Meeting colors

OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD

Record of Proceedings

Greenburgh Antenna Review Board Meeting - August 5, 2026

Meeting Portal — Wednesday, August 5, 2026

BodyGreenburgh, New York

SessionMeeting Portal

DateWednesday, August 5, 2026

StatusFILED

Video Record

0:00 / 1:18:21

Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

0:05

Today is August 5th, 2026.

0:09

This is the antenna review board meeting in a publicly accessible location.

0:14

I'm going to take attendance.

0:18

Where?

0:19

Oh, Town of Greenburg.

0:21

Sorry.

0:22

Lee F.

0:23

Jackson room, town hall.

0:26

Catherine Letter of Plasquette here.

0:28

Diane Torstrop here.

0:30

Francis Sheen is also here.

0:32

We have a quorum.

0:35

And we can proceed with this meeting.

0:37

We are here to review two applications.

0:41

We will start with 280 North Central Avenue.

0:44

May I ask your name?

0:45

Yeah, my name is Diana Koenig.

0:47

I'm from Phillips Night All here on behalf of the.

0:49

Do we have a part or something so that I spell your name correctly?

1:02

There you go.

1:04

Thank you.

1:04

Sure.

1:18

Well, we're gonna start with 280 North Central Avenue.

1:23

The um which is a submission on behalf of ATNC made made by your firm is that what is the name?

1:41

Yeah.

1:45

He's from Air.

1:46

That Aerosmith, right?

1:49

It's um okay.

2:02

This first submission was on the 10th of April 2025.

2:09

It was reviewed on the 15th of April 2025, five days later.

2:14

The second submission was on August 13th, 2025.

2:19

It was reviewed on August 19th, 2025, six days later.

2:24

The third submission was on the 10th of November 2025.

2:29

The talk was stopped by Steve in the MOTO.

2:35

Um on the 14th of November, the meeting was held on the 18th of November.

2:43

The fourth submission was done on the 13th of January 2026.

2:47

It was reviewed on the 16th of January 2026, which was three days later, and the fifth submission was on the 6th of April 2026.

2:57

It was reviewed on the 13th of April 2026, which was seven days later, and the sixth emission was on the 3rd of August 2026, and we are meeting today on the 5th of August 2026, which is two days later to review it.

3:12

We are only looking at those items that were deemed incomplete when we last reviewed the application, and A, B, C, and D were deemed complete, as were E F H I, J, K, L, and M.

3:45

N was not deemed complete, it was incomplete.

3:49

So if we go to end, if you go to the following intro letter, if you go to Fortune they're not numbered.

4:08

If we go to N, it is here, and when I looked at it, there's a way that they also did it that first at least in F.

4:22

They now include what we were asking for.

4:27

We were provide documentation of exposure on the roof and use the examples provided to you for um work applications by other providers for other sites.

4:39

And if you go to that, that is now there.

4:41

It has the to the left and to the right, and it also has the grading of the section that is marked as as hazardous or warnings.

4:51

So for my eye, that's complete.

4:53

I don't know if anybody else has anything else about that.

5:00

And the change was made for three um to buy one thirty-one instead of on one thirty-one after that.

5:15

Oh complete P was complete Q and R S was incomplete, and it said add in the application that ATT is not adding any lighting and does not have any now.

5:38

And the answer was provided.

5:44

It says their last point eighteen C is not adding any lighting and does not have any existing lighting.

6:00

So that was our objection there about the lighting component.

6:03

T is complete.

6:05

Therefore, what?

6:06

Therefore, you gotta mark that complete thing.

6:11

It was there, it is yeah, I know it was incomplete, and it now it's complete.

6:16

Okay, thank you.

6:17

So okay.

