Meeting colors

OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD

Record of Proceedings

Greenburgh Antenna Review Board Meeting - November 18, 2025

Meeting Portal — Tuesday, November 18, 2025

BodyGreenburgh, New York

SessionMeeting Portal

DateTuesday, November 18, 2025

StatusFILED

Video Record

0:00 / 1:21:03

Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

0:00

Are we recording it?

0:01

We are recording.

0:04

Today is November 18th, 2028.

0:13

Today is November 18th, 2025.

0:18

The antenna review board is meeting at the town of Greenberg Town Hall in the auditorium.

0:25

Let me take attendance.

0:27

Catherine Letter of Plasquette here.

0:29

Donna Chonikman.

0:30

Here.

0:32

Diane Torstrup is at is not here.

0:35

Francis Sheehan.

0:36

Present.

0:38

Very good.

0:40

We have in attendance also people from Aerosmith.

0:44

We have a quorum present at the Greenburg Town Hall, so we can proceed.

0:50

We are here to review a submission for 280 North Central Avenue.

0:58

The first submission was made on the April 10, 2025.

1:03

It was reviewed on the 15th of April 2025, which was five days later.

1:08

The clock stopped.

1:09

It was resubmitted on the 13th of August 2025.

1:13

The meeting to review it was held on the 19th of August, six days later, again deemed incomplete.

1:19

The third submission was made on the 10th of November 2025.

1:25

Agreed to by ATT and Aerosmith.

1:30

The clock was stopped on the 14th of 2025.

1:33

We accommodated their request to change the day and time of our meeting twice.

1:39

So we're meeting on the third option.

1:46

We require a quorum to meet, and we have to schedule our meetings according to that.

1:52

We are a volunteer board.

1:54

We work.

1:54

So making this accommodation is not something that is easy, and we will not do it again.

2:00

We will make it when the quorum can meet.

2:03

Especially given the fact that no one from the from Aerosmith was traveling to be here.

2:12

So I just want everyone to know that this is it.

2:18

We were very generous in our time.

2:37

And that needs to be respected by applicants as well.

2:42

So moving forward.

2:46

Using the last and let me only say before we get started, I will make the exact same recommendation I made last time.

2:55

If I were doing this and I work for Aerosmith, I would take the time to go to the building department and ask them for the application submitted by T Mobile, Cudi and Feder in October 2024.

3:09

A lot of the information that is missing here or provided incorrectly is there and they were deemed complete.

3:17

Moving forward.

3:34

No, August, sorry.

3:38

In August, um we marked one incomplete and still now.

3:46

We don't know what the people attesting to the entire application does not tell us what they are expert in and what they are attesting to.

4:12

Or Stephen.

4:13

If Stephen is going to be responsible for the whole application, that's great, but he has to say that this is that his that the buck stops there and that he is the one reviewing and responsible for the accuracy.

4:26

So one is incomplete.

4:30

A B is complete, C is complete.

4:33

Can you move your thermos to the other side?

4:36

Sure.

4:38

Thank you.

4:40

D is complete.

4:43

E is complete.

4:46

Um we have an issue that Mr.

4:48

Sheehan pointed out that F.

4:51

If you look at F.

5:00

Oh, the other thing I will request again is if you look at applications submitted by other applicants, there are tabs on the side of all of the applications that facilitates our not spending endless hours trying to locate something.

5:09

Move it more.

5:12

Yeah, those are the tabs.

5:13

Okay.

5:13

Okay.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting

Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████47%

Noise Ordinance███████████████████████████████32%

Procedural██████████████████19%

Personnel Matters██2%

Summary of Proceedings

Greenburgh Antenna Review Board Meeting - November 18, 2025

The Antenna Review Board of the Town of Greenburgh met on November 18, 2025, at Town Hall to review a submission for 280 North Central Avenue. The board had previously reviewed submissions on April 15 and August 19, 2025, each time deeming them incomplete. The current submission was filed on November 10, 2025. After a detailed line-by-line review, the board voted unanimously to deem the application incomplete, identifying multiple deficiencies across sections A, F, G, N, O, P, Q, S, and T. The applicant's representative, Stephen of Aerosmith, agreed to revise and resubmit.

