Hi.

This is the antenna review board meeting at the town of Greenberg on the ele on the 10th of November 2025 to review two applications.

Before we proceed, let me take attendance.

Catherine Letter of Flasquette, me present.

Diane Torstrip.

Present.

That is a quorum in a public place, Town of Greenberg Town Hall.

Let me take the um take the rest of attendance.

Frances Sheehan.

Present.

Michael Sheridan.

Present.

Okay.

So let's get started.

This application was submitted on the 3rd of November 2025.

It's today is the 10th of November 2025 that we are meeting to review it, so it is seven days later.

If anyone sees, you know, has a different take on the what I what I see.

Please interrupt me.

A it says name, addresses, and qualifications of persons preparing the reports and his or her or their signatures attesting to the truth and completeness of the information contained therein.

The there are two issues for me.

The first one is the same issue that we had on Friday when we reviewed another application.

Is there a license number for a license for the radio frequency engineer that is cited in number three under A.

So I maybe were able to get that information from there's no there's no license number.

He's not a PE, but they're um I spoke to him briefly, and I think similar to what the other RF consultant that provides as a report with that uh certification page that this is you're talking about I'm talking about page 42 and 6A for the report certification.

He can do a similar similar certification page to that.

You know, dealing with his how does it come that someone's called an engineer if they're not a he's not a P, he's not a professional engineer, it's just an RF.

There's no I my understanding is there is no specific RF engineer.

So that's just like with the title that people assume.

Okay.

So I understand.

Yes, we would like the credentials then something that can the other issue that comes up and it comes up throughout is the address on the drawings is different than the address on everything else.

This one says 609 North Central, North Song River Road, and other things say 609 Solmnow River Road.

So we'll I'll highlight it at different points, but it needs to be one and the same.

Let me just write here.

Okay.

Um the next one is B, and it says name, address, and phone number, cellular and landline of the property owner, operator, and applicant.

You have the property owner 609 Sonal River or Salmo Realty LLC.

Um I haven't checked whether it is indeed one word or two words, but then you have you don't have the owner of the poll here.

You did have the owner of the poll and the application you provided on Friday, because I went back to see if we had looked for that.

I think that's two global signal acquisition for but it says operator lease, or it doesn't say owner.

Okay, I'll have a owner there, the owner as well.

Which gets to another point of confusion later on when it's called crown and we don't have a connection drawn.

So that's incomplete.

Um C here reads the property the property postal address is 609 Solmo River Road.

Um Cerees the property, the property postal address is six oh nine sawmill river road, so this goes to the issue of needing it to be the same.

I have the address on the application versus drawing is different.

So with um D is complete.

Um there are two parts to this though.

If the so if it says if the installation is present release agreement confirmation from the less order that the LEC is authorized to utilize the property, you send us to um exhibit D fifty-four, page fifty-four, it says enclosed here with this the affidavit of owner should be executed by the operator of the server, which authorizing the applicant to make this application.

But again, it doesn't say owner, it says operator.

So we need to know that that person, this is the same thing with it, was the problem in B.

Um so if you go there to D fifty-four, just as it was with the hard steel parking, it has global signature signal acquisitions being the one who's being duly sworn.

So it should be really Jennifer Bocci on behalf of or representative of which was what we had with the hard still parking on Friday.

Okay.

Is authorized authorizing Verizon, but we don't have the property owner authorizing Verizon.

So we need also the property owner, like you did, you did that on Friday.

We're also recording.

Okay, so what did we say?

We said name, correction, affidavit.

Prove the global signal equals crown if that's the case.