OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Greenburgh, New York/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Crown Castle Applications Deemed Incomplete - Greenburgh Town Board - Oct 24, 2025

Meeting Portal — Friday, October 24, 2025
BodyGreenburgh, New York
SessionMeeting Portal
DateFriday, October 24, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:03:13

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:02

Today is the 24th of October 2025.

0:08

It is now 6 32, a full hour and two minutes past when we anticipated beginning this meeting because we have serious technological problems.

0:30

Oh, I'm not able to hear you now.

0:37

There we go.

0:40

No, no.

0:42

You didn't hear anything?

0:44

I I heard, I heard up until you gave the date.

0:48

And okay.

0:50

Okay.

0:51

1024, 2025, 632.

0:54

We started the meeting.

0:55

It was still out for 530, but we had technological difficulties.

0:59

We're here to review three applications by Crown Castle on behalf of with T Mobile.

1:06

And we have I want to take attendance now.

1:09

Catherine letter of Plasquette.

1:11

Me, I'm here.

1:12

Diane Torstrop.

1:14

I can't here.

1:16

Donna Chonikman.

1:17

I'm here.

1:18

We are all three here.

1:20

We have a forum present at the town hall.

1:24

Francis Sheehan is here.

1:26

And Lauren, what's your last name?

1:28

Sorry.

1:31

E E R G.

1:32

Yeah.

1:35

And you're with Crown, yes?

1:37

Yes, correct.

1:47

Okay.

1:49

So let's start with the application that's identified as 548 Ardsley Road.

1:59

Am I no?

2:02

No, I'm sorry.

2:03

Let's start with.

2:07

Yes.

2:09

Um that the application starts with one.

2:16

And it asks your name, address, and qualifications of persons preparing the report and his or her or their signatures attesting to the truth and completeness of the information contained here in therein.

2:29

And we have here the stamps for the first two engineers, and we have no stamp, and we have no date of signature for Ray Cap, which is also an engineer, and we need a stamp.

2:49

This we will have that same statement made in the other two because the situation is the same.

2:59

So I'm writing the need need stamp for engineer.

3:03

Um Dennis, and I can't pronounce his last name.

3:20

Okay, so that's incomplete.

3:23

And two, it asks in the question for the names, addresses, and landline and cellular phone numbers of the property owners, operators, and applicants.

3:40

And of a an additional question, actually.

3:44

If I look at the plans, I'm not sure who owns the poll.

3:49

It says the Verizon poll number is seven six.

3:53

This isn't the next answer.

3:55

But if I go to the drawings, this is the one.

4:01

I apologize.

4:22

Yes.

4:22

It doesn't have on the drawings that I can see that it identifies as the poll owned by Verizon.

4:30

So if I may just show you on page nine of the drawing, uh of the first page of the drawing.

4:49

Page nine of the entire package, yeah.

4:52

Okay, I have here four of eight.

4:55

Are you saying there's a ninth page for the zillion?

4:58

No, no, I'm sorry.

5:00

So page one of eight.

5:01

Well the first page of the drawing, yes.

5:07

And what am I looking at?

5:09

Underneath the vicinity map, it should say project information, and it will list the um company Verizon.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████69%
Technology and Innovation██████████15%
Procedural██████9%
Noise Ordinance████6%
Cannabis Regulation█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Greenburgh Town Board Review of Crown Castle Applications - October 24, 2025

The Greenburgh Town Board (members Catherine, Diane, Donna, and Francis Sheehan) met on October 24, 2025, at 6:32 PM (delayed due to technical problems) to review three applications filed by Crown Castle on behalf of T-Mobile for modifications to wireless facilities on utility poles. The board unanimously deemed all three applications incomplete due to multiple deficiencies, including missing engineer stamps, inconsistent addresses, lack of pole ownership identification, non-site-specific RF emissions reports, and unresolved tenant documentation issues. The applications were for 548 Ardsley Road, 35 Spring Valley Road, and 382 Ardsley Road.

Key Deficiencies Identified for Each Application

  • 548 Ardsley Road: Missing engineer stamp for Ray Cap; inconsistent address (listed as 536-552 Ardsley Road); pole ownership not specified on drawings; structural assessment recommended by NBNC (bold comment on page 4 of Exhibit 2) requiring clarification; RF emissions report not site-specific (same 3.33% at 10 feet as other sites despite different antenna heights); noise report misspelled “Greenburgh” and used conditional language (“has met” and “if” regarding ions); lighting and sign dimensions not shown; no identification of pole owner on plans.
  • 35 Spring Valley Road: Similar deficiencies: missing engineer stamp, incomplete applicant info, non-site-specific RF report (again 3.33% at 10 feet for a 39-foot pole), same noise report issues, missing lighting/sign details, and contradiction about street light (drawing shows existing street light but table says none).
  • 382 Ardsley Road: All prior issues plus a critical additional problem: the application stated T-Mobile is the only tenant, but the RF report included Verizon as an existing tenant. The board noted Verizon has never been formally authorized or documented for this pole, requiring legalization. The RF report also had a typo (3.33% vs 4.5% on same page). Pole ownership and tenant identification needed on drawings.

Public Comments & Testimony

No public comments were received. Only the applicant’s representative, Lauren (from Crown Castle), was present to answer questions.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to deem 548 Ardsley Road incomplete: Unanimously approved.
  • Motion to deem 35 Spring Valley Road incomplete: Unanimously approved.
  • Motion to deem 382 Ardsley Road incomplete: Unanimously approved.
  • The board will provide scanned notes (via Francis Sheehan) and expects the applicant to resubmit complete applications. The clock is stopped as of October 14, 2025, the date of receipt. The applicant must reprint all pages, correct deficiencies (including site-specific RF reports, pole ownership, Verizon documentation), and resubmit.

Meeting Transcript

Today is the 24th of October 2025. It is now 6 32, a full hour and two minutes past when we anticipated beginning this meeting because we have serious technological problems. Oh, I'm not able to hear you now. There we go. No, no. You didn't hear anything? I I heard, I heard up until you gave the date. And okay. Okay. 1024, 2025, 632. We started the meeting. It was still out for 530, but we had technological difficulties. We're here to review three applications by Crown Castle on behalf of with T Mobile. And we have I want to take attendance now. Catherine letter of Plasquette. Me, I'm here. Diane Torstrop. I can't here. Donna Chonikman. I'm here. We are all three here. We have a forum present at the town hall. Francis Sheehan is here. And Lauren, what's your last name? Sorry. E E R G. Yeah. And you're with Crown, yes? Yes, correct. Okay. So let's start with the application that's identified as 548 Ardsley Road. Am I no? No, I'm sorry. Let's start with. Yes. Um that the application starts with one. And it asks your name, address, and qualifications of persons preparing the report and his or her or their signatures attesting to the truth and completeness of the information contained here in therein. And we have here the stamps for the first two engineers, and we have no stamp, and we have no date of signature for Ray Cap, which is also an engineer, and we need a stamp. This we will have that same statement made in the other two because the situation is the same. So I'm writing the need need stamp for engineer. Um Dennis, and I can't pronounce his last name. Okay, so that's incomplete. And two, it asks in the question for the names, addresses, and landline and cellular phone numbers of the property owners, operators, and applicants. And of a an additional question, actually. If I look at the plans, I'm not sure who owns the poll. It says the Verizon poll number is seven six. This isn't the next answer. But if I go to the drawings, this is the one. I apologize. Yes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com