. Mr. Knapp. Here. Miss Conan. Here. Miss Coral. Here, Miss Yanko. Here. Okay. Um this evening I thought what we would do is let's start up where we left off, which is finalizing the parks budget, and then we can go through the competitive bidding and then finish with the law director. And I know we have some people here that may want to speak on the competitive bidding. So with that, um we've got um I think we have the correct version of this. The only question I had was in the last line in or out. Um what Sharon has, right, Sharon? That was what we believe was the final final. Right, with that last line left in questions of on that version that we have up. Okay. With that, does anybody want to make a motion to approve? I'll make the motion to approve. Is it item sixteen? Yes. Item sixteen, item sixteen. Second. Sure. Ms. Yanko. Yes, Miss Coral. Yes, Mr. Dufferin. I have a question. Okay. I I apologize. It says no more than forty percent of the annual allocation may be used for the operation. And we're talking about only taken out it's we're we're talking about income tax revenue. So is there if if the city is then contributing or subsidizing the parks. So what we're doing is we're allowing some of the expense that comes out of the general fund to get paid for out of that seven percent, up to forty percent, which then opens up some of the dollars, correct? Shelley, that can be used because that's been the issue that that's there's been a constraint because the operating expense has grown so dramatically that it's starving off some of the other funding for other departments. And so this allows some of that then to be some of the expense dollars to be funded out of the seven percent. It's okay, but we have we're gonna have two budgets though. We're gonna have an income tax budget and then a budget that includes the city's revenue that is subsidizing that parks, right? You have two I'll let Shelley talk.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com