OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Green, Ohio/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City of Green Charter Review Commission Meeting - June 1, 2026

City Council & Boards — Monday, June 1, 2026
BodyGreen, Ohio
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateMonday, June 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 10:19

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:11

Call the order the green uh charter review commission meeting June 1st.

0:16

It is 5 30 p.m.

0:19

Um I'll rise for the Pledge of Allegiance Pledge of Allegiance to the South America to the Republic for which it stands under liberty and justice can we call the roll please?

0:48

Sure.

0:48

Mr.

0:49

Dufferin.

0:49

Here.

0:50

Mr.

0:50

Knapp.

0:50

Here.

0:51

Miss Conan?

0:52

Here.

0:52

Uh Miss Coral is absent.

0:54

Miss Shenko.

0:55

Here.

0:55

Okay.

0:57

Umybody want to make the motion to approve minutes.

1:03

I'll move to approve the minutes of May 13th.

1:08

I'll second it.

1:12

Okay, Miss Janko.

1:14

Yes.

1:14

Miss Conan.

1:15

Yes.

1:15

Mr.

1:16

Dufferin?

1:16

Yes.

1:17

Mr.

1:17

Knapp.

1:17

Yes.

1:18

Okay.

1:18

Motion case.

1:21

We have no correspondence, correct?

1:24

Correct.

1:24

Okay.

1:26

Um, so we need to, under new business, um, adopt the video recording as permanent record for our minutes.

1:38

You don't have to, but it's strongly suggested.

1:42

Yeah, no, I uh just a suggestion.

1:46

Um, so I don't know if you know this is just historic.

1:49

Um in 2014, City Council um did a ordinance to adopt the video as the minutes for all of their um meetings, and so all the other boards and commissions have kind of adopted that same ideology, just you know, with the wave of the future and a lot of people like to watch the meetings and they're live streamed and things like that.

2:11

So um that's the suggestion by us for the next one, especially since it's gonna be maybe every five years.

2:20

Do we need to vote on this?

2:22

I would say yes.

2:23

Okay, anyone make a move to oh I'm sorry, do we uh is a part of that?

2:28

Do we decide if it's a non-substantive or substantive change or is that set separate that we would do that?

2:32

You would decide now if if that's the case.

2:36

I have a question.

2:37

Will there be less intense minutes kept or it's just the video?

2:42

Uh there will also be a summary along with it.

2:44

That's what I'm reading.

2:45

So that would be like but nothing like what I've no verb.

2:50

Yeah.

2:50

So I don't know if you look at any of the summaries that I provide for council.

2:54

It's okay if you don't.

2:57

But excellent job.

2:59

But it's you know, it's um all the votes and um you know times and things like that.

3:05

So yeah, just a good summary.

3:09

It feels to me like it's non-substantive.

3:12

Is that yeah, I agree.

3:14

You agree with that?

3:15

Non-substantive.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████74%
Personnel Matters████████████████26%
Summary of Proceedings

City of Green Charter Review Commission Meeting - June 1, 2026

The Green Charter Review Commission met on Monday, June 1, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. Members present: Chair Bob Knapp, Vice Chair Kristin Yanko, Betty Konen, and Robert Duffrin; Deborah Koral was absent for roll call. The commission unanimously approved a proposed amendment to Section 9.2 of the City Charter making video the official record of meetings (with written summaries), determined the change to be non-substantive, and approved and signed a letter to City Council transmitting recommended Charter changes and non-substantive items.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes: The May 13, 2026 meeting minutes were approved unanimously by a 4–0 roll-call vote (Koral absent).
  • Correspondence: None was received.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public testified.

Discussion Items

  • Proposed Section 9.2 Amendment (Video as Official Minutes): The commission considered adding a paragraph to Section 9.2 providing that the video recording serves as the official minutes for Charter Review Commission meetings, accompanied by a written summary detailing the general discussion and votes on each item, along with the original documents on which the report is based. The video and summary would be kept by the appointed Commission Secretary, with a copy given to the Clerk of Council. Staff noted that City Council adopted this same practice by ordinance in 2014, and that the Planning and Zoning Commission, Design Review Board, and Board of Zoning Appeals already follow it. The Charter is currently silent on the subject. Members framed the change as setting the standard for future commissions that meet roughly every five years.
  • Substantive vs. Non-Substantive Determination: The commission generally agreed the amendment is non-substantive. One member said they personally viewed it as substantive but accepted the group's consensus. Members observed that the proposed language was taken directly from City Council's ordinance and that Council could alternatively adopt it by legislation if needed.
  • Letter to City Council: The commission reviewed the letter transmitting recommended Charter changes and non-substantive items. Member Koral had signed the letter before leaving; the remaining members signed it after the meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion carried 4–0 (unanimous): Amend Section 9.2 to allow video recordings and written summaries to serve as the official record, and include this change on the non-substantive list.
  • Letter approved and executed: The transmittal letter to City Council was approved and signed by all members.
  • Adjournment: The meeting adjourned unanimously by a 4–0 vote.
  • Remarks and appreciation: Chair Knapp thanked commission members, staff (including Sharon), and Clerk of Council Nicole Messner, noting staff commitment and citing one prior evening that ran until 7:38 p.m. He also reflected on his own council service from 1993 to 1999.

Meeting Transcript

Call the order the green uh charter review commission meeting June 1st. It is 5 30 p.m. Um I'll rise for the Pledge of Allegiance Pledge of Allegiance to the South America to the Republic for which it stands under liberty and justice can we call the roll please? Sure. Mr. Dufferin. Here. Mr. Knapp. Here. Miss Conan? Here. Uh Miss Coral is absent. Miss Shenko. Here. Okay. Umybody want to make the motion to approve minutes. I'll move to approve the minutes of May 13th. I'll second it. Okay, Miss Janko. Yes. Miss Conan. Yes. Mr. Dufferin? Yes. Mr. Knapp. Yes. Okay. Motion case. We have no correspondence, correct? Correct. Okay. Um, so we need to, under new business, um, adopt the video recording as permanent record for our minutes. You don't have to, but it's strongly suggested. Yeah, no, I uh just a suggestion. Um, so I don't know if you know this is just historic. Um in 2014, City Council um did a ordinance to adopt the video as the minutes for all of their um meetings, and so all the other boards and commissions have kind of adopted that same ideology, just you know, with the wave of the future and a lot of people like to watch the meetings and they're live streamed and things like that. So um that's the suggestion by us for the next one, especially since it's gonna be maybe every five years. Do we need to vote on this? I would say yes. Okay, anyone make a move to oh I'm sorry, do we uh is a part of that? Do we decide if it's a non-substantive or substantive change or is that set separate that we would do that? You would decide now if if that's the case. I have a question. Will there be less intense minutes kept or it's just the video? Uh there will also be a summary along with it. That's what I'm reading. So that would be like but nothing like what I've no verb.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com