Meeting colors

OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD

Record of Proceedings

Greenburgh Antenna Review Board Meeting – July 29, 2026

Meeting Portal — Wednesday, July 29, 2026

BodyGreenburgh, New York

SessionMeeting Portal

DateWednesday, July 29, 2026

StatusFILED

Video Record

0:00 / 1:25:15

Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

0:05

Today is July 29th, 2026.

0:10

This is the antenna review board convening at the town of Breenberg Town Hall in the Leah Jackson room.

0:18

Before we move forward, let us take attendance.

0:22

Diane Torstrap present.

0:25

Catherine Letter of Basket, me present.

0:28

Together we have a quorum in a publicly located facility that is accessible to the public.

0:36

Francis Sheehan is with us.

0:38

County from the town.

0:42

I'm sorry?

0:43

Present.

0:45

And Lauren Berg.

0:47

Present.

0:47

And you are with Crown Castle.

0:49

Brown Castle.

0:51

And we have one guest, one brave soul.

0:56

Brian, what is your last name?

0:59

Leather.

1:01

So we are reviewing two applications today.

1:05

One submitted in for 55 Jackson Avenue and one 35 Sprain Road.

1:13

Sprain Valley or Spring Valley Road.

1:16

And these are for right of ways, and they are to update already existing installations.

1:27

Let's start with 55 Jackson Avenue.

1:32

55 Jackson Avenue was first submitted on the 3rd of December 2025.

1:38

And the meeting was convened on the 15th of December 2025.

1:44

That's 12 days.

1:54

And the meeting today is convening on the 7th, 29th of July 2026, five days later.

2:01

Anything that we have deemed complete before we will not be reviewing.

2:08

And so starting with A, which was deemed incomplete.

2:13

We needed license number for Dennis, and I don't want to destroy his last name.

2:19

The action I see that was taken was to drop into the application.

2:24

We the noise report that she was part of when we did the individual studies, he was not part of that study.

2:32

So we dropped his and Jen is the only here that you added the credentials for Jin.

2:42

What's the name of the person?

2:43

Jin uh Jin Lee.

2:46

That was one of the things we asked for with the credentials and license number, and that was provided.

2:53

So it is now A is now complete.

2:57

Either of you, if you see something that was not, then I swim that I there is different, please let me now stop me.

3:04

In the second, in B.

3:07

Um we reviewed it and it asked for a person must be provided for each and applicant was missing.

3:15

And you did answer a person for each, and you did add the applicant.

3:20

You did provide Paul Finer as the owner, and I believe Francis, you have somebody else like Department of Commissioner of Public Works should be identified as the it says town of Greenberg is the owner, but then the person provided is Paul, and I think that you have Department of Public Works this week.

3:40

Okay.

3:41

And that would be because it's in the right-of-way.

3:44

Commissioner Marabinho.

3:50

So you I it is complete because you did it, but you need to make the change.

3:55

Okay.

4:22

You had Greenberg, and now you have corrected it to reflect Scarsdale.

4:28

Correct.

4:30

So that is complete.

4:34

And the you have it both on the drawings to my eye, and in and I'm and Diane, you're awesome at checking through these to see she can catch spelling, and it looks like nobody's business.

4:45

Uh, to see if I missed something, but you made that change in the postal address.

4:52

So that's complete.

4:54

So then D was complete, E was complete, F was complete.

5:01

Um G was not, and what we commented was must include poll replacement in the description.

5:08

Yes.

5:08

And now it includes that in the description.

5:11

Yes.

5:12

So it is now complete.

5:29

The explanation for H was it said the address on the drawings concluded.

5:42

Um there must be you have to reconcile the difference, and the document provided is one seventy-nine Jackson Avenue.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting

Procedural████████████████████████████████32%

Technology and Innovation█████████████████████████████29%

Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████29%

Water And Wastewater Management█████5%

Public Safety█████5%

Summary of Proceedings

Greenburgh Antenna Review Board Meeting – July 29, 2026

The Antenna Review Board of the Town of Greenburgh convened on July 29, 2026, to review two applications for existing telecommunications installations in public rights-of-way. The board assessed completeness of submissions for 55 Jackson Avenue and 35 Sprain Road (also referred to as Spring Valley Road). Both applications were deemed conditionally complete with a deadline of August 19, 2026, for submitting outstanding items.