6:26

Was complete you was complete as was B.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting

Engineering And Infrastructure███████████████████████████████████████39%

Procedural████████████████████████████28%

Technology and Innovation████████████████████████████28%

Insurance And Liability█████5%

Summary of Proceedings

Greenburgh Antenna Review Board Meeting - August 5, 2026

The Greenburgh Antenna Review Board met on August 5, 2026, to review two applications for wireless telecommunications facilities. The board deemed one application complete and the other incomplete, with specific items to be addressed before resubmission.

Discussion Items

280 North Central Avenue (AT&T): The board reviewed the sixth submission, checking only items previously deemed incomplete. After discussion, all items were found complete except for insurance expiry date, which was handled on-site. The board voted to deem the application complete.
301-305 Old Tarrytown Road (AT&T): This was the fourth submission. The board identified several incomplete items, including:
- Item N (RF emissions): The cumulative power density chart submitted did not match a previous T-Mobile submission for the same site. The board requested an explanation of the discrepancy or correction, and that units be made consistent.
- Item S (Materials for all items): Materials were provided only for antennas, not for all equipment. The board required a complete list of materials for all items.
- Item S (Lighting): The board required a note on the drawings stating that AT&T has no existing lighting and will add no lighting.
- Spelling: The name of the town (Greenburgh) was misspelled in the application; must be corrected.

Key Outcomes

280 North Central Avenue: Deemed complete. The applicant will proceed to the building department for permits.
301-305 Old Tarrytown Road: Deemed incomplete. The applicant must resubmit with corrections to items N, S, and spelling. Specific instructions: provide a cumulative chart with consistent units that matches or explains the difference from the prior T-Mobile report; include materials for all items; add a note on drawings about no lighting; fix town name spelling.

Meeting Transcript

Today is August 5th, 2026. This is the antenna review board meeting in a publicly accessible location. I'm going to take attendance. Where? Oh, Town of Greenburg. Sorry. Lee F. Jackson room, town hall. Catherine Letter of Plasquette here. Diane Torstrop here. Francis Sheen is also here. We have a quorum. And we can proceed with this meeting. We are here to review two applications. We will start with 280 North Central Avenue. May I ask your name? Yeah, my name is Diana Koenig. I'm from Phillips Night All here on behalf of the. Do we have a part or something so that I spell your name correctly? There you go. Thank you. Sure. Well, we're gonna start with 280 North Central Avenue. The um which is a submission on behalf of ATNC made made by your firm is that what is the name? Yeah. He's from Air. That Aerosmith, right? It's um okay. This first submission was on the 10th of April 2025. It was reviewed on the 15th of April 2025, five days later. The second submission was on August 13th, 2025. It was reviewed on August 19th, 2025, six days later. The third submission was on the 10th of November 2025. The talk was stopped by Steve in the MOTO. Um on the 14th of November, the meeting was held on the 18th of November. The fourth submission was done on the 13th of January 2026. It was reviewed on the 16th of January 2026, which was three days later, and the fifth submission was on the 6th of April 2026. It was reviewed on the 13th of April 2026, which was seven days later, and the sixth emission was on the 3rd of August 2026, and we are meeting today on the 5th of August 2026, which is two days later to review it. We are only looking at those items that were deemed incomplete when we last reviewed the application, and A, B, C, and D were deemed complete, as were E F H I, J, K, L, and M. N was not deemed complete, it was incomplete. So if we go to end, if you go to the following intro letter, if you go to Fortune they're not numbered. If we go to N, it is here, and when I looked at it, there's a way that they also did it that first at least in F. They now include what we were asking for. We were provide documentation of exposure on the roof and use the examples provided to you for um work applications by other providers for other sites. And if you go to that, that is now there. It has the to the left and to the right, and it also has the grading of the section that is marked as as hazardous or warnings. So for my eye, that's complete. I don't know if anybody else has anything else about that. And the change was made for three um to buy one thirty-one instead of on one thirty-one after that. Oh complete P was complete Q and R S was incomplete, and it said add in the application that ATT is not adding any lighting and does not have any now.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI

TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com