Discussion Items

The chair noted the board had accommodated the applicant's request to change the meeting time twice and warned that this would not happen again.
The chair recommended the applicant examine a previous complete application by T-Mobile (Cudi and Feder) for guidance.
The board reviewed each component of the application, marking several items incomplete:
- Section A: Incomplete. The affidavit of ownership was filed by an association rather than an individual, and the person attesting to the entire application lacked specificity regarding their area of expertise.
- Section F: Incomplete. The affidavit of authorization required a specific individual's name and signature.
- Section G: Incomplete. The description of work needed to be a sequential list rather than a paragraph, and "ground level" should be replaced with "roof or location appropriate".
- Section N (RF emissions): Incomplete. The required chart of combined maximum output from all antennas on the property was not properly provided; center line numbers on the chart did not match the construction drawings.
- Section O (Noise): Incomplete. The noise report referenced only ATT equipment, but the code requires evaluation of the entire site; the phrase "regular capacity" needed definition.
- Section P (Schedule): Incomplete. The schedule lacked details on when old antennas would be removed and new ones installed on the dunnage, and whether equipment was new or being relocated.
- Section Q (Noise follow-up): Incomplete. The monitoring plan was combined with a non-interference statement, failing to answer separately as requested.
- Section S (Drawings): Incomplete. Many required elements (height above grade and sea level, identification of all antennas and appurtenances, owner/operator names, lighting details, color) were missing from the drawings.
- Section T (Signage): Incomplete. The sign did not include the required permit number, date of issuance, and contact information in a single sign.
The board also noted that Section M was complete, and several other sections (B, C, D, E, H, I, J, K, L, U, V) were complete.
Stephen of Aerosmith acknowledged each issue and agreed to make the necessary revisions.

Key Outcomes

The board voted unanimously (by voice vote) to deem the application incomplete.
The applicant was directed to revise and resubmit, with a reminder that further delays would not be accommodated.
The meeting was adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

Are we recording it? We are recording. Today is November 18th, 2028. Today is November 18th, 2025. The antenna review board is meeting at the town of Greenberg Town Hall in the auditorium. Let me take attendance. Catherine Letter of Plasquette here. Donna Chonikman. Here. Diane Torstrup is at is not here. Francis Sheehan. Present. Very good. We have in attendance also people from Aerosmith. We have a quorum present at the Greenburg Town Hall, so we can proceed. We are here to review a submission for 280 North Central Avenue. The first submission was made on the April 10, 2025. It was reviewed on the 15th of April 2025, which was five days later. The clock stopped. It was resubmitted on the 13th of August 2025. The meeting to review it was held on the 19th of August, six days later, again deemed incomplete. The third submission was made on the 10th of November 2025. Agreed to by ATT and Aerosmith. The clock was stopped on the 14th of 2025. We accommodated their request to change the day and time of our meeting twice. So we're meeting on the third option. We require a quorum to meet, and we have to schedule our meetings according to that. We are a volunteer board. We work. So making this accommodation is not something that is easy, and we will not do it again. We will make it when the quorum can meet. Especially given the fact that no one from the from Aerosmith was traveling to be here. So I just want everyone to know that this is it. We were very generous in our time. And that needs to be respected by applicants as well. So moving forward. Using the last and let me only say before we get started, I will make the exact same recommendation I made last time. If I were doing this and I work for Aerosmith, I would take the time to go to the building department and ask them for the application submitted by T Mobile, Cudi and Feder in October 2024. A lot of the information that is missing here or provided incorrectly is there and they were deemed complete. Moving forward. No, August, sorry. In August, um we marked one incomplete and still now. We don't know what the people attesting to the entire application does not tell us what they are expert in and what they are attesting to. Or Stephen. If Stephen is going to be responsible for the whole application, that's great, but he has to say that this is that his that the buck stops there and that he is the one reviewing and responsible for the accuracy. So one is incomplete. A B is complete, C is complete. Can you move your thermos to the other side? Sure. Thank you.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI

TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com