Discussion Items

55 Jackson Avenue Application

Submitted December 3, 2025, previously deemed incomplete. The board reviewed each completeness criterion (items A through U). Items A, B, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P (noise), Q, R, S, T were now complete, except items N (site-specific RF exposure chart) and P (noise compliance conclusion).
The board required a site-specific chart of data at five-foot increments at ground level for a person of six feet in height, including maximum and minimum distances.
The noise report needed a conclusion stating that the 55 Jackson Avenue site is in compliance with the town’s noise ordinance.
A motion was passed to deem the application conditionally complete with the clock stopped, requiring submission of only the incomplete items and a corrected cover page by August 19, 2026. If not submitted by that date, the application would revert to incomplete.

35 Sprain Road Application

Submitted October 14, 2025, previously deemed incomplete. The board reviewed items A through T. Most items were complete, with two outstanding: N (site-specific RF chart, same requirements as previous) and P (noise compliance conclusion for this site).
Additional discussion on lighting description and signage. The board accepted the existing street light depiction on the drawing but requested that future applications clearly state existing lighting, that Crown Castle is not adding lighting, and the presence of a street light.
Signage issue: The applicant proposed a small adhesive vinyl sign on the shroud at 11 feet. The board found this inadequate for public notice and left it to the Building Department to address.
A motion was passed to deem the application conditionally complete with clock stopped, requiring submission of incomplete items, corrected cover page, and updated dates by August 19, 2026, failing which it reverts to incomplete.

Key Outcomes

Both applications were granted conditional completeness with a deadline of August 19, 2026.
Specific requirements: site-specific RF exposure charts (by five-foot increments at ground level for a six-foot tall person) and noise compliance conclusions for each site.
Signage for 35 Sprain Road to be addressed by the Building Department.
Both motions passed unanimously (all members in favor).

Meeting Transcript

Today is July 29th, 2026. This is the antenna review board convening at the town of Breenberg Town Hall in the Leah Jackson room. Before we move forward, let us take attendance. Diane Torstrap present. Catherine Letter of Basket, me present. Together we have a quorum in a publicly located facility that is accessible to the public. Francis Sheehan is with us. County from the town. I'm sorry? Present. And Lauren Berg. Present. And you are with Crown Castle. Brown Castle. And we have one guest, one brave soul. Brian, what is your last name? Leather. So we are reviewing two applications today. One submitted in for 55 Jackson Avenue and one 35 Sprain Road. Sprain Valley or Spring Valley Road. And these are for right of ways, and they are to update already existing installations. Let's start with 55 Jackson Avenue. 55 Jackson Avenue was first submitted on the 3rd of December 2025. And the meeting was convened on the 15th of December 2025. That's 12 days. And the meeting today is convening on the 7th, 29th of July 2026, five days later. Anything that we have deemed complete before we will not be reviewing. And so starting with A, which was deemed incomplete. We needed license number for Dennis, and I don't want to destroy his last name. The action I see that was taken was to drop into the application. We the noise report that she was part of when we did the individual studies, he was not part of that study. So we dropped his and Jen is the only here that you added the credentials for Jin. What's the name of the person? Jin uh Jin Lee. That was one of the things we asked for with the credentials and license number, and that was provided. So it is now A is now complete. Either of you, if you see something that was not, then I swim that I there is different, please let me now stop me. In the second, in B. Um we reviewed it and it asked for a person must be provided for each and applicant was missing. And you did answer a person for each, and you did add the applicant. You did provide Paul Finer as the owner, and I believe Francis, you have somebody else like Department of Commissioner of Public Works should be identified as the it says town of Greenberg is the owner, but then the person provided is Paul, and I think that you have Department of Public Works this week. Okay. And that would be because it's in the right-of-way. Commissioner Marabinho. So you I it is complete because you did it, but you need to make the change. Okay. You had Greenberg, and now you have corrected it to reflect Scarsdale. Correct. So that is complete. And the you have it both on the drawings to my eye, and in and I'm and Diane, you're awesome at checking through these to see she can catch spelling, and it looks like nobody's business.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI

TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com